「國中校長多元型模領導力量表」的編製及分析

The Development of a Multi-frame Leadership Scale for Junior High Principals

10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(2).01

黃文三(Wen-San Huang)；沈碩彬(Shou-Pin Shen)

二階單因素模式 ； 多元型模領導力 ； 國中校長 ； second-order factor model ； multi-frame leadership ； junior high principal

教育科學研究期刊

59卷2期（2014 / 06 / 01）

1 - 30

繁體中文

本研究依據L. G. Bolman和T. E. Deal的理論，並參酌國情，建構一份創新且具有信度與效度的「國中校長多元型模領導力量表」，再分析國中校長多元型模領導力的現況。研究採用分層隨機抽樣，第一階段取樣132位教師進行項目分析、探索性因素分析與信度分析，第二階段取樣646位教師，並隨機分成兩組獨立樣本，分別進行驗證性因素分析與簡效模式的複核效化；最後，根據調查結果進行現況分析及討論。所得結論包括：一、國中校長多元型模領導力可分為教學領導、象徵領導、政治領導及結構領導等四個構面；二、二階單因素模式為一最簡效模式，量表同時具有良好的穩定度及預測力；三、國中校長多元型模領導力現況大致良好，且不論何種型模的領導力，各校校長自評程度總是優於教師評量程度，但兩者呈現正相關。根據研究結果，提出建議供國中校長、教師及未來研究參考。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the current status of junior high school principals’ multi-frame leadership and to construct an innovative, reliable, and valid scale according to Bolman and Deal’s theory and national conditions. The scale is named the ＂Junior High Principal Multi-frame Leadership Scale＂. Through stratified random sampling, 132 teachers were examined using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability analysis. A target sample of 646 teachers was then randomly divided into two groups to perform confirmatory factor analysis and cross-validation. A situational analysis of the survey results was conducted. The major findings and conclusions are as follows: Junior high principals’ multi-frame leadership can be divided into four aspects, comprising instructional leadership, symbolic leadership, political leadership, and structural leadership; a second-order factor model is the most efficient model because of its stability and predictive power; and the current situation of principals’ multi-frame leadership is robust. The principals’ self-perception of their performance in each aspect was consistently higher than the teachers’ perception of them; nevertheless, both were positively correlated. Based on the results, recommendations are offered for junior high principals, teachers, and future researchers.

