臺灣網路霸凌之實證研究

The Empirical Study of Cyberbully in Taiwan

10.30136/ZXYGLKX.201206.0002

廖國良(Gwo-Liang Liao)；黃正魁(Tony Cheng-Kui Huang)；張仁俊(Jen-Chun Chang)；劉籹君(Chuang-Chun Liu)

霸凌 ； 網路霸凌 ； Bullying ； Cyberbullying

資訊與管理科學

5卷1期（2012 / 06 / 01）

31 - 55

繁體中文

霸凌已經普遍影響到校園甚至成人的社會，而網際網路的普及運用，也讓霸凌方式有了新的型式。網路霸凌是藉由網際網路來進行霸凌，人們可以不用傳統的方式霸凌別人，應用隨身攜帶的上網科技產品就能隨時隨地進行霸凌的行為。網際網路結合手機、電腦等科技產品達到即時通訊能力，不僅能讓認識你的人在你活動的網路世界裡看見自己上傳的訊息，也藉由網際網路無國界的特性來做到讓全世界的人都看得到你所上傳的訊息。本研究以問卷調查法的方式去瞭解臺灣網路霸凌的情況，以描述統計裡的比例分析與交叉分析，試圖找出會影響網路霸凌的相關因素。最後根據結果提出相關建議及未來發展。

Bullying has been affected the campus and the society, while the popularization of the internet, bullying has emerged in a new form. However, rely on internet access through portable technology products can also achieve the purpose without using the traditional way. The definition of cyberbullying is through the internet to achieve bullying. Internet combines many technological products including mobile phones and computers to accomplish in-time communication, people who know you can not only know the information in your mobile internet, but also can use the characteristic of unlimited internet to make people see the message you upload. This theory uses questionnaires to comprehend cyberbullying which through descriptive statistics in the proportion of analysis and cross-analysis to figure out the impacts of cyberbullying. In conclusion, the writer would provide some suggestions and future developments based on the results.

1. 蔡育如、高宛瑜、祁容玉(2011 年3 月26 日)，《校園霸凌女國中生遭圍毆過程ＰＯ上網》，聯合報，B1 版
2. 邱靖惠、蕭慧琳(2009)，《臺灣校園霸凌現象與危機因素之解析》，兒童福利聯盟文教基金會，http://www.children.org.tw
3. 中小學網路素養與認知(2002)，http://eteacher.edu.tw/Read.aspx?PostID=1870
4. 網路霸凌調查中心(2011)， http://www.cyberbullying.us/
5. Hinduja, S., and Patchin,W. J. (2010), “Cyberbullying research summary: The changing nature of online social networking,”Cyberbuylling Research, availableonline at http:// www.cyberbulling.us/index.php
6. 張念慈(2011 年5 月10 日)，《網路貼文恐嚇工程師被提告》，聯合報，B1 版。
7. 曾懿晴(2011 年2 月16 日)，《匿名攻擊更猛烈網路成新霸主》，聯合報，AA4 版
8. Campbell, M. A.(2005).Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise?.Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling,15(1),68-76.
9. Gackenbach, J.(ed.)(2007).Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal and Transpersonal Implications.San Diego, CA:Elsevier Academic Press.
10. Huang, Y. Y.,Chou, C.(2010).An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbully among junior high school students in Taiwa.Computer in Human Behavior,26(6),1581-1590.
11. Jacobs, J. D.(2010).Teen Cyberbullying Investingated.America:Free Spirit Publishing Inc..
12. Kowalski, R. M.,Limber, S. P.,Agatston, P.W(2008).CYBER BULLYING.Malden:Blackwell.
13. Li, Q.(2007).New bottle but old wine: A research of cyberbullying in school.Computer in Human Behavior,23(4),1777-1791.
14. Macdonald, C. D.,Bridget, R. P.(2010).Cyberbullying among college student: prevalence and demographic differences.Procedia social and Behavioral Sciences,9,2003-2009.
15. McLoughlin, C.,Meyricke, R.,Burgess, J.(2009).Bullies in Cyberspace: How Rural and Regional Australian Youth Perceive the Problem of Cyberbullying and Its Impact.International Symposium for Innovation in Rural Education Improving Equity in Rural Education,Australia:
16. Mishna, F.,Saini, M.,Solomon, S.(2009).Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullyin.Children and Youth Services Review,31(12),1222-1228.
17. Olweus, D.(1993).Bullying at school-what we know and what we can do.Cambridge, MA:Blackwell.
18. Olweus, D.(2001).Bullying at school: Tackling the problem.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,225,24-26.
19. Swarth, M. K(2009).Cyberbullying: An extension ofthe schoolyard.Journal of Pediatric Health Care,23(5),281-282.
20. Willard, N.(2007).Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress.Champaign Illinois:Research Press.
21. Worthen, M. R.(2007).Education policy implications from the expert panel on electronic media and youth violenc.Journal of Adolescent Health,41(6),61-63.
22. Ybarra, M.,Mitchell, K.(2004).Youth engaging in online in online harassment: Associations with cargiver- child relationship, Internet use, and personal characteristi.Journal of Adolescence,27(3),319-336.
23. 朱美瑰(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。

1. 黃國彰(2018)。網路霸凌的輔導策略。諮商與輔導，396，6-10。
2. 黃俊勝、王昱翔(2017)。潛規則？運動場域中辱禮活動之文獻回顧。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，16(2)，133-142。
3. 林育陞(2018)。青少年網路霸凌對身心影響之探討。諮商與輔導，396，2-5。
4. 施琮仁(2017)。台灣青少年網路霸凌現況、原因與影響。中華傳播學刊，32，203-240。
5. 石泱,王乃琳(2021)。父母、家庭與同儕對兒童及少年網路霸凌行為影響之研究。社會發展研究學刊，28，39-72。
6. 顏妙如(2020)。國小學童及青少年負向支配性人格、自律學習行為及人際需要對網路霸凌行為的影響關係。休閒運動健康評論，9(2)，1-23。
7. (2021)。美國網路霸凌立法與學校管理判例對臺灣的啟示。教育研究月刊，327，103-114。
8. (2021)。校園霸凌防制準則2020年修法評釋。月旦法學雜誌，308，212-220。
9. (2024)。高中職普通生霸凌行為之研究。教育科學研究期刊，69(1)，165-206。
10. (2024)。虛擬實境中體驗霸凌受害者經歷對旁觀者在同理心、行為、和態度上的影響。資訊管理學報，31(1)，123-151。