老師，暑假後你還會回來嗎？探究中彰投偏遠地區國小教師留任意願之影響因素

Will You Come Back after Summer Vacation? The Influence Factors of Retention of Rural Area Elementary School Teachers in Taichung, Changhua, and Nantou

10.3966/207136492019121203004

侯伯樺(Po-Hua Hou)；龔心怡(Hsin-Yi Kung)

留任意願 ； 偏遠地區國小教師 ； 學校認同度 ； retention ； rural area elementary school teachers ； school identification

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

12卷3期（2019 / 12 / 01）

79 - 108

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討中彰投偏遠地區國小教師留任意願之影響因素，以中彰投三縣市偏遠地區326位國小教師為研究對象，並使用描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析及多元迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析。本研究結果如下：（一）中彰投偏遠地區國小教師留任意願屬中等程度。（二）中彰投偏遠地區51歲以上國小教師之「自願性留任意願」高於其他年齡教師；已婚教師之「自願性留任意願」高於未婚教師；南投縣教師之「自願性留任意願」高於彰化縣與臺中市教師；在校服務11年以上教師之「自願性留任意願」高於服務6－10年及5年以下教師；兼任行政職務教師之「自願性留任意願」高於科任與級任教師；本地教師之「自願性留任意願」高於外地教師。（三）31－40歲教師之「非自願性留任意願」高於其他年齡層教師；在校服務5年以下教師之「非自願性留任意願」高於服務6－10年及11年以上教師；外地教師之「非自願性留任意願」高於本地教師。（四）婚姻狀況與服務縣市及學校認同度對留任意願具有顯著預測力，其中又以學校認同度的預測力最高。最後根據研究發現提出具體建議，以供教育機關決策、偏遠地區國小行政及未來研究者參考。

The purpose of this study was to explore the influence factors of retention of 326 rural area elementary school teachers in Taichung, Changhua, and Nantou. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA and multiple regression analysis were applied to analyze data. The findings are as follows. First, teachers perceived a moderate level of retention. Second, in terms of voluntary retention, the scores of teachers over 51 years old were significantly higher than those younger than 50 years old. The scores of married teachers were significantly higher than unmarried teachers. The scores of teachers in Nantou were significantly higher than that of Taichung and Changhua. The scores of those with teaching years of employment over 11 years were significantly higher than those with teaching years of employment less than 11 years. The scores of teachers with an administrative position were significantly higher than those of subject teachers and homeroom teachers. The scores of local resident teachers were significantly higher than of non-resident teachers. Third, in terms of involuntary retention, the scores of teachers between 31 to 40 years old were significantly higher than other age groups. The scores of teachers with teaching years of employment less than 5 years were significantly higher than those with teaching years of employment more than 6 years. The scores of non-resident teachers were significantly higher than those of local resident teachers. Fourth, the variables of material status, different cities, and school identification significantly predict retention, and the variable of school identification was the strongest one. The suggestions of the findings were made for educational authorities, rural area elementary schools, and future researchers.

