案例討論提升教學問題解決能力之研究

The Impact of Using Case Studies to Enhance Problem Solving in Teaching

10.6764/JTEPD.201212.0069

沈羿成(Yi-Cheng Shen)；劉佩雲(Pei-Yun Liu)

教學案例 ； 教學問題解決能力 ； 教師專業學習社群 ； teaching cases ； problem-solving teaching skills ； teacher professional learning community

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

5卷2期（2012 / 12 / 01）

69 - 87

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討教師透過數學教學案例討論對教師教學問題解決能力之影響。於國小進行個案研究，蒐集討論前後訪談、教學案例討論的錄影錄音、省思扎記等質性資料進行內容分析。研究結果如下：教學案例討論，提升教師教學問題的界定能力；以問題為核心的教學案例討論模式，有助於提升教師的問題解決能力；在案例討論過程時，分段呈現教學問題解決歷程，有助於教師主動建構專業知識；掌握核心概念的主題式教學案例討論，能促進系統化教學專業能力。研究建議，核心主題教學案例待有系統的建構。其次，案例撰寫不宜過長，以免影響討論品質。最後，參與教師講述式的教學習慣，是否改變為引導式教學，宜進一步做個案研究，了解改變因素。

This study aimed to explore in-service mathematical teachers' problem-solving ability through the discussion of teaching cases. The study was conducted in an elementary school and the data were collected from the interviews before and after the teaching cases, video recordings of the discussion, and the reflective journals were analyzed. The findings are as follows: the discussion of teaching cases enhanced the teachers' ability to define the teaching problems; the discussion model of problem-based teaching cases strengthened the teachers' problem solving ability; the process of segmented case discussion with focused teaching problems helped teachers to actively construct their professional knowledge; and the theme-based teaching cases enabled teachers to grasp the core concepts of each case and reinforced their professional competence of systematic teaching. The study suggested that the core themes of teaching cases be systematically constructed. Secondly, long written case studies should be avoided, so the quality of discussion is not affected. Finally, the expository teaching habits of some participant teachers could change into guided teaching mode so the further case studies are investigated to verify the underlying factors.

1. 林育瑋(2007)。幼教教學案例之建立。人類發展與家庭學報，9，1-25。
   連結：
2. Brown, J. S.,Collins, A.,Duguid, P.(1989).Situated cognition and the culture of Learning.Educational Researcher,18(1),32-42.
3. Carder, W.,Bibb(2001).Case-based, problem-based learning Information Literacy for the real world.Research Strategies,18,181-190.
4. Chen, C. C.,Shang, R. A.,Albert, H.(2006).The efficacy of case method teaching in an online asynchronous learning environment.International Jour nal of Distance Education Technologies,4(2),72-86.
5. Choi, I.,Lee, K.(2008).A case-Base learning environment design for real-world classroom management problem solving.TechTrends,52,26-31.
6. Collins, A.,Brown, J. S.,Newman, S. E.(1989).Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics.Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser,Hillsdale, NJ:
7. Davis, C. K.(2007).Two information technology classroom minicase: Benefit assessments and implementation issues.Journal of Information Systems Education,18(1),15-20.
8. Dyke, C. V.,Poncelet, A.,Tong, L.,Berger, O.(2006).Case-based learning on the web.International Congress Series,1287,269-271.
9. Grouws, A.(Ed.)(1992).Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning.New York, NY:Macmllan.
10. Hsu, S.(2004).Using case discussion on the web to develop student teacher problem solving skills.Teaching and Teacher Education,20(7),681-692.
11. Lave, J.,Wenger, E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
12. Mayer, R. E.(1992).Thinking, problem solving, cognition.New York, NY:W. H., Freeman and Company.
13. Mayer, R. E.(2003).Learning and instruction.New Jersey:Merrill Prentice Hall.
14. McKeachie, W. J.,Pintrich, P. R.,Smith, D. A. F.,Lin, Y. G.,Sharma, R.(1990).Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature.Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan.
15. Rippin, A.,Booth, C.,Bowie, S.,Jordan, J.(2002).A complex case: Using the case study method to explore uncertainty and ambiguity in undergraduate business education.Teaching in Higher Education,7(4),429-441.
16. Schön, D.(1987).Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
17. Shulman, J.(1992).Case method in teacher education.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
18. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Education Review,57(1),1-22.
19. Smith, R. A.(2010).Professor use of case discussion leadership at Harvard and daraen mba programs: Characteristics of a successful case discussion.Academy of Educational leadership Journal,14(2),13-31.
20. Snyder, P.,William, M.(2003).Using case method of instruction effectively in early intervention personnel preparation.Infants and Young Children,16(4),284-295.
21. Tabachnick, B. R.(Ed.),Zeichner, K.(Ed.)(1991).Issues and practices in inquiry-oriented teacher education.New York, NY:The Falmer Press.
22. Wassmermann(1994).Introduction to case method teaching: A guide to the galaxy.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
23. Yadaw, A.,Koehler, M.(2007).The role of epistemological beliefs in preservice teachers' interpretation of video cases of early-grade literacy instruction.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,15(3),335-361.
24. 王金國(2008)。以教學案例進行教師知識管理。教育月刊，168，142-146。
25. 吳英長(2007)。深入教學現場。臺東市:全民。
26. 李勇諭(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北市立師範學院。
27. 李源順(2001)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
28. 沈羿成、劉佩雲(2009)。案例教學法在國小數學教學上的應用。2009 台灣教育研究學術研討會，高雄市:
29. 汪履維(1997)。在師資養成教育中應用「案例法」與「自傳法」的經驗。臺北市:漢文。
30. 林玫君(2005)。案例教學法對在職老師戲劇研習之影響─從言談角度分析。「藝術教育研究回顧與展望研討會」論文集，屏東市:
31. 林碧珍(2001)。發展國小教師之學生數學認知知識─理論結合實務研究取向的教師專業發展。臺北市:師大。
32. 高熏芳(2002)。師資培育─教學案例的發展與應用策略。臺北市:高等教育。
33. 高熏芳、蔡宜君(2001)。案例教學法在師資培育之發展與運用。淡江人文學刊，7，265-305。
34. 張民杰(2001)。案例教學法：理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
35. 張民杰(2004)。案例教學法在「班級經營」課程應用之行動研究。教育研究資訊，12，129-147。
36. 張民杰(2008)。以案例教學法增進實習教師班級經營知能之研究。國民教育研究學報，20，147-176。
37. 陳憶芬(2004)。案例教學法及其在師資培育上之應用。中等教育，55，130-140。

1. 黃銘源,邱世哲,杜瀛岳,李英芬(2015)。案例討論於社區醫療照護團隊教育成效之初探。安寧療護雜誌，20(1)，13-23。
2. 李翠玲(2015)。結合案例教學法與正向行為支持處理智能障礙學生性問題行為之探討。特殊教育發展期刊，60，1-10。
3. (2017)。大陸地區運用社群媒體案例教學促進AAC 專業成長之困境探討。東臺灣特殊教育學報，19，1-20。
4. (2018)。運用社群媒體案例教學對 AAC 專業成長之現況調查－以大陸地區為例。東臺灣特殊教育學報，20，70-107。