探討臺灣學生的自律學習：TEPS資料的縱貫性分析

Self-Regulation Learning among Taiwanese Students: A Longitudinal Analysis of the TEPS Database

趙珮晴(Pei-Ching Chao)；余民寧(Min-Ning Yu)；張芳全(Fang-Chung Chang)

分析能力 ； 台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫 ； 自律學習 ； 潛在成長曲線模型 ； analytical ability ； Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS) ； self-regulation learning ； latent growth curve model

教育科學研究期刊

56卷3期（2011 / 09 / 01）

151 - 179

繁體中文

課後學生自主的時間能否自己自律繼續學習，是值得關注的議題。本研究欲瞭解學生從國中到高中自律學習發展情況，以台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫的2,939個追蹤樣本，進行潛在成長曲線模型分析。在本研究的假設模型中發現：兩性學生在自律學習的假設模型無顯著差異，而且國中高自律學習的學生到高中的自律學習成長有限；國中低自律學習的學生到高中自律學習成長幅度較大。至於學生家庭社經地位愈高、父母學校參與和接納的程度愈高，學生國中時期的自律學習情況會愈好；但是學生家庭社經地位愈高、父母學校參與程度愈高，對於學生國中到高中自律學習成長有限，至於父母接納則無顯著影響關係。另外，國中自律學習良好的學生，有較良好的分析能力；但是自律學習無法有效預測分析能力的成長情況。本研究將依據上述研究結果提出相關結論與建議以供參考。

Students self-regulating their learning after school is an important topic. This study examines the development of self-regulation learning (SRL) and analytical abilities using 2,939 samples from junior high schools and senior high schools. Data were collected from the Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS). A latent growth curve model was employed to analyze the data. The analysis results are as follows: No gender differences exist regarding the development of SRL and analytical ability in both junior and senior high school students in Taiwan. Junior high school students with higher levels of SRL tend to make less SRL progress during senior high school, whereas students with lower SRL levels tend to make greater progress. Junior high school students with higher family socioeconomic status, greater parental involvement and acceptance, and superior SRL levels demonstrated less SRL progress in senior high school. Additionally, junior high school students with higher SRL levels tend to have greater analytical abilities. However, the SRL level of senior high school students could not accurately predict their analytical abilities. Based on these results, this study provides a number of conclusions and suggestions for practical applications and future research.

