Indigenous Psychology, Westernized Psychology, and Indigenized Psychology: A Non-Western Psychologist's View

三種心理學

10.30114/CGJHSS.201204.0001

楊國樞(Kuo-Shu Yang)

本土契合性 ； 本土心理學 ； 西方心理學 ； 西化心理學 ； 虛假本土心理學 ； 本土化心理學 ； Indigenized Psychology ； Indigenous Compatibility ； Indigenous Psychology ； Pseudo-Indigenous Psychology ； Western Psychology ； Westernized Psychology

長庚人文社會學報

5卷1期（2012 / 04 / 01）

1 - 32

英文

在華人社會中，有三種心理學同時並存，即本土心理學（IP）、西化心理學（WP）、及本土化心理學（IZP）。從世界史的觀點來說，歐美本土心理學是在歐美社會文化因素的影響下形成。此種西方心理學傳入眾多非西方國家，逐漸形成不同的西化心理學。在有些主要非西方國家中，當地心理學者已在推動本土化的運動，自會形成本土化心理學。本文有系統地闡述三種心理學逐漸形成的歷程。三種心理學不只代表三類方法論，也形成三套心理學知識系統。最後將從知識論的下列六方面加以比較：文化基礎、創新方法、本土自主性、本土脈絡性、本土契合性、及本土應用性。

Three kinds of coexisting contemporary scientific psychologies, namely, indigenous psychology (IP), Westernized psychology (WP), and indigenized psychology (IZP), can be meaningfully distinguished and defined. Historically speaking, IP, the first of the three, was directly and spontaneously generated under the sole influence of Euro-American sociocultural factors. This Western psychology was then imported to and implanted in many non-Western countries to form various kinds of WP. The WPs in some of the major non-Western nations have been gradually transformed into IZPs by local psychologists under the academic movement of indigenization. This article systematically describes the dynamic process of the successive formation of the three psychologies. These psychologies represent not only three disciplines but also three methodologies which, in turn, produce three distinctive kinds of psychological knowledge. The three knowledge systems are then compared in terms of such epistemological aspects as cultural basis, production method, indigenous autonomy, indigenous contextualization, indigenous compatibility, and indigenous applicability.