1. 林秀吟, H. Y.,廖益興, Y. H.(2014)。國民小學資訊組長工作壓力與留任意願之研究。中華行政學報，14，201-226。
   連結：
2. 許逢修, F. S.,吳淑鈴, S. L.(2015)。服務業員工職場友誼對組織公民行為之影響：組織認同的中介效果。管理研究學報，15(2)，85-119。
   連結：
3. 潘淑琦, S. C.(2017)。初任校長從實踐經驗中開拓偏鄉教育之研究。嘉大教育研究學刊，38，35-69。
   連結：
4. 蔡宗廷, C. T.,張育菱, Y. L.(2015)。金融人才性格測驗對工作滿意、工作績效與留任意願之效標關聯驗證─以P 銀行為例。兩岸金融季刊，3(3)，1-46。
   連結：
5. 教育窗（2016）。教師來來去去偏鄉學校揮不去的惡夢。取自https://www.facebook.com/newmediatw/posts/1570773893246120[Edu-Window (2016). It is a nightmare for rural schools that teachers come back and forth. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/newmediatw/posts/1570773893246120]
6. Abelson, M. A.(1987).Examination of avoidable and unavoidable turnover.Journal of Applied Psychology,72,382-386.
7. Allensworth, E.,Ponisciak, S.,Mazzeo, C.(2009).The schools teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago public schools.Chicago, IL:Consortium on Chicago School Research.
8. Avalos, B.,Valenzuela, J. P.(2014).Education for all and attrition/retention of new teachers: A trajectory study in Chile.International Journal of Educational Development,49,279-290.
9. Bizumic, B.,Reynolds, K. J.,Turner, J. C.(2009).The role of the group in individual functioning: School identification and the psychological well-being of staff and students.Applied Psychology,58(1),171-192.
10. Finn, J. D.(1989).Withdrawing from school.Review of Educational Research,59(2),117-142.
11. Goodenow, C.(1993).The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates.Psychology in the Schools,30,79-90.
12. Hallam, P. R.,Chou, P. N.,Hite J. M.(2012).Two contrasting models for mentoring as they affect retention of beginning teachers.NASSP Bulletin,96(3),243-278.
13. Heineke, A. J.,Mazza B.S,Tichnor-Wagner A.(2014).After the two-year commitment: A quantitative and qualitative inquiry of teach for America teacher retention and attrition.Urban Education,49(7),750-782.
14. Jenkins, P. H.(1997).School delinquency And the school social bond.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,34,337-367.
15. Kraus, F.,Haumann, T.,Ahearne, M.,Wieseke, J.(2015).When sales managers and salespeople disagree in the appreciation for their firm: The phenomenon of organizational identification tension.Journal of Retailing,91(3),486-515.
16. Mafora, P.(2013).Managing teacher retention in a rural school district in South Africa.Australian Educational Researcher,40,227-240.
17. Naim, M. F.,Lenkla, U.(2016).Knowledge sharing as an intervention for Gen Y employees’ intention to stay.Industrial and Commercial Training,48(3),142-148.
18. Patchen, M.(1970).Participation achievement involvement job.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall Inc..
19. Tett, R.P.,Meyer, J.P.(1993).Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings.Personnel Psychology,46(2),259-293.
20. Troman, G.(2008).Primary teacher identity, commitment and career in performative school cultures.British Educational Research Journal,34(5),619-633.
21. Whipp, J. L.,Geronime, L.(2017).Experiences that predict early career teacher commitment to and retention in high-poverty urban schools.Urban Education,52(7),799-828.
22. 王佳蓉, C. J.,陳怡昌, Y. C.(2017)。社會支持對工作壓力與離職意願關係之調節結果—以臺南市國民中學教師為例。全球商業經營管理學報，9，67-82。
23. 王麗雲, L. Y.,甄曉蘭, H. L. Sharon(2007)。臺灣偏遠地區教育機會均等政策模式之分析與反省。教育資料集刊，36，25-46。
24. 何俊青, C. C.(2017)。偏鄉教育問題的迷思。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(9)，15-19。
25. 何慧群, H. C.,永井正武, M.(2016)。偏鄉小學教育—校長駐校與代理扶正。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(2)，12-20。
26. 吳清山, C. S.,林天祐, T. Y.(2009)。教育名詞偏鄉教育。教育資料與研究雙月刊，90，177-178。
27. 吳寶珍, P. C.(2016)。為偏鄉小校培育優秀教師。師友月刊，584，20-25。
28. 李元墩, Y. D.,鍾志明, C. M.,林育理, Y. L.(2000)。臺灣企業員工組織承諾衡量模式建構之研究。成功大學學報，35，133-157。
29. 李國賓, K. P.(2010)。新北=New Taipei City, Taiwan，天主教輔仁大學=Fu-Jen University。
30. 沈怡君, Y. C.,黃能堂, N. T.(2012)。期望落差、組織氣候、組織社會化對留任意願影響之研究。就業與勞動關係季刊，2(2)，208-235。
31. 林國源（2017）。偏鄉教育需要的不是「把人綁住」，而是用「對的資源」，讓對的人留下來！取自https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/6122[Lin, K. Y. (2017). What the rural education needs is not to “bind teachers,” but to use “right resources” to keep the right teachers. Retrieved from https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/6122]
32. 邱皓政, H. J.(2000).量化研究與統計分析.臺北=Taipei:五南=Wunan.
33. 姜禮讓, L. R.(1985)。國民小學教育人員校際流動調查研究。教育研究集刊，27，303-313。
34. 孫文琳, W. L.(2016)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
35. 高富美, F. M.(2014)。改善偏鄉小校教師流動率之淺見。臺灣教育評論月刊，3(5)，75-76。
36. 高慧如, H. J.(2007)。新北=New Taipei City, Taiwan，天主教輔仁大學=Fu-Jen University。
37. 教育部（2017a）。偏遠地區學校教育發展條例。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001698&KeyWord=偏遠地區學校教育發展條例[Ministry of Education (2017a). Act for education development of schools in remote areas. Retrieved from http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001698&KeyWord=偏遠地區學校教育發展條例]
38. 教育部（2017b）。偏遠地區中等以下公立學校地理資訊查詢系統。取自http://stats.moe.gov.tw/remotegis/[Ministry of Education (2017b). Geographic Information inquiry system for elementary and secondary public schools in remote areas. Retrieved from http://stats.moe.gov.tw/remotegis/]
39. 教育部統計處（2015）。教育統計簡訊，42。取自http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/103 學年偏遠地區國民中小學概況.pdf[Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education (2015). Education Statistics Newsletter, 42. Retrieved from http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/103學年偏遠地區國民中小學概況.pdf]
40. 教育部統計處（2017）。偏遠地區國民中小學教師數。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=OAAzAA2[Department of Statistics,Ministry of Education (2017). Numbers of primary and secondary school teachers in remote areas. Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=OAAzAA2]
41. 郭乃禎, N. C.(2011)。臺中=Taichung, Taiwan，中臺科技大學=Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology。
42. 馮丰儀, F. I,方竣憲, C. H.(2017)。偏鄉師資教育之結與解。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(9)，90-92。
43. 黃彥超, Y.-C.(2016)。偏鄉小校發展之思維：學校特色發展。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(5)，38-42。
44. 蕭霖, L.(1996)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學=National Chengchi University。

1. 龔心怡,孫俊傑,李靜儀(2023)。包容性評鑑取向運用於偏鄉國民中學學習扶助方案之探究。教育科學研究期刊，68(3)，141-178。