题名

反美主義與布希新保守主義外交政策之探討

并列篇名

A Study of Anti-Americanism and Bush's Neo-Conservative Foreign Policy

DOI

10.30114/CGJHSS.201010.0007

作者

楊吉林(Chi-Lin Yang)

关键词

反美主義 ； 單極體系 ； 善良霸權 ； 新保守主義 ； Anti-Americanism ； Unipolarity ； Benign Hegemony ； Neoconservatism

期刊名称

長庚人文社會學報

卷期/出版年月

3卷2期（2010 / 10 / 01）

页次

405 - 446

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

布希政府2003年揮兵伊拉克後引發全球反美聲浪，反美主義與新保守主義頓時成爲國際關係研究的熱門議題。反美主義內涵多元且具歷史性，學者對此議題多有不同解讀，傾向支持布希外交政策者往往將其視爲一種敵視美國的偏見，而批判布希政策者則將其視爲國際上對美國不當外交政策的合理反應。經由探討歐洲、拉丁美洲以及中東地區的反美主義的緣起梗概，本文說明了反美主義的發展過程中的確涉及對美國的偏見，但也不乏對美國強權外交的抨擊。此外，反美主義的討論也關係著美國國內自由與保守兩派對布希外交政策的爭論，左右兩派觀點迥異突顯出美國社會對此議題的意見分歧。 布希在2002年9月宣示美國爲了維護國家安全可以發動先制攻擊，這被稱爲「布希理論」的外交政策完全呼應了新保守主義的外交主張，強調美國擁有史無前例的超強軍力與影響力，並應以此爲後盾來維護國際和平與秩序。九一一後，布希政府展現單邊主義外交作風，表明美國不願受到國際組織或規範牽制。新保守主義重視意識形態，具有強烈道德觀與民主使命感，認爲美國在單極國際體系中應採取強勢外交政策，甚至主張建立善良霸權或是帝國來維護國際社會的和平繁榮，並以美國價值觀爲基準建構國際社會。此種思維簡化了國際問題的複雜性，也高估了美國軍事力量的有效性，以致布希政府的反恐戰爭不但遭遇國際反彈，也在國內引發自由主義學者的大肆批判。但隨著伊拉克與阿富汗戰爭陷入泥淖，美國又引發國際金融與經濟危機，布希政府期滿黯然下臺，新保守主義一時將難再主導美國外交政策，而反美主義遂有可能逐漸趨弱。
英文摘要