1. Wundt, W. (1916), in E.L. Schaub (trans.), Elements of Folk Psychology: Outlines of a Psychological History of the Development of Mankind, London: George Allen and Unwin.
2. Carmichael, L. C., Hogan, H. P. and Walters, A. A. (1932), “An Experimental Study of the Effect of Language on the Reproduction of Visually Perceived Form,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 73-86.
3. Fung, Y. L. (1948), A Short History of Chinese Philosophy, New York: Free Press.
4. Adair, J. G.(1999).Indigenization of Psychology: The Concept and its Practical Implementation.Applied Psychology: An International Review,48(8),403-418.
5. Allwood, C. M.,Berry, J. W.(2006).Origins and Development of Indigenous Psychologies: An International Analysis.International Journal of Psychology,41(4),243-268.
6. Atal, Y.(1981).The Call for Indigenization.International Social Science Journal,31(1),189-196.
7. Audi, R.(1995).The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
8. Azuma, H.(1984).Psychology in a Non-Western Country.International Journal of Psychology,19,145-155.
9. Berry, J. W.(1969).On Cross-Cultural Comparability.International Journal of Psychology,4,119-128.
10. Berry, J. W.(1989).Imposed Etics-Emics-Derived Etics: The Operationalization of a Compelling Idea.International Journal of Psychology,24,721-735.
11. Berry, J. W.(ed.),Poortinga, Y. H.(ed.),Pandey, J.(ed.)(1997).Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 1: Theory and Method.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
12. Berry, J. W.,Poortinga, Y. H.,Segall, M. H.,Dasen, P. R.(1992).Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
13. Bond, M. H.(ed.)(1997).Working at the Interface of Cultures: Eighteen Lives in Social Science.London:Routledge.
14. Burnet, J.(1980).An Introduction to Ancient Philosophy.London:Methuen.
15. Church, A. T.,Katigbak, M. S.(2002).Indigenization of Psychology in the Philippines.International Journal of Psychology,37(3),129-148.
16. Copleston, F.(1962).A History of Philosophy.Garden City, New York:Image Books.
17. Dai, L. T.(1956).Japanese Language as an Expression of Japanese Psychology.Western Speech,20,90-96.
18. Denzin, N. K.(ed.),Lincoln, Y. S.(ed.)(1994).Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
19. Dickason, O. P.(1984).The Myths of the Savage.Edmonton:University of Alberta.
20. Doi, T.(1992).On the Concept of Amae.Infant Mental Health Journal,13,7-11.
21. Enriquez, V. G.(1989).Indigenous Psychology and Natural Consciousness.Tokyo:Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
22. Enriquez, V. G.(1992).From Colonial to Liberation Psychology.Quezon City:University of the Philippines Press.
23. Gabrenya, W. K., Jr.,Kung, M.-C.,Chen, L.-Y.(2006).Understanding the Taiwan Indigenous psychology movement: A sociology of science approach.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,37(6),597-622.
24. Heelas, P.(ed.),Lock, A.(ed.)(1981).Indigenous psychologies: The Anthropology of the Self.London:Academic Press.
25. Heider, F.(1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.New York:Wiley.
26. Ho, D. Y. F.(1998).Indigenous Psychologies: Asian Perspectives.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,29(1),88-103.
27. Ho, D. Y. F.(1976).On the Concept of Face.American Journal of Sociology,81,867-884.
28. Ho, D. Y. F.,Peng, S.-Q.,Lai, A. C.,Chan, S.-F. F.(2001).Indigenization and Beyond: Methodological Relationalism in the Study of Personality across Cultural Traditions.Journal of Personality,69(6),925-953.
29. Hunt, E.,Agroli, F.(1991).The Whorfian Hypothesis: A Cognitive Psychological Perspective.Psychological Review,98,377-389.
30. Hwang, K. K.(2005).A Philosophical Reflection on the Epistemology and Methodology of Indigenous Psychologies.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,8(1),5-18.
31. Hwang, K. K.(1999).On the Multiparadigm Research Orientation: Indigenization of Social Psychology.Journal of Social Theory,2,1-15.
32. Jing, Q.,Fu, X.(2001).Modern Chinese Psychology: Its Indigenous Roots and International Influences.International Journal of Psychology,36(6),408-418.
33. Kao, H. S. R.(ed.),Sinha, D.(ed.)(1997).Asian Perspectives on Psychology.Thousands Oaks, CA:Sage.
34. Kim, U.(2000).Indigenous, Cultural, and Cross-Cultural Psychology: A Theoretical, Conceptual, and Epistemological Analysis.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,3(3),265-287.
35. Kim, U.(ed.),Berry, J. W.(ed.)(1993).Indigenous Psychologies: Research and Experience in Cultural Context.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
