大班教學環境中即時反饋及適性化學習系統的應用對大學生學習成效和投入的影響

The Influence of Applying Interactive Response and Adaptive Learning Systems in Large Classes on College Students' Learning Outcome and Engagement

10.3966/207136492020041301005

邱華慧(Hua-Huei Chiou)

即時反饋 ； 適性化學習 ； 學習成效 ； 學習投入 ； Interactive response system ； Adaptive learning system ； Learning outcome ； Learning engagement

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

13卷1期（2020 / 04 / 01）

101 - 128

繁體中文

本研究之目的在探討在大班教學的課程中，應用即時反饋和適性化學習系統融入教學，對於大學生專業科目學習成效和學習投入的影響。本研究以幼兒觀察課程為進行之場域，採準實驗研究法中的不等組前後測設計，三個班級參與者共130人。各班級課程內容相同，實驗組1課程中48位學生以手機使用即時反饋系統輔助教與學，實驗組2的48位學生使用即時反饋系統加上適性化學習系統，對照組34位學生則為直接講授與討論，課程中教師搭配隨堂短測驗和討論等策略進行教學。研究結果發現，應用即時反饋系統融入教學的作法，相較於對照組，實驗組學生在期中和期末成績的表現皆顯著較佳，但是外加適性化教材系統則無明顯幫助；結果也顯示運用即時反饋系統，可提升學生的學習投入，即時反饋系統亦能協助學生較願意表達個人想法並且勇於主動提問，此研究結果對於改進在大學課堂中學生被動學習且怯於發問的現象，提供了改善的策略。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the application of an Interactive Response System (IRS) and an adaptive learning system in a professional course for college students and the effects of their learning outcome and course engagement. The study is conducted for the course ＂Child Observation＂ in the Department of Child Care. A quasi-experimental design is adopted with 130 research subjects from three classes, and the course contents of these three classes are the same. One experimental class of 48 students uses IRS in the teaching of the course, another experimental class of 48 students uses IRS and an adaptive learning system, and the traditional lecture and discussion method is used in the control class of 34 students. Research results show that IRS might benefit students' performance in mid-term and final examinations, but the adaptive learning system does not significantly influence students' learning performance. The results also show problem solving strategies that are beneficial for improving students' passive learning attitudes and decreasing their fear of asking questions.

