题名

共同知識問題的分析-以脈絡中學習的方式來看

并列篇名

An Analysis of the Problem of Common Knowledge: Based on the Process of Learning from Context

作者

冀劍制(Chien-Chih Chi)

关键词

背景知識 ; 共同知識 ; 人工智慧 ; 自然語言處理 ; 命題語意網路 ; background knowledge ; common knowledge ; artificial intelligence ; natural language processing ; propositional semantic network

期刊名称

華岡哲學學報

卷期/出版年月

6期(2014 / 06 / 01)

页次

1 - 25

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

人工智慧學的主要目標之一是讓機器具有能力操作人類自然語言,而其所面臨的主要困難之一稱之為背景知識的問題,而在背景知識問題中其中一個部分稱之為共同知識的問題,企圖解決此一問題的一個主要方法是讓電腦程式具備有能在文章脈絡中主動學習新字詞的能力,若將類似的方法也能應用在日常生活的脈絡中,那麼,背景知識中的共同知識的問題將可能獲得很大的進展。本文依據Rapaport的Cassie程式與Zernik的RINA程式來討論,並且主張,共同知識問題的關鍵在於建立「使用者模型」(user model),而脈絡中學習的能力對於建立此模型有很大的幫助,但仍舊還有未能達成的部份而無法完全解決共同知識問題。本文針對此方法能做到的部分與不能做到的部份做一分析。

英文摘要

One of the main goals of Artificial Intelligence is trying to make machine be able to use natural language properly. In doing this, the most difficult problem is called the problem of background knowledge, and one important type of background knowledge is common knowledge. When we try to let machine possess common knowledge, one of the main approaches is to write a computer program that can learn new vocabulary from contexts. Once machine can have this ability and apply it to our daily life, there will be a lot of progress in solving the problem of common knowledge. In this paper, I use Rapaport's program of Cassie and Zernik's program of RINA as examples for discussion. In addition, I will argue that the key of possessing common knowledge is to build a proper user model, and the ability of learning new words from context is very helpful for building user model. However, it is still not enough for solving the whole problem of common knowledge. I will also discuss what difficulties remain.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. Church, A. (1936). “An unsolvable problem of elementary number theory,” American Journal of Math, 58, 345-63
  2. Baker, Stephen(2011).Final Jeopardy: Man vs. Machine and the Quest to Know Everything.NY:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publisher.
  3. Baron-Cohen, S.(1995).Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind.The MIT Press.
  4. Brachman, R.(ed.),Levesque, H.(ed.)(1981).Readings in Knowledge Representation.Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc..
  5. Cercone, NickMc(ed.),Calla, Gordon(ed.)(1987).The Knowledge Frontier: Essays in the Representation of Knowledge.New York:Springer-Verlag.
  6. Clark, A.(ed.),Toribio, J.(ed.)(1998).Language and Meaning in Cognitive Science: Cognitive Issues and Semantic Theory.Hamden, CT:Garland.
  7. Cohen, P.(ed.),Morgan, J.(ed.),Pollack, M. E.(ed.)(1990).Intentions in Communications.The MIT Press.
  8. Copeland, J.(1993).Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Introduction.Blackwell.
  9. Devlin, K.(1997).Goodbye, Descartes: The End of Logic and the Search for a New Cosmology of the Mind.John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
  10. Dreyfus, H.(1972).What Computers Can't Do.New York:Harper and Row.
  11. Dreyfus, H.,Dreyfus, S.(1986).Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer.New York:Free Press.
  12. Fillmore, C. J.(1978).On the Organization of Semantics Information in the Lexicon.Proceedings Chicago Linguistic Society
  13. Heal, Jane(1978).Common Knowledge.Philosophical Quarterly,28(111),116-131.
  14. Iwanska, L.(ed.),Shapiro, S.(ed.)(2000).Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Representation.:AAAI Press.
  15. Keenan, L. E.(1971).Two Kinds of Presupposition in Natural Language.Studies in Linguistic Semantics,New York:
  16. Lehnert, W.(ed.),Ringle, M.(ed.)(1975).Strategies for Natural Language Processing.New York:Academic Press.
  17. Lenat, D. B.,Guha, R. V.(1990).Building Large Knowledge-Based System: Representation and Inference in the CYC Project.Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley.
  18. Malory, S. T.(1982).Le Morte D'Arthur.New York:Collier.
  19. McDermott, D.(1987).A Critique of Pure Reason.Computational Intelligence,1987,151-237.
  20. Minsky, M.(1968).Semantic Information Processing.The MIT Press.
  21. Minsky, M.(ed.)(1968).Semantic Information Processing.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
  22. Penrose, R.(1989).The Emperor's New Mind.Oxford University Press.
  23. Pinker, S.(1994).The Language Instinct.William Morrow.
  24. Searle, J. R.(1983).Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.Cambridge University Press.
  25. Searle, J. R.(1992).The Rediscovery of the Mind.The MIT Press.
  26. Searle, J. R.(Ed.)(1978).Expression and Meaning.Cambridge University Press.
  27. Searle, J. R.(ed.),Kiefer, F.(ed.),Bierwisch, M.(ed.)(1980).Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics.Dordrecht, Holland:Reidel.
  28. Turing, A.(2000).Computing Machinery and Intelligence.Mind, Brains, and Computers: The Foundations of Cognitive Science
  29. Winston, P.(ed.)(1975).The Psychology of Computer Vision.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  30. Zernik, U.,Dyer, M.G.(1985).Towards a Self-Extending Lexicon.Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (University of Chicago),Morristown, NJ:
  31. Zernik, U.,Dyer, M.G.(1987).The Self-Extending Phrasal Lexicon.Computational Linguistics,13,308-327.