臺北市國小資源班學生個別化教育計畫設計及執行情形之研究

Design and Implementation of Individualized Education Plans for Elementary Students with Disabilities Who Participate in Resource Programs in Taipei City

10.3966/207136492019081202003

柯懿真(Yi-Zhen Ke)；盧台華(Tai-Hwa Emily Lu)

個別化教育計畫 ； 評鑑檢核表 ； 資源班學生 ； Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) ； evaluation checklist ； students with disabilities participating in resource programs

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

12卷2期（2019 / 08 / 01）

63 - 90

繁體中文

本研究目的在檢視臺北市國小資源班學生個別化教育計畫設計與執行情形。由研究者與五名評定者以自編之「個別化教育計畫評鑑檢核表」評鑑72名資源班學生103與104學年度之IEP。主要發現有：1.85%以上之IEP均能具備特教法令規範之基本要項，且與學生之需求達到適配性。2.兩年度之IEP設計與執行情形較理想之向度為「行政管理與執行」。待改善之處包括評量記錄多為一年以上的資料；較少敘明學生所需之教學和評量調整內容；部分學習領域之學習節數無法與學年教育目標配合；教育目標之可測量性／可觀察性、類化性、可行性等待改善；相關專業服務、行為功能介入方案說明不完整，且轉銜服務多以六年級學生為主。

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the contents and qualities of Individualized Educational Plans (IEPs) of elementary students with disabilities in Taipei City. The researcher and five co-raters employed a self-designed ＂IEP Evaluation Checklist＂ to analyze students' IEPs from 2014 to 2015, covering 72 elementary students with disabilities who had participated in resource programs. The main findings are as follows. 1. About 85% of ＂IEP-required content＂ met the requirements of the related special education laws and matched students' special needs. 2. The best area of quality rating from 2014 to 2015 was ＂administrative management and execution＂. The area needing improvement included stated assessment records of more than one year. However, there lacked adaptations of instructional designs and assessments. Moreover, the number of lessons of some areas/subjects provided did not match annual education goals; the qualities of the observability, generalization, and accessibility of goals/ objectives were in need of improvement; the contents of related services and behavior intervention programs of IEPs were not stated clearly; and IEPs were mainly developed for the 6 graders with transition needs.

