原住民學校教學卓越團隊教師專業增能之重要因素探討－以得勒樂卡潛能開發團隊為例

A Study of the Important Factors of Professional Empowerment of Teachers in Excellent Teaching Teams in Aboriginal Schools-A Case Study of the Teldreka Potential Development Team

10.29910/TJIS.201509_8(2).0001

鍾莉娜(Li-Na Chung)

原住民學校 ； 教師專業增能 ； 教學卓越團隊 ； 魯凱族 ； aboriginal schools ； teachers' professional empowerment ； excellent teaching teams ； rukai

台灣原住民族研究季刊

8卷2期（2015 / 09 / 01）

1 - 31

繁體中文

隨著環境的改變，教授制度也有所不同。但不論教育政策如何改變，唯其不變的是師生的教學成效永遠扮演著火車頭推動的角色。在高雄市偏鄉魯凱族茂林國中所屬「得勒樂卡潛能開發團隊」，不僅2008年榮獲教育部教學卓越金質獎，更屢創佳績，打破過往外界對台灣原住民學校及教師教學所存在的刻版印象。愛此，本文以該團隊為例，透過深度訪談法等，探討原住民學校教學卓越團隊教師專業增能的重要因素。研究發現影響教師專業增能之重要因素為一、具備優質領導及卓越教師：如校長、主任的領導方式、支持協助與教師本身的使命感、團隊尊重、溝通及領域專業;二、原住民學校文化特色之發展：如將原住民文化與在地生活結合，科展實驗就地取材生活化，傳統技藝人文藝術化；三、激勵與教學變革：如教學團隊成效激勵、社區家長的認同配合、教學傳薪創新等。教師專業增能效益的發揮，係教師的「能力」、「機會」與「願力」的結合，而教學卓越團隊之專業則有賴校長、教師與學生的用心參與，共同營造教育願景與教學效益。

As the environment changes, so does the teaching systems. No matter how the education policy changes, the teaching effects always play the leading role. An aboriginal junior high school in the remote area in Kaohsiung, the ＂Teldreka Potential Development Team,＂ won the Excellent Teacher Award from the MOE in 2008. Their winning changed the stereotype on aboriginal schools and teachers. The process and implications of their success are worth investigating. In this article, ＂Teldreka Potential Development Team was used as an example to explore the important factors of professional empowerment of teachers in excellent teaching teams in aboriginal schools through in-depth interview. The results indicate that three important factors influence professional empowerment of teachers. First, principals with supreme leadership and excellent teachers are required. The leadership styles of the principals or the section directors, the support from the principals, teachers' sense of calling, team respect, communication, and professional expertise are all important. Second, aboriginal schools need to emphasize the development of aboriginal culture. For instance, aboriginal culture and local lives can be combined. The works for science exhibitions should be life-related. Traditional skills need to be more artistic. Third, inspiration and teaching transforms are the important factors as well. For example, the effects of the teaching teams should be encouraged. The sense of identity and cooperation from the community and parents are necessary. Teaching inheriting and innovation are vital. In conclusion, the effectiveness of teachers' professional empowerment is the combination of ＂ability,＂ ＂opportunity,＂ and ＂will.＂ The professional expertise of the excellent teaching teams depends on the whole-hearted participation of the principal, the teachers, and the students so that vision of education and teaching effectiveness can be created.

