题名

從系統的三位體關係探討企業社會責任-以政府執行BOT公共工程案為例

并列篇名

Research of Corporate Social Responsibility in Triadic Analysis - A Case Study of Government Public Construction by BOT

DOI

10.3966/207321472019031101002

作者

胡宜中(Yi-Chung Hu);邱榆淨(Yu-Jing Chiu);耿彥偉(Yen-Wei Ken)

关键词

三位體交換關係 ; 企業社會責任 ; BOT ; Triadic Exchange Relationship ; BOT ; CSR

期刊名称

商略學報

卷期/出版年月

11卷1期(2019 / 03 / 01)

页次

27 - 44

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

公共工程採BOT模式推動,由於履約期間長達數十年,企業若有負面品質對外部產生影響,將使政府形象損失、人民對政府公信力產生質疑,成為政府在公共治理的重大議題。本研究依Mittun(2004)提出新的政府治理交換理論,作為論證三方觀點的典範,引用Carroll(1979)企業社會責任(Corporate Social Responsibility,CSR)分層理論及Federick(2004)的價值觀構面,做為討論三位體交換關係的內部因素,最後透過BOT案內容探討,融入本研究架構以完成典範移轉,產生政府對CSR導入BOT案的政策反思,作為後續管理意涵及研究的參考。

英文摘要

The public works are promoted by the BOT model. Since the performance period lasts for several decades, if the negative quality of the enterprise has an impact on the outside, the loss of the government image and the people's questioning for the government's credibility will become a major issue for the government in public governance. This study proposes a new government governance exchange theory based on Mittun (2004) as a model for demonstrating the tripartite views, also citing Carroll's (1979) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) stratification theory and Federick's (2004) value construct. As an internal factor to discuss the triadic exchange relationship, the BOT case is discussed and integrated into the research framework to complete the paradigm shift, resulting in the government's policy reflection on the CSR introducing into BOT cases, as a reference for subsequent management implications and research.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Albareda, L.,Lozano, J.M.,Tencati, Antonio,Midttun, Atle,Perrini, Francesco(2008).The Changing Role of Governments in Corporate Social Responsibility: Drivers and Responses.Business Ethics: A European Review,17(4)
  2. Albareda, L.,Ysa, T.,Lozano, J.M.(2004).The role of Public Policies in Promoting CSR: A Comparison Among the EU-15.Interdisciplinary CSR Research Conference
  3. Bowen, H.(1953).Social Responsibilities of the Businessman.NY:Harper & Row.
  4. Carroll, A. B.(2008).A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices.The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility,NY:
  5. Carroll, A. B.(1999).Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of A Definitional Construct.Business & Society,38,268-295.
  6. Carroll, A. B.(1979).A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance.Academy of Management Review,4,497-506.
  7. Carroll, A. B.,Buchholtz, A. K.(2015).Business & Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management.Stamford, CT:Cengage Learning.
  8. Collins, D.(1988).Adam Smith’s Social Contract: The Proper Role of Individual Liberty and Government Intervention in the 18th Century.Business & Professional Ethics Journal,7,120-146.
  9. Crane, A.,Matten, D.(2004).Business Ethics A European Perspective Managing Corporate Citizen-ship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization.NY:Oxford University Press.
  10. Dunfee, T.(1991).Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts.Business Ethics Quarterly,1,23-51.
  11. Frederick, W. C.(2008).Corporate Social Responsibility: Deep Roots, Flourishing Growth, Promising Future.The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility,NY:
  12. Frederick, W. C.(1992).Anchoring Values in Nature: Toward A Theory of Business Values.Business Ethics Quarterly,2,283-303.
  13. Freeman, R. E.(1984).Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.Marshfield, MA:Pitman.
  14. Friedman, M.(1970).The Social Responsibility of Business Is To Increase Its Profits(September 13).New York Times Magazine,33,122-126.
  15. Glesne, C.,Peshkin, A.(1992).Becoming Qualitative Research.White Plains, NY:Longman.
  16. Gribben, C.,Pinnington, K.,Wilson, A.(2001).Governments As Partners: The Role of the Central Government in Developing New Social Partnerships.Denmark:Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
  17. Jackson, B.(1987).Fieldwork.Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press.
  18. Jorgensen, D. L.(1981).Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  19. Klonosky, R. J.(1991).Foundational Considerations in the Corporate Social Responsibility Debate.Business Horizons,34(4),9-18.
  20. Kolb, R. W.(Ed.)(2008).Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  21. Kurucz, E.,Colbert, B.,Wheeler, D.(2008).The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility.The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility,UK:
  22. Lozano, J. M.,Albareda, L.,Ysa, T.,Roscher, H.,Marcuccio, M.(2005).Los Gobiernos Y La Responsabilidad Social De Las Empresas. Politicas Publicas Masalla De La Regulaciony La Voluntariedad.Spain:Granica.
  23. Midttun, A.(2005).Policy Making and the Role of Government. Realigning Business, Government and Civil Society. Emerging Embedded Relational Governance Beyond the Neoliberal and Welfare state models.Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society,5(3),159-174.
  24. Midttun, A.(2004).Realigning Business, Government and Civil Society: the CSR Model Compared to the Neoliberal and Welfare State models.3rd Colloquium of the European Academy of Business in Society,Ghent:
  25. Moir, L.(2001).What do we mean by corporate social responsibility?.Corporate Governance,1,16-22.
  26. Moon, J.(2004).ICCSR Research PaperICCSR Research Paper,University of Nottingham.
  27. Nelson, J.,Zadek, S.(2000).Partnership Alchemy–New Social Partnerships in Europe.Denmark:Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
  28. Ones, D. S.(Ed.),Anderson, N.(Ed.),Sinangil, H. K.(Ed.),Viswesvarian, C.(Ed.)(2018).Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  29. Sciarelli, S.(2007).Etica e Responsabilità Sociale Nell Impresa.Italy:Giuffre.
  30. Sciarelli, S.(1996).Etica Aziendale E Finalità Imprenditoriali.Economia & Management,6,13-27.
  31. Swanson, D. L.(1995).Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model.Academy of anagement Review,20,43-64.
  32. Zadek, S.(2001).Third Generation Corporate Citizenship.UK:The Foreign Policy Centre & Account-Ability.
  33. 內政部營建署,2011。下水道誌,台北:行政院。桃園市政府 , 2017 。 研考資訊系統 ,取自:https://reis.tycg.gov.tw/ris/RISIndex.aspx?_dc=636864551097576271
  34. 王明元,吳瑞益(2017)。大鵬灣 BOT 案開發現況及履約問題之探討。商業現代化學刊,8(3),111-127。
  35. 桃園市政府水務局,2018。官方網站最新消息,取自:http://wrb.tycg.gov.tw/home.jsp?id=10&parentpath=0,1 10&parentpath
  36. 陳向明(2009).社會科學質的研究.台北:五南.
  37. 陳昀,2017。工安意外蘆竹污水下水道工程意外 2 人遭活埋 1 人不治,自由時報,4 月 3 日,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/2025123
  38. 陳品榕(2013)。臺灣大學法律學研究所。
  39. 陳炳宏(2006)。臺灣大學土木工程學研究所。
  40. 魯鋼駿,2017。桃園蘆竹傳工安意外 2 工人遭活埋 1人不治,中央社通訊,4 月 3 日,取自:https://www.nownews.com/news/20170403/2468929/
  41. 謝智文(2009)。臺灣大學土木工程學研究所。