In the wake of the Iraq War in 2003, an outburst of anti-Americanism was witnessed around the globe. Suddenly anti-Americanism and Neoconservatism became hot topics of academic study and discussion in the field of international relations. While it is difficult to characterize and define the nature of Anti-Americanism due to its diversity, scholars tend to interpret the issue differently according to their own political views. Those who hold a favorable view of George W. Bush's foreign polices tend to see anti-Americanism as a bias, while those who disapprove of Bush's policies see it as a legitimate international response. After giving a brief overview of the development of anti-Americanism in Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East, this paper finds both views to be partially true. The conflicting views of the issue also reflect the deep schism that exists between liberals and conservatives in the United States. With the so-called Bush Doctrine, announced in September 2002 after the 911 attack, President Bush made it clear that in order to protect its national security the US had the right to engage in preventive war. The doctrine, echoing Neoconservative ideas, emphasized that the U.S. possessed unprecedented-and unequaled-strength and influence in the world and should use it to establish international peace and order. After 911, the Bush administration had unequivocally demonstrated its desire to evade the constraints of international rules and institutions, operating with a unilateral diplomatic style. Neoconservatism stresses ideology and upholds moral and democratic values, and its proponents believe that the US should act decisively in a unipolar environment. Moreover, Neoconservatives do not shun from talking about a benign American hegemony or Pax-Americana, and they consider American values to be its core element. However, Neoconservatism has underestimated the complexity of international problems and overestimated the effectiveness of American military prowess, consequently provoking an international backlash and strong liberal criticism on the domestic front. As wars in Iraq and Afghanistan drag on, and the world economy languishes in recession caused by an American financial crisis, the Bush administration has bid farewell to its discontented constituency. With Neoconservatism on the wane in the American political scene, anti-Americanism appears likely to recede.
主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 心理學
参考文献
  1. “USA's Policy Triggers Anti-Americanism,” USA Today, May 14, 2002.
  2. Kohut, A. (2008), “What Foreign Policy Agenda?” New York Times. Retrieved December 1, 2008, from http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/13/what-foreign-policy-agenda/
  3. “Excerpts from Pentagon's Plan: Prevent the Re-Emergence of a New Rival,”New York Times, March 8, 1992.
  4. “Chavez boosts Chomsky Book Sales,” BBC News, September 25, 2006. Retrieved April 23, 2009, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/5379650.htm
  5. “Global Public Opinions in the Bush Years (2008),” Pew Research Center. Retrieved May 12, 2009, from http://www.pewglobal.org
  6. Brenner, P. and S. Landau (2009), “Farewell, Monroe Doctrine,” Foreign Policy in Focus. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/5830
  7. Debate Transcript (2000), Commission on Presidential Debate. Retrieved March 3, 2009, from http://www.debates.org/pages/trans2000b.html
  8. Green, C. (2005), “The Monroe Doctrine, US Imperialism and Venezuela,” US Hands Off Venezuela. Retrieved November 19, 2008, from http://www.handsoffvenezuela.org/monroe_doctrine_venezuela.htm
  9. Hanson, V. D. (2007), “Anti-American Rhetoric vs. Reality,” Real Clear Politics.Retrieved February 20, 2009, from http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/ 2007/01/club_america.html
  10. (2005).Trends 2005.
  11. “Primary Choices: Hillary Clinton,” Editorial, New York Times, January 25, 2008.
  12. Robin, C., “Grand Designs: How 9/11 Unified Conservatives in Pursuit of Empire,” Washington Post, May 2, 2004.
  13. (2003).On the rise.The Economist,336(8305),10-11.