1. 張德銳、王淑珍、何嘉惠(2014)。教師彰權益能的現況、歷程、成效與困境之研究：以八位國小資深優良教師為例。教育研究與發展期刊，10(1)，23-52。
   連結：
2. 蔡文山(2004)。從教育機會均等的觀點省思台灣原住民學生的教育現況與展望。教育與社會研究，6，109-144。
   連結：
3. 原住民委員會。2015。〈原住民族簡介：魯凱族〉http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docList.html?CID=277F552950733982)(2015/5/29)
4. Bredson, P. V.(1989).Redefining leadership and the roles of school principals: Responses to changes in the professional work life of teachers.High School Journal,73(1),9-20.
5. Browder, J. L. H.(1994).Exploring the meanings of teacher empowerment.International Journal of Educational Reform,3(2),137-153.
6. Darling-Hammond, L.,Richardson, N.(2009).Teacher Learning: What Matters?.Educational Leadership,66(5),46-53.
7. DuFour, R.(2004).What is a professional learning community?.Educational Leadership,61(8),6-11.
8. DuFour, R.,Eaker, R.(1998).Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement.Bloomington, IN:National Educational Service.
9. Goyne, J.,Padgett, D.,Rowicki, M.,Priplitt, T.(1999).,未出版
10. Gray, S. P.,Streshly, W. A.(2008).From good schools to great schools: What their principals do well.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
11. Hord, S.(1997).Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement.Austin, TX:Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
12. Hord, S. M.(2004).Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities.New York:Teachers College Press.
13. Irwin, J. W.(1996).Empowering ourselves and transforming schools: Educators making a difference.Albany, N.Y.:State University of New York Press.
14. Kirby, P. C.(1991).Shared decision making: Moving from concerns about rest rooms to concerns about classrooms.The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Chicago:
15. Maeroff, G. I.(1989).The principles of teacher empowerment.The Education Digest,54(6),6-9.
16. Robbins, S. P.(2002).Organizational behavior: Concepts. controversies, applications.Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Prentice-Hall Inc..
17. Schmoker, M.(2006).Results now: How we can achieve unprecedented improvements in teaching and learning.Virginia:ASCD.
18. Short, P. M.,Rinehart, J. S.(1992).School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of level of empowerment within school.Educational and Psychological Measurement,52(4),951-960.
19. Sprague, J.(1992).Critical perspectives on teacher empowerment.Communication Education,41(2),181-203.
20. Wilson, S. M.,Coolican, M. J.(1996).How high and low self-empowered teachers work with colleagues and school principals.Journal of Education Thought,30(2),9-117.
21. Winter, P. A.,Keedy, J. L.,Newton, R. M.(1999).Teacher Service on Councils: Are Teachers Attracted to the Accountability of School Based Decision Making?.Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration,Minneapolis, MN:
22. Yukl, G.(2002).Leadership in organizations.N.J.:Prentice Hall.
23. 吳百祿(2011)。教師領導的三個重要概念及其對當前學校教育的啟示。正修學報，24，83-104。
24. 邢小萍(2011)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立台北教育大學教育學院教育經營與管理學系。
25. 林妙徽、顏瓊芬、李暉(2008)。原住民族科學教育之困境與未來展望。台灣人文生態研究，10(1)，89-112。
26. 林惠苗(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台北市立教育大學教育學院課程與教學研究所。
27. 邱曉音(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立新竹教育大學教育學系。
28. 高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課─首航初探之旅。高雄:麗文出版社。
29. 張景達(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，佛光大學未來學系。
30. 張新仁、馮莉雅、潘道仁、王瓊珠(2011)。臺灣教師專業學習社群的啓動。教育研究月刊，201，5-27。
31. 馮莉雅、徐昌慧(2010)。教師專業發展評鑑與專業學習社群發展之研究：以高雄市國小為例。國民教育學報，7，139-162。
32. 馮琬婷(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，中原大學教育研究所。
33. 葉梅蘭(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化縣，國立彰化師範大學財務金融技術學系。
34. 戴韋嘩(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，台北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所。
35. 蘇秀美(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
36. 龔素丹(2009)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所。
37. 凃嘉原(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學成人及繼續教育成系。

1. 陳建志(2018)。學校本位課程發展：兼論理念學校與教學卓越獎之助益。當代教育研究季刊，26(3)，69-106。
2. 馮莉雅,曾素秋,陳昭宇(2020)。以系統動態學觀點探討影響中小學教師專業發展因素：以教學訪問教師計畫為例。課程與教學，23(4)，153-196。