题名

國小數理教師教學專業能力類型之探討

并列篇名

A Study on the Classification of Elementary School Mathematics/Science Teachers Regarding Their Professional Teaching Competence

DOI

10.3966/207136492018081102002

作者

吳麗珍(Li-Chen Wu)；鄭碧雲(Pi-Yun Cheng)；郭重吉(Chorng-Jee Guo)

关键词

國小數理教師 ； 群集分析 ； 數理教學專業能力 ； elementary school mathematics/science teacher ； cluster analysis ； mathematics/science professional teaching competence

期刊名称

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

卷期/出版年月

11卷2期（2018 / 08 / 01）

页次

27 - 61

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

國小數理教師的教學專業能力及其影響因素包含範圍至為廣泛。本研究資料來自國科會區塊計畫「科學/數學教師專業發展問卷」施測結果。本研究使用群集分析技術對上述資料主要選取七個分量表125題，有效問卷1,298份，目的在了解國小數理教師教學專業能力的類型。其七個分量表為「課程計劃及教學設計」、「教學活動的安排」、「新建構主義學習環境的營造」、「探究教學及數理教學知識的個人數理教學效能」等四個教學專業能力的分量表，以及影響教師教學專業能力的「進修動機－加強專業能力」、「進修方式」、「進修主題」等三個分量表。研究結果顯示，可將國小數理教師分成三個集群：「熟練型」、「中等型」和「基礎型」。在分群過程中，「進修主題」扮演最重要的角色；而平均分數最低的分量表是「進修方式」。上述三群教師的人口特徵是:「熟練型」教師有顯著較多的科任、組長及主任，「中等型」老師在大型學校顯著較多，而「基礎型」教師則多為小型學校、級任、6-10年資和非數理系所。文中最後分別針對各群教師在進修課程和進修方式上提出建議。
英文摘要

