國小教師擴展學習歷程之研究

A Study of Expansive Learning Process of an Elementary School Teacher

10.3966/207136492019081202001

林盈均(Ying-Chun Lin)

矛盾 ； 活動理論 ； 擴展學習 ； conflict ； activity theory ； expansive learning

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

12卷2期（2019 / 08 / 01）

1 - 27

繁體中文

本研究透過一位國小教師的自我敘說，陳述個人在教學場域面對各種挑戰的故事，並以活動理論作為與故事情節對話的參考架構，探究教學故事中的社會文化脈絡，呈現教師擴展學習的歷程。研究目的是以活動理論為架構，理解教師教學活動的系統及運作；從教學故事探究因擾動而產生的情境變化，並從矛盾的觀點分析其影響；探究教師面對擾動及其產生的矛盾，將如何重新詮釋教學活動。研究結果如下：（1）教學是群體活動，應從整體脈絡來理解教學。教師實踐教學理念時，中介歷程包含工具的創造與應用、與社群成員在分工與規則中互動。活動系統是在情境脈絡中運作，中介歷程受到文化歷史因素影響，呈現社會環境的價值。（2）正向接受矛盾挑戰，有助教師擴展教學專業。教師面對擾動會感到挫折、形成矛盾張力，雖然矛盾是教師壓力來源，但在面對矛盾張力、建構解決問題策略歷程中，教師將更加瞭解問題以及環境，並擴展個人的教學專業。（3）面對擾動與矛盾，教師能反省慎思、理解自我，並建構未來教學行動的想像。

This paper presents the self-narration of an elementary school teacher to describe stories regarding various challenges at school. Activity theory is adopted as the reference framework of story plots and dialogues so as to analyze their sociocultural context and to present the expansive learning process of the teacher. The purpose of this paper is to examine the systems and operations related to teaching activities based on the framework of activity theory. Specifically, the teaching stories are explored to observe scenario changes engendered by related disturbances, and the effects of these changes from the perspective of conflict are analyzed, thus enabling a close examination of the teacher's conflicts while experiencing these disturbances and discussing the teacher's reinterpretation of teaching activities. The conclusions of the study are as follows. (1) Teaching is a group activity and should be examined through the overall context. While actualizing their teaching ideas, teacher undergo various mediating processes, including the creation and application of teaching tools and interaction with their peers to assign tasks and define related rules. An activity system is operated under a scenario context, and mediating processes are affected by cultural and historical factors so as to demonstrate the values of the social environment. (2) Facing challenges with a positive attitude helps facilitate the development of teachers' teaching professionalism. When teachers face conflicts, they experience frustration and tension, but through the process of coping with tension and formulating problem-solving strategies, they can gain a greater understanding of related problems and the environment, helping them develop their teaching professionalism. (3) When faced with disturbances and conflicts, teachers should conduct introspection through self-understanding and formulate strategies for subsequent teaching activities.

