题名

美國《印地安自決法》與部落管控學校對臺灣原住民族實驗教育的啟示

并列篇名

The Indian Self-Determination Act and Tribally Controlled Schools in the United States and Implications for Indigenous Experimental Education in Taiwan

DOI

10.29910/TJIS.201806_11(1).0002

作者

王前龍(Chien-Lung Wang)

关键词

印地安自決法 ； 部落管控學校 ； 自治權 ； 原住民族實驗教育 ； 部落公法人 ； Indian Self-determination Act ； Tribally Controlled School ； Right to Self-Governance ； School-based Indigenous Experimental Education ； Tribal Public Juristic Person

期刊名称

台灣原住民族研究

卷期/出版年月

11卷1期（2018 / 06 / 01）

页次

45 - 82

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

政府近年依據《學校型態實驗教育實施條例》，指定公立學校推動原住民族實驗教育，惟僅限於課程改革，未納入社區參與。未來若將部分實驗學校委由《原住民族基本法》所規定的部落公法人接辦，並借鏡美國「部落管控學校」的制度，更能落實自治權。本文探究美國《印地安自決與教育援助法》的歷史背景、該法中自決權與部落管控學校的發展，並對臺灣以部落公法人接辦原住民族實驗學校提出啟示。本文研究發現，美國原住民部落是主權政體，透過條約以土地換取聯邦政府之託管責任，但在長期遭受同化政策壓迫而在1960年代要求自決，促使國會在1975年制定《印地安自決法》，規定聯邦政府依託管責任所提供服務與教育，必須透過簽訂契約而將主控權轉移給部落；然由於聯邦政府持續抗拒轉移權利，國會陸續通過《印地安自決法》第三至六條款與《部落管控學校法》，經20多年努力逐漸落實部落永久自治。本文對臺灣的啟示是，部落公法人的政策應被視為原住民族創立部落管控學校的轉捩點；政府應從原住民族實驗學校的學區擇定可能的部落，依法與地方政府簽約且接辦這些學校，發展基於自治權的原住民族實驗教育。
英文摘要

