應用診斷測驗結合答題信心探究跨年級學生簡單暨串聯電路之理解及影響來源

Application of a Diagnostic Instrument with Item Confidence to Explore across Graders' Understanding of Simple and Series Circuits and Their Sources

林靜雯(Jing-Wen Lin)；吳育倫(Yu-Lun Wu)

答題信心 ； 答題類型 ； 電路 ； 影響答題類型的來源 ； item confidence ； answering type ； circuit ； source of an answer

教育科學研究期刊

58卷2期（2013 / 06 / 01）

25 - 56

繁體中文

本研究以量化調查輔以部分質性晤談，運用診斷測驗結合答題信心及影響概念來源之自評，診斷331位接受電路教學前之三年級生，與335位教學後之五年級生於簡單暨串聯電路一主題中真正理解、猜答及知識缺乏、另有答題類型之情形，並進一步探究其中正確及典型另有答題類型的影響來源。結果發現，整體學生之正確答案多屬真正理解，錯誤答案多屬另有答題類型。其中，跨年級學生皆有之另有答題類型，為較難因教學而概念改變者，包括「電池體積大小影響電流多寡與燈泡亮度」等三種。此外，影響三年級生典型另有答題類型的來源為「直覺」，而五年級生則為「實驗」及「直覺」。據此，研究者建議於教學時可考慮以認知衝突情境及電路系統化基模，重建學生的直覺推理。

This study is a quantitative survey with several qualitative interviews of participants. A diagnostic test with item confidence and source of an answer was used to diagnose 331 third graders' and 335 fifth graders' adequate understanding, guessing, knowledge deficiency, or alternative answering type in the topic of simple and series circuits. Moreover, the sources of the correct answers and alternative answering types were further examined. The results show that students' correct answers are mostly adequate in understanding, but incorrect answers are alternative answering types. The alternative answering types that both third and fifth graders have are difficult to conceptual change by informal teaching. They are ”the volume of a battery influences the strength of current and the light degree of a bulb” and two other answering types. Furthermore, the source of the third graders' typical alternative types is ”intuition,” and those of the fifth graders are ”experiment” and ”intuition.” This study suggests using cognitive conflict and a system schema of a circuit to reconstruct students' intuitive reasoning.