  14. Donnelly, T. (2003), “What's Next? Preserving American Primacy, Institutionalizing Unipolarity,” National Security Outlook. Retrieved October 8, 2008, from http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.16999/pub_detail.asp
  15. Drezner, D. W. (2008), “The Realists vs. the Neocons,” National Interest online. Retrieved October 14, 2008, from http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=17180
  16. Kroes, R. (2004), “Anti-Americanism: A Revisit,” Contemporary Conflict. Retrieved April 19, 2009, from http://conconflicts.ssrc.org/USA/kroes/
  17. Shadroui, G. (2006), “Dissecting Chomsky and anti-Americanism,” Intellectual Conservative. Retrieved March 12, 2009, from http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article3754.html
  18. Gray, J. (2008), “A shattering moment in America's fall from power,” The Guardian, September 28.
  19. PEW (2008), “Global Public Opinion in the Bush Years (2001-2008),” The PEW Global Attitudes Project..
  20. Montgomery, D., “The Author Who Got a Big Boost From bin Laden,” Washington Post, January 21, 2006.
  21. Hanson, V. D. (2002), “The End of An Era: The Bankruptcy of the Anti-Americanists,” National Review Online. Retrieved October 8, 2008, from http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson110802.asp
  22. Tyler, P., “Threats and Responses：News Analysis; A New Power in the Streets,” New York Times, February 17, 2003.
  23. Ajami, F.(2003).The Falseness of Anti-Americanism.Foreign Policy,138,53-61.
  24. Ballve, M.(2005).A New Wave of Anti-Americanism.NACLA Report on the Americas,138(6),37-41.
  25. Berman, R. A.(2004).Anti-Americanism in Europe: A Cultural Problem.Stanford:Hoover Press.
  26. Bohas, A.(2006).The Paradox of Anti-Americanism: Reflection on the Shallow Concept of Soft Power.Global Society,120(4),395-414.
  27. Bresler, R. J.(2007).Will Neo-Cons get real?.USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education),135(2740),17.
  28. Brinkley, A.,Dyer, D.(2004).The American Presidency.New York:Houghton Mifflin Company.
  29. Bronner, S. E.(2009).Constructing Neo-Conservatism.Logos,3(1)
  30. Brooks, S. G.,Wohlforth, W. C.(2000).American Primacy in Perspective.Foreign Affairs,81(4),20-34.
  31. Carothers, T.(1994).The Democracy Nostrum.World Policy Journal,11(3),47-53.
  32. Ceaser, J. W.(2007).Anti-Americanism Ever with Us: Reflecting on a Stubborn Ideology.National Review,59(7),32-36.
  33. Chomsky, N.(2004).Hegemony or Survival: American Quest for Global Dominance.New York:Henry Holt and Company.
  34. Collier, P.,Horowitz, D.(2004).The Anti Chomsky Reader.San Francisco:Encounter books.
  35. Dombrell, J.(2002).Unilateralism and 'America First'? President George W. Bush's Foreign Policy.Political Quarterly,73(3),279-287.
  36. Dombrowski, P.,Payne, R. A.(2003).Global Debates and the Limits of Bush Doctrine.International Studies Perspectives,4,395-408.
  37. Doyle, K.,Kumbluh, P.(2008).CIA and Assassinations: The Guatemala 1954 Documents.Washington, D.C.:National Security Archive, George Washington University.
  38. Fabbrini, S.(2004).Layers of Anti-Americanism: Americanization, American unilateralism and anti-Americanism in a European Perspective.European Journal of American Culture,23(2),79-94.
  39. Foster, J. B.(2003).Imperial America and War.Monthly Review,May,1-10.
  40. Fukuyama, F.(2006).America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  41. Glick, P.(2006).Anti-American Sentiment and America's Perceived Intent to Dominate: An 11 Nation Study.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,28(4),363-373.
  42. Greenberg, S. B.(2005).The Two Americas.New York:Thomas Dunne Books.
  43. Hollander, P.(ed.)(2004).Understanding Anti-Americanisms: Its Origins and Impacts at Home and Abroad.New York:Oxford University.
  44. Hollander, Paul(ed.)(2004).Understanding Anti-Americanisms: Its Origins and Impacts at Home and Abroad.New York:Oxford University.
  45. Hollander, Paul.(ed.)(2004).Understanding Anti-Americanisms: Its Origins and Impacts at Home and Abroad.New York:Oxford University.
  46. Hopkins, A. G.(2007).Capitalism, Nationalism and the New American Empire.The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History,35(1),95-117.
