登山健行者之遊憩衝突經驗與因應行爲之研究

The Study of the Recreation Conflicts and Coping Behaviors on Mountain Walkers

10.29859/JITR.201103.0004

趙芝良(Chih-Liang Chao)；王羿婷(I-Ting Wang)

遊憩衝突 ； 因應行爲 ； 人際間衝突 ； 社會價值觀衝突 ； Recreation Conflict ； Coping Behavior ； Interpersonal Conflict ； Social Values Conflict

島嶼觀光研究

4卷1期（2011 / 03 / 01）

53 - 78

繁體中文

台灣地小人稠，爲達到資源利用的最大化，在一地點同時存在多種遊憩活動時，活動參與者對於環境、人際間與社會價值觀所產生的心理衝突，勢必會降低遊憩品質或滿意度。近年來登山自行車廣爲推展，且其資源圈劃地多與登山健行活動者重疊，因此本研究選定登山健行活動與登山自行車活動皆相當活絡的新興路線－彰化縣花壇鄉的「虎山岩地區」作爲研究範圍，以健行者的經驗單向性調查方式，探討健行者與登山自行車活動者之間的遊憩衝突類型，以及遭遇衝突所採用之因應行爲取向。依據2006年三月至七月獲取150位現地與非現地受訪者問卷，經由卡方獨立性檢定、t檢定與羅吉特迴歸分析分析結果顯示：(1)衝突對象與遊憩衝突類型部份顯著相關，且以人際間衝突爲主要衝突發生情況。(2)在遭遇內部或外部團體時，因應行爲的採用程度會因衝突類型不同而有部分顯著差異。且遭遇社會價值觀衝突時所採用的因應行爲程度皆顯著的高於人際間衝突的因應行爲採用程度。(3)活動特性會顯著影響因應行爲採用的類型。研究結果將針對實務與理論應用試提供建議。

Taiwan is a small island but crowding with people. In order to maximize the utility of natural setting, the common situations are that many recreation activities share the same area. A theoretical model was adapted to understand both the recreationists' appraisal of conflict situations and the recreationists' response to these situations. To approach this understanding, recreation conflicts were defined as stress-producing hassles encountered during the outdoor recreation experience. A psychosocial stress/coping model was adapted for the recreation context. The population of this study was walkers to the Tiger Mountain Rock Area in Chang-hua County on the period through March to July, 2006. Total 150 subjects were collected from on-site and mailing questionnaire surveys. The results through Chi-square Test, T-test and Logistic Regression were shown as follows: (1) The types of conflict group were partially related to the conflict types and the degree of conflict perceptions. Moreover, the interpersonal conflict was the major determinant of conflict. (2) In face of conflicts happened in in-group or out-group status, some of emotion-focused or problem-focused coping behaviors were significantly different between the types of recreation conflict. That is, the degree of coping behaviors adoption were significantly higher while conflicts from social value than interpersonal conflict (3)In terms of the activity characteristics, the frequency of participating activity was the most significant independent variable to identify whether emotion-focused or problem-focused coping behaviors would be adopted. Implications and application were drawn for recreation management strategies.

