教師教學過程中心流體驗之研究

The Study on the Flow Experience of the Teacher While in Teaching

10.3966/207136492015080802003

方淑儀(Shu-I Fang)

心流體驗 ； 教師教學 ； flow experience ； teaching

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

8卷2期（2015 / 08 / 01）

41 - 68

繁體中文

本研究以Csikszentmihalyi 所提出的心流體驗為要，探究教師教學過程中心流體驗之感受經歷、影響教師心流體驗要素與心流體驗對於教師教學上之助益，並對6 位教師進行深度訪談，期望對教師教學過程中心流體驗之感受有深入之瞭解。本研究歸出並非每一位教師於課堂教學時皆能深刻感受到心流體驗；班級學生秩序常規影響教師心流體驗之感受；校長巡堂通常被視為一種干擾，不利教師心流體驗之發展；友善且資源充足之工作環境有助於教師感受心流體驗；心流體驗有助於教師教學品質之提昇；教師心流體驗與學生的投入程度互為因果等結論。此外，亦針對結論提出建議如下，建議校方主動提供設計良好的諮詢和引導計畫，以利教師提昇教學技巧與班級經營效能，協助教師克服挑戰，有助於班級秩序常規之建立；教師可多運用溝通技巧與學生建立良好的師生關係，以利課堂教學之進行與互動，有益心流體驗之產生；校方可採用「學習共同體」方式瞭解教師教學狀況，真正落實關注學生的學習力，而非只是走動式巡察，以減少校長巡堂所予教師之壓力；學校應多創造友善之工作氛圍，並傾聽教師之需求等建議。

The thesis is based on the concept of the flow experience in order to explore the teachers’ flow experiences while teaching students. Six interviewees were interviewed in this study to analyze the flow experiences of the teachers. The outcome of this study can be divided into six parts. Firstly, not every teacher could perceive the flow experience when they were teaching. Secondly, the performance of the students influenced the teachers’ flow experiences deeply. Thirdly, teaches were usually under pressure and felt interrupted because of the classroom visit from the principle. Fourthly, teachers could get the flow experiences more easily while working in the friendly and supporting surroundings. Fifthly, the flow experience could promote the quality of the teaching. Sixth, teachers could gain the flow experiences when students concentrated on the course. The conclusion reviews the research findings and offers related suggestions.

1. 林育則、夏康寧(2011)。奢侈性之炫耀性、涉入程度與心流體驗對消費者購買意願之影響—以高價盆栽為例。企業管理學報，89，57-80。
   連結：
2. 徐世同、張景弘、高俊雄(2012)。泳渡參賽者心流體驗與運動賽會贊助態度。臺灣體育運動管理學報，12(4)，343-363。
   連結：
3. 楊純青、陳祥(2003)。「神馳理論」之內涵與相關議題之介紹。課程與教學季刊，6(4)，151-174。
   連結：
4. 劉明德(2005)。中小學校長教學領導核心技術關鍵之探討。學校行政雙月刊，38，65-75。
   連結：
5. 盧姿麟、廖柏森(2012)。學習口譯的焦慮與心流體驗。編譯論叢，5(2)，83-115。
   連結：
6. Augustine, S. M.,Zoss, M.(2006).Aesthetic flow experience in the teaching of preservice language arts teachers.English Education,39(1),72-93.
7. Aydin, A.,Sarier, Y.,Uysal, S.(2013).The effect of school principals' leadership styles on teachers' organization commitment and job satisfaction.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice,13(2),806-811.
8. Basom, M. R.,Frase, L.(2004).Creating optimal work environment: Exploring teacher flow experience.Mentoring and Tutoring Partnership in Learning,12(2),241-258.
9. Bassi, M.,Fave, A. D.(2012).Optimal experience among teachers: New insight into the work paradox.The Journal of Psychology,146(5),533-557.
10. Bruya, B.(Ed.)(2010).Effortless Attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
11. Cassie, V. K.(2008).Teaching strategies for beginner orchestra class: Integrating seating arrangement and flow experience.Canadian Music Educator,49(4),50-51.
12. Cesarone, B.(2006).ECAP Report: Elementary education in the inner city.Childhood Education,82(5),312-314.
13. Coleman, L. J.(2014).Being a teacher: Emotions and optimal experience while teaching gifted children.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,37(1),56-69.
14. Cothran, D.,Ennis, C.(2000).Building bridges to student engagement: Communicating respect and care for students in urban high school.Journal of Research and Development in Education,33,106-117.
15. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996).Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention.New York, NY:Harper Collins.
16. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1990).Flow: The psychology of optimal experience.New York, NY:Harper & Row.
17. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2003).Good business: Leadership, flow, and the making of meaning.New York, NY:Penguin.
18. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(2000).Happiness, flow, and economic equality.American Psychologist,55(10),1163-1164.
19. Csikszentmihalyi, M.,LeFevre, J.(1989).Optimal experience in work and leisure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,56(5),815-822.
20. Day, C.、Leithwood, K.、謝傳崇譯(2009)。變革時代卓越的校長領導—國際觀點。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological publishing。
21. Elliot, A. J.(Ed.),Dweck, C. S.(Ed.)(2005).Handbook of competence and motivation.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
22. Ghani, A. J.,Deshpande, P. S.(1994).Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction.The Journal of Psychology,128(4),381-391.
23. Hadjithoma-Garsta, C.(2011).The role of the principal's leadership style in the implementation of ICT policy: Principal's leadership style and ICT implementation.British Journal of Educational Technology,42(2),311-326.
24. Havitz, M. E.,Mannell, R. C.(2005).Enduring involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities.Journal of Leisure Research,37(2),152-177.
25. Jackson, S. A.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1999).Flow in sports.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
26. Peifer, C.,Schulz, A.,Schächinger, H.,Baumann, N.,Antoni, C. H.(2014).The relation of flow-experience and physiological arousal under.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,53,62-69.
27. Snyder, C. R.(Ed.),Lopez, S. J.(Ed.)(2002).Handbook of Positive Psychology.Lodon, UK:Oxford University Press.
28. Weimar, D.(2005).Stress and flow-experience: An empirical investigation of the meaning of cognitions emotions and motivation in teachers and teachers-in-training.Berlin, Germany:Logos.
29. 王震宇(1996)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣大學=National Taiwan University。
30. 吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
31. 唐乾玲、湯幸芬(2014)。探討休閒動機與心流體驗之關係－以路跑愛好者為例。2014旅遊與健康學術研討會論文集，214，2014，70-82。
32. 詹志禹(2014)。如何做一個無怨尤的老師。親子天下，56，130-132。
33. 趙廣林(1996)。屏東縣=Pingtung, Taiwan，屏東師範學院=National Pingtung Normal University。
34. 鄭政宗(2011)。影響志願服務者心流體驗因素之研究—以臺中縣立港區藝術中心為例。朝陽管理評論，10(1)，1-19。
35. 謝建成(2001)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北師範學院=National Taipei Normal University。

1. 陳思帆,連廷嘉,邱雅玲(2019)。國中教師心流經驗及慢性疲勞症候群之調查研究。輔導季刊，55(4)，1-14。
2. 陳思帆,苗潔聆(2020)。心流經驗應用於國小教師情緒支持團體之方案設計。諮商與輔導，416，13-15+50+16。