题名

原住民與自然資源經營—共同經營的理論框架

并列篇名

Aborigine and Natural Resources Management: A Theoretical Framework for Co-management

DOI

10.29910/TJIS.201103.0002

作者

夏禹九(Yue-Joe Hsia);林佩蓉(Pei-Rong Lin)

关键词

指令與控制式的自然資源經營 ; 跨領域整合 ; 原住民自治 ; "command and control" natural resources management ; transdisciplinary integration ; self-governance of the aboriginal people

期刊名称

台灣原住民族研究季刊

卷期/出版年月

4卷1期(2011 / 03 / 01)

页次

39 - 66

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

原住民與自然資源經營是「社會—生態系統」的議題。面臨全球化、氣候變遷、民主化與原住民自治的變局,傳統的指令與控制式的自然資源經營的政策與制度,均需要變革。變革需要跨領域之間的瞭解與整合,而瞭解與整合則需要一個理論框架。本文介紹一個Panarchy理論框架,這個理論框架強調複雜適應系統的非線性、自我組織的特性,以一個適應循環來描述系統的變化。「社會—生態系統」更是套疊的層級系統,應用尺度與層級理論,可以解析此一複雜系統,釐清各子系統間尺度對應的關係。藉著Panarchy理論框架,不同領域的研究者與社會工作者或許能更容易認識到原住民與自然資源經營議題的複雜面向,從而推動轉型所需的社會、制度各層級上所需要的變革。

英文摘要

Conflict between aboriginal people and natural resources management is an issue of social-ecological system. In the face of globalization, climate change, and democratic political reforms, the movement of self-governance of the aboriginal people challenges the traditional ”command and control” natural resources management in Taiwan Reform of the natural resources management needs transdisciplinary integration and understanding. However, integration and understanding require a common theoretical framework. A brief introduction of theoretical framework, Panarcy, is presented, which focus on the non-linearity, self-organization characteristics of adaptive complex systems. Panarcy uses the concept of adaptive cycle to describe the characteristics of changes of complex systems. Together with the hieratical theorem based on scale concept could then be used to analyze such a complex system in order to clarify the corresponding scale-dependent interactions among nested subsystems. It is suggested that a theoretical framework such as Panarcy could serve as a narrative to aid cooperation needed for co-management of natural resources management.

