以MAIT網路促進科學教師探究教學能力之專業成長

Facilitating Science Teachers' Professional Development in Inquiry-Based Teaching using the MAIT Website

10.3966/207136492017041001005

余忠潔(Chung-Chieh Yu)；段曉林(Hsiao-Lin Tuan)

數位網站 ； 探究教學 ； 概念改變 ； 自我效能 ； 教師專業成長 ； Learning website ； inquiry teaching ； conceptual change ； self-efficacy ； teacher professional development

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

10卷1期（2017 / 04 / 01）

105 - 133

繁體中文

世界近年科學教育改革的趨勢是要學生探究科學，教師需具備科學探究與探究教學的知識與信念，才能進行這種以開放式為主的教學方式。本研究的目的利用網路，引用概念改變與促進教師自我效能的策略來建立MAIT網站學習情境，期望有效促進教師探究教學概念。研究中探討教師探究教學概念在網站學習的發展，並討論教師的探究教學概念與在課室的教學實務之間的相關。本研究分二階段進行，第一階段有25位在職中學教師參與，這些教師正在修「數理教學原理與策略」的課程，在課程融入MAIT協助教師學習。第二階段則運用MAIT網站，邀請17位中學教師上網學習。研究者利用質、量合併與影像分析的方法分析收集的資料。結果顯示：在第一階段科學與數學教師探究教學概念上均有顯著的進步，認為MAIT能夠提供「替代性經驗」、「口語勸說」、「成功的經驗」、「創造學習情境」及「陪伴學習」。在第二階段則發現具備不同自我效能的教師有不同的學習模式，高自我效能教師著重「引導探究教學」、「探究教學考量」、「探究教學觀點」並展現較多開放性活動。低自我效能教師重視「探究教學設計」、「本身教學」、「探究觀點」，出現較多結構性探究活動。

The modern trends in science education involve an open-ended approach that requires students to learn science by investigating concepts themselves. This open-ended approach means that teachers need to believe in it, and are enabled to conduct inquiry-based teaching. This study aimed to establish a website (MAIT) to facilitate teachers’ inquiry-based teaching competency by adopting strategies associated with conceptual change and the development of teacher self-efficacy. We investigated teachers’ conceptual development with regard to inquiry-based teaching in the learning environment provided by MAIT and discussed the relationship between teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based teaching and their teaching practices. In the first stage of this research, twenty-five in-service teachers taking the ＂Instructional Principles and Strategies in Science and Mathematics＂ course participated in the research. MAIT was included in the course to assist in teachers’ learning. In the second stage, seventeen in-service teachers took the course online using MAIT. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to collect the data which were subsequently analyzed and the results combined. The method of video analysis was also used. The results indicated that participating teachers in the first stage showed significant improvement in their understanding of inquiry-based teaching. The results showed that MAIT could provide ＂vicarious experience＂, ＂verbal persuasion＂, ＂performance accomplishments＂, ＂creating a learning environment＂ and ＂accompanying learning＂. In the second stage, it was noted that teachers’ preference for a specific learning approach depended on their levels of self-efficacy. Teachers with high self-efficacy tended to focus on ＂guided-inquiry teaching＂, ＂considerations on inquiry teaching＂ and ＂developing inquiry teaching perspectives＂, and preferred more open-ended inquiry-based activities. In contrast, teachers with low self-efficacy focused on ＂designing inquiry teaching＂, ＂considering their own teaching＂ and ＂developing inquiry perspectives＂. They engaged in more structured inquiry-based activities.

