台灣原住民族運動與文學的啟蒙

Taiwan Indigenous People's Movement and Literary Enlightenment

10.29910/TJIS.200803.0002

巴蘇亞˙博伊哲努(浦忠成)(Pasuya Poiconu (Chung-Cheng Pu))

原住民族運動 ； 原住民族文學 ； 抗爭文學 ； Indigenous movement ； indigenous literature ； resistance literature

台灣原住民族研究季刊

1卷1期（2008 / 03 / 01）

39 - 58

繁體中文

在有關於原住民文學的討論中，多半針對部分其作品已經結集出版的作家進行討論，卻對將文字書寫或文學創作結合著諸如正名、還我土地、反雛妓、反吳鳳神話等議題的原住民運動的人士，刻意予以忽略；事實上，這一批原住民知識份子是率先看清民族處境，也認識週遭惡質環境的先覺者。儘管由於抗爭之途崎嶇，亦難有閒暇修飾文辭，但是在民族處在極度邊陲與弱勢的情況下，敢於揭發統治者或大社會對於原住民的不公不義，極力爭取原住民生存的權利空間，顯示的是勇氣與尊嚴的風調。形式與實質內涵孰重孰輕？一直是文學研究者爭論不休的課題；但是在原住民族運動者來講，讓文字論述充滿如刀劍彈藥般充實的力量，比起徒然擁有華麗詞藻而溫軟乏力的美文，那是更加務實的選擇。

Most discussion of indigenous people's literature has looked at collected editions of literary works and has deliberately overlooked the accounts of persons involved in indigenous people's movements, such as the rectification of names, the return of land, opposition to child prostitution and protests against the legend of Wu Feng. In fact the indigenous people who led these movements are the pioneers of their people and the first to draw attention to the negative factors facing indigenous people. Given the difficulties of their struggles it was difficult to keep a record in literary writing but with their people marginalized and neglected, it demanded great courage and respect to point out to the rulers and majority society the injustice shown to indigenous peoples and to fight for their rights. Whether form or content is more important is a topic that literature constantly discusses, but for those active in the indigenous people's movements it was more important to use language to effect change than to worry about literary elegance.

1. 吳錦發。1989。〈論台灣原住民現代文學〉《民眾日報》。7 月 21-26 日。
2. Anaya, James(1996).Indigenous Peoples in International Law.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
3. Hannum, Hurst(1992).Autonomy, Sovereignty and Self-determination: The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
4. 台灣原住民權利促進會編(1987)。原住民：被壓迫者的吶喊。永和:台灣原住民權利促進會。
5. 夷將．拔路兒編(2008)。台灣原住民族運動史料彙編。台北:行政院原住民族委員會。
6. 高德義(1998)。台北，政治大學政治研究所。
7. 莫那能(1989)。美麗的稻穗。台中:晨星。
8. 趙中麒(2001)。台北，台灣大學政治學研究所。
9. 謝世忠(2004)。第四世界的建構。族群人類學的宏觀探索：臺灣原住民論集，台北:
10. 藤井志津枝(2001)。臺灣原住民史─政策篇。南投:省文獻會。