主题分类 人文學 > 人類學及族群研究
参考文献
  1. Allen, Timothy F. H.,Hoekstra, Thomas W.(1992).Toward a Unified Ecology.New York:Columbia University Press.
  2. Allenby, Braden(ed.)(2005).Reconstructing Earth: Technology and Environment in the Age of Humans.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
  3. Armitage, Derek,Berkes, Fikret,Doubleday, N.(2007).Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-level Governance.Vancouver:UBC Press.
  4. Berkes, Fikret(2008).Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management.New York:Routledge.
  5. Berkes, Fikret(ed.),Colding, Johan(ed.),Folke, Carl(ed.)(2003).Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  6. Berkes, Fikret(ed.),Folke, Carl(ed.)(1998).Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience.New York:Columbia University Press.
  7. Castillon, David A.(1992).Conservation of Natural Resources: A Resource Management Approach.Dubuque, Iowa:William C. Brown Publisher.
  8. Chapin, F. Stuart, III(ed.),Kofinas, Gary P.(ed.),Folke, Carl(ed.)(2009).Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World.New York:Springer.
  9. Clark, W.C.(ed.),Munn, R.E.(ed.)(1986).Sustainable Development of the Biosphere.Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge University Press.
  10. Cortner, Hanna J.,Moote, Margaret Ann(1999).The Politics of Ecosystem Management.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
  11. Cuddington, Kim(ed.),Beisner, Beatrix(ed.)(2005).Ecological Paradigms Lost: Routes of Theory Change.Burlington, Mass.:Elservier.
  12. Daft, Richard L.(2001).Essentials of Organization: Theory and Design.Mason, Ohio:South-Western College.
  13. Goldstein, Bruce Evan(2009).Resilience to Surprises through Communicative Planning.Ecology and Society,14(2),33-44.
  14. Gunderson, Lance H.,Holling, C. S.(2002).Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
  15. Holling, C. S.(2001).Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems.Ecosystems,4,390-405.
  16. Holling, C. S.,Meffe, Gary K.(1996).Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resources Management.Conservation Biology,10(2),328-37.
  17. King, Anthony W.(1998).Hierarchy Theory: A Guide to System Structure for Wildlife Biologists.Wildlife and Landscape Ecology: Effects of Pattern and Scale,New York:
  18. Kricher, John(2009).The Balance of Nature: Ecology's Enduring Myth.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  19. Lee, Kai N.(1993).Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Policies for the Environment.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
  20. Levin, Simon A.(1999).Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons.Reading, Mass.:Helix Books.
  21. Levin, Simon A.(1992).The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology.Ecology,73,1943-67.
  22. Levin, Simon A.(ed.)(2009).The Princeton Guide to Ecology.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  23. Meadows, Donella H.(2008).Thinking in Systems.White River Jct., Vt.:Chelsea Green Publish.
  24. Meffe, G.K.(2002).Ecosystem Management: Adaptive, Community-Based Conservation.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
  25. Mitsch, William J.(ed.),Jorgensen, Sven Erik(ed.)(1989).Ecological Engineering, an Introduction to Ecotechnology.New York:Hohn Wiley & Sons.
  26. Norberg, John(ed.),Cumming, Graeme S.(ed.)(2008).Complexity Theory for a Sustainable Future.New York:Columbia University press.
  27. O'Neill, R. V.,DeAngelis, D. L.,Waide, J. B.,Allen, T. F. H.(1986).A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  28. Peterson, David L.(ed.),Parker, V. Thomas(ed.)(1998).Ecological Scale: Theory and Application.New York:Columbia University Press.
  29. Pickett, Steward T. A.,Kolasa, Jurek,Jones, Clive G.(2007).Ecological Understanding: The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature.Burlington, Mass.:Academic Press.
  30. Puettmann, Klaus J.,Coates, K. David,Messier, Christian C.(2008).A Critique of Silviculture: Managing for Complexity.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
  31. Reid, Walter V.(ed.),Berkes, Fikret(ed.),Wilbanks, Thomas J.(ed.),Capistrano, Doris(ed.)(2006).Bridging Scales and Knowledge Systems: Concepts and Applications in Ecosystem Assessment.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
  32. Scheffer, Marten,Carpenter, Stiphen R.(2003).Catastrophic Regime Shifts in Ecosystems: Linking Theory to Observation.Trends in Ecology and Evolution,18(12),648-56.
  33. Suding, Katharine N.,Gross, Katherine L.,Houseman, Gregory R.(2004).Alternative States and Positive Feedbacks in Restoration Ecology.Trends in Ecology and Evolution,19(1),46-53.
  34. Urban, D. L.,O'Neill, R.V.,Shugart, H. H., Jr.(1987).Landscape Ecology: A Hierarchical Perspective can Help Scientists Understand Spatial Patterns.Bioscience,37,119-127.
  35. Walker, Brian H.,Salt, David(2006).Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World.Washington, D.C.:Island Press.
  36. Walters, Carl J.(1986).Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources.New York:Macmillan.
  37. Waltner-Toews, David(ed.),Kay, James J.(ed.),Lister, Nina E.(ed.)(2008).The Ecosystem Approach: Complexity, Uncertainty, and Managing for Sustainability.New York:Columbia University Press.
  38. Wu, Jianguo(ed.),Jones, K. Bruce(ed.),Li, Harbin(ed.),Loucks, Orie L(ed.)(2006).Scaling and Uncertainty Analysis in Ecology: Methods and Applications.Dordrechdt, The Netherlands:Springer.
  39. Zellmer, A. J.,Allen, T. F. H.,Kesseboehmer, K.(2006).The Nature of Ecological Complexity: A Protocol for Building the Narrative.Ecological Complexity,3,171-82.
  40. 教育部生物多樣性人才培育先導型計畫編(2006)。生物多樣性概論。臺北:教育部。
被引用次数
  1. 戴興盛,陳毅峰,張惠東,呂翊齊(2023)。調適、批判與拼裝:從三種環境治理的視野重新檢視臺灣原住民族狩獵自主管理政策。地理學報,105,65-102。
  2. 戴興盛,裴家騏,呂翊齊(2022)。原住民族狩獵自主管理機制的架構與展望。台灣原住民族研究,15(1),1-42。