探究學生串聯電路認知特徵演化歷程之跨年級研究

An Across-grade Study to Investigate the Evolutionary Processes of Students' Cognitive Characters in Series Connection

林靜雯(Jing-Wen Lin)；邱美虹(Mei-Hung Chiu)

支序分類之概念演化取向 ； 串聯電路 ； 跨年級研究 ； 認知特徵 ； cladistics approach in conceptual evolution ； series connection ； across-grade study ； cognitive character

教育科學研究期刊

54卷4期（2009 / 12 / 01）

139 - 170

繁體中文

跨年級研究有助於課程設計的縱向連續發展，但卻極為耗時費力。因此，林靜雯等人（林靜雯，2006；Lin & Chiu, 2006）建立支序分類之概念演化取向，藉電腦軟體預測學生串聯電路心智模式的演化路徑，希望能克服早期跨年級研究的缺點。本研究特別設計跨年級的調查，以電學診斷式測驗檢測三年級、五年級、七年級及九年級學生共440名，藉此獲得學生各認知特徵與狀態於各年段的分布比例以檢驗林靜雯等人的預測。研究結果顯示，林靜雯等人的預測與實徵結果大致相符，且藉由其預測與跨年級調查結果的整合，本研究清楚表徵學生於串聯電路心智模式上認知特徵演化的全貌，並解釋了學生串聯電路概念演化與課程發展之間的可能關係，初步證實了支序分類學之概念演化取向之可行性。

An across-grade study is helpful for the developing of vertical curriculum design, but it requires considerable time and manpower. Therefore, Lin and her colleague (Lin, 2006; Lin & Chiu, 2006) develop a cladistics approach in conceptual evolution to predict pupils' mental model evolutionary pathways in series connection with the assistance of the software. They hope to overcome the limitations of the across-grade studies in the early days by this approach. Accordingly, this study conducts an across-grade survey and adopts a set of diagnostic test items to 440 students from Grade 3 to Grade 9 to obtain the across graders percentages of students' cognitive characters and statuses for evaluating Lin and her colleague's prediction. The research results show that Lin's prediction almost fits the empirical data of the across-grade tests. In addition, they clearly represent a global picture of the evolutionary process of pupils' cognitive characters of mental models in series connection and explain the possible relationship between pupils' conceptual evolution in series connection and curriculum sequence by comparing Lin's prediction and the investigation results of the across-grade tests in this study. In sum, the research results verified the feasibility of applying cladistics approach in conceptual evolution to science education tentatively.