There is a wide range of variation among elementary school mathematics/science teachers' professional teaching competence and the associated influencing factors. The data analyzed in this study came from a national survey conducted by a research project supported by the National Science Council, using a Mathematics/ Science Teachers' Professional Development Questionnaire. Results from the above questionnaire involved 7 subscales, 125 items, and 1,298 valid respondents. Using cluster analysis technique, this study aims at studying the classification of elementary mathematics/science teachers' professional teaching competence. The professional teaching competence dimension consists of 4 subscales, Curriculum Plan and Instructional Design, Instructional Activity Arrangement, New Constructivist Learning Environment Survey, and Self-Efficacy toward Inquiry Teaching and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) for M/S Teaching. In addition, the associated influential factors dimension consists of 3 subscales, Motivation toward Professional Development (PD) in Terms of Promoting Professional Teaching Competence, Types of PD Activities, and PD Topics. Based on scores obtained from the 7 subscales, the results indicate that the participating teachers could be divided into 3 clusters, ＂proficient＂, ＂medium＂, and ＂basic＂. It was noted that the PD Topics subscale played a dominant role in the classification of teachers, and that the average score for the PD Activities subscale was the lowest. Teachers in the ＂proficient＂ cluster were found to consist mainly of subject teacher, division chiefs, and directors. Those in the ＂medium＂ cluster were found to belong significantly to large schools, while teachers in the ＂basic＂ cluster were found to belong significantly to small schools, and serve as class teachers, with 6-10 years of teaching experience and being non-M/S majors. Finally, in order to meet the professional development needs for different types of teachers, the authors offered suggestions regarding the planning of courses and types of activities to be included in their PD programs, respectively.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 黃台珠、Aldridge, J. M.、Fraser, B.(1998)。臺灣和西澳科學教室環境的跨國研究─結合質性與量的研究方法。科學教育學刊，6，343-362。
    連結：
  2. Abell, S. K.(Ed.),Lederman, L. G.(Ed.)(2007).Handbook of re search on science education.New Jersey, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Abell, S. K.(Ed.),Lederman, N. G.(Ed.)(2007).Handbook of Research on Science Education.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. American Psychological Association (APA), APA work group of the board of educational affairs (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school reform and redesign. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ed/governance/bea/learnercentered.pdf
  5. Banilower, E. R.,Smith, P. S.,Weiss, I. R.,Malzahn, K. A.,Campbell, K. M.,Weis, A. M.(2013).Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education.Chapel Hill, NC:Horizon Research.
  6. Blank R. K.(2005).Surveys of enacted curriculum: Tools and services to sssist educators.Washington, DC:Council of Chief State School Officers.
  7. Blumberg, P.(2009).Developing learning-centered teaching: A practical guide for faculty.California, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  8. Bransford, J.,Brown, A.,Cocking, R.(2000).How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  9. Chavl, K.,Abell, S.,Pareja, E.,Musikul, K.,Ritzka, G.(2008).Science and mathematics teachers' experiences, needs, and expectations regarding professional development.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,4(1),31-43.
  10. Cheng, C. S.,Wu, Y. T.(2010).Elementary science teachers' motivation toward professional development: The role of gender, academic background and teaching experience.Asian Conference on the Social Sciences 2010,Osaka, Japan:
  11. Council of Chief State School Officers and Wisconsin Center for Education Research (CCSSO & WCER). (2004). Surveys of enacted curriculum (SEC): Survey of instructional practices teacher survey grades K-12 science. Retrieved from http://seconline.wceruw.org/Reference/K12sciSurvey.pdf
  12. Darling-Hammond L.,Griffin G. A.,Wise, A. E.(1992).Excellence in teacher education: Helping teachers develop learner-centered schools.Washington, DC:National education association publication.
  13. Darling-Hammond, L.(2006).Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  14. Fraser, B. J.(Ed.),Tobin, K. G.(Ed.)(2003).International handbook of science education.New Jersey, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Fraser, B. J.(Ed.),Tobin, K. G.(Ed.),McRobbie, C. J.(Ed.)(2012).Second International handbook of science education.New York, NY:Springer.
  16. Gess-Newsome, J.(Ed.),Lederman, N. G.(Ed.)(1999).PCK and science education.Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  17. Glynn, S. M.、Yeany, R. H.、Britton, B. K.、熊召弟譯、王美芬譯、段曉林譯、熊同鑫譯(1996)。科學學習心理學。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
  18. Hawley, W. D.,Valli, L.(2000).Learner-centered professional development.Research Bulletin,27,1-27.
  19. Henry, M. A., Murray, K. S., & Phillips, K. A. (2007). Meeting the challenge of STEM classroom observation in evaluating teacher development projects: A comparison of two widely used instruments. Retrieved from http://mahenry.sumnermckenzie.com/pdf/RTOP%20ITC%20%20article%20Final%20120707.pdf
