题名

以資源為基礎之結構-行為-績效觀點下的策略群組分析:台灣太陽能電池產業實證研究

并列篇名

Strategic Group Analysis from the Resource Based Structure-Conduct-Performance Perspective: Empirical Study on Taiwan Solar Cell Industry

DOI

10.3966/207321472018031001001

作者

嚴奇峰(Ghi-Feng Yen);李英睿(Ying-Jui Lee)

关键词

太陽能電池 ; SCP ; 資源基礎觀點 ; 策略群組 ; 合圖法 ; Solar Cell ; Resource-Based View ; SCP Model ; Strategic Group ; Co-Plot Method

期刊名称

商略學報

卷期/出版年月

10卷1期(2018 / 03 / 01)

页次

1 - 22

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

台灣太陽能電池產業受惠於歐美國家能源政策而快速成長,但在2009與2012年因外部環境鉅變而受到嚴峻考驗。本研究提出以資源為基礎的結構-行為-績效(R-SCP)模型,來探討台灣太陽能電池產業12年來的動態策略發展過程,依據資源投入的積累形成進入障礙,以及資源餘裕的配置決定策略行為的選擇等觀點,構成策略變數,透過迴歸分析結果探討策略變數之間的因果關係,並採取合圖法(Co-Plot)進行穩定策略期間及策略群組分析。研究結果實證:(1)新的R-SCP模型可整合策略前與策略後的觀點,並分析資源配置的優先順序及排擠效應,呈現結構特徵對績效表現的直接影響,以及績效表現、競爭優勢與行為之間的動態關係;(2)不同穩定策略期間的產業特徵與廠商策略態勢的改變高度關聯,皆明顯反映外部環境的變化;(3)績效目標與策略群組之間的交叉分析,可知前四大廠商多數採取側重資本支出及研發投入之純粹型策略,並兼顧獲利與成長;(4)混合型策略群組的種類在市場競爭激烈時最多,儘管跨群組之策略移動軌跡及混合型策略群組的多樣化,分別呈現出廠商間及群組間的模仿行為,在策略移轉過程中,少數廠商呈現不具顯著特徵的策略態勢。

