题名

國小六年級學生犯罪軟體防治之教材發展與評鑑:以恐懼訴求為教學設計原則之研究

并列篇名

The Use of Fear Appeals in the Development and Evaluation of an Anti-Crimeware Courseware for Taiwanese Sixth Graders

作者

鄧達鈞(Ta-Chun Teng);周倩(Chien Chou)

关键词

犯罪軟體 ; 系統化教學設計 ; 防治教材 ; 恐懼訴求 ; 國小六年級學生 ; crimeware ; systematic instructional design ; prevention courseware ; fear-appeals ; Taiwanese sixth grader

期刊名称

教育科學研究期刊

卷期/出版年月

57卷3期(2012 / 09 / 01)

页次

91 - 120

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究之目的為發展國小六年級學童犯罪軟體防治教材,並探討其學習成效。本教材以系統化教學設計進行,並以傳播學領域之「恐懼訴求」為教學設計方式。在實驗設計中分別以不同高低之感受性及嚴重性設計四類不同訴求教材,作為教學實驗之自變項,以探究130位六年級學生之犯罪軟體防治態度、認知概念、問題解決及課後繼續行為之學習成效。研究結果指出:整體而言,接受高感受及高嚴重教材之學生的學習成效優於其他組別。本研究結果可提供未來相關研究、教學設計之參考。

英文摘要

This study describes the development of an anti-crimeware courseware for schoolchildren in Taiwan and examines its pedagogical effectiveness. The instructional design adopted the ADDIE model and integrated the fear appeals approach. A 2-by-2 factorial experimental design was used to test the four possible combinations of two levels (high and low) and two factors (perceived-susceptibility and severity) of fear appeals. The participants in this study included 130 sixth graders. Using immediate and delayed individual tests, this study examined their anti-crimeware attitudes, cognitive concepts, and problem solving skills. The results indicated that the High- Susceptibility/High-Severity (H-Su/H-Se) group outperformed the other three groups. Further explanations and interpretations of the results are provided, and suggestions for future research are proposed.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 凌儀玲、劉宜芬(2008)。廣告訊息之理解與說服效果:捷思式—系統式訊息處理觀點。管理學報,25(5),487-503。
    連結:
  2. 樊國楨、林樹國、黃健誠(2008)。資訊安全管理系統驗證標準化之二:資訊安全管理系統政策集初探。資訊安全通訊,14(2),1-21。
    連結:
  3. 賽門鐵克 (2009)。白皮書:網站攻擊 。取自http://www.symantec.com/content/zh/tw/enterprise/collateral/white_papers/Web_Attacks_wp_tw.pdf【Symantec. (2009). Web based attacks. Retrieved from http://www.symantec.com/content/zh/tw/enterprise/collateral/white_papers/Web_Attacks_wp_tw.pdf】
  4. 行政院主計總處 (2007)。96年電腦應用概況報告。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=24347&CtNode=5048&mp=1【Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. (2007). Report on the computer use survey 2007. Retrieved from http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=24347&CtNode=5048&mp=1】
  5. Baum, A.(Ed.),Revenson, T. A.(Ed.),Singer, J.(Ed.)(2012).Handbook of health psychology: Second edition.New York, NY:Psychology Press.
  6. Cacioppo, J.(Ed.),Petty, R.(Ed.)(1983).Social psychophysiology.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
  7. Chaiken, S.(1980).Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39(5),752-766.
  8. de Hoog, N.,Stroebe, W.,de Wit, J. B. F.(2007).The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications: A meta-analysis.Review of General Psychology,11(3),258-285.
  9. de Hoog, N.,Stroebe, W.,de Wit, J. B. F.(2005).The impact of fear appeals on the processing and acceptance of action recommendations.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,31(1),24-33.
  10. Dourish, P.,Grinter, E.,de la Flor, J. D.,Joseph, M.(2004).Security in the wild: User strategies for managing security as an everyday, practical problem.Personal Ubiquitous Computing,8(6),391-401.
  11. Emigh, A.(2006).,未出版
  12. Gordon, S.,Ford, R.(2006).On the definition and classification of cybercrime.Journal in Computer Virology,2(1),13-20.
  13. Henthome, T. L.,LaTour, M. S.,Nataraajan, R.(1993).Fear appeals in print advertising: An analysis of arousal and response.Journal of Advertising,22(2),59-69.
  14. Icove, D.,Seger, K.(1995).Computer crime: A crimefighter's handbook.Sebastopol, CA:O'Reilly & Associates.
  15. Internet Crime Complaint Center(2008).,未出版
  16. Keller, P. A.,Block, L. G.(1996).Increasing the persuasiveness of fear appleas: The effect of arousal and elaboration.Journal of Consumer Research,22(4),448-459.
  17. Markus, J.,Zulfikar, R.(2008).Crimeware: Understanding new attacks and defenses.Cambridge, MA:Addison-Wesley.
  18. Rippetoe, P. A.,Rogers, R. W.(1987).Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(3),596-604.
  19. Rogers, R. W.(1975).A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change.Journal of Psychology,91,93-114.
  20. Rogers, R. W.,Deckner, C. W.(1975).Effects of fear appeals and physiological arousal upon emotion, attitudes, and cigarette smoking.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,32(2),222-230.
  21. Rossiter, J. R.,Thornton, J.(2004).Fear-pattern analysis supports the fear-drive model for antispeeding road-safety TV ads.Psychology and Marketing,21(11),945-960.
  22. Smith, P. L.,Ragan, T. J.(2005).Instructional design.New York, NY:Merrill.
  23. Symantec.(2008).,未出版
  24. Wack, J. P.,Carnahan, L. J.(1989).Computer viruses and related threats: A management guide.Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
  25. Weirich, D.,Sasse, M. A.(2001).Pretty good persuasion: A first step towards effective password security in the real world.Proceedings of the 2001 Workshop on New Security Paradigms
  26. Witte, K.(1992).Putting fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model.Communication Monographs,59(4),329-349.
  27. Witte, K.(1994).Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model(EPPM).Communication Monographs,61(2),113-134.
  28. Witte, K.,Allen, M.(2000).A meta-analysis for fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns.Health Education and Behaviour,27(5),91-615.
  29. 尹玫君、康旭雅(2005)。國小兒童網路倫理教學成效之研究。南大學報,39(1),1-20。
  30. 王鴻原(2007)。新竹市=Hsinchu, Taiwan,國立交通大學=National Chiao Tung University。
  31. 林生傳(2003)。教育研究法:全方位的統整與分析。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。
  32. 林佳旺、林菁(2005)。國小六年級網路素養課程系統化教學設計之行動研究。教學科技與媒體,71,47-60。
  33. 林宜隆(2006)。資訊社會與資通安全管理之探討。風險社會與安全管理學術研討會,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
  34. 財團法人臺灣網路資訊中心(2007)。,未出版
  35. 國立政治大學數位文化行動研究室、白絲帶關懷協會(2010)。,未出版
  36. 張博竣編(2004)。資訊安全管理實務。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:文魁資訊=Kings Information。
  37. 教育部(2010)。,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:作者=Author。
  38. 黃鈴媚(1999)。恐懼訴求與健康宣導活動:宣導訊息內容設計之研究。新聞學研究,61,99-135。
  39. 鄧達鈞、張志銘、周倩、陳昭秀(2007)。國小六年級網路素養與倫理課程之發展與實施成效探討。2007電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan: