大學經濟弱勢學生入學及就學扶助政策分析與建議

Expanding Access to and Participation in Higher Education for Low-SES Students: Policy Analysis and Suggestions

10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).01

鄭英耀(Ying-Yao Cheng)；方德隆(Der-Long Fang)；莊勝義(Sheng-Yih Chuang)；陳利銘(Li-Ming Chen)；劉敏如(Min-Ju Liu)

大學入學 ； 政策分析 ； 就學扶助 ； 經濟弱勢學生 ； access to university ； policy analysis ； student aid ； low-SES students

教育科學研究期刊

60卷4期（2015 / 12 / 01）

1 - 19

繁體中文

經濟弱勢學生可能會因個人家庭或經濟因素而被排除於高等教育之外，使得以教育來促動社會流動的功能大打折扣。本研究目的在探討臺灣及國際上對大學經濟弱勢學生的入學及就學扶助措施，並據以對教育部政策提供修正芻議。研究方法為文獻分析法，分別針對臺灣對大學經濟弱勢學生的助學政策、經濟弱勢學生入學與就學時的考量與問題、改善經濟弱勢學生入學與就學的策略等議題進行探討。結果顯示，教育部對經濟弱勢學生的入學與就學提供了相當多的扶助措施，但這些扶助措施與經濟弱勢學生的問題與考量仍有部分落差，如學生可能選擇學業不匹配的大學、不懂申請程序與缺乏協助等，仍待改善政策以符學生需求。本研究依據文獻資料、國外政府與頂尖大學的作法，針對政策端及大學端的經濟弱勢學生入學及就學扶助措施提出改善建議，如推動擴大參與方案、簡化入學申請流程、建構經濟弱勢學生入學扶助單一網頁窗口等。以期能讓更多經濟弱勢學生有機會透過高等教育來改善自身處境，促進社會向上流動，亦可落實校園多元化的理念，符應社會公正性。

Family or economic factors may hinder low socioeconomic status (SES) students from pursuing higher education, which may limit their social mobility. This study investigated the admission policy and practices of and campus aid for low-SES students in Taiwan and other developed countries and accordingly provided suggestions for Taiwan education policies. The research method was a literature review focusing on university campus aid for low-SES students in Taiwan, on these students’ considerations and difficulties in pursuing higher education, and on strategies to improve their admission and retention rates. The analysis indicated that although the Taiwan Ministry of Education enacted numerous assistance strategies for the admission and retention of low-SES students, gaps still exist between these measures and the actual problems and considerations of students. For instance, low-SES students may choose schools that academically undermatch their performance, have little understanding of the admission process, or lack assistance in preparing admission applications. Thus, some policies may require revision to address the needs of such students. According to the strategies of developed country governments and top universities and evidences from empirical studies, this paper proposes numerous suggestions for improving low-SES students’ university admission and retention rates, including promoting widening participation programs, simplifying the admission application process, and constructing a single platform website integrating all information on application and assistance relevant to low-SES students. With these suggestions, the authors hope to reinforce the concept of campus diversity and assist low-SES students improve their current situation.