1. 林晨華, C. H.(2015)。從臺中特殊教育評鑑探討 IEP之運作。特殊教育季刊，136，19-26。
   連結：
2. 陳麗如, L. J.(2004)。國民中小學轉銜服務工作之執行現況研究。特殊教育學報，20，141-170。
   連結：
3. 特殊教育課程教材教法及評量方式實施辦法(2010 年 12 月 31日 )。[Regulations for Implementation of Special Education Curriculum, Teaching Materials, Instructional Designs, and Assessment (2010, December 31)]
4. 特殊教育法 (2009 年，11 月18 日 )。[The Special Education Act (2009, November 18)]
5. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. §1400（2004）.
6. Education of All Handicapped Children Act , Public Law 94-142,20 U.S.C (1975).
7. 特殊教育法 (1997 年，5 月14 日 )。[The Special Education Act (1997, May 14)]
8. 身心障礙學生支持服務辦法 (2013 年，9 月27 日 )。[Regulations of Support Service for Student with Disabilities (2013, September 27)]
9. 特殊教育法施行細則 (2013 年，7 月12 日 )。[Enforcement Rules of the Special Education Act (2013, July 12)]
10. 身心障礙學生考試服務辦法 (2012 年，7 月24 日 )。[Regulations for Examination Service for Student with Disabilities (2012, July 24)]
11. Aiken(1985).Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings.Educational and Psychological Measurement,45(1),131-142.
12. Bateman, B. D.,Linden, M. A.(2006).Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs.Verona, Wisconsin:Attainment Company.
13. Boavida, T.,Aguiar, C.,McWilliam, R. A.,Pimental, J. S.(2010).Quality of individualized education program goals of preschoolers with disabilities.Infant & Young Children,23(3),233-243.
14. Burns, E.(2006).IEP-2005: Writing and implementing individualized education programs.Springfield, Illinois:Charles C Thomas Publisher.
15. Herr, C. M.,Bateman, B. D.(2006).Better IEP meetings: Everyone wins.Verona, Wisconsin:Attainment Company.
16. Hunt, P.,Goetz, L.,Anderson, J.(1986).The quality of IEP objectives associated with placement on integrated versus segregated school sites.The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps,11(2),125-130.
17. Lynch, E. C.,Beare, P. L.(1990).The quality of IEP objectives and their relevance to instruction for students with mental retardation and behavioral disorders.Remedial and Special Education,11(2),48-55.
18. Nevo, D.(1983).The conceptualization of educational evaluation : An analytical review of the literature.Review of Educational Research,53(1),117-128.
19. Pierangelo, R.,Giuliani, G.(2007).Understanding, developing, and writing effective IEPs : A step-by-step guide for educators.Thousand Oaks, California:Corwin Press.
20. Podemski, R.S.,Marsh, G.E., Ⅱ,Smith, T. E.,Price, B.J.(1995).Comprehensive administration of special education.Englewood Cliff, NJ.:Prentice-Hall.
21. Pretti-Frontczak, K.,Bricker, D.(2000).Enhancing the quality of Individualized Education Plan (IEP) goals and objectives.Journal of Early Intervention,23(2),92-105.
22. Rosas, C.,Winterman, K. G.,Kroeger, S.,Jones, M. M.(2009).Using a rubric to assess individualized education programs.International Journal of Applied Educational Studies,4(1),47-57.
23. Sanches-Ferreira, M.,Lopes-dos-Santos, P.,Alves, S.,Santos, M.,Silveira-Maia, M.(2013).How individualised are the Individualized Education Plan (IEPs) : An analysis of the contents and quality of the IEPs goals.European Journal of Special Needs Education,28(4),507-520.
24. Smith, D. D.(2007).Introduction to special education : making a difference.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
25. Yell, M. L.,Stecker, P. M.(2003).Developing legally correct and educationally meaningful IEPs using curriculum-based measurement.Assessment for Effective Intervention,28(3-4),73-88.
26. Yell, M.,Conroy ,T.,Katsiyannis, A.,Conroy ,T.(2013).Individualized education Programs and special education programming for students with disabilities in urban schools.Fordham Urban Law Journal,41(2),669-714.
27. 王健諭, J. Y.(2010)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學=National Chengchi University。
28. 王馨怡, H. Y.(2008)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，銘傳大學=Ming Chuan University。
29. 朱陳淑媛, S. Y.(2012)。新竹市=Hsinchu, Taiwan，國立新竹教育大學=National Hsinchu University of Education。
30. 吳美麗, M. L.(2001)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北師範學院=National Taipei College of Education。
31. 李如鵬, R. B.(2009)。彰化縣=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
32. 李翠玲, T. L.(2001)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
33. 李翠玲, T. L.(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
34. 李翠玲, T. L.(2006)。啟智班個別化教育計畫內容偵錯與修正分析研究。九十五年度東台灣特殊教育學術研討會，臺東=Taitung, Taiwan:
35. 李翠玲, T. L.(2007).個別化教育計畫（IEP）理念與實施.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing.
36. 林千惠, C. H.(1997)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
37. 林素貞, S. C.(2007).個別化教育計畫之實施.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wunan.
38. 林素鳳, S. F.(2006)。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan，國立臺中教育大學=National Taichung University of Education。
39. 林雅玲, Y. L.(2004)。彰化縣=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
40. 林蒼毅, T. Y.(2006)。彰化縣=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
41. 胡永崇,Y. C.(2003)。個別化教育計畫的困境與檢討：接受問卷調查的啟智班教師之書面陳述意見分析。屏東師院學報，18，81-120。
42. 孫孝儀, H. Y.(2007)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，臺北市立教育大學=Taipei Municipal University of Education。
43. 張蓓莉, B. L.,蔡明富, M. F.(2001).量生訂做─IEP 的理念與落實.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心=National Taiwan Normal University Special Education Center.
44. 教育部 (2013)。國民教育階段特殊教育課程大綱。臺北市：教育部。[Ministry of Education. (2013). Newly revised curriculum guideline for students with special needs in compulsory education. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.]
45. 陳明聰, M. C.,張靖卿, C. C.,詹孟琦, M. C.(2010)。,未出版
46. 陳媛雯,Y.W.,秦麗花, L. H.,林金珠, G.C.,李莉, L.(2010)。高雄市國小特教教師對轉銜工作與知能需求調查之研究。南屏特殊教育，1，45-59。
47. 鈕文英, W.Y.(2013).邁向優質、個別化的特殊教育服務.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological Publishing.
48. 楊佩貞, P.C.(1996)。彰化縣=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
49. 盧台華, T.H. Emily,張靖卿, C. C.(2003)。個別化教育計畫評鑑檢核表之建構研究。特殊教育研究學刊，24，15-38。
50. 蕭朱亮, C. L.(2003)。花蓮縣=Hualien, Taiwan，國立花蓮師範學院=National Hualien Teachers College。
51. 賴錫安, H. A.(1996)。彰化縣=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。

1. 劉錦昌,黃澤洋,孟瑛如(2020)。國小資源班教師執行IEP個案管理調查研究。特教論壇，28，20-48。