1. 吳心楷、宋曜廷、簡馨瑩(2010)。錄影分析在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55(4)，1-37。
   連結：
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993).Benchmarks for science literacy.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
3. Anderson, D.,Nashon, S.(2007).Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting student metacognition in an amusement park physics program.Science Education,91,298-320.
4. Ball, D. L.,Cohen, D. K.(1999).Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice.San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass.
5. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
6. Berger, H.,Eylon, B.,Bagno, E.(2008).Professional development of physics teachers in anevidence-based blended learning program.Journal of Science Education and Technology,17(4),399-409.
7. Bishop, K.,Denley, P.(2007).Learning science teaching: Developing a professional knowledge base.Maidenhead, England:Open University.
8. Blanton, W. E.,Moorman, G.,Trathen, W.(1998).Telecommunications and teacher education: A social constructivist review.Review of Research in Education,Washington, DC:
9. Borko, H.(2004).Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain.Educational Researcher,33,3-15.
10. Boyatzis, R. E.(1998).Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
11. Brand, B. R.,Moore, S. J.(2010).Enhancing teachers' application of inquiry-based strategies using a constructivist sociocultural professional development model.International Journal of Science Education,7(33),1-25.
12. Bursal, M.(2010).Turkish preservice elementary teachers' self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics and science teaching.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,8(4),649-666.
13. Clarke, C. M.,Hollingsworth, H.(2002).Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth.Teaching and Teacher Education,18,947-967.
14. Colburn, A.(2000).An inquiry primer.Science Scope,23(6),42-44.
15. Crawford, B. A.(2007).Learning to teach science as inquiry as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44,613-642.
16. Creswell, J. W.,Plano Clark, V. L.(2011).Designing and conducting mixed methods research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
17. Dede, C.(2000).Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum.Journal of Curriculum Studies,32(2),281-303.
18. Dede, C.,Ketelhut, D. J.,Whitehouse, P.,Breit, L.,McCloskey, E. M.(2009).A research agenda for online teacher professional development.Journal of Teacher Education,60(1),8-19.
19. Driver, R.,Scanlon, E.(1989).Conceptual change in science.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,5(1),25-36.
20. Duschl, R. A.(Ed.),Hamilton, R. J.(Ed.)(1992).Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice.Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
21. El-Deghaidy, H.,Mansour, N.,Alshamrani, S.(2015).Science teachers' typology of CPD activities: A socio-constructivist perspective.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,13,1539-1566.
22. Evers, W.,Brouwers, A.,Tomic, W.(2002).Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on teacher s' beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in the Netherlands.British Journal of Educational Psychology,72,227-243.
23. Feldman, A.(2000).Decision making in the practical domain: A model of practical conceptual change.Science Education,84,606-623.
24. Ferry, B.,Kervin, L.,Cambourne, B.,Turbill, B.,Hedberg, J.,Jonassen, D.(2005).Incorporating real experience into the development of a classroom-based simulation.Journal of Learning Design,1(1),22-32.
25. Garrison, D. R.,Anderson, T.(2003).E- learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice.London, England:Routledge/Falmer.
26. Garrison, D. R.,Kanuka, H.(2004).Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education.Internet High Education,7,95-105.
27. Gengarelly, L. M.,Abrams, E. D.(2009).Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and the secondary science classroom.Journal of Science Education and Technology,18,74-84.
28. Gess-Newsome, J.(2001).Professional development: Planning and design.Arlington, VA:National Science Teachers Association.
29. Gess-Newsome, J.(Ed.),Lederman, N. G.(Ed.)(1999).Examining pedagogical content knowledge.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer.
30. Guskey, T. R.(1986).Staff development and the process of teacher change.Educational Researcher,15(5),5-12.
31. Hashweh, M.Z.(2003).Teacher accommodative change.Teaching and Teacher Education,19,421-434.
32. Hawley, W. D.,Valli, L.(1999).Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice.San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass.
33. Higgins, T. E.,Spitulnik, M. W.(2008).Suppor ting teachers' use of technology in science instruction through professional development: A literature review.Journal of Science Education and Technology,17,511-521.
34. Kazempour, M.(2009).Impact of inquirybased professional development on core conceptions and teaching practices: A case study.Science Educator,18(2),56-68.
35. Lee, B.,Cawthon, S.,Dawson, K.(2013).Elementary and secondary teacher self-efficacy for teaching and pedagogical conceptual change in a drama- based professional development program.Teaching and Teacher Education,30,84-98.
36. Lemke, J. L.(1990).Talking science: Language, learning, and values.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