  20. Horizon Research, Inc. (HRI) (2003). Inside the classroom observation and analytic protocol . Retrieved from http://www.horizon-research.com/instruments/hri_instrument.php?inst_id=14
  21. Hor izon Research, Inc. (HRI) (2000). 2000 National survey of science and mathematics education: Science questionnaires. Retrieved from http://2000survey.horizon-research.com/instruments/teacher.php
  22. Hsieh, C. H.,Tuan, H. L.,Chin, C. C.,Wu, T. Y.(2013).The development of science teacher's motivation teaching efficiency questionnaire.Third International Conference of East-Asian Association for Science Education,Hong Kong, China:
  23. McCombs, B. L.(2003).Defining tools for teacher reflection: The assessment of learner-centered practices (ALCP).Annual Meeting of the 84th American Educational Research Association,Chicago, IL.:
  24. Merriam, S. B.、Caffarella, R. S.、楊惠君譯(2004)。終身學習全書：成人教育總論。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:商周=Business Weekly Publications。
  25. Michalsky, T.(2012).Shaping self-regulation in science teachers' professional growth: Inquiry skills.Science Education,96,1106-1133.
  26. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principle s and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principlesand-Standards/
  27. National Research Council=NRC(2007).Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  28. National Research Council=NRC(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  29. Ramey-Gassert, L.,Shroyer, M. G.,Staver, J. R.(1996).A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers.Science Education,80,283-315.
  30. Rhoton, J.(Ed),Bowers, P.(Ed)(2001).Issues in science education: Professional development planning and design.Virginia, VA:NSTA Press.
  31. Rhoton, J.(Ed.),Bowers, P.(Ed.)(2001).Issues in science education: Professional development planning and design.Virginia, VA:NSTA Press.
  32. Riggs, I. M.,Enochs, L. G.(1990).Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument.Science Education,74,625-637.
  33. Smith, M. C.(Ed.),DeFrates-Densch, N.(Ed.)(2009).Handbook of research on adult learning and development.New York, NY:Routledge.
  34. Tschannen-Moran, M.,Woolfolk H. A.(2001).Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct.Teaching and Teacher Education,17,783-805.
  35. Wang, J. R.,Lin, S. W.(2009).Evaluating elementary and secondary school science learning environments in Taiwan.International Journal of Science Education,31,853-872.
  36. Watters, J. J.,Ginns, I. S.(2000).Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education.Journal of Science Teacher Education,11(4),277-313.
  37. Weiss, I. R.,Banilower, E. R.,McMahon, K. C.,Smith, P. S.(2001).Report of the 2000 National survey of science and mathematics education.Chapel Hill, NC:Horizon Research.
  38. Weiss, I. R.,Pasley, J. D.,Smith, P. S.,Banilower, E. R.,Heck, D. J.(2003).A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States.Chapel Hill, NC:Horizon Research.
  39. Wu, Y. T.(2010).Exploring elementary science teachers' perceived self-efficacy toward pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching.annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching,Philadelphia, PA.:
  40. Yoon, K. S.,Garet, M.,Birman, B.,Jacobson, R.(2006).Examining the effects of mathematics and science professional development on teachers' instructional practice: Using professional development activity log.Washington, DC:Council of Chief State School Officers.
  41. 王保進(2006)。中文視窗版SPSS 與行為科學研究。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
  42. 吳明隆(2013)。SPSS 操作與應用―多變量分析實務。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wunan。
  43. 李淑慧（2000）。探究教學法。國家教育研究院雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1309716/[Lee, S. H. (2000). Inquiry method. Bilingual vocabulary, academic terms and dictionaries of National Academy for Educational Research web. Retrieved f rom http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1309716/]
  44. 洪詠善編、范信賢編(2015)。同行～走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。新北市=New Taipei, Taiwan:國家教育研究院=National Academy for Educational Research。
  45. 張德銳(1998)。師資培育與教育革新研究。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wunan。
  46. 教育部（2012）。97 年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。取自http://www.k12ea.gov.tw/ap/sid17_law.aspx [Ministry of Education (2012). Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.k12ea.gov.tw/ap/sid17_law.aspx]
  47. 教育部社會教育司編(1991)。成人基本教育。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:臺灣書店=Taiwan Book Store。
  48. 梁茂森（2000）。教師動機。國家教育研究院雙語辭彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1309949/[Liang, M. S. (2000). Teacher motivation. Bilingual vocabulary, academic terms and dictionaries of National Academy for Educational Research web. Retrieved from http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1309949/ ]
  49. 許添明、葉珍玲(2015)。城鄉學生學習落差現況、成因及政策建議。臺東大學教育學報，26(2)，63-91。
  50. 許銘津、許瑛玿、潘靖瑛、黃義峰、林清達(2010)。影響國小教師實施資訊融入主題探究教學之個人因素量表發展。教育行政論壇，2(1)，1-31。
  51. 郭重吉編(2007)。科學教師之路―由實習輔導到專業成長。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing。
  52. 郭重吉(1992)。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊，20，548-570。
  53. 曾千純、段曉林、溫媺純、秦爾聰、王國華(2012)。研究「探究師資培育計畫」對中學科學／數學教師探究教學效能的影響。科學教育研究與發展季刊，64，27-58。
  54. 黃富順(2000)。成人教育導論。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wunan。
  55. 賴慶三(2012)。中小學科學領導教師的核心能力指標之研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，64，59-76。
  56. 蘇峰山(2006)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告,未出版
被引用次数
  1. 廖本煌,陳欣民(2023)。中學數學實習師資生教學知能指標之建構：改良式德懷術之應用。教育科學研究期刊，68(1)，73-108。
print cancel