我的麻吉實習輔導老師：實習輔導教師教學風格與實習教師學習風格關係之研究

Mentor Match-A Study on the Relationship between the Teaching Style of Practicum Mentor and the Learning Style of Student-Teacher

黃泓霖(Hong-Lin Huang)；劉唯玉(Wei-Yu Liu)

國小教育實習 ； 實習輔導教師 ； 實習教師 ； 教學風格 ； 學習風格 ； elementary practicum ； practicum mentor ； student-teacher ； teaching style ； learning style

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

6卷1期（2013 / 06 / 01）

1 - 24

繁體中文

本研究以Grasha之教學風格與Silver與Hanson之學習風格觀點，立意取樣四組教學與學習風格明顯，且為不同配對組合者為研究對象。以訪談法為主，觀察法為輔，試圖瞭解師徒式教育實習中實習輔導老師教學風格與實習教師學習風格之交互關係及其對師徒關係與實習結果的影響。研究發現，麻吉組合為授權型vs.自我表達型，以及促進型vs.注重人際型。不麻吉組合為授權型vs.注重人際型。研究發現麻吉組之實習教師滿意實習輔導教師之指導方式；實習教師的學習動機與學習表現佳；實習輔導教師滿意實習教師之學習行為與表現，肯定個人指導方式並持續提供指導；師徒關係良好發展順利。不麻吉組之實習教師無法獲得所需之指導方式，師徒關係發展不順利，也影響到實習教師之實習過程與實習結果。

Based on Grasha's teaching style and Silver and Hanson's learning style perspectives, this study aims to understand and explore the interactions between mentor's teaching style and student-teacher's learning styles and their influences on the relationships between mentors and student-teachers and student-teachers' internship learning results. The researchers purposefully sampled four different combinations of practicum mentor and student-teacher for interviews and observations. The result shows that the delegator/self-expressive combination, and the facilitator/interpersonal combination lead to a satisfactory practicum. However, the delegator/interpersonal combination produces poor results, even problems, in terms of all three aspects, namely practicum progress, mentorship, and practicum outcome.

1. Felder, R. M.,Henriques, E. R.(1995).Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education.Foreign Language Annals,28(1),21-31.
2. Felder, R. M.,Silverman, L. K.(1988).Learning and teaching styles in engineering education.Engr. Education,78(7),674-681.
3. Grasha, A. F.(2002).Teaching with styles: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles.Pittsburgh, PA:Alliance.
4. Heimlich, J. E.,Norland, E.(1994).Developing teaching style in adult education.
5. Keefe, J.(Ed.)(1979).Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs.Reston, VA:National.
6. Kolb, A. Y.,Kolb, D. A.(2005).The Kolb learning style inventory - version 3.1 -2005 technical specifications.Boston, MA:Experience Based Learning Systems.
7. Kraska, M.,Harris, S.(2007).Cognitive and teaching style preferences of officers attending the force reserve officer training instructor course.Journal of Industrial Teacher Education,44(1),5-24.
8. Lopus, J.,Hoff, J.(2009).Is there a disconnect between teaching styles and learning styles in high school economics classes?.The Journal of Private Enterprise,24(2),157-164.
9. McCoy, M. R.(2006).Teaching style and the application of adult learning principles by police instructors.Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management,29(1),77-91.
10. McDermott, P. A.,Beitman, B. S.(1984).Standardization of a scale for the study of children's learning styles: Structure, stability, and criterion validity.Psychology in Schools,21,5-14.
11. Naimie, Z.,Siraj, S.,Piaw, C. Y.,Shagholi, R.,Abuzaid, R. A.(2010).Do you think your match is made in heaven? Teaching styles/learning style match and mismatch revisited.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,2,349-353.
12. Orsak, L.(1990).Learning style versus the Rip Van Winkle Syndrome.Educational Leadership,48(2),19-21.
13. Razak, N. A.,Ahmad, F.,Mohd, S. P.(2007).Perceived and preferred teaching styles (methods) of English for specific purposes (esp) students.Journal e-Bangi,2(2),1-20.
14. Rush, L. S.,Blair, S. H.,Chapman, D.,Codner, A.,Pearce, B.(2008).A new look at mentoring proud moments and pitfalls.The Clearing House,81(3),128-132.
15. Schaefer, K. M.,Zygmont, D.(2003).Analyzing the teaching style of nursing faculty: Does it promote a student-centered or a teacher-centered learning environment?.Nursing Education Perspectives,24(5),238-245.
16. Siebert, C. J.,Clark, A.,Kilbridge, A.,Peterson, H.(2006).When preservice teachers struggle or fail: Mentor teachers' perspectives.Education,126(3),409-422.
17. Silvernail, D. L.(1986).Teaching styles as related to student achievement.Washington, DC:National Education Association.
18. Welborn, R. B.(1985).Texas A & M University.
19. 王雅伶、段曉林(2004)。學習風格理論融入國二理化教學之個案研究。科學教育，14，105-124。
20. 田耐青譯、Siver, H. F.、Strong, R.W.、Perini, M. J.(2002)。統整多元智慧與學習風格。臺北市:遠流。
21. 何妤珩(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，國立臺中師範學院。
22. 李翠萍(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺東市，國立臺東大學。
23. 周水珍(1998)。國民小學實習輔導之研究─以花蓮縣宜蘭縣為例。臺北市:師大書苑。
24. 林生傳(1988)。新教學理論與策略。臺北市:五南。
25. 翁榮源、陳定威、呂榮順(2009)。Herrmann 學習風格理論對大學生有機化學學習成就之研究。科學教育月刊，318，31-47。
26. 張景媛(1988)。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證。教育心理學報，21，113-172。
27. 張德銳(1998)。師資培育與教育革新研究。臺北市:五南。
28. 陳嘉彌(2003)。師徒式教育實習之理論與實踐。臺北市:心理。
29. 陳獻旗(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，逢甲大學。
30. 傅聖國、張英傑(2003)。師徒制輔導數學教學之個案研究。中華民國第十九屆科學教育學術研討會論文集，臺北市:
31. 黃洲(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學。

1. 陳姿螢(2018)。學生對於數學教師教學看法與數學焦慮之關聯性－以PISA 2012 臺灣學生為例。教育學誌，39，55-85。
2. 蕭佳純,邱憲義(2019)。高中教師教學風格與教學效能之相關研究－以教師專業發展為中介變項、學校組織文化為調節變項。當代教育研究季刊，27(1)，39-78。
3. 周水珍,方舟(2023)。教學實習課程協同師徒制師資生專業成長之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，16(1)，1-27。
4. (2019)。高級中等學校教師組織公民行為對學生自主學習影響之研究：以教師教學風格為中介變項。中正教育研究，18(1)，89-128。