37. Lotter, C.,Harwood, W. S.,Bonner, J. J.(2007).The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44(9),1318-1347.
38. Lotter, C.,Yow, J. A.,Peters, T. T.(2014).Building a community of practice around inquiry instruction through a professional development program.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,12(1),1-23.
39. Marshall, J. C.,Horton, R.,Igo, B. L.,Switzer, D. M.(2009).K-12 science and mathematics teachers' beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,7(3),575-596.
40. Mulholland, J.,Wallace, J.(2001).Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy.Teaching and Teacher Education,17,243-261.
41. Mundry, S.(2005).Changing perspectives in professional development.The Science Educator,14(1),9-15.
42. National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and the national science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
43. National Research Council(2012).Nutrient requirements of swine.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
44. National Research Council(1996).The national science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
45. Oliver-Hoyo, M.,Allen, D.,Anderson, M.(2004).Inquiry-guided instruction: Practical issues of implementation.Journal of College Science Teaching,33(6),20-24.
46. Owston, R. D.,Sinclair, M.,Wideman, H.(2008).Blended learning for professional d evelopment: An evaluation of a program for middle school mathematics and science teachers.Teachers College Record,110(5),1033-1064.
47. Pajares, M. F.(1992).Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct.Review of Educational Research,62,307-332.
48. Palmieri, P.(1997).Technology in education...Do we need it?.ARIS Bulletin,8(2),1-5.
49. Park, S.,Oliver, S.(2007).Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals.Research in Science Education,38(3),261-284.
50. Pintrich, P. R.,Marx, R. W.,Boyle, R. A.(1993).Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change.Review of Educational Research,63(2),167-199.
51. Posnanski, T. J.(2002).Professional development programs for elementary science teachers: An analysis of teacher self-efficacy beliefs and a professional development model.Journal of Science Teacher Education,13(2),189-220.
52. Posner, G. J.,Strike, K. A.,Hewson, P. W.,Gertzog, W. A.(1982).Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change.Science Education,67(4),489-508.
53. Rodriguez, A. J.(1993)."A dose of reality": Understanding the origin of the theory/practice dichotomy in teacher education from the students' point of view.Journal of Teacher Education,43,213-222.
54. Rodriguez, A. J.,Kitchen R. S.(2005).Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy.Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Sawyer, K.(ed.)(2006).Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
56. Schuck, S.(2003).The use of electronic question and answer forums in mathematics teacher education.Mathematics Education Research Journal,5,19-31.
57. Shulman, L.(1986).Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher,15(1),4-14.
58. Siegel, M.,Derry, M.,Kim, J-B.,Steinkuehler, C.,Street, J.,Canty, N.,Spiro, R.(2000).Promoting teachers' flexible use of the learning sciences through case-based problem solving on the WWW: A theoretical design approach.Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences,Ann Arbor, Michigan:
59. Sinatra, G. M.(2005).The "Warming Trend" inconceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich.Educational Psychologist,40(2),107-115.
60. Skibba, K.(2006).A cross-case analysis of how faculty connects learning in hybrid courses.Proceedings of 47th annual adult education research conference
61. Swan, K.(2001).Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses.Distance Education,22(2),306-331.
62. Swinkels, M. F. J.,Koopman, M.,Beijaard, D.(2013).Student teachers' development of learning-focused conceptions.Teaching and Teacher Education,34,26-37.
63. Tuan, H. L.,Wen, M. C.(2005).The development of aninquiry teaching efficacy questionnaire.International Conference of Authentic Science and Mathematics (Teacher) Education in the Netherlands and Taiwan,Hsinchu, Taiwan:
64. Wallace, C. W.,Kang, N.(2004).An invest igat ion of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41,936-960.
65. Wee, B.,Shepardson, D.,Fast, J.,Harbor, J.(2007).Teaching and learning about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development.Journal of Science Teacher Education,18,63-89.
66. Wentzel, K. R.(Ed.),Wigfield, A.(Ed.)(2009).Handbook of motivation at school.New York, NY:Routledge.
67. Wolf, S. J.,Fraser, B. J.(2008).Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities.Research in Science Education,38,321-441.
68. Zimmerman, B. J.(Ed.),Schunk, D. H.(Ed.)(2003).Educational psychology: A century of contributions.Mahwah:Erlbaum.
69. Zwiep, S. G.,Benken, B. M.(2013).Exploring teachers' k knowledge and perceptions across mathematics and science through content-rich learning experiences in a professional development setting.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,11(2),299-324.
70. 教育部(2003)。科學教育白皮書。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Ministry of Education。

1. 林淑梤(2019)。探討學生科學能力與教師探究教學實務的關係。科學教育學刊，27(4)，251-274。
2. 蕭佳純(2023)。自我效能、學校環境因素對國小教師參與專業發展活動影響之研究。學校行政，145，107-131。
3. 張家銘、孫美蓮、邱瀞瑩、林素婷(2018)。國高中體育教師之教師專業能力、自我效能感對幸福感之影響。運動休閒管理學報，15(4)，36-53。