题名

意義、脈絡、反身性：質性研究的科學性與正當性

并列篇名

Meaning, Contextuality and Reflexivity: The Scientificity and Legitimacy of Qualitative Research

作者

張育誠(Yu-Cheng Chang)；吳鴻昌(Hong-Chang Wu)；李清潭(Chin-Tarn Lee)

关键词

質性研究 ； 反身性 ； Qualitative Research ； Reflexivity

期刊名称

商略學報

卷期/出版年月

7卷2期（2015 / 06 / 01）

页次

71 - 88

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

質性研究是科學研究，且管理學需要質性研究。在科學性的部份本文先以Kuhn、Popper的科學哲學爭議澄清科學的本質，來定位質性研究的科學性，再透過介紹與分析詮釋人類學與延伸個案法說明質性研究如何達到科學的要求。在對管理學的重要性部份，本文拓深質性研究蘊涵的反身性概念，藉此應用到相關管理學議題，以證明質性研究對管理學的重要。透過上述的論證，本研究除了反駁對於質性研究的諸多質疑、拓深反身性的概念外，更增加了質性研究於管理學場域中的正當性。藉此，祈對質性研究社群的發展有所助益。
英文摘要

The scientificity and legitimacy of qualitative research are discussed in this article. After the analysis of the nature of Science, Interpretive Anthropology and Extended Case Method are discussed to show the scientificity of qualitative research. As for legitimacy, reflexivity, which is the nature of Management Sciences, is discussed and applied to three related issues in Management, to show the importance of qualitative research. In all, this article proves the scientificity and legitimacy of qualitative research.
主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 侯勝宗(2012)。見所未見：詮釋性個案研究方法探索。組織與管理，5(1)，111-153。
    連結：
  2. 葉啟政(2001)。均值人與離散人的觀念巴貝塔：統計社會學的兩個概念基石。台灣社會學，1，1-63。
    連結：
  3. Jones, S., 2009. The Formula That Felled Wall St., Financial Times, retrieved from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/912d85e8-2d75-11de-9eba-00144feabdc0.html
  4. Abbott, A. D.(2004).Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences.New York, NY:W. W. Norton & Company, Inc..
  5. Abrahamson, E.(1996).Management Fashion.Academy of Management Review,21(1),254-285.
  6. Abrahamson, E.,Fairchild, G.(1999).Management Fashion: Life Cycles, Triggers and Collective Learning Processes.Administrative Science Quarterly,44(4),708-740.
  7. Adler, P. S.(2002).Corporate Scandals: It's Time for Reflection in Business Schools.The Academy of Management Executive,16(3),148-149.
  8. Adler, P.,Jermier, J.(2005).Developing a Field with More Soul: Standpoint Theory and Public Policy Research for Management Scholars.Academy of Management Journal,48(6),941-944.
  9. Alexander, J. C.(1987).Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory since World War II.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
  10. Alford, R. R.(1998).The Craft of Inquiry: Theories, Methods, Evidence.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  11. Alvesson, M.,Sköldberg, K.(2000).Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
  12. Astley, G.(1985).Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth.Administrative Science Quarterly,30(4),497-513.
  13. Bazerman, M. H.(2005).Response: Conducting Influential Research: The Need for Prescriptive Implications.Academy of Management Review,30(1),25-31.
  14. Bourdieu, P.(1990).The Logic of Practice.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  15. Bourdieu, P.,Chamboredon, J.,Passeron, J.(1991).The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries.New York, NY:Walter de Gruyter.
  16. Burawoy, M.(2009).The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations and One Theoretical Tradition.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  17. Burawoy, M.(1998).The Extended Case Method.Sociological Theory,16(1),4-33.
  18. Burawoy, M.(1991).Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis.Oakland, CA:University of California Press.
  19. Cannella, A. A.,Paetzold, R. L.(1994).Pfeffer's Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: A Rejoinder.Academy of Management Review,19(2),331-341.
  20. Cassell, C.,Symon, G.(2006).Taking Qualitative Methods in Organization and Management Research Seriously.Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal,1(1),4-12.
  21. Chandler, A. D.(1977).The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business.Cambridge, MA:Belknap Press.
  22. Corley, K.(2011).The Coming of Age for Qualitative Research: Embracing the Diversity of Qualitative Methods.Academy of Management Journal,54(2),233-237.
  23. Corley, K.(2012).Publishing in AMJ-Part 7: What's Different about Qualitative Research?.Academy of Management Journal,55(3),509-513.
  24. Denzin, N. K.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed.)(2000).Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
  25. Denzin, N. K.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y. S.(Ed.)(2005).The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