Under the School-Based Experimental Education Act, the Government has enlisted dozens of schools to conduct projects related to indigenous experimental education since 2016, but community participation has not been integrated into these projects. Taking reference from the tribally controlled schools in the United States, the schools can be overtaken by tribal public juristic persons according to the newly amended Indigenous Peoples' Basic Law. This paper explores the historical background and development of the titles associated with self-determination and tribally controlled schools in the Indigenous Self-Determination and Educational Assistance Act in the United States as well as implications for indigenous experimental education in Taiwan. The findings were as follows. The United States Federal Government signed treaties with Native American tribes, originally sovereign entities, to provide a service of trust in exchange for a large amount of land. Tribe members claimed self-determination in the 1960s after decades of oppression under assimilation policies. Congress again recognized the sovereignty of the tribes and promulgated the Indian Self-Determination Act in 1975, mandating that the Federal Government transfer the control of education and service programs to tribes with contracts. However, because of the continual resistance of the Federal Government to the transfer of power, Congress further promulgated Titles III, IV, V, and VI of the Indian Self-Determination Act and the Tribally-Controlled Schools Act to ensure maximal tribal participation. In terms of implications for Taiwan, the policy of tribal public juristic persons should be viewed as a turning point for indigenous peoples regarding the establishment of tribally controlled schools with the right to self-governance. The government should select potential tribes from the communities served by the schools participating in indigenous experimental education projects and help them to establish contracts with municipal governments to obtain control over the schools. By these means, indigenous experimental education can be developed based on the tribes' right to self-governance.
主题分类 人文學 > 人類學及族群研究
参考文献
  1. Convention against Discrimination on Education. 1960. (http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=12949&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html) (2018/9/30)
  2. 原住民族基本法。2015。(http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0130003) (2017/11/23)
  3. Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Law. 1975. (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg2203.pdf)(2017/11/23)
  4. 公立國民小學與國民中學委託私人辦理條例。2014。(http://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawArticle. aspx?LawID=A040080030015000-1031126) (2017/11/23)
  5. 學校型態實驗教育實施條例（2014）。(http://law.moj.gov.tw/Law/LawSearchResult.aspx?p=A&k1= 學校型態實驗教育實施條例 &t=E1F1A1&TPage=1) (2017/11/23)
  6. 原住民族教育法。2014。(http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0020037) (2017/11/23)
  7. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 2007. (https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf ) (2018/9/30)
  8. Tribally Controlled School Grants. n.d.. (http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title25/chapter27&chapter27&edition=prelim) (2017/11/23) /prelim@title25/chapter27&chapter27&edition
  9. 原住民族委員會推動原住民族部落會議實施要點。2016。(https://law.apc.gov.tw/LawContent. aspx?id=FL038615) (2018/9/26)
  10. 原住民族委員會辦理部落核定作業要點。2017。(http://www.rootlaw.com.tw/LawArticle.aspx? LawID=A040350001009300-1030519) (2018/9/26)
  11. 地方制度法。2016。(http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0040003) (2017/12/11)
  12. Anaya, S. James(2009).International Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples.New York, NY:Wolter Kluwer.
  13. Bielenberg, Brian(2000).Charter Schools for American Indian.Learn in Beauty: Indigenous Education for a New Century,Flagstaff, AZ:
  14. Christie, Thomas W.(2010).An Introduction to the Federal Tort Claims Act in Indian Self-Determination Act Contracting.Montana Law Review,71(1),1-19.
  15. Cornell, Stephen,Kalt, Joseph P.(2010).American Indian Self-determination: The Political Economy of a Successful Policy.Tucson, AZ:Udall Center Publications.
  16. Department of the Interior. 2015. “Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible to Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs.” Federal Register, Vol.80, No.9, pp.1942-1948.
  17. Department of the Interior and Health and Human Services. 1996. “Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistant Act Amendments.” Federal Register, Vol. 61, No.122, pp.32482-32535.
  18. Deyhle, Donna,Comeau, Karen Gayton(2009).Connecting the Circle in American Indian Education.The Routledge International Companion to Multicultural Education,New York, NY:
  19. Echo-Hawk, Walter R.(2014).Self-Determination, Not Termination: Past, Present, and Future of the American Indian Movement.New York, NY:Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung-New York Office.
  20. Emm, Staci and Loretta Singletary. 2011. “Working Effectively with American Indian Populations: Contracting and Compacting.” (https://www.unce.unr.edu/publications/files/cd/2010/fs1014. pdf) (2017/11/27)
  21. Ewing, Eve L., and Meaghan E. Ferrick. 2016. “For This Place, for These People: An Exploration of Best Practices among Charter Schools Serving Native Students.” (http://leg.mt.gov/content/Committees/Interim/2015-2016/State-Tribal-Relations/Meetings/July-2016/charter-school-case-study.pdf) (2017/10/15)
  22. Fletcher, Mathew L. M.(2008).American Indian Education: Counternarratives in Racism, Struggle, and the Law.New York, NY:Routledge.
  23. Fletcher, Mathew L. M.(2006).The Iron Cold of the Marshall Trilogy.North Dakota Law Review,82,627-696.
  24. Glazert, Elizabeth M.(2004).Appropriating Availability: Reconciling Purpose and Text under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistant Act.The University of Chicago Law Review,71(4),1637-1660.