1. 林佩璇, P. H.(2007)。台灣教學行動研究運動－走入洪流，走出泥淖，邁向新視野。課程與教學季刊，10(2)，35-52。
   連結：
2. 林意雪, Y. S.(2010)。文化工具做為教與學之分析架構：一個文學圈的實例探討。當代教育季刊，18(4)，79-119。
   連結：
3. 張德銳, D. R.,郭淑芳, S. F.(2011)。我國中小學教師專業發展實務與研究的問題與展望。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，4(2)，21-43。
   連結：
4. 陳佩英, P. Y.,曾正宜(2011)。探析專業學習社群的展化學習經驗與課程創新行動－活動理論取徑。教育研究集刊，57(2)，39-84。
   連結：
5. 甄曉蘭, H.L.S.(2000)。新世紀課程改革的挑戰與課程實踐理論的重建。教育研究集刊，44，61-90。
   連結：
6. 歐用生, Y. S.(2002)。快樂學習或安樂死？體驗學習的批判教育學意涵。課程與教學季刊，5(3)，107-124。
   連結：
7. 簡紅珠, H. C.(2002)。教師知識的不同詮釋與研究方法。課程與教學季刊，5(3)，1-16。
   連結：
8. Au, K.(1990).Changes in a teacher's view of interactive comprehension instruction.Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology,Cambridge:
9. Augustsson, D.(2018).Collaborative media in educational settings: Teaching as a design profession.The international journal of design education,13(2),1-19.
10. Chaiklin, S.(Ed.),Hedegaard, M.(Ed.),Jensen, U. J.(Ed.)(1999).Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical.Headington:Aarhus University Press.
11. Daniels, H.(Ed.),Edwards, A.(Ed.),Engeström, Y.(Ed.),Gallagher, T.(Ed.),Ludvigsen, S. R.(Ed.)(2010).Activity Theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies.NY:Routledge.
12. Davydov, V. V.(1999).The content and unsolved problems of activity theory.Perspectives on Activity Theory,Cambridge, UK:
13. Engeström, Y.(2008).From teams to knots: activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work.NY:Cambridge University Press.
14. Engeström, Y.(2015).Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
15. Engeström, Y.(2001).Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization.Journal of Education and Work,14(1),133-156.
16. Engeström, Y.(1999).Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation.Perspectives on activity theory,Cambridge:
17. Engeström, Y.(1999).Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice.Perspectives on activity theory,Cambridge:
18. Engeström, Y.(2000).Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work.Ergonomics,43(7),960-974.
19. Engeström, Y.,Sannino, A.(2010).Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges.Educational Research Review
20. Gallucci, C.,Van Lare, M. D.,Yoon, I. H.,Boatright, B.(2010).Instructional coaching: Building theor y about the role and organizational support for professional learning.American Educational Research Journal,47(4),919-963.
21. Gedera. D. S. P,Williams, P. J.(2016).Activity Theory in Education.CT:Sense Publishers.
22. Guy, E. S. (2005). From rollout to appropriation: Changing practices of development and use during a groupware project. Retrieved from http://www.cmis.brighton.ac.uk/staff/esg1/papers/PhD/00_toc.pdf
23. Jackson, P. W.(1992).Untaught lessons.NY:Teachers College Press.
24. Jackson, P. W.(1990).Life in classrooms.NY:Teachers College.
25. Jonassen, D. (2000). Learning as activity. Retrieved from http://www.learndev.org/dl/DenverJonassen.PDF
26. Leont'ev, A. N.(1978).Activity, consciousness, and personality.Englewood Cliffs. NJ:Prentice- Hall.
27. Loughran, J. J.(Ed.),Hamilton, M. L.(Ed.),LaBoskey, V. K.(Ed.),Russel, T.(Ed.)(2004).International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices.London:Kluwer academic publishers.
28. Pinnegar, S.,Hamilton, M. L.(2009).Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research-theory, methodology, and practice.NY:Springer.
29. Pithouse-Morgan, K.(Ed.),Samaras, A. P.(Ed.)(2015).Polyvocal Professional Learning through Self-Study Research.CT:Sense Publishers.
30. Rantavuori, J.,Engeström, Y.,Lipponen, L.(2016).Learning actions, objects and types of interaction: A methodological analysis of expansive learning among pre-service teachers.Frontline Learning Research,4(3),1-27.
31. Richardson, V.(ed.)(2001).Handbook of research on teaching.Washington, D.C:American Educational Research Association.
32. Richardson, V.(Ed.)(2001).The Handbook of Research on Teaching.Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association.
33. Roth, W. M.,Lee, Y. J.(2007).‘Vyogotsky’s neglected Legacy’: Cultural-historical activity theory.Review of Educational Research,77(2),186-232.
34. Rückriem, G. (2012). „Activity Theory“as Methodology. Retrieved from http://georgrueckriem.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/2methodologie2012.pdf
35. Samaras, A. P.(2011).Self-study: teacher research.NY:SAGE.
36. Sannino, A.,Engeström, Y.,Lemos, M.(2016).Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency.Journal of the Learning Sciences,25(4),599-633.
37. Schön, D. A.(1986).Educating the reflective practitioner.NY:Jossey-Bass.
38. Schwab, J. J.(1970).The practical: A language for curriculum.Washington, DC:National Education Association.
39. Smidt, S.(2009).Introducing Vygotsky.NY:Routledge.
40. Vanassche, E.,Kelchtermans, G.(2015).The state of the art in self-study of teacher education practices: a systematic literature review.Journal of Curriculum Studies,47(4),508-528.
41. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Havard University Press.
42. Vygotsky, L. S. & Luria, A. (1934). Tool and symbol in child development. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1934/tool-symbol.htm
43. Wittrock, M. C.(Ed.)(1986).Handbook of research on teaching.NY:Macmillan.
44. Yamagata-Lynch, L. C.,Haudenschild, M.(2006).Using activity theory to identify contradictions and tensions in teacher professional development.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
45. 李政勳（2015）。備課，備什麼？觀課，觀什麼？議課，議什麼？。取自http://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/blogdetail?id=1076[Lee, Z. H. (2015). How to do lesson preparation? How to do lesson observation? How to do debriefing? Retrieved from http://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/blog-detail?id=1076]
46. 林佩璇, P. H.(2014)。課程轉化的持續動力：文化歷史活動理論觀。課程改革持續的動力：第十六屆兩岸三地課程理論研討會論文集，吉林省=Jilin Province, China:
47. 林盈均, Y. C.(2004)。,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:臺北市教師研習中心=Taipei City Teachers' In-Service Education Center。
48. 林煥祥, H. S.(2008)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council Research。
49. 饒見維, J. W.(2003).教師專業發展：理論與實務.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wunan.

1. 洪承宇,王淳瑩(2021)。新制師資培育課程基準下的課程發展：「合作教學」與「教師專業社群」融入「教育實踐課程」設計。當代教育研究季刊，29(2)，33-60。
2. 黃健庭,林志成(2021)。疫情下的學校行政及教師教學因應對策。學校行政，135，28-52。