錄影分析在教育研究的應用

Conducting Video Analysis in Educational Research

吳心楷(Hsin-Kai Wu)；宋曜廷(Yao-Ting Sung)；簡馨瑩(Hsin-Yin Chien)

教育研究法 ； 資料分析 ； 錄影分析 ； research method ； data analysis ； video analysis

教育科學研究期刊

55卷4期（2010 / 12 / 01）

1 - 37

繁體中文

近年來，錄影資料在教育研究的應用日漸普遍。本文探討錄影如何成為有效的觀察和研究工具，並且如何應用錄影分析於其他的研究方法中。錄影資料具有忠實紀錄細節、可供重複觀看等特性，然而，錄影資料的轉換及分析過程可能相當複雜，因此，本文圍繞在資料收集、管理和分析三大部分，提供錄影資料登錄、選取和表徵的策略，以實例說明如何將錄影分析應用於量化、質性及混合方法的研究，並簡介七種錄影分析軟體供研究者參考。這些實例顯示，若能善用錄影分析，將之與研究設計有效地結合，可更深入地瞭解所關心的現象。雖然錄影分析有諸多優點，研究者仍應考量其限制並留意研究倫理的議題，本文建議運用同儕審視和多重驗證等策略，以確保分析結果的信度與效度。最後，期待在證據為導向的教育研究中，錄影分析能被有效應用，並進一步擴展教育研究的架構和視野。

Recently, video analysis has been used increasingly more widely in educational research. The purpose of this article is to present how to conduct video analysis in education and discuss its potential benefits, limitations, and ethical issues. The benefits of video data include preserving detailed information of interactions, allowing repeated examination of data, and allowing multidisciplinary analyses; however, the process of video transcription and data reduction could be challenging and complicated. Therefore, this article outlines strategies and procedures for managing, selecting, and representing video data, and provides examples to show how to combine video analysis with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. This article also introduces several technological tools for video research. Although there are potential benefits of using video analysis in educational research, researchers should also pay attention to its limitations and related ethical issues, and employ techniques such as member checking and triangulation to ensure the trustworthiness of the analysis. Finally, an effective use of video analysis could support evidence-based research and deepen current understandings of teaching and learning in complex learning environments.

