题名

「反思性對話」運用於在職教保服務人員專業成長之探究

并列篇名

Inquiry of Reflective Conversations Applied to In-service Preschool Teachers' Professional Development

DOI

10.3966/207136492020041301003

作者

張素貞(Su-Chen Chang)

关键词

反思性對話 ; 反思教學 ; 教保服務人員 ; 教師專業發展 ; reflective conversation ; reflective teaching ; pre-school teachers ; teachers' professional development

期刊名称

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

卷期/出版年月

13卷1期(2020 / 04 / 01)

页次

53 - 73

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探究「反思性對話」運作的歷程與促進教保服務人員專業的開展。關於反思性對話運作的概念,理念層面主要以文獻探討作為立論的根基,並輔以在現場實務層面的運作歷程,研究者透過現場觀察、深度訪談、研究者和參與者的反思札記以及教保服務人員的教學相關對話與文件,歷時一年進行資料的蒐集,並以主題分析法進行分析,以獲得反思性對話運作策略與促進教保服務人員專業發展的情形。本研究發現反思性對話的方法與策略為:反思性對話的進行需建立在信任的關係基礎,內容從參與者的經驗開始切入,讓教保服務人員對反思性對話意涵與運作有所知覺,強調教保服務人員與專業文本進行反思與對話的歷程,鼓勵教保服務人員對其「意識流」有所覺察、強調「教學中」與「教學中反思之交互作用的再思」之對話運作,透過由口說、書寫、自我、社群、專業(理論)文本與交相運作後的反思與對話;而個案教保服務人員專業開展的情形為:從無意識耗時耗力的反思,逐漸到具覺察性的習慣性反思、教師課程意識的提升與反思性教學實務,激發出教師的教學熱情。