1. 王正平(2004)。登山健行遊客與登山自行車使用者遊憩衝突之研究。戶外遊憩研究，17(4)，71-91。
   連結：
2. 巫昌陽(2003)。海域休閒活動參與者遊憩衝突之探討。大專體育學刊，5(2)，51-63。
   連結：
3. 彰化縣政府(2010)。彰化TOP5 單車休閒旅遊PaPaGo。上網日期：2011 年2 月10 日。網址：http://chbike.emmm.tw/。
4. Moore, R. L. (1994). Conflicts on multiple-use trails: Synthesis of the literature and state of the practice. The Federal Highway Administration and the National Recreational Trails Advisory Committee, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation..
5. 參山國家風景區(2009)。參山國家風景區簡訊。上網日期：2011 年2 月10 日。網址：http://www.trimt-nsa.gov.tw
6. 行政院體育委員會全民運動處(2001)。登山活動概況。上網日期：2009 年6 月14 日。網址：http://media.justsports.net.tw/spo_demo/online_leisure.asp?m_3_id=492。
7. Albritton, R.,Stein, T. V.(2011).Integrating social and natural resource information to improve planning for motorized recreation.Applied Geography,31,85-97.
8. Carothers, P.,Vaske, J. J.,Donnelly, M. P.(2001).Social values versus interpersonal conflict among hikers and mountain bikers.Leisure science,23,47-61.
9. Cessford, G.(2003).Perception and reality of conflict: walkers and mountain bikes on the Queen Charlotte Track in New Zealand.Journal for Nature Conservation,11,310-316.
10. Coleman, D.,Iso-Ahola, S. E.(1993).Leisure and health: The role of social support and selfdetermination.Journal of Leisure Research,25(2),111-128.
11. Folkman, S.,Lazarus, R. S.(1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping.New York:Springer Publishing Company.
12. Gibbons, S.,Ruddell, E. J.(1995).The effect of goal orientation and place dependence on select goal interferences among winter backcountry users.Leisure Sciences,17,171-183.
13. Hidalgo, A.(2010).university of British Columbia.
14. Iwasaki, Y.,Schneider, I. E.(2003).Leisure, stress, and coping: An evolving area of inquiry.Leisure Sciences,25(2/3),107-113.
15. Jacob, G. R.,Schreyer, R.(1980).Conflict in outdoor recreation: a theoretical perspective.Journal of Leisure Research,12(4),368-380.
16. Manfredo, M. J.(Ed.),Vaske, J. J.(Ed.),Bruyere, B. L.(Ed.),Field, D. R.(Ed.),Brown, P. J.(Ed.)(2004).Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge.Jefferson, MO:Moders Litho.
17. Manning, R. E.(1999).Studies in outdoor recreation: search and research for satisfaction.Corvallis, Or.:Oregon State University Press.
18. Ramthun, R.(1995).Factors in user group conflict between hikers and mountain bikers.Leisure Sciences,17(3),159-169.
19. Ruddell, E. J.,Gramann, J. H.(1994).Goal orientation, norms, and noise-induced conflict among recreation area users.Leisure science,16(2),93-104.
20. Saremba, J.,Gill, A.(1991).Value conflicts in mountain park settings.Annals of Tourism Research,18,455-472.
21. Schneider, I. E.,Hammitt, W. E.(1995).Visitor response to outdoor recreation conflict: a conceptual approach.Leisure Sciences,17,223-234.
22. Schneider, I. E.,Hammitt, W. E.(1995).Visitor response to on-site recreation conflict.Journal of Applied Recreation Research,20(4),249-268.
23. Schuster, R. M.,Hammitt, W. E.,Moore, D.(2003).A Theoretical Model to Measure the Appraisal and Coping Response to Hassles in Outdoor Recreation Settings.Leisure Sciences,25(2/3),277-299.
24. Vaske, J. J.,Beaman, J.,Barreto, H.,Shelby, L. B.(2010).An extension and further validation of the potential for conflict index.Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal,32(3),240-254.
25. Vaske, J. J.,Donnelly, M. P.,Wittmann, K.,Laidlaw, S.(1995).Interpersonal versus social-values conflict.Leisure science,17,205-222.
26. Vaske, J. J.,Needham, M. D.,Cline, R. C.(2007).Clarifying interpersonal and social values conflict among recreationists.Journal of Leisure Research,39(1),182-195.
27. 王小文、林晏州(1998)。大屯自然公園戶外遊憩者之遊憩衝突研究。戶外遊憩研究，11(1)，65-84。
28. 侯錦雄、郭彰仁(1998)。香客與戶外遊憩者之遊憩衝突探討—以松柏嶺宗教觀光區為例。戶外遊憩研究，11(2)，1-18。
29. 徐業良(2010)。由統計數字看台灣高齡者交通安全問題。汽車購買指南雜誌，1-5。
30. 楊萃萍(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中市，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系。
31. 彰化縣環境教育促進協會(2008)。原生期刊，十七
32. 鍾文玲、林晏州(1993)。釣魚者遊憩衝突認知之研究。戶外遊憩研究，6(1/2)，55-79。

1. 孫淑芬,林志鈞(2016)。登山健行者戶外遊憩體驗、遊憩衝突、休閒涉入與地方依戀之關係－以大坑登山步道為例。育達科大學報，43，163-196。
2. 顏宏旭,張峻豪(2019)。運用實景情境模擬影片探討都會區自行車道之衝突管理。都市與計劃，46(1)，61-85。
3. 張軒瑄、高俊雄、林俐吟(2011)。陽明山登山自行車者的衝突敏感性、遊憩衝突與調適行為關係之研究。觀光休閒學報，17(3)，411-433。