臺灣與中國大陸國小教師專業發展政策與實施現況之分析研究

An Analysis Study on Professional Development Policy and Implementation Status of Elementary School Teachers in Taiwan and Mainland China

10.3966/207136492015120803003

劉鎮寧(Jen-Ning Liou)；吳子宏(Zai-Hong Wu)；邱世杰(Shi-Jie Qiu)

小學教師 ； 專業發展 ； 比較教育 ； elementary school teacher ； professional development ； comparative education

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

8卷3期（2015 / 12 / 01）

53 - 75

繁體中文

本研究針對臺灣與中國大陸小學教師專業發展的政策法規和實施現況進行探究，主要透過文件分析、焦點團體等研究方法的運用，並以高雄市和廣州市的國小教育人員為研究的主要對象，以期回應本研究的三個問題。首先，在專業發展政策法規上，本研究針對二者異同進行討論，分別歸納出四點相同與相異之處。其次，在教師專業發展課程規劃方面，高雄市含括政策落實與學校自主二種類型；廣州市則是較偏向學校特色的發展。再次，在參與專業發展感受情形上，高雄市國小教師覺得可對專業發展課程進行選擇和決定，也認為專業學習社群的規劃能貼近教師的實際需求，至於對校內所辦理的進修課程，教師認為形式主義大於實質的效益。廣州市的國小教師則是覺得因為分級制度，使得國小教師對研習課程有實際需求的必要，而且政府部門和學校相當重視在教學現場對教師的督導。最後綜合結論和建議以供當局參考。

This study investigated the professional development policy and implementation status of elementary school teachers in Taiwan and Mainland China. The subjects were elementary school teachers in Kaohsiung City and Guangzhou City. The research methods included document analysis and focus group, in order to answer the three research questions. First, regarding the laws and regulations of professional development policy, this study compared the similarities and differences between the two sides and respectively concluded four aspects of similarities and differences. Second, in regard to curriculum planning of teachers’ professional development, Kaohsiung City gives considerations to both policy implementation and school autonomy, while Guangzhou City pays more attention to the development of significant features of schools. Third, regarding the perceptions of teachers participating in professional development, the elementary school teachers in Kaohsiung City think that they are allowed to select and determine the curriculum of professional development. They also think that the learning activities planned by the professional learning communities meet their practical needs, while the professional development courses provided on campus tend to put more emphasis on obeying formal rules than bringing about actual benefits. On the other hand, in the opinion of elementary school teachers in Guangzhou City, rating system makes it necessary that elementary school teachers have the actual demand for learning from the professional development courses. Moreover, they are conscious that government sectors and schools pay close attention to monitoring and supervising teachers in classroom settings. Finally, this study draws conclusions and offers some suggestions that may serve as references for the governing authorities.