1. 宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究，55(4)，97-130。
   連結：
2. University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Education Research (2010). Qualitative analysis software for video and audio data: Transana. Retrieved April 14, 2010, from http://www.transana.org/
3. American Evaluation Association (2010). Qualitative analysis software. Retrieved march 31, 2010, from http://www.eval.org/Resources/QDA.htm
4. MacWhinney, B.(2010). TalkBank. Retrieved April 20, 2010, from http://talkbank.org/
5. Goldman, R.(2010). Orion: Video tool to create online communities. Retrieved April 20, 2010, from http://www.videoresearch.org
6. Angelillo, C.,Rogoff, B.,Chavajay, P.(2007).Examining shared endeavors by abstracting video coding schemes with fidelity to cases.Video research in the learning sciences,Mahwah, NJ:
7. Barab, S. A.,Hay, K. E.,Yamagata-Lynch, L. C.(2001).Constructing networks of action-relevant episodes: An in situ research methodology.Journal of the Learning Sciences,10(1),63-112.
8. Barron, B.(2000).Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups.Journal of the Learning Sciences,9(4),403-436.
9. Collier, J.,Collier, M.(1986).Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method.New Mexico, NM:University of New Mexico Press.
10. Creswell, J. W.(1994).Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
11. Creswell, J. W.,Plano Clark, V. L.(2007).Designing and conducting mixed methods research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
12. Creswell, J. W.,Plano Clark, V. L.,Gutmann, M. L.,Hanson, W. E.(2003).Advanced mixed methods research designs.Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research,Thousand Oaks, CA:
13. Dawkins, R.(1976).The selfish gene.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
14. Derry, S. J.(2007).Guidelines for conducting video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel.Chicago, IL:Data Research and Development Center.
15. Derry, S. J.,Pea, R. D.,Barron, B.,Engle, R. A.,Erickson, F.,Goldman, R.(2010).Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics.Journal of the Learning Sciences,19(1),3-53.
16. Dey, I.(1993).Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guide for social scientists.New York:Routledge.
17. Ducharmeand, D. A.,Arcand, I.(2009).Using Noldus Observer XT for research on deaf signers learning to read: An innovative methodology.Behavior Research Methods,41(3),833-840.
18. Edwards, J. A.(ed.),Lampert, M. D.(ed.)(1993).Talking data: Transoiption and coding in discourse research.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Erickson, F.(1979).Talking down: Some culture sources of miscommunication in inter-racial interviews.Nonverbal behavior: Applications andcultural implications,New York:
20. Erickson, F.(1986).Qualitative methods in research on teaching.Handbook of research on teaching,New York:
21. Flood, J.(ed.),Heath, S. B.(ed.),Lapp, D.(ed.)(1997).Handbook of research on reaching literacy through the communicative and visual art.New York:Macmillan.
22. Goldman, R.(2004).Video perspectivity meets wild and crazy teens: A design ethnography.Cambridge Journal of Education,34(2),157-178.
23. Goldman, R.(2007).ORION, an online digital video data analysis tool: Changing our perspectives as an interpretive community.Video research in the learning sciences,Mahwah, NJ:
24. Goldman-Segall, R.(1998).Points of viewing children's thinking: A video ethnographer's journey.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
25. Greene, J. C.,Caracelli, V. J.(1997).Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
26. Gulek, C.(1999).Using multiple means of inquiry to gain insight into classrooms: A multi-trait multi-method approach.the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Montreal, Canada:
27. Hansen, C. C.(2004).Teacher talk: Promoting literacy development through response to story.Journal of Research in Childhood Education,19(2),115-129.
28. Hutchins, E.(1991).The social organization of distributed cognition.Perspectives on socially shared cognition,Washington, DC:
29. Jacknis, I.(1988).Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson in Bali: Their use of photography and film.Cultural Anthropology,3(2),160-177.
30. Jacobs, J. K.,Kawanaka, T.,Stigler, J. W.(1999).Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching.International Journal of Educational Research,31(8),717-724.
31. Janssen, J.,Erkens, G.,Kanselaar, G.(2007).Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during computer-supported collaborative learning.Computers in Human Behavior,23(3),1105-1125.
32. Jordan, B.,Henderson, A.(1995).Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice.Journal of the Learning Sciences,4(1),39-103.
33. Kelly, A. E.(ed.),Lesh, R. A.(ed.)(2000).Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education.Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
34. Lincoln, Y. S.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Naturalistic inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
35. Mathison, S.(1988).Why triangulate?.Educational Researcher,17(2),13-17.
36. Mavrou, K.,Douglas, G.,Lewis, A.(2007).The use of Transana as a video analysis tool in researching computer-based collaborative learning in inclusive classrooms in Cyprus.International Journal of Research and Method in Education,30(2),163-178.
37. Maykut, P.,Morehouse, R.(1994).Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide.New York:Routledge.
38. Mehan, H.(1979).Learning lessons.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
39. National Research Council(2002).Scientific research in education.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
40. Nederhof, A. J.(1985).Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review.European Journal of Social Psychology,15(3),263-280.
41. Pea, R. D.,Hay, K.(2003).Report to the National Science FoundationReport to the National Science Foundation,Palo Alto, CA:Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning.
42. Pea, R. D.,Lindgren, R.(2008).Video collaboratories for research and education: An analysis of collaboration design patterns.IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies,1(4),235-247.
43. Pea, R.,Hoffert, E.(2007).Video workflow in the learning sciences: Prospects of emerging technologies for augmenting work practices.Video research in the learning sciences,Mahwah, NJ:
44. Prosser, J.(ed.)(1998).Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers.Bristol, UK:Falmer Press.
45. Rosenstein, B.(2002).Video use in social science research and program evaluation.International Journal of Qualitative Methods,1(3),22-43.
46. Siegel, S.,Castellan, N. J.(1988).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.New York:McGraw-Hill.
47. Stevens, R.,Toro-Martell, S.(2003).Leaving a trace: Supporting museum visitor interaction and interpretation with digital media annotation systems.Journal of Museum Education,28(2),25-31.
48. Stigler, J. W.,Gallimore, R.,Hiebert, J.(2000).Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies.Educational Psychologist,35(2),87-100.
49. Sung, Y.-T.,Chang, K.-E.,Hou, H.-T.,Chen, P.-F.(2010).Designing an electronic guidebook for learning engagement in a museum of history.Computers in Human Behavior,26(1),74-83.
50. Sung, Y.-T.,Hou, H.-T.,Liu, C.-K.,Chang, K.-E.(2010).Mobile guide system using problem-solving strategy for museum learning: A sequential learning behavioural pattern analysis.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,26(2),106-115.
51. Tashakkori, A. (ed.),Teddlie, C. B.(ed.)(2003).Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
52. Weitzman, E. A.(2000).Software and qualitative research.Handbook of qualitative research,Thousand Oaks, CA:
53. Wu, H.-K.(2003).Linking the microscopic view of chemistry to real life experiences: Intertextuality in a high-school science classroom.Science Education,87(6),868-891.
54. Wu, H.-K.,Krajcik, J. S.(2006).Exploring middle school students' use of inscriptions in project-based science classrooms.Science Education,90(5),852-873.
55. 吳心楷、辛靜婷。質性資料分析軟體NVivo在數位學習研究的應用。數位學習研究方法，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
56. 林本炫編、何明修編(2004)。質性研究方法及其超越。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan:南華大學教育社會學研究所=Graduate Institute of Sociology of Education, Nanhua University。
57. 林陳涌、童麗珠(2000)。生物實驗教學能力重要性評估比較研究。師大學報：科學教育類，45(2)，21-38。
58. 胡幼慧編(2003)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:巨流=Chu-Liou。
59. 謝州恩、吳心楷(2006)。探究情境中國小學童科學解釋能力成長之研究。師大學報：科學教育類，50(2)，55-84。