1. 黃政傑, J. J.,張嘉育, C. Y.(2010)。讓學生成功學習：適性課程與教學之理念與策略。課程與教學，13(3)，1-22。
   連結：
2. Alexander, P. A.(Ed.),Winne, P. H.(Ed.)(2006).Handbook of educational psychology.New York, NY:Routledge.
3. Aljaloud, A. S.,Gromik, N.,Kwan, P.,Billingsley, W.(2019).Saudi undergraduate students’perceptions of the use of smartphone clicker apps on learning performance.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,35(1),85-99.
4. Appleton, J. J.,Christenson, S. L.,Furlong, M. J.(2008).Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct.Psychology in the Schools,45,369-386.
5. Bimba, A. T.,Idris, N.,Al-Hunaiyyan, A.,Mahmud, R. B.,Shuib, N. L. B. M.(2017).Adaptive feedback in computer-based learning environments: A review.Adaptive Behavior,25(5),217-234.
6. Chapman, E.(2003).Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates.Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation,13(8),1-10.
7. Connor, E.(2011).Using cases and clickers in library instruction: Designed for science undergraduates.Science & Technology Libraries,30,244-253.
8. Crossgrove, K.,Curran, K.(2008).Using clickers in non-majors and majors-level biology courses: Student opinion, learning and long-term retention of course material.CBE-Life Sciences Education,7,146-154.
9. Emenike, M. E.,Home, T. A.(2012).Classroom response systems have not "crossed the chasm"：Estimating the numbers of chemistry faculty who use clickers.Journal of Chemical Education,89,465-469.
10. Farmer, R.（2006）. Instant messaging-collaborative tool or educator’s nightmare! Retrieved from https://www.student.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~cs492/papers/im.pdfhttp://www.unb.ca/naweb/proceedings/2003/PaperFarmer.html.
11. Felder, R.,Silverman, L.(1988).Learning and teaching style in engineering education.Engineering Education,78(7),674-681.
12. Fleming, N. D.(2001).Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies.Philadelphia, PA:Idea Group Publishing.
13. Flynn, A. B.(2012).Development of an online, postclass question method and its integration with teaching strategies.Journal of Chemical Education,89,456-464.
14. Frand, J.(2000).The information-age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education.Educause,35(5),14-24.
15. Fredricks, J.A.,Blumenfeld, P.,Paris, A.(2004).School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence.Review of Educational Research,74,59-109.
16. Fuller, M. B.,Wilson, M. A.,Tobin, R. M.(2011).The national survey of student engagement as a predictor of undergraduate GPA: A cross-sectional and longitudinal examination.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,36(6),735-748.
17. Furlong, M. J.,Whipple, A. D.,Jean, G. S.,Simental, J.,Soliz, A.,Punthuna, S.(2003).Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice.The California School Psychologist,8,99-113.
18. Graf, S.,Kinshuk, K.(2007).Providing adaptive courses in learning management systems with respect to learning styles.Proceedings of E-Learn:World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007,Chesapeake, VA:
19. Graf, S.,Kinshuk,Liu, T. C.(2009).Supporting teachers in identifying students' learning styles in learning management systems: An automatic student modelling approach.Journal of Educational Technology & Society,12(4),3-14.
20. Hung, B. P.(2019).Meaningful learning and its implications for language education in Vietnam.Journal of Language and Education,5(1),98-102.
21. Karaman, S.(2011).Effects of audience response systems on student achievement and long-term retention.Social Behavior and Personality,39,1431-1440.
22. Kolb, D.(1985).Learning-Style inventory.Boston, MA:McBer.
23. Kraus, L. A.,Reed, W. M.,Fitzgerald, G. E.(2001).The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: A case-based hypermedia environment.Computers in Human Behavior,17,125-140.
24. Kuh, G. D.(2001).The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties.Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research & Planning.
25. Lantz, M. E.,Stawiski, A.(2014).Effectiveness of clickers: Effect of feedback and the timing of questions on learning.Computers in Human Behavior,31,280-286.
26. Mayer, R. E.(2008).Learning and instruction.NY:Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
27. Mayer, R. E.,Stull, A.,DeLeeuw, K.,Almeroth, K.,Bimber, B.,Chun, D.,Zhang, H.(2009).Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture asses.Contemporary Educational Psychology,34(1),51-57.
28. Morling, B.,McAuliffe, M.,Cohen, L.,DiLorenzo, T. M.(2008).Efficacy of personal response systems ("clickers") in large, introductory psychology classes.Teaching of Psychology,35,45-50.
29. Poole, D.(2012).The impact of anonymous and assigned use of student response systems on student achievement.Journal of Interactive Learning Research,23(2),101-112.
30. Porter, S.(2006).Institutional structures and student engagement.Research in Higher Education,47(5),531-558.
31. Russell, V. J., Ainley, M., & Frydenberg, E. （2005）. Schooling issues digest: Student motivation and engagement. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school
32. Schuetz, P.(2008).A theory-driven model of community college student engagement.Community College Journal of Research and Practice,32,305-324.
33. Shaffer, D. M.,Collura, M. J.(2009).Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom.Teaching of Psychology,36,273-277.
34. Shapiro, A. M.(2009).An empirical study of personal response technology for improving attendance and learning in a large class.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,9,13-26.
35. Shieh, R. S.,Wheijen, C.(2013).Implementing the interactive response system in a high school physics context: Intervention and reflections.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,29(5),748-761.
36. Shinde, G. S.(2010).The relationship between students' responses on the National Survey of Student Engagement (Nsse) and retention.Review of Higher Education & Self-Learning,3(7),54-67.
37. Spector, J. M.(2014).Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments.Smart learning environments,1(1),2.
38. Strang, K. D.(2011).Asynchronous knowledge sharing and conversation interaction impact on grade in an online business course.Journal of Education for Business,86(4),223-233.
39. Trees, A. R.,Jackson, M. H.(2007).The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems.Learning, Media and Technology,32(1),21-40.
40. Trowler, V.,Trowler, P.(2010).,University of Lancaster: Department of Educational Research.
41. Truong, H. M.(2016).Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities.Computers in Human Behavior,55,1185-1193.
42. Umbach, P. D.,Wawrzynski, M. R.(2005).Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement.Research in Higher Education,46(2),153-184.
43. Vaughn, K. E.,Rawson, K. A.(2012).When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?.Psychonomic Bulletin Review,19,899-905.
44. Wang, A. I.,Elvemo, A. A.,Gamnes, V.(2014).Three social classroom applications to improve student attitudes.Education Research International,2014,1-14.
45. Yazzie-Mintz, E. （2010）. Charting the path from engagement to achievement: A report on the 2009 high school survey of student engagement: Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
46. Yourstone, S. A.,Kraye, H. S.,Albaum, G.(2008).Classroom questioning with immediate electronic response: Do clickers improve learning?.Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education,6,75-88.
47. Zepke, N.,Leach, L.(2010).Beyond hard outcomes: "Soft" outcomes and engagement as student success.Teaching in Higher Education,15,661-673.
48. 于蕙清, Lily H.C.(2010)。以非同步討論小組進行合作式學習 ─「現代世界史」為例。高醫通識教育學報，5，35-55。
49. 林含諭, H. Y.(2017)。資訊科技應用於適性化學習的教學策略之探討研究。臺灣教育評論月刊，6(6)，142-145。
50. 張晉昌, J.C.,黃學堂, S. T.(2008)。高職學生不同學習風格對數位學習成效影響之研究。技術及職業教育學報，2(1)，37- 57。
51. 陳嘉彌, J. M.(1997)。網路互動式遠距教學策略之構想與其可行性（上）。教學科技與媒體，34，42-46。
52. 陳嘉彌, J. M.(2008)。跨年級同儕師徒制中師傅生學業成績及其學習感受改變之分析。教育研究與發展期刊，4(1)，109-140。
53. 簡禎富, C. F.,許嘉裕, C. Y.(2014).資料挖礦與大數據分析.台北市=Taipei, Taiwan:前程文化=Future Career Publishing.

1. 侯雅齡(2023)。國中及高中數理資優學生學習投入之縱貫研究。特殊教育學報，57，37-69。
2. 蘇美禎,林嘉玲,李慧貞(2022)。疫情下遠距多元互動教學融入社區衛生護理課程學習成效之探討。教育傳播與科技研究，129，45-62。
3. 楊昕,黃諭宣,湯文慈,林羿君(2023)。整合情境式教學應用於運動生物力學與技術診斷課程實踐研究。臺灣體育學術研究，74，1-15。
4. (2024)。素養導向教學提升大學生民主素養之探討。通識學刊：理念與實務，12(2)，117-163+165。