  26. Donaldson, L.(1995).American Anti-management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  27. Donaldson, L.(2005).For Positive Management Theories while Retaining Science: Reply to Ghoshal.Academy of Management Learning & Education,4(1),109-113.
  28. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1991).Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic.Academy of Management Review,16(3),620-627.
  29. Eisenhardt, K. M.(1989).Building Theories from Case Study Research.Academy of Management Review,14(4),532-550.
  30. Eisenhardt, K. M.,Graebner, M. E.(2007).Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges.Academy of Management Journal,50(1),25-32.
  31. Felin, T.,Foss, N. J.(2009).Social Reality, the Boundaries of Self-fulfilling Prophecy and Economics.Organization Science,20(3),654-668.
  32. Felin, T.,Foss, N. J.(2009).Performativity of Theory, Arbitrary Conventions and Possible Worlds: A Reality Check.Organization Science,20(3),676-678.
  33. Ferraro, F.,Pfeffer, J.,Sutton, R. I.(2009).How and Why Theories Matter: A Comment on Felin and Foss (2009).Organization Science,20(3),669-675.
  34. Ferraro, F.,Pfeffer, J.,Sutton, R. I.(2005).Reply: Prescriptions Are Not Enough.Academy of Management Review,30(1),32-35.
  35. Ferraro, F.,Pfeffer, J.,Sutton, R. I.(2005).Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-fulfilling.Academy of Management Review,30(1),8-24.
  36. Feyerabend, P.(1984).Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge.London, UK:Verso.
  37. Freeman, J.,Carroll, G. R.,Hannan, T.(1983).The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organizational Death Rates.American Sociological Review,48(5),692-710.
  38. Freeman, R. E.,Wicks, A. C.,Parmar, B.(2004).Stakeholder Theory and "The Corporate Objective Revisited".Organization Science,15(3),364-369.
  39. Fuller, S.(2003).Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science.Thriplow, UK:Icon.
  40. Gapper, J.(2005).Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal's "Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices".Academy of Management Learning & Education,4(1),101-103.
  41. Geertz, C.(1974).From the Native's Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences,28(1),26-45.
  42. Geertz, C.(1983).Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  43. Geertz, C.(2001).Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  44. Geertz, C.(1973).The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  45. Gephart, R. P.(2004).Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal.Academy of Management Journal,47(4),454-462.
  46. Ghoshal, S.(2005).Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices.Academy of Management Learning & Education,4(1),75-91.
  47. Ghoshal, S.,Bartlett, C. A.,Moran, P.(1999).A New Manifesto for Management.Sloan Management Review,40(3),9-20.
  48. Ghoshal, S.,Moran, P.(1996).Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory.Academy of Management Review,21(1),13-47.
  49. Glaser, B. G.,Strauss, A. L.(1967).The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago, IL:Aldine Pub. Co..
  50. Golden-Biddle, K.,Locke, K.(1993).Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Works Convince.Organization Science,4(4),595-616.
  51. Greve, H. R.,Palmer, D.,Pozner, J. E.(2010).Organizations Gone Wild: The Causes, Processes and Consequences of Organizational Misconduct.Academy of Management Annals,4(1),53-107.
  52. Gummesson, E.(1991).Qualitative Me thods in Management Research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
  53. Gummesson, E.(2000).Qualitative Methods in Management Research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
  54. Hambrick, D. C.(2005).Just How Bad Are Our Theories? A Response to Ghoshal.Academy of Management Learning & Education,4(1),104-107.
  55. Hammersley, M.(1989).Dilemma Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition.New York, NY:Routledge.
  56. Kanter, R. M.(2005).What Theories Do Audiences Want? Exploring the Demand Side.Academy of Management Learning & Education,4(1),93-95.
  57. Kuhn, T. S.(1962).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  58. Lakatos, I.,Musgrave, A.(1970).Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Cambridge, UK:University Press.
  59. Lee, T. W.(2001).From the Editors: On Qualitative Res ea rch in AMJ.Academy of Management Journal,44(2),215-216.
  60. Lee, T. W.(1999).Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
  61. Lyotard, J. F.(1984).The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
