题名

國小學生字母朗讀流暢度電腦化測驗之編製與發展

并列篇名

Developing a Computer-Based English Letter Naming Fluency Test for Primary School Students in Taiwan

DOI

10.3966/207136492016040901003

作者

劉佩雲(Pei-Yun Liu)；吳玉珍(Yuh-Jen Wu)

关键词

字母朗讀流暢度 ； 正確率 ； 電腦化測驗 ； letter naming fluency ； accuracy ； computer-based test

期刊名称

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

卷期/出版年月

9卷1期（2016 / 04 / 01）

页次

53 - 82

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

字母知識是英語閱讀啟蒙教學的重要基礎能力之一，若未能及早具備精熟的字母辨識能力，後續在英語聽說讀寫的發展都會受到影響。為評估國小學童朗讀字母之正確率及流暢度，本研究旨在編製與發展國小學生英文字母朗讀流暢度電腦化測驗（Computer-based Letter Naming Fluency, C-LNF），並探討以C-LNF 作為臺灣學童早期英語閱讀能力發展篩檢工具的可行性。本研究以234 位國小一、二、三年級初學英語之學童為樣本，於第一年學習期末時進行電腦化及紙本版之LNF 測驗。研究發現，C-LNF 測驗信效度俱佳，其中信度方面，內部一致性Cronbach’s α 係數為.98、折半信度為.98、三週後重測信度在正確率為.87，流暢度為.91，評分者一致性度為.99。效度部分採效標關聯效度，以DIBELS（Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills）紙本版LNF 測驗為效標，參與者同時接受兩種版本施測，電腦化與紙本版之LNF 的相關在流暢度為.96，在正確率為.84，均達0.01 顯著水準，顯示C-LNF 具有良好的信度與效度，可作為檢測國小學童字母朗讀能力之工具。本研究並依此工具取得初學英語學童第一年結束時應達到之英文字母朗讀數及切截點等參考數據，能提供英語教育工作者評估學童字母學習表現的有用參考。
英文摘要