英文摘要

The rapid growth of Taiwan solar cell industry has benefited from the energy policy of European countries and the United States. Yet, the industry also coped with the revenue downturn caused by the unexpected changes of the external environment in 2009 and 2012. Founded on the concepts that entry barrier is transformed from cumulated resources and that the allocation of slack resources determine firm's strategic conduct , this study proposes the resource based structure-conduct-performance (R-SCP) model to surface out how competitive strategies evolved within Taiwan solar cell industry during 2004-15, employs multiple linear regression to outline the causal relationship among strategic variables, and investigate whether stable strategic time periods (SSTPs) existed and the strategic groups in different SSTPs by co -plot analysis. The results validate that (1) the new R-SCP model successfully integrates the pre- and post-strategy perspectives, revealing the prioritization of and the crowding-out effect in firm's resource allocation as well as how firm's performance is influenced by its structural characteristics directly and the dynamic relation among firm’s performance, comp etitive advantage and conduct; (2) the industry's traits in different SSTPs correlate with the strategic postures of firms within the industry, and both reflect the changes of external environment; (3) the cross analysis of strategic group and performance objective shows that the top four firms in majority belonged to the pure strategic group featured by the much higher capital and R&D spending, and attended to profitability and revenue growth simultaneously; (4) the most types of hybrid strategic groups existed when the market competition turned to the fiercest, and the strategic posture of neutral characteristics is observed in a few firms' path of strategy switch, whereas firm's inter-group strategic move and the diversity of hybrid strategic groups reveal the imitation among firms and among groups respectively.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 吳嘉興、邱曉瑩(2014)。台灣發展太陽光電產業之關鍵成功因素分析。管理資訊計算,3(2),78-95。
    連結:
  2. 金成隆、林修葳、邱煒恒(2005)。研究發展支出與資本支出的價值攸關性:以企業生命週期論析。中山管理評論,13(3),617-643。
    連結:
  3. 陳筱琪、陳文良(2011)。探討台灣矽晶圓太陽能電池產業之合作網絡評估模式。企業管理學報,89,81-105。
    連結:
  4. 陳筱琪、陳文良、胡宜中(2014)。探討台灣薄膜太陽能電池產業之合作網絡評估模式:以多目標決策之觀點。科技管理學刊,19(2),1-24。
    連結:
  5. 曾真真、何雍慶(2005)。以資源基礎觀點及動態能力觀點檢視併購決策及併購績效─以金融整合為例。管理評論,24(3),95-116。
    連結:
  6. Bain, J. S.(1951).Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936-1940.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,65(3),293-324.
  7. Bain, J. S.(1956).Barries to New Competition.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  8. Barney, J.(1991).Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.Journal of Management,17(1),99-120.
  9. Bourgeois, L. J.(1981).On the measurement of organizational slack.Academy of Management review,6(1),29-39.
  10. Caves, R. E.(1972).American Industry: Structure, Conduct, Performance.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
  11. Caves, R. E.,Porter, M. E.(1977).From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,91(2),241-261.
  12. Chatterjee, S.,Wernerfelt, B.(1988).Related or Unrelated Diversification: A Resource Based Approach.the Academy of Management Proceedings
  13. Cool, K.,Schendel, D.(1988).Performance Differences among Strategic Group Members.Strategic Management Journal,9(3),207-223.
  14. Day, G. S.(1984).Strategic Market Planning: The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage.West Group.
  15. Delorme, C. D., Jr,Kamerschen, D. R.,Klein, P. G.,Voeks, L. F.(2002).Structure, Conduct and Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach.Applied Economics,34(17),2135-2141.
  16. Desarbo, W. S.,Grewal, R.(2008).Hybrid Strategic Groups.Strategic Management Journal,29(3),293-317.
  17. Fiegenbaum, A.,Thomas, H.(1990).Strategic Groups and Performance: The US Insurance Industry, 1970-84.Strategic Management Journal,11(3),197-215.
  18. Galbraith, C.,Schendel, D.(1983).An Empirical Analysis of Strategy Types.Strategic Management Journal,4(2),153-173.
  19. Giladi, R.,Spector, Y.,Raveh, A.(1996).Multidimensional Scaling: An Analysis of 1980-1990 Computers.European Journal of Operational Research,95(2),439-450.
  20. Greve, H. R.(2003).A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding.Academy of Management Journal,46(6),685-702.
  21. Guttman, L.(1968).A general Nonmetric Technique for Finding the Smallest Coordinate Space for a Configuration of Points.Psychometrika,33(4),469-506.
  22. Hatten, K. J.,Hatten, M. L.(1987).Strategic Groups, Asymmetrical Mobility Barriers and Contestability.Strategic Management Journal,8(4),329-342.
  23. Hatten, K. J.,Schendel, D. E.(1977).Heterogeneity within an Industry: Firm Conduct in the U.S. Brewing Industry, 1952-71.The Journal of Industrial Economics,26(2),97-113.
  24. Hoskisson, R. E.,Hitt, M. A.(1990).Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of Diversification: A Review and Critique of Theoretical Perspectives.Journal of Management,16(2),461-509.
  25. Hunt, M.(1972).Harvard University.
