你讀到什麼科學？－科學新聞閱讀回憶診斷工具發展與評析

What Science Have You Read? Developing and Investigating a Diagnostic Tool for Evaluating Science News Reading Memory

10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).05

黃俊儒(Chun-Ju Huang)

科學新聞 ； 閱讀回憶 ； 閱讀回憶診斷 ； science news ； reading memory ； reading diagnosis

教育科學研究期刊

60卷2期（2015 / 06 / 01）

139 - 166

繁體中文

近代社會中的科技發展變化快速，若要持續地關心這些正在發生的科學相關議題，科學新聞文本就扮演一個重要的媒介角色。在眾多的科學新聞當中，「科學編譯新聞」是國內引進「科學新知」的最主要媒介，並且同時融合了科學的「說明文」及「故事文」兩種文類，是一個十分特殊及重要的科學知識文本。一般民眾如何對這類新聞文本進行閱讀與回憶，甚至足以影響科技社會的發展與成熟。本研究透過科學新聞閱讀回憶診斷工具的發展，經由自由回想及問題晤談的方法，探討大學生在閱讀科學編譯新聞時的閱讀回憶量、類型及相關的影響因素。研究結果發現，主題興趣是影響閱讀者掌握相關科學訊息的最主要因素，而閱讀者對於科學新聞的文本結構掌握地愈完整，愈有助於科學知識的吸收及整體意義的掌握。

In the current technological society, science news is a crucial mediator between people and developing science and technology. Among the various types of science news, compiled science news is the main source from which the latest scientific information from abroad is introduced. Compiled science news, which combines narrative and expository texts, is a unique type of scientific information. Because scientific information is increasingly prevalent, the manner in which people read and remember science news can affect the development and maturity of a technological society. This study explored students' reading memory and style as well as the factors influencing reading by applying a developed diagnostic tool in combination with free recall tasks and interviews. The results revealed that the motivation of interest is the main factor affecting student monitoring of science news. When readers maintain more complete textual structures in their mind, they can more efficiently master the scientific knowledge and grasp complete concepts from the compiled science news.

