题名

差異化教學對國中學生數學學習成效影響之研究

并列篇名

A Study on the Effects of Differentiated Instruction on Junior High School Student's Learning of Mathematics

DOI

10.3966/207136492018041101004

作者

黃于眞(Yu-Chen Huang);陳美如(Mei-Ju Chen)

关键词

國中生 ; 差異化教學 ; 數學學習成效 ; junior high school student ; differentiated instruction ; learning outcomes in math

期刊名称

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

卷期/出版年月

11卷1期(2018 / 04 / 01)

页次

91 - 122

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究探討「差異化教學法」對國中八年級學生數學學習成效的影響,採用準實驗研究法,並採取不等組前-後測設計。研究對象為某國中八年級兩班共50位學生,以其中一班為實驗組,進行「差異化教學法」,另一班為對照組,進行「講述教學法」。教學內容為「等差數列」與「等差級數」兩個單元,實驗教學結束後,研究者蒐集相關資料進行量化的分析比較,以探討兩組學生數學學習成效的改變,並透過教學回饋單及晤談資料來了解學生對於「差異化教學法」的態度及接受程度。研究發現,實施差異化教學可以顯著提高學生數學學習成效,以中分群學生之學習成效差距最大。

英文摘要

The study discusses the impact of "differentiated instruction" on the learning of math for 8th graders in junior high school. The quasi-experimental research method was adopted, using the pretest-posttest design with unequal groups. The subjects were 50 students from two 8th grade classes in one junior high school. One class was assigned as the experimental group to receive "differentiated instruction", while the other one was the control group to receive "didactic instruction". The instruction contents were two units of the curriculum: "arithmetic sequence" and "arithmetic series". After the entire experimental teaching was over, the researcher collected relevant data to proceed with quantitative analysis and comparison, as well as to investigate the changes of math learning outcomes for the two groups of students. Students' attitudes and degree of acceptance toward "differentiated instruction" were examined through data collected from students' feedback sheets and interviews. Findings from this study indicate that the implementation of differentiated instruction can significantly promote student's learning outcomes in math; the effect is particularly noteworthy for the average-grade student group.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Aiken, L. R.(1976).Psychological testing and assessment.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Corley, M. A.(2005).Differentiated instruction.Focus Basics: Connect Res Pract,7,13-16.
  3. Diane, H.(2002).Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, grades 3-12.Minneapolis, MN:Free Spirit.
  4. Ebel, R. L.,Frisbie, D. A.(1991).Esswntials of educational measurement.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  5. Gregory, G. H.(2003).Differentiated instructional strategies in practice.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
  6. Gregory, G. H.,Chapman, C.(2013).Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
  7. Hall, T.(2002).Differentiated instruction.Wakefield, MA:National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
  8. Servilio, K. L.(2009).You get to choose! Motivating students to read through differentiated instruction.TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus,5(5)
  9. Stanford, B.,Reeves, S.(2009).Making it happen: Using differentiated instruction, retrofit framework, and universal design for learning.TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus,5(6)
  10. Tomlinson, C. A.(2003).Deciding to teach them all.Educational Leadership,61(2),6-11.
  11. Tomlinson, C. A.(2005).Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice?.Theory into Practice,44(3),262-269.
  12. Tomlinson, C. A.(1999).The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners.Alexandria, VA:ASCD.
  13. Tomlinson, C.A.(2001).How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classroom.Alexandria, VA:ASCD.
  14. Weinstein, C.E.(ed.),Goetz, E. T.(ed.),Alexander, P.(ed.)(1988).Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation.San Diego:Academic Press.
  15. 王文科、王智弘(2014)。課程發展與教學設計論。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wunan。
  16. 王財印、吳百祿、周新富(2009)。教學原理。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
  17. 行政院國家科學委員會(2013)。臺灣PISA2012 結果報告
  18. 吳清山(2009)。臺北教育111 學校經營手冊
  19. 洪蘭(2012)。日本能,為什麼我們不能?。取自https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5031551[Hung, L. (2012). If Japan can, why can't we? Ret r ieved f rom ht tps://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5031551.]
  20. 教育部(2013)。十二年國教基本教育差異化教學學術研討會
  21. 許梅韻(2011)。彰化縣=Changhua, Taiwan,國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
  22. 連秀敏(2010)。臺東縣=Taitung, Taiwan,國立臺東大學=National Taitung University。
  23. 陳郁婷(2014)。桃園市=Taoyuan, Taiwan,元智大學=Yuan Ze University。
  24. 黃鈺琳(2014)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan,國立臺北教育大學=National Taipei University of Education。
  25. 葉錫南(2013)。英文科差異化教學之理念與實施。教育研究月刊,233,37-48。
  26. 詹惠雪、林曉音(2014)。差異化教學運用在國小六年級數學領域之實踐歷程。教育研究月刊,245,130-148。
  27. 蔡易勳(2011)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan,臺北市立教育大學=University of Taipei。
被引用次数
  1. 曾世杰,陳淑麗,張明珠(2021)。在五年級國語課實施差異化教學:教師適應與學習成效的個案研究。特殊教育研究學刊,46(3),87-113。
  2. 陳文正,古智雄(2022)。應用差異化教學策略實施國小跨年級自然教學之研究。課程與教學,25(1),99-134。
  3. 邱靜娥(2023)。差異化教學對大學統計學課程學生學習態度與學習成效之影響。商管科技季刊,24(1),111-131。
  4. 吳淑禎(2023)。弱勢學生的生涯促進:融入差異化概念發展同儕支持生涯服務方案與實施。中華輔導與諮商學報,66,81-122。