One of the most fundamental skills in early English reading is the alphabet knowledge. Without mastering the alphabets, further development in English listening, speaking, reading, and writing will be obstructed. The current study aims to develop a computer-based letter naming fluency (C-LNF) measurement to assess novice English learners’ ability in letter recognition and examined the applicability of C-LNF as a screening tool for early English literacy. The sample was 234 first-year English learners from Taiwan that include first-, second-, and third-graders. Their letter-naming ability were assessed twice at the end of first-year English learning in schools, one with computer-based tool and the other with paper-based measurement. C-LNF test exhibited acceptable reliability, with Cronbach’s α .98, split-half reliability .98, three-week test-retest reliability .87 for accuracy and .91 for fluency, and the inter-rater reliability .99. The criterion validity with paper-based DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills) LNF test was .96 for fluency and .84 for accuracy, p＜0.01. The results indicated that C-LNF is a qualified tool with proper technical adequacy that can be applied to assess letter naming ability in primary school students. Suggested letter naming fluency benchmark and cutoff points for students after one year of English learning were provided based on C-LNF which could serve as a valuable reference for English educators when evaluating students’ performance in letter acquisition.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王梅軒、黃瑞珍(2005)。國小課程本位悅讀測量方法之信度與效度研究。殊教育研究學刊，29，73-94。
    連結：
  2. 吳玉珍、劉佩雲(2014)。課程本位閱讀測量之研究現況與發展趨勢。師資培育與師專業發展期刊，7(2)，149-174。
    連結：
  3. 林素貞(2004)。國小一年級國語文課程本位測量不同版本朗讀測驗之比較研究。特殊教育學報，20，1-24。
    連結：
  4. 曹純瓊、郝佳華(2010)。國小學童學前英語學習經驗對其學習動機與學業成就之影響。教育實踐與研究，23(2)，95-124。
    連結：
  5. 曾世杰、邱上真、林彥同(2003)。幼稚園至國小三年級學童各類唸名速度能力之研究。師大學報：教育類，48(2)，261-290。
    連結：
  6. 教育部（2008）。97 年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市：教育部。取自http://www.k12ea.gov.tw/ap/sid17_ law.aspx [Ministry of Education. (2008). Grades 1-9 curriculum guidelines in primary and secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.k12ea.gov.tw/ap/sid17_ law.aspx.]
  7. 兒童福利聯盟文教基金會（2013）。2013 臺灣偏鄉弱勢學童學習貧窮分析報告。取自http://www.children.org.tw/news/advocacy_detail/974 [Child Welfare League Foundation. (2013). Analytical report on studying under poverty of the disadvantaged schoolchildren in rural areas, year 2013. Retrieved from http://www.children.org.tw/news/advocacy_detail/974.]
  8. 教育部（2003）。92 年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市：教育部。取自http://www.k12ea.gov.tw/ap/sid17_92law.aspx。[Ministry of Education. (2003). Grades 1-9 curriculum guidelines in primary and secondary schools. Retrieved from http://wwwk12ea.gov.tw/ap/sid17_92law.aspx.]
  9. Intervention Central (2014). Letter Name Fluency Generator. Retrieved from http://www.interventioncentral.org/teacher-resources/letter-namefluency-generator.
  10. 教育部（2013）。國民中小學學生人數查詢。臺北市：教育部。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=NgA4AA2 [Ministry of Education. (2013). The inquiry about the number of the students in primary and secondary in Taiwan Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.twqframe.aspx?qno=NgA4AA2.]
  11. Ardoin, S. P.,Christ, T. J.,Morena, L. S.,Crormier, D. C.,Klingbeil, D. A.(2013).A systematic review and summarization of the recommendations and research surrounding curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) decision rules.Journal of School Psychology,51(1),1-18.
  12. Bogacz, R.,Hu, P. T.,Holmes, P. J.,Cohen, J. D.(2010).Do humans produce the speed-accuracy trade-off that maximizes reward rate?.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,63(5),863-891.
  13. Bracken, B. A.,Crawford, C.(2010).Basic concepts in early childhood educational standards: a 50 state review.Early Childhood Education Journal,37(5),421-430.
  14. Bugbee, A. C., Jr.(1996).The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing.Journal of Research on Computing In Education,28(3),282-299.
  15. Burke, M. D.,Hagan-Burke, S.,Kwok, O.,Parker, R.(2009).Predictive validity of early literacy indicators from the middle of kindergarten to second grade.The Journal of Special Education,42(4),209-226.
  16. Catts, H. W.,Fey, M. E.,Zhang, X.,Tomblin, J. B.(2001).Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,32(1),38-50.
  17. Chall, J. S.(1983).Stages of Reading Development.Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt-Brace.
  18. Chua, Y. P.,Don, Z. M.(2013).Effects of computer-based educational achievement test on test performance and test takers' motivation.Computers in Human Behavior,29(5),1889-1895.
  19. Deno, S. L.(1992).The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement.Preventing School Failure,36(2),5-10.
