题名

多角化結合範疇效益、封鎖效應與市場績效之關連:多角化結合類型的干擾效果

并列篇名

Scope Benefit, Foreclosure and Market Performance in Conglomerate Mergers: Moderating Effect of Categories of Conglomerate Mergers

作者

施錦村(Chin-Tsun Shih);鄭宇傑(Yu-Chieh Cheng)

关键词

多角化結合 ; 範疇效益 ; 封鎖效應 ; 市場績效 ; 結合類型 ; Conglomerate Merger ; Scope Benefits ; Foreclosure Effects ; Market Performances ; Merger Categories

期刊名称

商略學報

卷期/出版年月

2卷3期(2010 / 09 / 01)

页次

183 - 198

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

台灣公平交易委員會以公平交易法第12條作為企業結合准許與否的基準,其中多角化結合管制之關鍵因素,可歸納為「範疇效益」與「封鎖效應」,及二者抵換後產生的「市場績效」。本研究以台灣公平交易委員會1992年至2008年,可從公開資料取得之多角化結合案件共145件作為研究樣本,再運用內容分析法、SEM、區別分析等研究方法進行分析。實證結果顯示,範疇效益與市場績效間呈正向不顯著的關係;封鎖效應與市場績效間呈顯著負向關係;範疇效益與封鎖效應間呈顯著反向關係;範疇效益與市場績效之結構係數小於封鎖效應與市場績效之結構係數;相關多角化結合消費者福利之樣本平均值大於非相關多角化;非相關多角化結合市場自由競爭之樣本平均值大於相關多角化。