1. 教師法（1995 年，8 月9 日）。[Teachers' Act (1995, August 9).]
2. 教師請假規則（2006 年，5 月8 日）。[Regulations of Leave-taking for Teachers (1999, May 8).]
3. 師資培育素質提升方案（2006 年2 月23日）。[Programs on Teachers Training and Quality Enhancement (2006, February 23).]。
4. 中國教育部（2004c）。中小學教師教育技術能力標準（試行）。北京市，中國：作者。[Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (2004c). Educational technology competency standards for elementary and secondary teachers (trial regulation). Beijing, China: Author.]
5. 中國教育部（2004b）。關於加速推進全國教師教育網絡聯盟計畫組織開發新一輪中小學教師全員培訓的意見。北京市，中國：作者。[Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (2004b). Opinions on accelerating the plan for national teacher education network alliance to organize and develop the new round of training for all elementary and secondary school teachers. Beijing, China: Author.]。
6. 中國教育部（1995）。中華人民共和國教育法。取自http://www.flssw.com/fagui/info/1587070/ [Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (1995). Education law of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved from http://www.flssw.com/fagui/ info/1587070/]
7. 中小學教師素質提升方案（2009 年7 月17日）。[Programs on Quality Enhancement for teachers of Elementary and Secondary Schools (2009, July 17).]。
8. 教育基本法（1999 年，6 月23 日）。[Educational Fundamental Act (1999, June 23).]
9. 中國教育部（1985）。小學教師職務試行條例。取自http://www.flssw.com/fagui/info/4001689/ [Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (1985). The trial regulation of teacher's position in elementary. Retrieved from http://www.flssw.com/fagui/info/4001689/]
10. 高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師在職進修辦法（1996 年，10 月2 日）。[The approach to In-service Teacher Training of High School, Secondary School, Elementary School and Kindergarten (1996, October 2).]
11. 教師進修研究獎勵辦法（1996 年，10 月9日）。[Regulations Governing the Rewards of Teacher Professional Development and Research (1996, October 9).]
12. 中國教育部（1999）。中小學教師繼續教育規定。取自http://www.moe.edu.cn/edoas/website18/level3.jsp?tablename=1377&infoid=15483 [Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (1999). Provisions on teachers continuing education of elementary and secondary school. Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.cn/edoas/website18/level3.jsp?tablename=1377&infoid=15483]
13. 中國教育部（2010）。2010 年中小學教師國家級培訓計畫－示範性專案實施方案。取自 http://www.flssw.com/fagui/info/14655477/ [Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (2010). 2010 National training program for elementary and secondary teachers - exemplary case of implementation scheme. Retrieved from http://www.flssw.com/fagui/info/14655477/]
14. 中華民國教師在職進修統計年報（2011年，9月）。[Yearbook of In-service Teacher Education Statistics of the Republic of China (2011, September).]
15. 全國教師在職進修資訊網（2011）。學校本位暨教師自我專業進修研習規劃服務操作說明手冊。取自http://teacher.inservice.edu.tw/103/ [National Teacher Online In-Service Training (2011). Instruction Manual on Planning Service for School-based Teachers' Continuing Professional Development and Study. Retrieved from http://teacher.inservice.edu.tw/103/]
16. 中國教育部（2004a）。關於進一步加強基礎教育新課程師資培訓工作的指導意見。取自http://jsjy.e21.cn/article.php?id=117 [Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (2004a). Guidance on further strengthening teacher training for the new curriculum of basic education. Retrieved from http://jsjy.e21.cn/article.php?id=117]
17. 中國國務院（2012a）。關於加強教師隊伍建設的意見。取自http://www.xjjz.cn/show.aspx?id=1512&cid=79 [State Council of the People's Republic of China (2012a). Opinions on strengthening the construction of teachers' team. Retrieved from http://www.xjjz.cn/show. aspx?id=1512&cid=79]
18. (2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書。
19. 中國教育部（2012b）。小學教師專業標準（試行）。取自http://big5.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-09/14/content_2224534.htm [Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (2012b). Professional standards of primary school teachers (Trial regulation). Retrieved from http://big5.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-09/14/content_2224534.htm]
20. 中國教育部（1983）。關於加強小學在職教師進修工作的意見。取自http://www.docin.com/p-197043365.html [Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (1983). Opinions on intensifying the in-service teacher education in elementary schools. Retrieved from http://www.docin.com/p-197043365.html]
21. 師資培育法（1994 年，2 月7 日）。[Teacher Education Act (1994, February 7).]
22. 中國教育部（1993）。中華人民共和國教師法。取自http://www.flssw.com/fagui/info/1587517/ [Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (1983). Teachers law of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved from http://www.flssw.com/fagui/ info/1587517/]
23. 國民小學教師專業表現指標及專業表現水準（2012 年，10 月22 日）。[The Professional Performance Indicator and Professional Performance Level for National Elementary School Teachers (2012, October 22).]
24. Blandford, S.(2000).Managing professional development in schools.New York, NY:Routledge.
25. Dipaola, M. F.,Hoy, W. K.(2008).Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development.Boston, MA:A&B/Pearson.
26. Gabriel, D. M.(2004).Teacher-centered professional development.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
27. Nicholls, G.(2001).Professional development in higher education: New dimensions & directions.London, UK:Kogan.
28. Tiemann, S.(2004).Innovative and individualized teacher professional development.Houston, TX:Houston University Press.
29. 吳文鳳、曾健萍(2010)。建國以來我國中小學教師繼續教育的歷史反思。湘潮（下半月），2010(6)
30. 呂錘卿(1999)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立高雄師範大學=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
31. 李更生(2013)。《專業標準》視域下教師培訓的變革與創新－以浙江省為例。教育發展研究，8，13-18。
32. 洪詠善、盧秋珍(2013)。中國大陸校本教研制度與教師專業發展之現況與特色。新北市教育，6，18-24。
33. 高熏芳(2004)。師資培育評鑑的反省：一些尚待探討的實務與研究議題。教育資料集刊，29，359-380。
34. 張純(2012)。武漢市，中國=Wuhan, China，華中師範大學=Central China Normal University。
35. 陳木金、邱馨儀、陳宏彰(2005)。從教師專業發展模組談教師進修研習系統建構。教師專業發展與規劃學術研討會，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:

1. 陳正專(2016)。偏鄉小學推展健體領域教師專業學習社群阻礙因素及運作策略探析。中原體育學報，9，25-35。
2. 謝紫菱(2019)。組織支持、有效專業發展活動、專業發展正向影響與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。清華教育學報，36(2)，91-122。
3. 張志瑋(2022)。大陸教師職級制度對台灣中小學教師專業發展之啟示。學校行政，139，72-93。
4. (2019)。臺北市與亞洲三國 TALIS 教師專業發展之比較研究。中正教育研究，18(2)，1-41。
5. (2021)。臺北市優質學校之個案研究：以專業發展為例。教育研究月刊，332，4-21。