1. 王秀玲、康瀚文(2013)。國民中學教師課程領導相關問題之探究：以學習領域召集人為例。教育科學研究期刊，58(1)，29-58。
   連結：
2. 李佳穎、鄭淵全(2012)。國民小學校長多元領導策略與教師組織公民行為之研究。學校行政，82，90-110。
   連結：
3. 李琪明(2013)。校長道德發展及其品德校園營造之質性探究。教育科學研究期刊，58(1)，117-147。
   連結：
4. 紀家雄(2013)。中小學校長推動學習共同體的教學領導核心技術之探討。學校行政，85，156-172。
   連結：
5. 郭小蘋、吳勁甫(2011)。臺灣地區近年來校長教學領導與教師教學效能學位論文研究走向之分析。嘉大教育研究學刊，27，1-27。
   連結：
6. 黃文三(2012)。中等教育。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
   連結：
7. 葉連祺(2008)。不同類別評量者對國小校長領導能力知覺評量之比較。師大學報：教育類，53(3)，1-28。
   連結：
8. 蔡慶文、范熾文、林清達(2006)。國小校長教學領導與教師教學效能之研究。花蓮教育大學學報，23，29-48。
   連結：
9. Anderson, J.,Gerbing, D.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423.
10. Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(1991).Leadership and management effectiveness: A multi-frames, multi-sector analysis.Human Resource Management,30(4),509-534.
11. Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(2003).Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
12. Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(1999).Four steps to keeping change efforts heading in the right direction.Journal for Quality and Participation,22(3),6-12.
13. Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(2002).Reframing the path to school leadership: A guide for teachers and principals.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
14. Bryman, A.(1992).Charisma and leadership in organizations.London, UK:Sage.
15. Bulis, R. C.(1992).Lubbock, TX.,Texas Tech University.
16. Byrne, B. M.(1994).Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
17. Cheng, Y.-C.(1994).Principal's leadership as a critical factor for school performance: Evidence from multi-levels of primary schools.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,5(3),299-317.
18. Dandridge, T.,Mitroff, I.,Joyce, W.(1980).Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis.Academy of Management Review,5(1),77-82.
19. Day, C.,Harris, A.,Hadfield, M.(2001).Challenging the orthodoxy of effective school leadership.International Journal of Leadership in Education,4(1),39-56.
20. Elhosary, K. D.,Ahmed, E.(2012).Classroom discipline management: A multi-frame analysis.The Beacon,9(2),1-7.
21. Fleming, N. J. B.(2003).College Park, MD.,University of Maryland College Park.
22. Gardner, J. W.(1990).On leadership.New York, NY:Free Press.
23. Griffin, M. S.(2005).Morgantown, WV.,West Virginia University.
24. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R., L.,Black, W. C.(2009).Multivariate data analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
25. Hall, G. E.,Hord, S. M.(2001).Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
26. Hallinger, P.(1992).The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders.Journal of Educational Administration,30(3),35-48.
27. Hallinger, P.,Heck, R. H.(1998).Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,9(2),157-191.
28. Hatch, E. W.(2012).Divine empowerment of leaders: An intertextual analysis of Luke's use of Joel 2, Psalm 16 and Psalm 110 in Peter's sermon in Acts 2.Emerging Leadership Journeys,5(1),102-116.
29. House, R. J.,Javidan, M.(2004).Overview of globe.Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies,Thousand Oaks, CA:
30. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.).Chicago, IL:SPSS.
31. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,39(1),31-36.
32. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
33. Kmetz, J. T.,Willower, D. J.(1982).Elementary school principals' work behavior.Educational Administration Quarterly,18(4),62-78.
34. Mitchell, D. E.,Tucker, S.(1992).Leadership as a way of thinking.Educational Leadership,49(5),30-35.
35. Monahan, M. L.,Shah, A. J.(2011).Having the right tools: The leadership frames of university presidents.Coastal Business Journal,10(1),14-30.
36. Moorthy, D.(1992).The Canadian principal of the '90s: Manager or instructional leader? Or both?.Education Canada,32(2),8-11.
37. Murphy, J.(Ed.),Louis, K. S.(Ed.)(1999).Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American educational research association.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
38. Noar, S. M.(2003).The role of structural equation modeling in scale development.Structural Equation Modeling,10(4),622-647.
39. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
40. Onoye, K. J.(2004).Los Angeles, CA.,University of Southern California.
41. Quinn, R. E.(1984).Applying the competing values approach to leadership: Toward and integrative framework.Leaders and managers: International perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership,New York, NY:
42. Quinn, R. E.(1988).Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
43. Quinn, R. E.,Rohrbaugh, J.(1981).A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness.Public Productivity Review,5,122-140.
44. Reise, S. P.,Waller, N. G.,Comrey, A. L.(2000).Factor analysis and scale revision.Psychological Assessment,12(3),287-297.
45. Senge, P. M.(1999).Leadership in living organizations.Leading beyond the walls,San Francisco, CA:
46. Sergiovanni, T. J.,Burlingame, M.,Coombs, F. S.,Thurston, P. W.(1992).Educational governance and administration.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
47. Shum, L.-C.,Cheng, Y.-C.(1997).Perceptions of women principals' leadership and teachers' work attitudes.Journal of Educational Administration,35(2),165-184.
48. Smith, W. F.,Andrews, R. L.(1989).Instructional leadership: How principals make a difference.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
49. Spady, W.,Schwahn, C.(2001).Leading when everyone goes back to zero.Principal Leadership,2(4),10-16.
50. Sullivan, L. G.(2001).Four generations of community college leadership.Community College Journal of Research and Practice,25(8),559-571.
51. Viray, D. J.(2007).Claremont, CA.,The Claremont Graduate University.
52. 吳明清(2006)。學校領導的整合架構。臺灣教育，642，2-5。
53. 吳勁甫(2006)。競值架構應用在國民小學校長領導行為與學校組織效能關係之研究。教育政策論壇，9(2)，155-186。
54. 林俊傑(2011)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立高雄師範大學=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
55. 邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式：LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:雙葉書廊=Yeh Yeh Book Galler。
56. 秦夢群(2011)。教育行政理論與模式。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book。
57. 張慶勳(2006)。學校組織文化與領導。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book。
58. 陳成宏(2005)。學校變革與校長領導理論的整合性觀點：Bolman 和Deal 之多元架構領導途徑分析。教育研究與發展期刊，1(2)，155-176。
59. 陳麗玉(2007)。競值架構對我國高等教育評鑑國際化指標之啟示。教育行政與評鑑學刊，3，1-18。
60. 黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式：理論與應用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book。
61. 楊振昇(2004)。近十年來教育組織變革對教學領導之啟示。教育政策論壇，7(2)，107-130。
62. 鄭彩鳳(2007)。校長競值領導效能研究：理論、指標與衡量。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
63. 鄭燕祥(2003)。教育領導與改革：新範式。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。

1. 張文權、范熾文(2018)。「國民小學校長績效責任領導量表」之發展。測驗學刊，65(1)，69-94。
2. (2024)。特教學校校長多元架構領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。學校行政，149，73-98。