  20. Deno, S. L.(1985).Curriculum-based measurement: the emerging alternative.Exceptional Children,52(3),219-232.
  21. Deno, S. L.(2003).Developments in curriculum-based measurement.The Journal of Special Education,37(3),184-192.
  22. Deno, S. L.,Fuchs, L. S.(1987).Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving.Focus on Exceptional Children,19(8),1-6.
  23. Deno, S. L.,Mirkin, P. K.,Chiang, B.(1982).Identifying valid measures of reading.Exceptional Children,49,36-45.
  24. Foulin, J. N.(2005).Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read?.Reading and Writing,18(2),129-155.
  25. Fuchs, L. S.,Fuchs, D.(1992).Identifying a measure for monitor ing student reading progress.School Psychology Review,21(1),45-58.
  26. Good, R. H.(Ed.),Kaminski, R. A.(Ed.)(2002).Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills.Eugene, OR:Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
  27. Good, R. H.,Kaminski, R. A.,Shinn, M.,Bratten, J.,Shinn, M.,Laimon, D.,Smith, S.,Flindt, N.(2004).,Eugene, OR:University of Oregon.
  28. Good, R. H.,Simmons, D. C.,Kame'enui, E. J.(2001).The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for thirdgrade high-stakes outcomes.Scientific Studies of Reading,5(3),257-288.
  29. Graden, J.(Ed.),Zins, J.(Ed.),Curtis, M.(Ed.)(1988).Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students.Washington, DC:National Association of School Psychology.
  30. Hammill, D. D.(2004).What we know about correlates of reading.Exceptional Children,70(4),453-468.
  31. Hasbrouck, J. E.,Tindal, G.(2006).Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers.The Reading Teacher,59(7),636-644.
  32. Hasbrouck, J. E.,Tindal, G.(1992).Curriculum-Based Oral Reading Fluency Norms for Students in Grades 2 Through 5.Teaching Exceptional Children,24,41-44.
  33. Howe, A. E.,Arnell, K. M.,Klein, R. M.,Joanisse, M. F.,Tannock, R.(2006).The ABCs of computerized naming: Equivalency, reliability, and predictive validity of a computerized rapid automatized naming (RAN) task.Journal of Neuroscience Methods,151(1),30-37.
  34. Juel, C.(1988).Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(4),437-447.
  35. Juul, H.,Poulsen, M.,Elbro, C.(2014).Separating speed from accuracy in beginning reading development.Journal of Educational Psychology,106(4),1096 -1106.
  36. Kame'enui, E. J.,Simmons, D. C.(2001).Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of reading fluency.Scientific Studies of Reading,5(3),203-210.
  37. Kaminski, R. A.,Good, R. H.(1996).Toward a technology for accessing basic early literacy skills.School Psychology Review,25(2),215-227.
  38. Kirby, J. R.,Georgiou, G. K.,Martinussen, R.,Parrila, R.,Bowers, P.,Landerl, K.(2010).Naming speed and reading: From prediction to instruction.Reading Research Quarterly,45(3),341-362.
  39. LaBerge, D.,Samuesl, S. J.(1974).Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology,6,293-323.
  40. Lenneberg, E. H.(1969).On explaining language.Science,164(3880),635-643.
  41. Liao, C. H.,Kuo, B. C.(2011).A web-based assessment for phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming (RAN) and learning to read Chinese.The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,10(2),31-42.
  42. McBride-Chang, C.(1999).The ABCs of the ABCs: The development of letter-name and letter-sound knowledge.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,45(2),285-308.
  43. Metsala, J. L.(Ed.),Ehri, L. C.(Ed.)(1998).Word recognition in beginning literacy.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
  44. National Early Literacy Panel(2008).Developing early literacy.Washington, DC:National Institute for Literacy.
  45. National Reading Panel=NRP(2000).Teaching children to read: Anevidence-based assessment of the research literature on scientific reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups.Bethesda, MD:National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
  46. Oakhill, J.(ed.),Beard, R.(ed.)(1999).Reading development and the teaching of reading - A psychological perspective.Oxford:Blackwell.
  47. Olson, R. K.,Wise, B.,Ring, J.,Johnson, M.(1997).Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological decoding: Effects on the posttraining development of word recognition.Scientific Studies of Reading,1(3),235-253.
  48. Piasta, S. B.,Petscher, Y.,Justice, L. M.(2012).How many letters should preschoolers in public programs know? The diagnostic efficiency of various preschool letter-naming benchmarks for predicting first-grade literacy achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,104(4),945-958.
  49. Piasta, S. B.,Wagner, R. K.(2010).Developing emergent literacy skills: A meta-analysis of alphabet learning and instruction.Reading Research Quarterly,45(1),8-38.
  50. Ritchey, K. D.,Speece, D. L.(2006).From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency.Contemporary Educational Psychology,31(3),301-327.