英文摘要

The Fair Trade Commission of Taiwan (TFTC) regards Article 12 of the Fair Trade Act (FTA) as the foundation of merger regulations. A number of the key factors in cases of conglomerate merger considered by TFTC included benefits of scope, effects of foreclosure and market performance. In this study, we employed a research sample of 145 conglomerate mergers mediated by the Taiwan Fair Trade Commission, between 1992 and 2008. We used empirical analytical methods including content analysis and SEM, a discriminate analytical method. Our results confirmed an insignificant positive relationship between benefits of scope and market performance. The effects of foreclosure and market performance showed a significant negative relationship, and the benefits of scope showed a significant negative relationship to the effects of foreclosure. In addition, these results confirmed that the structural coefficient between benefits of scope and market performance was less than the structural coefficient between effects of foreclosure and market performance. Finally, with regard to consumer welfare, the average score of related conglomerate mergers was greater than that of unrelated conglomerate mergers. With free competition in the market, the average measurement of unrelated conglomerate merger was greater than for related conglomerate mergers.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Monti, M., 2001. The Future for Competition Policy, Speech of July 9 at Merchant Taylor's Hall, London..
  2. 行政院公平交易委員會,1995。美國公平交易法規彙編,台北:行政院公平交易委員會
  3. Monti, M., 2002. Review of the EC Merger Regulation, Brussels: The Reform Package (7)..
  4. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.Academic of Marketing Science,16(1),76-94.
  5. Bentler, P. M.,Chou, C. P.(1987).Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.Sociological Methods and Research,16(1),78-117.
  6. Boot, A. W.,Schmeits, A.(2000).Market Discipline and Incentive Problems in Conglomerate Firm with Applications to Banking.Journal of Financial Intermediation,9(2),240-273.
  7. Campbell, P. G.,Fiske, D. W.(1959).Convergent and Discrimination Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod Matrix.Psychological Bulletin,56,81-105.
  8. Cooper, D. R.,Schindler, P. S.(2001).Business Research Method.Singapore:McGraw-Hill.
  9. Coscelli, A.(2001).A Need for a Substantial Tightening of Merger Control? Comment on Tichy.Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade,1(4),423-430.
  10. Cummins, J. D.,Xie, X.(2008).Mergers and Acquisitions in the US Property-liability Insurance Industry: Productivity and Efficiency Effects.Journal of Banking & Finance,32(1),30-55.
  11. Fan, J. P. H.,Goyal, V. K.(2006).On the Patterns and Wealth Effects of Vertical Merger.The Journal of Business,79(2),877-902.
  12. Felton, J. R.(1971).Conglomerate Mergers, Concentration and Competition.The American Journal of Economics and Sociology,30(3),225-242.
  13. Hill, C. W. L.(1985).Diversified Growth and Competition.Applied Economics,17(5),827-847.
  14. Hill, C. W. L.,Jones, G. R.(2006).Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach.Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company.
  15. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago:Scientific Software International.
  16. Kassarjian, H. H.,Kassarjian, W. M.(1988).The Impact of Regulation on Advertising: A Content Analysis.Journal of Consumer policy,11,269-285.
  17. Lindsay, A.(2003).The EC Merger Regulation Substantive Issue.London:Sweet & Maxwell.
  18. Lombard, M.,Snyder-Duch, J.,Bracken, C. C.(2002).Content Analysis in Mass Communication Assessment and Reporting of Inter-coder Reliability.Human Communication Research,28(4),587-604.
  19. Martin, S.(1993).Advanced Industrial Economic.NJ:Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
  20. Nath, P.,Nachiappan, S.,Ramanathan, R.(2010).The Impact of Marketing Capability, Operations Capability and Diver sification Strategy on Performance: A Resource Based View.Industrial Marketing Management,39(2),317-327.
  21. Otgontsetseg, H.,Erhemjamts, M.(2005).U.S.A.,Georgia State University.
  22. Qian, Z.(1997).Breaking the Racial Barriers: Variation in Interracial Marriage between 1980 and 1990.Demography,34(2),478-500.
  23. Romano, C. J.(2005).Comparative Advertising in the United States and in France.Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business,25(2),371-413.
  24. Rumelt, R. P.(1974).Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance.Cambridge, MA:Harverd University Press.
  25. Santos, M. B.,Errunza, V.,Miller, D.(2008).Does Corporate International Diversification Destroy Value? Evidence from Cross-border Merger and Acquisitions.Journal of Banking & Finance,32(2),2716-2724.
  26. Stemler, S.(2001).An Overview of Content Analysis, Practical Assessment.Research & Evaluation,17(7),1-9.
  27. Subhash, S.,Durand, R. M.,Gur-Arie, O.(1981).Identification and Analysis of Moderate Variable.Journal of Marketing Research,18(3),291-299.
  28. Watson, P.(2003).Portfolio Effects in EC Merger Law.Antitrust Bulletin,48(3),781-805.
  29. Weber, R. P.(1985).Basic Content Analysis.Calif:Sage Publication.
  30. Wever, D. B.,Schellens, T.,Valcke, M.,Keer, H. V.(2006).Content Analysis Schemes to Analyze Transcripts of Online Asynchronous Discussion Group: A Review.Computers & Education,46(1),6-28.
  31. Wilcox, H. D.,Chang, K. C.,Grover, V.(2001).Valuation of Mergers and Acquisitions in the Telecommunications Industry: A Study on Diversification and Firm Size.Information & Management,38(7),459-471.
  32. Williamson, O. E.(1968).Economic and Antitrust Defense : The Welfare Trade -off.Americsn Economic Review,58(1),18-36.
  33. Wrigley, L.(1970).U.S.A.,Harvard Business School.
  34. 王石番(1999)。傳播內容分析法-理論與實務。台北:幼獅文化事業股份有限公司。
  35. 行政院公平交易委員會(2002)。認識公平交易法。台北:行政院公平交易委員會。
  36. 行政院公平交易委員會(2007)。認識公平交易法。台北:行政院公平交易委員會。
  37. 余朝權、施錦村(2006)。整體經濟利益、限制競爭之不利益、產業別對水平結合管制市場績效影響之實證研究。公平交易季刊,14(1),11-46。
  38. 吳秀明(2003)。獨占性訂價與市場績效管制─公平會作為一個價格的監督與管制者?。政大法學評論,73,119-227。
  39. 吳萬益(2008)。企業研究方法。台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
  40. 范建得、莊春發(1994)。公平交易法(第一冊):獨占、結合、聯合。台北:漢興書局。
  41. 張鴻基(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台北大學經濟學研究所。
  42. 廖義男編(2003)。公平交易法之註釋研究系列。台北:行政院公平交易委員會。
  43. 劉孔中(1998)。論結合管制之理論與實務。公平交易季刊,6(2),30-32。
  44. 劉華美(2001)。論結合管制。月旦法學雜誌,69,81-100。
  45. 蔡知敏(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。銘傳大學企業管理研究所。
  46. 蘇登雄(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 蘇中信(2012)。價格調整策略的分析:以台灣宜家家居為例。國立虎尾科技大學學報,31(1),19-42。
  2. 游筑雅、許煜訢、張順教(2012)。產品市場重疊程度與生產資源相似程度對廠商競爭策略的影響:以台灣信用卡產業為例。商略學報,4(3),153-172。