  62. March, J. G.(Ed.)(1965).Handbook of Organizations.Chicago, IL:Rand McNally.
  63. Meyer, J. W.,Rowan, B.(1977).Institutional Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.American Journal of Sociology,83(2),340-363.
  64. Miller, P.,Power, M.(2013).Accounting, Organizing and Economizing: Connecting Accounting Research and Organization Theory.Academy of Management Annals,7(1),555-603.
  65. Mintzberg, H.(1989).Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations.New York, NY:Free Press.
  66. Mintzberg, H.(1973).The Nature of Managerial Work.New York, NY:Harper & Row.
  67. Mintzberg, H.(2005).How Inspiring. How Sad. Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal's Paper.Academy of Management Learning & Education,4(1),108.
  68. Moran, P.,Ghoshal, S.(1999).Markets, Firms and the Process of Economic Development.Academy of Management Review,24(3),390-412.
  69. Parmar, B. L.,Freeman, R. E.,Harrison, J. S.,Wicks, A. C.,Purnell, L.,De Colle, S.(2010).Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art.Academy of Management Annals,4(1),403-445.
  70. Perrow, C.(1994).Pfeffer Slips!.Academy of Management Review,19(2),191-194.
  71. Perrow, C.(2000).An Organizational Analysis of Organizational Theory.Contemporary Sociology,29(3),469-476.
  72. Perrow, C.(1991).A Society of Organizations.Theory and Society,20(6),725-762.
  73. Pfeffer, J.(1997).New Directions for Organization Theory.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  74. Pfeffer, J.(2005).Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist? A Comment on Ghoshal.Academy of Management Learning & Education,4(1),96-100.
  75. Pfeffer, J.(1993).Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable.Academy of Management Review,18(4),599-620.
  76. Podolny, J. M.(2009).The Buck Stops (and Starts) at Business Schools.Harvard Business Review,87(6),62-67.
  77. Popper, K. R.(1970).Normal Science and Its Dangers.Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge,New York, NY:
  78. Popper, K. R.(2002).Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.New York, NY:Routledge.
  79. Pratt, M. G.(2009).From the Editors: For the Lack of a Boilerplate: Tips on Writing Up (and Reviewing) Qualitative Research.Academy of Management Journal,52(5),856-862.
  80. Rynes, S. L.(2007).Academy of Management Journal Editors' Forum on Rich Research.Academy of Management Journal,50(1),13.
  81. Sahlins, M.(1972).Stone Age Economics.Chicago, IL:Aldine-Atherton.
  82. Senge, K.(2013).The 'New Institutionalism' in Organization Theory: Bringing Society and Culture Back.American Sociologist,44(1),76-95.
  83. Shah, S. K.,Corley, K. G.(2006).Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-qualitative Divide.Journal of Management Studies,43(8),1821-1835.
  84. Shweder, R. A.(2005).Cliff Notes: The Pluralisms of Clifford Geertz.Clifford Geertz by His Colleagues,Chicago, IL:
  85. Shweder, R. A.,Good, B.(2005).Clifford Geertz by His Colleagues.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  86. Sismondo, S.(2004).An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies.Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  87. Smelser, N. J.(Ed.),Swedberg, R. (Ed.)(2005).The Handbook of Economic Sociology.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  88. Starkey, K.,Hatchuel, A.,Tempest, S.(2004).Rethinking the Business School: A European Perspective.Journal of Management Studies,41(8),1521-1531.
  89. Sundaram, A. K.,Inkpen, A. C.(2004).The Corporate Objective Revisited.Organization Science,15(3),350-363.
  90. Swedberg, R.(2003).Principles of Economic Sociology.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  91. Tracy, S. J.(2010).Qualitative Quality: Eight "Bigtent" Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.Qualitative Inquiry,16(10),837-851.
  92. Van Maanen, J. (Ed.)(1998).Qualitative Studies of Organization.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
  93. Zelizer, V. A. R.(2011).Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  94. Zuckerman, E.(1999).The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount.American Journal of Sociology,104(5),1398-1438.
  95. 陳瑞麟(2010)。科學哲學：理論與歷史。台北市:群學。
  96. 蕭瑞麟(2007)。不用數字的研究：鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究。台北市:台灣培生教育出版。
  97. 謝國雄、高穎超、李慈穎、吳偉立、劉怡昀、劉惠純、鄭玉菁、葉虹靈、林文蘭(2007)。以身為度、如是我做：田野工作的教與學。台北市:群學。
  98. 蘇國賢編(2012)。社會及行為科學研究法 （二）：質性研究法。台北市:東華。
被引用次数
  1. (2021)。手遊中虛擬扭蛋機制與消費實踐之反思。中華傳播學刊，40，83-114。
print cancel