  47. Huntington, S.(1993).The Clash of Civilizations?.Foreign Affairs,72(3),22-49.
  48. Ikenberry, J. G.(2002).America's Imperial Ambition.Foreign Affairs,81(5),44-60.
  49. Inglehart, R.,Norris, P.(2003).The True Clash of Civilizations.Foreign Policy,135,62-66.
  50. Johnson, C.(2004).The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic.New York:Owl Books Henry Holt and Company.
  51. Judt, Tony(ed.),Lacorne, Denis(ed.)(2005).With Us or Against Us.New York:Palgrave MacMillan.
  52. Kagan, R.(1998).The Benevolent Empire.Foreign Policy,111,24-36.
  53. Katzenstein, Peter J.(ed.),Keohane, Robert O.(ed.)(2007).Anti-Americanism in World Politics.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
  54. Kissinger, H.(1994).Diplomacy.New York:Simon and Schuster Incorporation.
  55. Kristol, I.(2004).The Neocon Reader.New York:Grove Press.
  56. Kristol, W.,Kagan, R.(2000).Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy.San Francisco:Encounter.
  57. Kupchan, C. A.,Trubowitz, P. L.(2007).Grand Strategy for a Divided America.Foreign Affairs,86(4),71-83.
  58. Leffler, M. P.(2004).Bush's Foreign Policy.Foreign Policy,144,22-28.
  59. Lieber, Robert J.(ed.)(1997).Eagle Adrift.New York:Longman.
  60. MacDonald, K.(2008).The Neoconservative Mind.The Occidental Quarterly,8(3),1-18.
  61. Mann, J.(2004).Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet.New York:Penguin Books.
  62. Mann, M.(2003).Incoherent Empire.New York:Verso.
  63. Mazarr, M.(2003).George W. Bush, Idealist.International Affairs,79(3),503-522.
  64. McGuire, S.(2004).The Anti-American century.New Statesman,133(4711),19.
  65. McPherson, A.(2003).Yankee No! Anti-Americanism in U.S.-Latin American Relations.Cambridge, Massachusetts:Massachusetts: Harvard University.
  66. Mendieta, E.(2003).Patriotism and anti-Americanism.Peace Review,15(4),435-442.
  67. Meunier, S.(2000).The French Exception.Foreign Affairs,79(4),104-116.
  68. Muravchik, J.(2007).The Past, Present, and Future of Neoconservatism.Commentary,October,19-29.
  69. Naim, M.(2002).Anti-Americanism: A guide to hating Uncle Sam.Foreign Policy,128,103-104.
  70. Nye, J. S.(2004).Soft Power and American Foreign Policy.Political Science Quarterly,119(2),255-270.
  71. O'' Meara, D.(2006).American Empire' and 'US Imperialism' after the War in Iraq?: The American State in the Contemporary Global Order.Labour, Capital and Society,39(1),4-33.
  72. Paz, R.(2003).Islamists and Anti-Americanism.Middle East Review of International Affairs,7(4)
  73. Posen, B.,Ross, A.(1997).Eagle Adrift.New York:Longman.
  74. Revel, J.-F.(2003).Anti-Americanism.San Francisco:Encounter Books.
  75. Ross, Andrew(ed.),Ross, Kristin(ed.)(2004).Anti-Americanism.New York:New York University Press.
  76. Rossant, J.,Engardio, P.,Roberts, D.,Postlewaite, S.,Starobin, P.(2001).The Roots of Resentment.Business Week,October 1,46-47.
  77. Rubin, B.(2002).The Real Roots of Anti-Americanism.Foreign Affairs,81(6),73-85.
  78. Rubin, B.,Rubin, J. C.(2004).Hating America: a history.New York:Oxford University Press.
  79. Rubin, B.,Rubin, J. C.(2004).Anti-Americanism Re-Examined.Brown Journal of World Affairs,11(1),17-24.
  80. Rubinstein, A.,Smith, D.(1988).Anti-Americanism in the Third World.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,497,35-45.
  81. Ryn, C. G.(2003).The Ideology of American Empire.Orbis,383-397.
  82. Scruton, R.(2007).Anti-Americanism.American Spectator,40(7),40-42.
  83. Singer, P. W.(2006).America, Islam, and the 911 War.Current History,December,415-422.
  84. Spero, A.(2003).Anti-Americanism: Opiate of the Left.Human Events,59(37),13.
  85. The White House(2002).The National Security Strategy.
  86. Walt, S. M.(2000).Two Cheers for Clinton's Foreign Policy.Foreign Affairs,79(2),63-80.
  87. Walt, S. M.(2005).Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy.New York:W.W. Norton and Company.
  88. Waltz, K. N.(2000).Globalization and American Power.The National Interest,59,46-56.
  89. Wilson, J. Q.(2006).American Exceptionalism.The American Spectator,39(7)
  90. Zakaria, F.(2004).Hating America.Foreign Policy,144,47-49.
print cancel