  51. Schatschneider, C.,Fletcher, J. M.,Francis, D. J.,Carlson, C. D.,Foorman, B. R.(2004).Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,96(2),265-282.
  52. Schatschneider, C.,Torgesen, J. K.(2004).Using our current understanding of dyslexia to support early identification and intervention.Journal of Child Neurology,19(10),759-765.
  53. Shapiro, B. K.(Ed.),Accardo, P. J.(Ed.),Capute, A. J.(Ed.)(1998).Specific reading disability: A review of the spectrum.Timonium, MD:York Press.
  54. Shinn(Ed.)(1989).Curriculum-Based measurement: Accessing special children.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
  55. Shinn, M. R.(1989).Curriculum-Based measurement: Accessing special children.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
  56. Shinn, M. R.(1998).Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
  57. Snowling, M. J.,Gallagher, A.,Frith, U.(2003).Family risk of dyslexia Is Continuous: Individual differences in the precursors of reading skill.Child Development,74(2),358-373.
  58. Speece, D. L.,Mills, C.,Ritchey, K. D.,Hillman, E.(2003).Initial evidence that letter fluency tasks are valid indicators of early reading skill.The Journal of Special Education,36(4),223-233.
  59. Stage, S. A.,Sheppard, J.,Davidson, M. M.,Browning, M. M.(2001).Prediction of first-graders' growth in oral reading fluency using kindergarten letter fluency.Journal of School Psychology,39(3),225-237.
  60. Stanovich, K. E.(1986).Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly,21(4),360-407.
  61. Stanovich, K. E.,Feeman, D. J.,Cunnignham, E.(1983).The development of the relation between letter-naming speed and reading ability.Bulletin of Psychonomic Society,21(3),199-202.
  62. Stecker, P. M.,Fuchs, L. S.,Fuchs, D.(2005).Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of Research.Psychology in the Schools,42(8),795-819.
  63. Storch, S. A.,Whitehurst, G. J.(2002).Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model.Developmental Psychology,38(6),934-947.
  64. Torgesen, J. K.(2002).The prevention of reading difficulties.Journal of School Psychology,40(1),7-26.
  65. Torppa, M.,Poikkeus, A. M.,Laakso, M. L.,Eklund, K.,Lyytinen, H.(2006).Predicting delayed letter knowledge development and its relation to Grade 1 reading achievement among children with and without familial risk for dyslexia.Developmental Psychology,42(6),1128-1142.
  66. Walsh, D. J.,Price, G. G.,Gillingham, M. G.(1988).The critical but transitory importance of letter naming.Reading Research Quarterly,23(8),108-122.
  67. Wang, S.,Jiao, H.,Young, M. J.,Brooks, T.,Olson, J.(2008).Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K-12 reading assessments: A meta-analysis of test ing mode effects.Educational and Psychological Measurement,68(1),5-24.
  68. Whitehurst, G. J.,Lonigan, C. J.(1998).Child development and emergent literacy.Child Development,69(3),848-872.
  69. Wolf, M.(1991).Naming speed and reading: The contribut ion of the cognitive neurosciences.Reading Research Quarterly,26(2),123-141.
  70. Wolf, M.,Bowers, P. G.,Biddle, A.(2000).Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review.Journal of Learning Disability,33(4),387-407.
  71. 王麗雲(2014)。基本能力的雙峰現象及因應建議。教育人力與專業發展，31(1)，1-4。
  72. 行政院內政部(2013)。中華民國103 年內政綱要。
  73. 何榮桂(1990)。電腦輔助教學系統中之測驗設計。中等教育，41(2)，29-34。
  74. 吳明隆、張毓仁、曾世杰、柯華葳、林素貞(2013)。國小低年級學童中文朗讀流暢能力的發展軌跡分析。臺東大學教育學報，24(2)，33-65。
  75. 宋曜廷、邱佳民、張恬熒、曾芬蘭(2011)。以國中基本學力測驗成績探討學習成就落差。教育政策論壇，14(1)，85-117。
  76. 李怡穎、李雨蓁、高郡韓(2011)。地方政府層級課程決定之研究─以新竹市國小語文學習領域（英文科）為例。教育人力與專業發展，28(4)，89-97。
  77. 李家同(2004)。為什麼英語會有雙峰現象？。英語教育電子月刊，74
  78. 林素貞(2005)。國小低年級國語文課程本位測量編製報告。特殊教育研究學刊，28，75-96。
  79. 邱毓雯(2007)。國小英語教學問題之探討。教育人力與專業發展，24，135-140。
  80. 柯華葳編(2010)。中文閱讀障礙。臺北市=Taipei:心理=Psychological Publishing。
  81. 張武昌(2006)。臺灣的英語教育：現況與省思。教育資料與研究，69，129-144。
  82. 張武昌、陳秋蘭、程玉秀、葉錫南、陳浩然、許月貴、林至誠(2012)。國家教育研究院專題研究計劃成果報告國家教育研究院專題研究計劃成果報告,國家教育研究院=National Academy for Educational Research。
  83. 張毓仁、邱皓政、柯華葳、曾世杰、林素貞(2011)。聲韻覺識、唸名速度和流暢度對中文閱讀理解的影響：結構方程模式與增益效度之探究。教育與心理研究，34(1)，1-28。
  84. 陳超明(2012)。改變80% 與20% 英語學習規則。English Career，38，43-45。
  85. 陳新豐(2005)。傳統紙筆測驗與線上電腦化測驗試題參數估計差異之比較。教育研究與發展期刊，1(3)，123-146。
  86. 曾世杰(2004)。聲韻覺識、唸名速度與中文閱讀障礙。臺北市=Taipei:心理=Psychological Publishing。
  87. 楊秀文、蘇宜芬(2012)。中文讀寫能力低落兒童唸名速度、聲韻處理及處理速度困難之研究。教育研究學報，46(2)，23-44。
  88. 葉靖雲(1993)。課程本位閱讀測驗的效度研究。特殊教育學報，8，273-323。
  89. 葉靖雲(1994)。課程本位、英文閱讀英文書寫表達測驗之效度研究。特殊教育學報，9，257-287。
  90. 葉靖雲(1998)。課程本位閱讀測驗的效度研究。特殊教育與復健學報，6，239-260。
  91. 詹餘靜(2004)。教師、教學、評量與教材─九年一貫課程國小英語教學探究。國立臺北師範學院學報，17(1)，167-196。
  92. 廖革為(2010)。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan，國立臺中教育大學=National Taichung University of Education。
  93. 蔡佩孜、廖晨惠(2010)。國小四年級學童唸名速度在中文閱讀歷程之相關研究。國立臺中教育大學特殊教育學系特殊教育與輔助科技學報，99(2)，118-139。
  94. 戴維揚(2002)。評析／規畫九年一貫國民中小學英語文教材。中等教育，53(3)，24-43。
被引用次数
  1. 呂育甄,王瓊珠(2023)。國小識字障礙學生聲韻覺識、唸名速度與中英文識字之相關研究。特殊教育學報，57，1-36。
print cancel