  25. Glogower, Ari. 2005. “The Indian Education Act of 1972.” (http://uintahbasintah.org/papers/ indianeducationact.pdf) (2017/10/15)
  26. Jaeger, Lisa. 2007. “Tribal Nations: The Story of Federal Indian Law.” (https://opi.mt.gov/Portals/ 182/Page%20Files/Indian%20Education/Social%20Studies/6-8/Tribal%20Nations%20The%20Story%20of%20Federal%20Indian%20Law.pdf)(2017/11/25)
  27. Lomawaima, K. Tsianian,McCarty, Teresa L.(2006).To Remain an Indian: Lessons in Democracy from a Century of Native American Education.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
  28. Lomawaima, K. Tsianina,McCarty, Teresa L.(2002).When Tribal Sovereignty Challenges Democracy: American Indian Education and the Democratic Ideal.American Educational Research Journal,39(2),279-305.
  29. Manuelito, Kathryn(2005).The Role of Education in American Indian self-determination: Lessons from the Ramah Navajo Community School.Anthropology and Education Quarterly,36(1),73-87.
  30. McCarty, Teresa,Lee, Tiffany S.(2014).Critical Culturally Sustaining/Revitalizing Pedagogy and Indigenous Education Sovereignty.Harvard Education Review,84(1),101-136.
  31. McHugh, P. G.(2004).Aboriginal Societies and the Common Law: A History of Sovereignty, Status, and Self-determination.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  32. National Conference of State Legislature. 2016. “Federal and State Recognized Tribes.” (http://www.ncsl.org/research/state-tribal-institute/list-of-federal-and-state-recognized-tribes.aspx#federal) (2018/9/30)
  33. National Congress of American Indians. n.d. “An Introduction to Indian Nations in the United States.” (http://www.ncai.org/resources/ncai_publications/tribal-nations-and-the-united- states-an-introduction) (2018/9/27)
  34. National Indian Education Association. 2017. “Barriers to Tribally Controlled Schools.” (http://www.niea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/NIEA-BarriersTribeControledSchools- FINAL.pdf) (2018/9/26)
  35. Native American Financial Services Association. n.d. “Federal-Tribal Relations and Tribal Sovereignty: A History.” (https://nativefinance.org/historical-sovereignty-relations/) (2017/11/26)
  36. Newton, Nell Jessup(ed.)(2004).Cohen's Handbook of Federal Indian Law.Newark, NJ:LexisNexis.
  37. Richardson, Benjamin J.(ed.),Imai, Shin(ed.),McNeil, Kent(ed.)(2009).Indigenous People and the Law.Oxford, UK:Hart Publishing.
  38. Roessel, Faith(1989).Federal Recognition – A Historical Twist of Fate.Native American Right Fund Law Review,14(3),1-9.
  39. Schmidt, Ryan W.(2011).American Indian Identity and Blood Quantum in the 21st Century: A Critical Review.Journal of Anthropology,2011,1-9.
  40. Strommer, Geoffrey D.,Osborne, Stephen D.(2015).The History, Status, and Future of Tribal Self-Governance under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act.American Indian Law Review,39(1),1-75.
  41. The White House. 2010. “Obama Announces US Endorsement of UNDRIP” [Video Clip]. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMv2xiqaWYc) (2018/9/26)
  42. Tweedy, Ann E.(2009).Connecting the Dots between the Constitution, the Marshall Trilogy, and United States V. Lara: Notes toward a Blueprint for the Next Legislative Restoration of Tribal Sovereignty.University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform,42(3),365-717.
  43. U. S. Department of State. 2011. “Announcement of U.S. Support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” (https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/srgia/154553.htm) (2018/9/26)
  44. U.S. Department of the Interior. n.d.a “Bureau of Indian Education (BIE).” (https://www.bia.gov/bie) (2017/12/10)
  45. U.S. Department of the Interior. 2012. “Federal Tribal Recognition.” (https://www.doi.gov/ocl/hearings/112/FederalTribalRecognition_071212) (2018/9/30)
  46. U.S. Department of the Interior. n.d.b “A Guide to Tracing American Indian & Alaska Native Ancestry.” (https://www.bia.gov/sites/bia.gov/files/assets/public/ois/pdf/Guide_to_Tracing_American_Indian_Alaska_Native_Ancestry.pdf) (2018/9/30)
  47. Whittlesey, Dennis, J.,Sullivan, Patrick(2016).The Foundation of Indian Law in the United States.Indian Gaming Lawyer,Autumn,8-13.
  48. Wiseman, Joseph, J. n.d. “Judicial Toolkit on Indian Law: An Overview of Key Federal Indian Law Cases.” (http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/Key-FederalIndian-Law-Cases.pdf) (2017/11/ 26)
  49. Witmer, Richard C.,O’Conner, Margaret(2016).Policy Issues in the Self-Determination Era.Indigenous Policy Journal,27(1),1-12.
  50. Zaferatos, Nicholas Christos(1998).Planning the Native American Tribal Community: Understanding the Basis of Power Controlling the Reservation Territory.Journal of the American Planning Association,64(4),395-410.
  51. 夷將‧拔路兒(1994)。臺灣原住民族運動發展路線之初步探討。山海雜誌，4，22-38。
  52. 自由時報。2017。〈原教法上路近 20 年原住民族實驗教育終露曙光〉。（http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1936910）（2017/11/23）
  53. 施正鋒(2012)。原住民族主權與國家主權。臺灣原住民研究論叢，12，1-56。
  54. 施正鋒。2015。〈暗藏玄機的原住民族部落法人化〉。（http://www.peoplenews.tw/news/149828c8-84d9-4a2d-836f-5f4789419710）（2017/10/13）
  55. 原住民族委員會。2016a。〈文化即教育 ‧ 教育即生活原住民族實驗教育開跑 - 邁向原住民族學校〉。（https://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docDetail.html?CID=35AE118732EB6BAF&DID= 0C3331F0EBD318C2BCF46B82E0E94A71）（2017/11/23）
  56. 原住民族委員會。2016b。〈部落公法人組織設置辦法草案總說明〉。（https://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docDetail.html?CID=18ADE0D0D6EE280E&DID=0C3331F0EBD318C2553447310E215AF7）（2017/10/15）
  57. 原住民族委員會。2017b。〈部落核定彙整總表〉。（https://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/ docDetail.html?CID=70BB33E603A72F50&DID=0C3331F0EBD318C27663B7B0AC83ABB6#）（2017/12/13）
  58. 原住民族委員會。2017a。〈106 年 12 月部落公法人組織設置辦法草案（預告版本修正對照表）〉。（https://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docDetail.html?CID=18ADE0D0D6EE280E&DID=0C3331F0EBD318C2553447310E215AF7）（（2018/9/26）
  59. 高德義(2017)。部落公法人化之若干課題與挑戰：以「部落公法人組織設置辦法草案」為例的探討。臺灣原住民研究論叢，20，19-56。
  60. 教育部,原住民族委員會(2018)。教育部、原住民族委員會。2018。〈原住民族教育法修正草案公聽會會議手冊〉，未出版。
  61. 陳坤昇(2017)。原住民族實驗教育—向原住民族教育體系邁進。原教界，77，6-7。
  62. 隋杜卿(2010)。,未出版
print cancel