  26. Kraatz, M. S.,Zajac, E. J.(2001).How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments: Theory and Evidence.Organization Science,12,632-657.
  27. Lahti, A.(1983).Strategy and Performance of a Firm: An Empirical Investigation in the Knitwear Industry in Finland in 1969-1981.Helsinki:Helsinki School of Economics.
  28. Lawless, M. W.,Tegarden, L. F.(1991).A Test of Performance Similarity among Strategic Group Members in Conforming and Non-conforming Industry Structures.Journal of Management Studies,28(6),645-664.
  29. Leask, G.,Parnell, J. A.(2005).Integrating Strategic Groups and the Resource Based Perspective: Understanding the Competitive Process.European Management Journal,23(4),458-470.
  30. Lipshitz, G.,Raveh, A.(1994).Application of the Co-plot Method in the Study of Socio-economic Differences Between Cities: A Basis for a Differential Development Policy.Urban Studies,31(1),123-135.
  31. McGee, J.,Thomas, H.(1986).Strategic Groups: Theory, Research and Taxonomy.Strategic Management Journal,7(2),141-160.
  32. Miller, D.(1986).Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards a Synthesis.Strategic Management Journal,7(3),233-249.
  33. Nath, P.,Mukherjee, A.,Pal, M. N.(2001).Identification of Linkage between Strategic Group and Performance of Indian Commercial Banks: A Combined Approach Using DEA and Co-plot.International Journal of Digital Accounting Research,1(2),125-152.
  34. Olusoga, S. A.,Mokwa, M. P.,Noble, C. H.(1995).Strategic Groups, Mobility Barriers, and Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Investigation.Journal of Business Research,33(2),153-164.
  35. Penrose, E.(1959).The Theory of the Growth of the Firm.London:Basil Blacewell.
  36. Porter, M. E.(1981).The Contributions of Industrial Organization to Strategic Management.Academy of Management Review,6(4),609-620.
  37. Porter, M. E.(1979).The Structure within Industries and Companies' Performance.The Review of Economics and Statistics,61(2),214-227.
  38. Porter, M. E.(1985).Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance.NY:Free Press.
  39. Raveh, A.(2000).Co-plot: A Graphic Display Method for Geometrical Representations of MCDM.European Journal of Operational Research,125(3),670-678.
  40. Scherer, F. M.,Ross, D.(1990).Industrial Market Structure and Economics Performance.Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company.
  41. Shepherd, W. G.(1990).The Economics of Industrial Organization.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice Hall.
  42. Spender, J.-C.(1989).Industry recipes: The Nnature and Sources of Managerial Judgement.Basil Blackwell Oxford.
  43. Tan, J.,Peng, M. W.(2003).Organizational Slack and Firm Performance during Economic Transitions: Two Studies from an Emerging Economy.Strategic Management Journal,24(13),1249-1263.
  44. Tung, G. S.,Lin, C. Y.,Wang, C. Y.(2010).The Market Structure, Conduct and Performance Paradigm Re-applied to the International Tourist Hotel Industry.African Journal of Business Management,4(6),1116-1125.
  45. Uyterhoeven, H. E.,Ackerman, R. W.,Rosenblum, J. W.(1973).Strategy and Organization: Text and Cases in General Management.Irwin:McGraw-Hill.
  46. Voss, G. B.,Sirdeshmukh, D.,Voss, Z. G.(2008).The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmental Threat on Product Exploration and Exploitation.Academy of Management Journal,51(1),147-164.
  47. Weber, Y.,Shenkar, O.,Raveh, A.(1996).National and Corporate Cultural Fit in Mergers/Acquisitions: An Exploratory Study.Management Science,42(8),1215-1227.
  48. Wernerfelt, B.(1984).A Resource-based View of the Firm.Strategic Management Journal,5(2),171-180.
  49. Wiggins, R. R.,Ruefli, T. W.(1995).Necessary Conditions for the Predictive Validity of Strategic Groups: Analysis without Reliance on Clustering Techniques.Academy of Management Journal,38(6),1635-1656.
  50. Yang, Y. H.,Lee, Y. C.(2013).Strategic Grouping of Financial Holding Companies: A Two-dimensional Graphical Analysis with Application of the Three-Stage Malmquist Index and Co-plot Methods.International Journal of Organizational Innovation,5(3),158.
  51. 王瑞豐(2014)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。長榮大學高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)。
  52. 台灣經濟新報,2018。TCRI 採用之財務比率:獲利力,台灣經濟新報,一月三十一日,取自:http://www.tej.com.tw/webtej/tcriweb/FinSt_1.htm
  53. 吳柄村(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。元智大學管理研究所。
  54. 林偉倫(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣大學經濟學研究所。
  55. 張騰文(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中原大學企業管理研究所。
  56. 產業價值鏈資訊平台,2017。太陽能產業產業鏈簡介,一月十七日, 取自:http://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=A100
  57. 黃丙雄(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)。
  58. 楊銀發(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中原大學企業管理研究所。
  59. 經濟部能源局(2016)。2016 年能源產業技術白皮書
  60. 劉文光(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中原大學企業管理研究所。
  61. 蔡逸姝(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班經營管理組。
被引用次数
  1. 嚴奇峰,李雨師,吳曼綺(2019)。運用合圖法探討台灣金融控股產業策略群組之競爭結構與動態發展關係。萬能學報,41,153-177。
  2. 嚴奇峰,廖本哲,楊凱文(2019)。臺灣印刷電路板產業結構與發展研究-結構-行為-績效模型及策略群組分析的觀點。中原企管評論,17(1),83-99。
  3. 嚴奇峰、宋雁然(2018)。探討遴選外勞仲介公司之關鍵因素與決策偏好-以台灣製造業為例。商略學報,10(4),285-306。