1. 程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報：教育類，46(1)，67-92。
   連結：
2. 中央研究院調查研究專題中心（2009）。台灣教育長期追踨資料庫。2009年11月21日，取自http://srda.sinica.edu.tw/teps Center for Survey Research, Academia Sinica. (2009). Taiwan Education Panel Survey. Retrieved November 21, 2009 from http://srda.sinica.edu.tw/teps。http://srda.sinica.edu.tw/teps
3. 楊孟麗、譚康榮、黃敏雄（2003）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：心理計量報告：TEPS 2001 分析能力測驗（第一版）。臺北市：中央研究院調查研究專題中心。Yang, M.-L., Tam, T., & Huang, M.-H. (2003). Psychometric report for the ability tests of TEPS 2001 (1st ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Center for Survey Research, Academia Sinica.
4. 張苙雲（2008）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：第一波（2001）、第二波（2003）、第三波（2005）、第四波（2007）資料使用手冊【公共使用版電子檔】。臺北市：中央研究院調查研究專題中心【管理、釋出單位】。Chang, L.-Y. (2008). Taiwan Education Panel Survey: User's guide and base year (2001), base year(2003), base year(2005), & base year(2007) student data 〔public release computer file〕. Taipei, Taiwan: Center for Survey Research, Academia Sinica.
5. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
6. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
7. Bandura, A.(1977).Social learning theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
8. Bandura, A.(2002).Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era.European Psychologist,7(1),1-16.
9. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York:Freeman.
10. Bandura, A.(2001).Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective.Annual Review of Psychology,52,1-26.
11. Bandura, A.(1989).Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy.Development Psychology,25(5),729-735.
12. Bandura, A.,Barbaranelli, C.,Caprara, G. V.,Pastorelli, C.(1996).Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning.Child Development,67(3),1206-1222.
13. Bandura, A.,Barbaranelli, C.,Caprara, G. V.,Pastorelli, C.(2001).Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories.Child Development,72(1),187-206.
14. Bandura, A.,Caprara, G. V.,Barbaranelli, C.,Gerbino, M.,Pastorelli, C.(2003).Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning.Child Development,74(3),769-782.
15. Bollen, K. A.,Curren, P. J.(2006).Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective.Hoboken, NJ:Wiley-Interscience.
16. Bynum, M. S.,Brody, G. H.(2005).Coping behaviors, parenting, and perceptions of children's internalising and externalising problems in rural African American mothers.Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies,54(1),58-71.
17. Byrnes, J.,Hong, L.,Xing, S.(1997).Gender differences on the math subtest of the Scholastic Aptitude Test may be culture-specific.Educational Studies in Mathematics,34(1),49-66.
18. Caprara, G. V.,Fida, R.,Vecchione, M.,Del Bove, G.,Vecchio, G. M.,Barbaranelli, C.(2008).Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,100(3),525-534.
19. Grolnick, W. S.,Kurowski, C. O.,Gurland, S. T.(1999).Family processes and development of children's self-regulation.Educational Psychologist,34(1),3-14.
20. Hong, E.,Aqui, Y.(2004).Cognitive and motivational characteristics of adolescents gifted in mathematics.Gifted Child Quarterly,48(3),191-201.
21. Hong, E.,Peng, Y.,Rowell, L. L.(2009).Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement-level differences.Learning and Individual Differences,19(2),269-276.
22. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Kaplan, A.,Lichtinger, E.,Gorodetsky, M.(2009).Achievement goal orientations and self-regulation in writing: An integrative perspective.Journal of Educational Psychology,101(1),51-69.
24. Kline, R. B.(2005).Principle and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford.
25. Martin, A. J.(2004).School motivation of boys and girls: Differences of degree, differences of kind, or both?.Australian Journal of Psychology,56(3),133-146.
26. Martinez-Pons, M.(1996).Test of a model of parental inducement of academic self-regulation.The Journal of Experimental Education,64(3),213-227.
27. Martinez-Pons, M.(2002).Parental influences on children's academic self-regulatory development.Theory into Practice,41(2),126-131.
28. Matuga, J. M.(2009).Self-regulation, goal orientation, and academic achievement of secondary students in online university courses.Educational Technology & Society,12(3),4-11.
29. Moss, E.(1990).Social interaction and metacognitive development in gifted preschoolers.Gifted Child Quarterly,34(1),16-20.
30. Nader-Grosbois, N.,Normandeau, S.,Ricard-Cossette, M.(2008).Mother's, father's regulation and child's self-regulation in a computer-mediated learning situation.European Journal of Psychology of Education,23(1),95-115.
31. Perels, F.,Dignath, C.,Schmitz, B.(2009).Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes.European Journal of Psychology of Education,24(1),17-31.
32. Pintrich, P. R.(1999).The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining SRL.International Journal of Educational Research,31(6),459-470.
33. Riding, R.(Ed.),Rayner, S.(Ed.)(2001).Perception.London:Ablex.
34. Shell, D. F.,Husman, J.(2001).The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective in achievement and studying.Contemporary Educational Psychology,26(4),481-506.
35. Shell, D. F.,Husman, J.(2008).Control, motivation, affect, and strategic self-regulation in the college classroom: A multidimensional phenomenon.Journal of Educational Psychology,100(2),443-459.
36. Tang, M.,Addison, K. D.,LaSure-Bryant, D.,Norman, R.,O''Connell, W.,Stewart-Sicking, J. A.(2004).Factors the influence self-efficacy of counseling students: An exploratory study.Counselor Education and Supervision,44(1),70-80.
37. Tang, M.,Neber, H.(2008).Motivation and self-regulated science learning in high-achieving students: Differences related to nation, gender, and grade-level.High Ability Studies,19(2),103-116.
38. Thompson, C. L.,Yawkey, T. D.(1983).,Pennsylvania:Pennsylvania State University, University Park Div of Curriculum and Instruction.
39. Thoresen, C. E.,Mahoney, M. J.(1974).Behavioral self-control.New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
40. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
41. Zimmerman, B. J.(1989).A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,81(3),329-339.
42. Zimmerman, B. J.,Martinez-Pons, M.(1986).Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies.American Educational Research Journal,23(4),614-628.
43. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
44. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程式模型─LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:雙葉書廊=Yeh Yeh Book Gallery。
45. 黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程式模型理論與應用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book。

1. 陳俐君、張芳全(2018)。國中生家庭社經地位、文化資本、自然科學習興趣對自然科學習動機影響之縱貫性研究。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，32(2)，1-33。
2. 溫福星(2012)。重複觀測量數之分析：多群體多變項線性成長模式的估計。教育科學研究期刊，57(1)，51-78。
3. 吳淑禎(2017)。「高中（職）學生學習與讀書策略量表」修訂之研究。測驗學刊，64(2)，155-181。
4. 薛智暉,余民寧(2021)。不同類型暑假活動對學習成長之潛在影響－TEPS之縱貫資料分析。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，51，1-23。
5. 詹秀雯、張芳全(2018)。基隆市國中生學習成就影響因素之縱貫性研究。臺北市立大學學報：教育類，49(2)，1-32。
6. 張芳全,洪筱仙(2019)。澎湖縣國中生未來時間觀、自律學習與學習成就之研究。臺北市立大學學報.教育類，50(2)，1-32。
7. 張芳全,江淑芳(2020)。馬公國中九年級生背景因素與自律學習對英語學習成就影響之研究。學校行政，126，86-117。
8. 趙珮晴、余民寧(2012)。自律學習策略與自我效能、學習興趣、學業成就的相關研究。教育研究集刊，58(3)，1-32。
9. (2016)。國小中高年級學生自律學習與數學學業成就關係之縱貫性分析。教育與心理研究，39(4)，87-111。
10. (2020)。澎湖縣國中生背景因素與數學成績之研究：以自律學習與國文成績為中介變項。教育研究學報，54(2)，31-70。
11. (2021)。「國中公民與社會科自我調整學習量表」 之編製與驗證。教育研究學報，55(1)，71-98。