英文摘要

The aims of this study were to explore the mechanics of reflective conversations and promote the practice of reflective teaching among pre-school teachers. To examine the concept of reflective conversations, we conducted a literature review to develop the theoretical framework and observed reflective conversation practices on-site to obtain practical insights. Over a period of one year, we collected data from on-site observations, in-depth interviews, reflective journals kept by the researchers and participants, teaching-related conversations, and documents of preschool teachers. The collected data subsequently underwent thematic analysis to determine strategies of reflective conversation practices and to provide suggestions for promoting preschool teachers' professional development. The methods of reflective conversations determined in this study are outlined as follows developing reflective conversations through a trust-based relationship; initiating conversations with topics that a participant is familiar with encouraging pre-school teachers to understand the meaning and mechanics of reflective conversations, to use professional texts for the reflection and conversation processes, and to pay attention to their streams of consciousness emphasizing the mechanics of conversations developed between the teaching process and the reinterpretation of the reflections on their teaching; and developing reflections and conversations through the interaction between speaking, writing, self, communities, and professional (theoretical) texts. By observing the reflective teaching practices of the teacher participants, we obtained the following findings initially, the teachers found reflections to be a time-consuming and demanding process and did not develop an awareness of their reflections however, the teachers developed an awareness of and became accustomed to their reflections gradually. Moreover, increasing teacher awareness of courses and their reflective teaching practices might stimulate their enthusiasm toward teaching.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 張素貞, S. C.,劉美慧, M. H.(2018)。以協作敘事取徑促進幼教師專業發展歷程之探究。當代教育研究,26(3),35-68。
    連結:
  2. (2007).Collins COBUILD Advanced Dictionary of American English.Boston:Thomson.
  3. Clandinin, D. J.(1985).Personal practical knowledge: A st udy of teachers' classroom images.Curriculum Inquiry,15(4),361-385.
  4. Clandinin, J. D.(Ed.),Davis, A.(Ed.),Hogan, P.(Ed.),Kennard, B.(Ed.)(1993).Learning to teach, teaching to learn: Stories of collaboration in teacher education.New York:Teacher's College Press.
  5. Clark, C. M.(Ed.)(2001).Talk shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning.New York:Teacher College Press.
  6. Clark, C. M.(Ed.)(2001).Talk shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning.New York, NY:Teacher College Press.
  7. Clark, C. M.,Peterson P. L.(1984).,未出版
  8. Day, C.(2004).A passion for teaching.New York, NY:Routledge Falmer.
  9. Dewey, J. (1933) . How we think. New York, NY: Free Press.
  10. Elliott, J.(Ed.)(1993).Reconstruction teacher education: Teacher development.London, UK:The Falmer Press.
  11. Farrell, T. S. C.(2004).Reflective practice in action: 80 reflection breaks for busy teachers.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin.
  12. Freire, P.(1973).Education for critical consciousness.New York:Continuum.
  13. Fuller, F. F.(1969).Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization.American Educational Research Journal,6,207-226.
  14. Ghaye, T.,Ghaye, K.(1998).Teaching and learning through critical reflective practice.London, UK:David Fulton Press.
  15. Gipe, J. P.,Richards, J. C.(1992).Reflective thinking and growth in novices, teaching abilities.Journal of Educational Research,86(1),52-57.
  16. Gitlin, A. D.(1990).Educative research, voice, and school change.Harvard Educational Review,60(4),443-466.
  17. Grimmett, P. P.,MacKinnon, A. M.,Erickson, G. L.,Riecken, T. J.(1990).Reflective practice in teacher education.Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs,New York:
  18. Jay, J. K.,Johnson, K. L.(2002).Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education.Teaching and Teacher Education,18,73-85.
  19. Katz, L. G.(1972).Developmental stages of preschool teachers.Elementary School Journal,73(1),50-54.
  20. Kelly, J. & Cherkowshi, S.(2014). Collaboration, collegiality, and collective reflection:A case study of professional development for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/pdf_files/kelly_cherkowski.pdf
  21. Korthagen, F.(1993).Two modes of reflection.Teaching and Teacher Education,9,317-326.
  22. LaBoskey, V. K.(1994).Development of reflective practice: a study of preservice teachers.New York:Teachers College Press.
  23. Lieberman, A.,Miller, L.(1990).Restructuring schools: What matters and what works.Phi Delta Kappan,71,759-764.
  24. Lyons, N.(Ed.),LaBoskey, V. K.(Ed.)(2002).Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching.New York:Teachers College Press.
  25. Pinar, W.(Ed.)(1975).Curriculum theorizing: The conceptualist.Berkeley, CA:McCutchan.
  26. Posner, G. J.(1996).Field experience: A guide to reflective teaching.New York:Longman.
  27. Schön, D. A.(1983).The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action.London:Routledge.
  28. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57,1-22.
  29. Smyth, J.(1993).Reflective practice in teacher education.Australian Journal of Teacher Education,18(1)
  30. Spodek, B.(1995).The professional development of early childhood teachers.Early childhood education symposium of Taiwan and United States: The professional development of early childhood teachers,Taipei, Taiwan:
  31. Spodek, B.(Ed.),Saracho, O. N.(Ed.),Peters, D. L.(Ed.)(1988).Professionalism and the early childhood practitioner.New York:Teachers College Press.
  32. Thayer-Bacon, B.(1995).Constructive thinking: Personal voice.Journal of Thought,Spring,55-70.
  33. Van Manen, M.(1990).Researching lived experience- human science for action sensitive pedagogy.New York:Routledge.
  34. Van Manen, M.(1991).Reflectivity and pedagogical moment: The normativity of pedagogical thinking and acting.Journal of Studies,23,507-536.
  35. Vella, J.(2002).Learning to listen learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  36. Witherell, C.(Ed.),Noddings, N.(Ed.)(1991).Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
  37. Zeichner, K. M.,Liston, D. P.(2014).Reflective teaching: An introduction.London, UK:Routledge.
  38. 李咏吟, Y. Y.(1998).認知教學:理論與策略.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理出版社=Psychological Publishing.
  39. 林育瑋, Y. W.(1996)。幼教教師的專業成長歷程。台北師院學報,9,803-832。
  40. 徐綺穗, C. S.(2009)。學生反思內涵的分析及其對教學實習課程的啟示。教育研究與發展期刊,5(1),35-58。
  41. 張素貞, S. C.(2014)。我的幼稚園輔導之旅:一位輔導員的覺醒與行動。幼兒教保研究期刊,12,1-18。
  42. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2015)。教育部(2015)。幼兒園輔導計畫。臺北市:作者。[Ministry of Education.(2015). Preshcool counseling program. Taipei, Taiwan:Author.]。
  43. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2017)。,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:作者=Author。
  44. 教育部(2017b)。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。臺北市: 作者。[Ministry of Education.(2017b). Early childhood education and care curriculum Framework. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.]
  45. 甄曉蘭, H. L.(2004).課程理論與實務:解構與重建.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education Publishing.
  46. 潘慧玲, H. L.(2003)。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊,11(1),115-143。
  47. 簡紅珠, H. C.(1992).教學研究主要派典及其啟示之探析.高雄=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:復文=Fu Wen Books.