36. Kim, U.(ed.),Yang, K. S.(ed.),Hwang, K. K.(ed.)(2006).Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context.New York:Springer.
37. Kim, U.,Park, Y. S.,Park, D. H.(1999).The Challenge of Cross-Cultural Psychology: The Role of the Indigenous Psychologies.Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology,31(1),63-75.
38. Kim, U.,Yang, K. S.,Hwang, K. K.(2006).Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context.New York:Springer.
39. Koch(ed.) ,Leary, D. E.(ed.)(1985).A Century of Psychology as Science.New York:McGraw Hill.
40. Leung, K.,Wu, P. K.(1997).Indigenous and Cross-Cultural Orientations should not be Incredulous of Each Other.Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Indigenous Research in Chinese Societies,Taipei:
41. Lynch, F.(ed.),de Guzman, A., II.(ed.)(1973).Four readings on Philippine Values.Quezon City, Philippines:Ateneode Manila University Press.
42. Maccoby, E. E.(ed.),Newcombe, T. M.(ed.),Hartley, E. L.(ed.)(1958).Readings in Social Psychology.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
43. Matsumto, D.(ed.)(2001).The Handbook of Culture and Psychology.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
44. Moore, C. A.(1967).The Indian mind: Essentials of Indian philosophy and culture.Honolulu, Hawaii:The University Press of Hawaii.
45. Moore, C. A.(1967).The Chinese Mind: Essentials of Chinese Philosophy and Culture.Honolulu, Hawaii:The University Press of Hawaii.
46. Oyama, T.,Sato, T.,Suzuki, Y.(2001).Shaping of Scientific Psychology in Japan.International Journal of Psychology,36(6),396-406.
47. Pandey, J.(ed.)(2004).Psychology in India Revisited: Developments in the Discipline, Vol. 3: Applied Social and Organizational Psychology.Thousand Oaks. CA:Sage.
48. Paranjpe, A. C.(ed.),Ho, D. Y. F.(ed.),Rieber, R. W.(ed.)(1988).Asian contributions to psychology.New York:Praeger.
49. Pe-Pua, R.,Protacio-Marcelino, E.(2000).Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Flipino psychology): A Legacy of Virglio G.. Enriquez.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,3(1),49-71.
50. Polanyi, M.(1962).Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post Critical Philosophy.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
51. Radhakrishnan, S.,Moore, C. A.(1954).A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
52. Redfield, R.(1956).Peasant Society and Culture: An Anthropological Approach to Civilization.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
53. Segall, M. H.,Dasen, P. R.,Berry, J. W.,Poortinga, Y. H.(1990).Human Behavior in Global Perspective: An Introduction to Cross-Cultural Psychology.New York:Pergamon.
54. Shams, M.(2002).Issues in the Study of Indigenous Psychologies: Historical Perspectives, Cultural Interdependence, and Institutional Regulations.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,5,79-91.
55. Sinha, I. B. P.(2000).Toward Indigenization of Psychology in India.Psychological Studies,45,3-13.
56. Soukhanov, A. H.(1984).Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary.Boston, MA:Hough Mifflin Co..
57. Ustun, O.,Smith, P. B.(1999).The Search for Indigenous Psychologies: Data from Turkey and the Former USSR.Applied Psychology: An International Review,48(4),465-479.
58. Wallerstein, I.(1974).The Modern World System.New York:Academic Press.
59. Wallerstein, I.(1980).The Modern World System II.New York:Academic Press.
60. Whorf, B. L.(1956).Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benajmain Lee Whorf.New York:Wiley.
61. Yang, K. S.(2000).Monocultural and Cross-Cultural Indigenous Approaches: The Royal Road to the Development of a Balanced Global Human Psychology.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,3,241-264.
62. Yang, K. S.(1999).Towards an Indigenous Psychology: A Selected Review of Methodological, Theoretical, and Empirical Accomplishments.Chinese Journal of Psychology,41,181-211.
63. Yang, K. S.(1998).Chinese Responses to Modernization: A Psychological Analysis.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,1,75-97.
64. Yang, K. S.(1997).Indigenous Compatibility in Psychological Research and its Related Problems.Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies,8,75-120.
65. Yang, K. S.(1993).Why do We Need to Develop an Indigenous Chinese Psychology?.Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies,1,6-88.
66. Yang, K. S.(ed.),Hwang, K. K.(ed.),Pederson, P. B.(ed.),Daibo, I.(ed.)(2003).Progress in Asian Social Psychology: Conceptual and Empirical Contributions.Westport, CO:Praeger.

1. 李維倫(2017)。華人本土心理學的文化主體策略。本土心理學研究，47，3-79。
2. (2024)。哲學諮詢和心理治療（諮詢）可以通約嗎？——以對心理治療（諮詢）時代難題的符號「診治」為例。哲學與文化，51(3)，157-173。