1. 陳綱佩、張寶芳、洪瑞雲(2007)。科學報導的閱讀理解與隱喻角色。中華傳播學刊，11，71-109。
   連結：
2. 黃俊儒(2008)。構思科技社會中的即時學習：以學生及專家對於科學新聞文本之理解差異為例。科學教育學刊，16(1)，105-124。
   連結：
3. 黃俊儒、簡妙如(2008)。「科學家發明了什麼？」─解析學生對於科學新聞中的科技產物意象。科學教育學刊，16(4)，415-438。
   連結：
4. 黃俊儒、簡妙如(2006)。科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈：構思另個科學傳播的起點。新聞學研究，86，135-170。
   連結：
5. 黃俊儒、簡妙如(2010)。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究：從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究，105，127-166。
   連結：
6. 魏國金（編譯）（ 2010 ， 8 月 31 日）。蘋果基因圖譜 科學家破解。自由時報， a11 版。【Wei, K.-C. (Ed. & Trans.). (2010, August 31). Scientists sequence apple genome. Liberty Times, p. a11.】
7. Britton, B. K.(Ed.),Graesser, A. C.(Ed.)(1996).Models of understanding text.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. DeBoer, G. E.(2000).Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,97(6),582-601.
9. Dimopoulos, K.,Koulaidis, V.(2002).The socio-epistemic constitution of science and technology in the Greek press: An analysis of its presentation.Public Understanding of Science,11(3),225-241.
10. Garcia, M. R.,Stark, P.(1991).Eyes on the news.St. Petersburg, FL:The Poynter Institute.
11. Graesser, A. C.,Hemphill, D.(1991).Question answering in the context of scientific mechanisms.Journal of Memory and Language,30(2),186-209.
12. Graesser, A. C.,Millis, K. K.,Zwaan, R. A.(1997).Discourse comprehension.Annual Review of Psychology,48(1),163-189.
13. Graesser, A. C.,Singer, M.,Trabasso, T.(1994).Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.Psychological Review,101(3),371-395.
14. Huang, C.-J.(2014).Double media distortions for science communication-An analysis of "compiled science news" transforming in Taiwan.Asian Journal of Communication,24(2),128-141.
15. Hyona, J.(Ed.),Radach, R.(Ed.),Deubel, H.(Ed.)(2003).The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research.Amsterdam, the Netherlands:Elsevier Science.
16. Kameenui, E. J.(Ed.),Simmons, D. C.(Ed.)(1990).Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problem.Columbus, OH:Merrill.
17. Kennedy, G.,Moren, D. R.,Ranly, D.(1993).Beyond the inverted pyramid: Effective writing for newspapers, magazines and specialized publications.New York, NY:St. Martin's Press.
18. Kerckhove, D. D.(1995).The skin of culture: Investigating the new electronic reality.Toronto, Canada:Somerville House.
19. Kintsch, W.(1974).The representation of meaning in memory.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Lemke, J. L.(1990).Talking science: Language, learning, and values.New York, NY:Ablex.
21. Levinson, R.(Ed.)(1994).Teaching science.London, UK:Routledge.
22. McGinn, R. E.(1991).Science, technology, and society.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
23. Millar, R.,Osborne, J. E.(1998).Beyond 2000: Science education for the future.London, UK:Kings College London.
24. Mullis, I. V. S.,Martin, M. O.,Kennedy, A. M.,Foy, P.(2007).PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA's progress in international reading literacy study in primary schools in 40 countries.Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
25. National Research Council(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
26. Norris, S. P.(Ed.),Phillips, L. M.(Ed.)(1990).Foundations of literacy policy in Canada.Alberta, Canada:Detselig.
27. Norris, S. P.,Phillips, L. M.(2003).How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy.Science Education,87(2),224-240.
28. Norris, S. P.,Phillips, L. M.,Korpan, C. A.(2003).University students' interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty.Public Understanding of Science,12(2),123-145.
29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007).PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world. Volume 1: Analysis.Paris, France:Author.
30. Osborne, R.,Wittrock, M.(1983).Learning science: A generative process.Science Education,67(4),489-508.
31. Otero, J.(Ed.),Leon, J. A.(Ed.),Graesser, A. C.(Ed.)(2002).The psychology of science text comprehension.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Otero, J.(Ed.),León, J. A.(Ed.),Graesser, A.(Ed.)(2002).The psychology of science text comprehension.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Sweet, A. P.(Ed.),Snow, C. E.(Ed.)(2003).Rethinking reading comprehension.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
34. Unsworth, L(2001).Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum.Philadelphia, PA:Open University Press.
35. Unsworth, L.(1999).Developing critical understanding of the specialized language of school science and history texts: A functional grammatical perspective.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,42(7),508-521.
36. Wartenberg, C.,Holmqvist, K.(2005).Daily newspaper layout-Designers' predictions of readers' visual behaviour-A case study.Lund University Cognitive Studies,126,1-11.
37. Webster, A.(1991).Science, technology and society.London, UK:Macmillan.
38. Wellington, J.(1991).Newspaper science, school science: Friends or enemies?.International Journal of Science Education,13(4),363-372.
39. Yore, L. D.,Bisanz, G. L.,Hand, B. M.(2003).Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research.International Journal of Science Education,25(6),689-725.
40. Zimmerman, C.,Bisanz, G. L.,Bisanz, J.,Klein, J.,Klein, P.(2001).Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know.Public Understanding of Science,10(1),37-58.
41. 李哲迪(2006)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
42. 李國秀(2000)。科學的社會視角。合肥=Hefei, China:安徽人民出版社=Anhul People's。
43. 林俊智(2003)。臺北市= Taipei, Taiwan.，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
44. 翁育誠(2004)。臺北市= Taipei, Taiwan.，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
45. 國立中正大學教育學研究所編(2000)。質的研究方法。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:麗文=Liwen。
46. 張文強(1997)。閱聽人與新聞閱讀－閱聽人概念的轉變。新聞學研究，55，291-310。
47. 楊文金(1994)。生活世界與科學教育。科學教育月刊，167，2-16。
48. 楊文金、陳世文(2008)。科學漢語與科學英語論述特質的比較－以「觀念物理」文本為例。師大學報：科學教育類，53(1)，113-137。
49. 顏若映(1993)。先前知識在閱讀理解上之認知研究。教育與心理研究，16，385-412。

1. 洪瑞兒、林煥祥、王薪惠(2018)。臺灣公民科技素養、科學興趣及科學參與之探討。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，229-259。
2. 黃俊儒(2018)。猜猜新聞背後是什麼？整合科學與媒體的跨領域教學。科學教育學刊，26(4)，353-375。
3. (2018)。教學與研究的雙螺旋：通識教育教學行動研究之實踐面向。教育研究月刊，286，48-61。