1. 陳劍涵(2018)。多元識讀導向的中學教育學程英語教材教法探討。教科書研究，11(3)，63-86。
2. 段曉林、余忠潔(2017)。以MAIT網路促進科學教師探究教學能力之專業成長。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，10(1)，105-133。
3. 許志榮(2023)。地方政府委託私人辦理實驗教育之研究：以宜蘭人文中小學解約為例。學校行政，147，174-206。
4. 簡瑞宇,蔡文程,黃俊發(2021)。女子網球雙打最佳贏球策略：以臺灣詹家姊妹為例。大專體育學刊，23(3)，277-292。
5. 簡馨瑩、連啟舜(2014)。教師手勢對幼兒故事詞彙理解影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊，59(2)，61-88。
6. 潘佩妤、宋曜廷(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55(4)，97-130。
7. 蘇育代(2014)。職前幼教師學習幼兒歌曲彈唱之探究。幼兒教育年刊，25，87-112。
8. 顏芝芸,陳佳利,江懿德,方偉達(2023)。應用「方法目的鏈」探究高雄兒童美術館「圖案，真奇妙！」特展之錄影分析。藝術教育研究，45，35-70。
9. 翟敏如(2015)。探究生氣繪本情緒文本內容對於幼教師情緒言談之影響。課程與教學，18(2)，27-44。
10. (2024)。國民小學低年級實施素養導向課程形成性回饋之研究－以生活主題課程為例。教育理論與實踐學刊，49，33-60。