1. 李賢哲、樊琳、張蘭友(2005)。國小學童「電池」概念之診斷－以兩段式選擇題為例。科學教育學刊，13(3)，263-288。
   連結：
2. 林靜雯、邱美虹(2009)。探究學生串聯電路認知特徵演化歷程之跨年級研究。教育科學研究期刊，54(4)，139-170。
   連結：
3. 邱美虹、林靜雯(2002)。以多重類比探究兒童電流心智模式之改變。科學教育學刊，10(2)，109-134。
   連結：
4. 邱美虹、高淑芬(1999)。類比對應對學生建構“原子結構”心智表徵之影響。師大學報：科學教育類，44(1&2)，31-59。
   連結：
5. 黃國禎、朱蕙君、王榕榆(2008)。以答題信心度為基礎之線上診斷評量系統。師大學報：教育類，53(1)，1-24。
   連結：
6. 盧秀琴(2005)。探討教科書與中小學學生學習細胞相關概念的關係。科學教育學刊，13(4)，367-386。
   連結：
7. 盧秀琴、黃麗燕(2007)。國中「細胞課程」概念改變教學之發展研究。科學教育學刊，15(3)，295-316。
   連結：
8. Azaiza, I.,Bar, V.,Galili, I.(2006).Learning electricity in elementary school.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,4(1),45-71.
9. Borges, A. T.,Gilbert, J. K.(1999).Mental models of electricity.International Journal of Science Education,21(1),95-117.
10. Caleon, I.,Subramaniam, R.(2010).Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students' understanding of waves.International Journal of Science Education,32(7),939-961.
11. Çepni, S.,Keleş, E.(2006).Turkish students' conceptions about the simple electric circuits.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,4(2),269-291.
12. Chiu, M.-H.,Lin, J.-W.(2005).Promoting fourth graders' conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(4),429-464.
13. Chu, H.-C.,Hwang, G.-J.,Tsai, C.-C.,Tseng, J. C.-R.(2010).A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning system for natural science courses.Computers & Education,55(4),1618-1627.
14. Driver, R.(Ed.),Guesne, E.(Ed.),Tiberghien, A.(Ed.)(1985).Children's ideas in science.Milton, MA:Open University Press.
15. Driver, R.,Squires, A.,Rushworth, P.,Wood-Robinson, V.(1994).Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas.London:Routledge.
16. Echternacht, G. J.(1972).The use of confidence testing in objective tests.Review of Educational Research,42(2),217-236.
17. Engelhardt, P. V.,Beichner, R. J.(2004).Students' understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits.American Journal of Physics,72(1),98-115.
18. Gabel, D.(Ed.)(1994).Handbook of research on science teaching and learning.New York, NY:Macmillan.
19. Gilbert, J. K.(1977).The study of student misunderstandings in the physical sciences.Research in Science Education,7(1),165-171.
20. Hammer, D.(1996).More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research.American Journal of Physics,64(10),1316-1325.
21. Hasan, S.,Bagayoko, D.,Kelley, E. L.(1999).Misconceptions and the certainty of response index(CRI).Physics Education,34(5),294-299.
22. Head, J.(1986).Research into alternative frameworks: Promise and problems.Research in Science & Technological Education,4(2),203-211.
23. Jack, B. M.,Liu, C.-J.,Chiu, H.-L.,Tsai, C.-Y.(2012).Measuring the confidence of 8th grade Taiwanese students' knowledge of acids and bases.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,10(4),889-905.
24. Kaltakçi, D.,Didiş, N.(2007).Identification of pre-service physics teachers' misconceptions on gravity concept: A study with a 3-tier misconception test.AIP Conference Proceedings,899,499-500.
25. Lin, J.-W.,Chiu, M.-H.(2010).The mismatch between students' mental models of acids/bases and their sources and their teacher's anticipations thereof.International Journal of Science Education,32(12),1617-1646.
26. Lin, J.-W.,Chiu, M.-H.(2007).Exploring the characteristics and diverse sources of students' mental models in acids and bases.International Journal of Science Education,29(6),771-803.
27. Lin, J.-W.,Wu, Y.-L.,Lin, Y.-C.(2011).What are the impacts of dynamic representations on students' answering behavior in the two-tier test in electricity?.42nd annual conference of Australian Science Education Research Association,Adelaide, SA:
28. Lo, J.-J.,Wang, H.-M.,Yeh, S.-W.(2004).Effects of confidence scores and remedial instruction on prepositions learning in adaptive hypermedia.Computers & Education,42(1),45-63.
29. Magnusson, S. J.,Boyle, R. A.,Templin, M.(1997).Dynamic science assessment: A new approach for investigating conceptual change.The Journal of the Learning Science,6(1),91-142.
30. Osborne, R.,Freyberg, P(1985).Learning in science: The implications of children's science.Auckland, New Zealand:Heinemann.
31. Osborne, R.,Gilbert, J. K.(1980).A technique for exploring students' views of the world.Physics Education,15(6),376-379.
32. Peşman, H.,Eryilmaz, A.(2010).Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits.The Journal of Educational Research,103(3),208-222.
33. Peterson, R. F.,Treagust, D. F.,Garnett, P.(1989).Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade 11 and 12 students' concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,26(4),301-314.
34. Pfundt, H.,Duit, R.(2009).Bibliography: Students alternative frameworks and science education.Kiel, Germany:University of Kiel Institute for Science Education.
35. Psillos, D.,Koumaras, P.,Tiberghien, A.(1988).Voltage presented as a primary concept in an introductory teaching sequence on DC circuits.International Journal of Science Education,10(1),29-43.
36. Pugh, R. C.,Brunza, J. J.(1975).Effects of a confidence weighted scoring system on measures of test reliability and validity.Educational and Psychological Measurement,35(1),73-78.
37. Renner, C. H.,Renner, M. J.(2001).But I thought I knew that: Using confidence estimation as a debasing technique to improve classroom performance.Applied Cognitive Psychology,15(1),23-32.
38. Shipstone, D. M.(1984).A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits.European Journal of Science Education,6(2),185-198.
39. Stankov, L.,Crawford, J. D.(1997).Self-confidence and performance on tests of cognitive abilities.Intelligence,25(2),93-109.
40. Tan, K. C. D.,Goh, N. K.,Chia, L. S.,Treagust, D. F.(2002).Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(4),283-301.
41. Thomaz, M.,Malaquias, I.,Valente, M. C.,Antunes, M. J.(1995).An attempt to overcome alternative conceptions related to heat and temperature.Physics Education,30(1),19-26.
42. Treagust, D. F.(1988).Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science.International Journal of Science Education,10(2),159-169.
43. Treagust, D. F.(Ed.),Duit, R.(Ed.),Fraser, B. J.(Ed.)(1996).Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
44. 林靜雯(2000)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
45. 林靜雯(2006)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
46. 林靜雯(2008)。跨年級學生電學心智模式一致性與課程進程之比較研究。教育與心理研究，31(3)，53-79。
47. 林靜雯、吳育倫(2011)。探究動態表徵結合即時回饋系統對診斷學生簡單暨串聯電路之另有概念的影響。教育與心理研究，34(1)，79-107。
48. 林靜雯、吳育倫、林燕青(2011)。動態表徵融入二階層試題對診斷學生簡單及串聯電路概念之答題影響。科學教育研究與發展季刊，61，25-50。
49. 許瑛玿、謝惠珠(2004)。應用概念改變教學策略在颱風常識的學習。師大學報：科學教育類，49(1)，15-40。