1. Lin, J. W.,Chiu, M. H.(2008).Investigating the influences of mental model based teaching-learning sequences on students learning in electricity.Paper presented at the NARST 2008.
   連結：
2. Lin, J. W.,Chiu, M. H.(2008).Investigating the influences of mental model based teaching-learning sequences on students learning in electricity.Paper presented at the NARST 2008.
   連結：
3. 邱美虹、林靜雯(2002)。以多重類比探究兒童電流心智模式之改變。科學教育學刊，10(2)，109-134。
   連結：
4. 黃達三(2004)。學生動物分類及脊椎動物概念的發展：跨年齡研究。科學教育學刊，12(3)，289-310。
   連結：
5. Arnold, M.,Millar, R.(1987).Being constructive: An alternative approach to the teaching of introductory ideas in electricity.International Journal of Science Education,9(5),553-563.
6. Borges, A. T.,Gilbert, J. K.(1999).Mental models of electricity.International Journal of Science Education,21(1),98-117.
7. Campbell, D. T.,P. A. Schilpp (Ed.)(1974).The philosophy of Karl Popper (vol. 14, 1 & 11). The library of living philosophers.La Salle, IL:Open Court.
8. Carlton, K.(1999).Teaching electric current and electrical potential.Physical Education,34(6),341-345.
9. Chiu, M. H.,Guo, C. J.,Treagust, D.(2007).Assessing students' conceptual understanding in science: An introduction about a national project in Taiwan.International Journal of Science Education,29(4),379-390.
10. Chiu, M. H.,Lin, J. W.(2005).Promoting fourth graders' conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(4),424-468.
11. Chiu, M. H.,Lin, J. W.,I. V. Eriksson (Ed.)(2008).Science education in the 2lst century.New York:Nova Science.
12. Closset, J. L.(1983).Paper presented at the Research on Physics Education.Paris, France:La Londe les Maures.
13. Cohen, R.,R. Duit (Eds.),W. Jung (Eds.),C. von Rhoneck (Eds.)(1984).Proceedings of the international workshop: Aspects of understanding electricity.Ludwigsburg, Germany:IPN-Arbeitsbericht.
14. Driver, R.,Leach, J.,Scott, P.,Wood-Robinson, C.(1994).Young people's understanding of science concepts: Implications of cross-age studies for curriculum planning.Studies in Science Education,24,75-100.
15. Duit R. (Eds.),W. Jung (Eds.),C. von Rhoneck (Eds.)(1984).Proceedings of the international workshop: Apects of understanding electricity.Ludwigsburg, Germany:IPN-Arbeitsbericht.
16. Dupin, J. J.,Johsua, S.(1987).Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,24(9),791-806.
17. Haslam, F.,Treagust, D. F.(1987).Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument.Journal of Biological Education,21(3),203-211.
18. Heller, P.M.,Finley, F. N.(1992).Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(3),259-275.
19. Hull, D. L.(1988).Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
20. Lee, S. J.(2007).Exploring pupils' understanding concerning batteries: Theories and practices.International Journal of Science Education,29(4),497-516.
21. Lin, J. W.,Chiu, M. H.(2006).Students' conceptual evolution in electricity: The cladistical perspective.Paper presented at the NARST 2006.
22. Lin, J. W.,Chiu, M. H.(2009).Why are mental model based teaching-learning sequences in electricity effective? Perspective from students' affection attitude.Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association 2009.
23. Lin, J. W.,Chiu, M. H.,Hsu, Y. F.(2006).A novel approach to analyze pupils' conceptual evolutionary pathway in electricity from systematic perspective.Paper presented at the Symposium and Workshop of Bioinformatics in Taiwan.
24. Magnusson, S. J.,Boyle, R. A.,Templin, M.(1997).Dynamic science assessment: A new approach for investigating conceptual change.The Journal of the Learning Science,6(1),91-142.
25. Méheut, M.,Psillos, D.(2004).Teaching-learning sequences: Aims and tools for science education research.International Journal of Science Education,26(5),515-535.
26. Niedderer, H.(1997).Learning process studies in physics: A review of concepts and results.Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association.
27. Osborne, R.(1983).Children's ideas meet scientists' science.Lab Talk,28(1),2-7.
28. Osborne, R.,Freyberg, R.(1985).Learning in science: The implications of children's science.Auckland, New Zealand:Heinemann.
29. Peterson, R. F.,Treagust, D. F.,Garnett, P. J.(1989).Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade 11 and 12 students' concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,26,301-314.
30. Pfundt, H.,Duit, R.(2007).Bibliography-Students alternative frameworks and science education.Kiel, Germany:University of Kiel Institute for Science Education.
31. Pfundt, H.,Duit, R.(2004).Bibliography-Students alternative frameworks and science education.Kiel, Germany:University of Kiel Institute for Science Education.
32. Psillos, D.,Kournaras, P.,Tiberghien, A.(1988).Voltage presented as a primary concept on DC circuits.International Journal of Science Education,10(1),29-43.
33. Shepardson, D. P.,Moje, E. B.(1994).The nature of fourth graders' understandings of electric circuits.Science Education,78(5),489-514.
34. Shipstone, D. M.(1984).A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits.European Journal of Science Education,6(2),185-188.
35. Shipstone, D. M.,R. Driver (Eds.),E. Guesne (Eds.),A. Tiberghien (Eds.)(1985).Children's ideas in science.Milton, MA:Open University Press.
36. Tasker, R.,Osborne, R. (Eds.),P. Freyberg (Eds.)(1985).Learning in science: The implications of children's science.Auckland, New Zealand:Heinemann.
37. Tiberghien, A.,G. Delacôte (Eds.),A. Tiberghien (Eds.),J. Schwartz (Eds.)(1983).Proceeding of the first international workshop: In research on physics eduation.Paris:Editions du CNRS.
38. Toulmin, S.(1972).Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
39. Tsai, C. H.,Chen, H. Y.,Chou, C. Y.,Lain, K. D.(2007).Current as the key concept of Taiwanese students' understandings of electric circuit.International Journal of Science Education,29(4),483-496.
40. von Rhoneck, C. (Eds.),R. Duit (Eds.),W. Jung (Eds.)(1984).Proceedings of the international workshop: Aspects of understanding electricity.Ludwigsburg, Germany:IPN-Arbeitsbericht.
41. Wiley, E. O.,Siegel-Causey, D.,Brooks, D. R.,Funk, V. A.(1993).The compleat cladist: Primer of phylogenetic procedures.Lawrence, MA:Museum of Natural History.
42. 林靜雯(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
43. 林靜雯、邱美虹(2006)。探究以學生心智模式為設計基礎之教－學序列對學生電學概念學習之影響。「中華民國第二＋二屆科學教育」學術研討會，臺北市:
44. 林靜雯、邱美虹(2008)。以概念演化樹探究學生電學心智模式演化之歷程。「中華民國第二十四屆科學教育」學術研討會，彰化市:
45. 教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫暫行綱要。臺北市:教育部。
46. 葉俊豪、陳瓊森(1995)。利用定性與定量測驗來探究高二學生對直流電路的知識結構。科學教育，6，156-178。

1. 林靜雯(2012)。國中學生為什麼改變了心智模式？以電學教─學序列為例。臺北市立教育大學學報：教育類，43(1)，59-92。
2. 林靜雯、吳育倫(2013)。兒童地球形狀概念演化樹之跨年級調查驗證。教育科學研究期刊，58(4)，133-163。
3. 林靜雯、吳育倫(2013)。應用診斷測驗結合答題信心探究跨年級學生簡單暨串聯電路之理解及影響來源。教育科學研究期刊，58(2)，25-56。
4. 鐘建坪、張志康、邱美虹、白勝安(2011)。跨年級中學生認知地圖之分析研究：以粒子行為試題為例。教育科學研究期刊，56(2)，207-240。