1. 梁佩雲(2013)。「成果導向學習」與大學教學的品質提升：以中文學科的實踐為例。教育科學研究期刊，58(4)，1-35。
   連結：
2. Stanford University. (2014). Student financial services. Retrieved from https://studentaffairs.stanford.edu/sfs
3. 教育部（2014）。103學年度大專校院助學措施。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2014). 2014 university and college student support programs. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】。
4. 國立清華大學（ 2014 ）。104 學年度學士班特殊選才（拾穗計畫）招生簡章。取自 http://adms.web.nthu.edu.tw/ezfiles/72/1072/img/2232/150900721.pdf【 National Tsing Hua University. (2014). 2015 undergraduate special admission handbook. Retrieved from http://adms.web.nthu.edu.tw/ezfiles/72/1072/img/2232/150900721.pdf 】
5. 國立中興大學（ 2014 ）。104 學年度國立中興大學特殊選才招生簡章。取自 http://recruit.nchu.edu.tw/college-exam/special/104/104special_PAPER.pdf 【 National Chung Hsing University. (2014). 2015 NCHU undergraduate special admission handbook. Retrieved from http://recruit.nchu.edu.tw/college-exam/special/104/104special_PAPER.pdf 】
6. Stanford University. (2014). Diversity at Stanford. Retrieved from http://admission.stanford.edu/student/diversity/
7. University of Melbourne. (2014). Access Melbourne for 2015 entry. Retrieved from http://futurestudents.unimelb.edu.au/admissions/access_melbourne_and_equity_programs/access-melbourne
8. Stanford University. (2014). Our selection process. Retrieved from http://admission.stanford.edu/basics/selection/index.html
9. Ministry of Education and Culture. (2014). Student financial aid in Finland. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Koulutus/opintotuki/?lang=en
10. The Australian Government Department of Education and Training. (2014, May 15). Higher education participation and partnerships programme (HEPPP). Retrieved from https://education.gov.au/higher-education-participation-and-partnerships-programme-heppp
11. Student Awards Agency for Scotland. (2014). Funding guide 2014-2015. Retrieved from http://www.saas.gov.uk/forms_and_guides/index.htm
12. An, B. P.(2013).The impact of dual enrollment on college degree attainment: Do low-SES students benefit?.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,35(1),57-75.
13. Anders, J.(2012).The link between household income, university applications and university attendance.Fiscal Studies,33(2),185-210.
14. Avery, C.(2010).,未出版
15. Bastedo, M. N.,Jaquette, O.(2011).Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,33(3),318-339.
16. Brand, J. E.,Xie, Y.(2010).Who benefits most from college?: Evidence for negative selection in heterogeneous economic returns to higher education.American Sociological Review,75(2),273-302.
17. Deming, D.,Dynarski, S.(2009).,未出版
18. Douglass, J.,Thomson, G.(2012).Poor and rich: Student economic stratification and academic performance in a public Research university system.Higher Education Quarterly,66(1),65-89.
19. Engberg, M. E.,Allen, D.(2011).Uncontrolled destinies: Improving opportunity for low-income students in American higher education.Research in Higher Education,52(8),786-807.
20. Higher Education Funding Council for England(2007).Higher education outreach: Targeting disadvantaged learners.
21. Hoare, A.,Johnston, R.(2011).Widening participation through admissions policy-A British case study of school and university performance.Studies in Higher Education,36(1),21-41.
22. Kariya, T.(2011).Japanese solutions to the equity and efficiency dilemma? Secondary schools, inequity and the arrival of 'universal' higher education.Oxford Review of Education,37(2),241-266.
23. Liu, A.(2011).Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education.Higher Education,62(4),383-397.
24. Lucas, S. E.(2001).Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects.American Journal of Sociology,106(6),1642-1690.
25. Mangan, J.,Hughes, A.,Davies, P.,Slack, K.(2010).Fair access, achievement and geography: Explaining the association between social class and students' choice of university.Studies in Higher Education,35(3),335-350.
26. Nahai, R. N.(2013).Is meritocracy fair? A qualitative case study of admissions at the University of Oxford.Oxford Review of Education,39(5),681-701.
27. Posselt, J. R.,Jaquette, O.,Bielby, R.,Bastedo, M. N.(2012).Access without equity: Longitudinal analyses of institutional stratification by race and ethnicity, 1972-2004.American Educational Research Journal,49(6),1074-1111.
28. Reimer, D.,Pollak, R.(2010).Educational expansion and its consequences for vertical and horizontal inequalities in access to higher education in West Germany.European Sociological Review,26(4),415-430.
29. Sackett, P. R.,Kuncel, N. R.,Arneson, J. J.,Cooper, S. R.,Waters, S. D.(2009).Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance?.Psychological Bulletin,135(1),1-22.
30. Sackett, P. R.,Kuncel, N. R.,Beatty, A. S.,Rigdon, J. L.,Shen, W.,Kiger, T. B.(2012).The role of socioeconomic status in SAT-grade relationships and in college admissions decisions.Psychological Science,23(9),1000-1007.
31. Scull, S.,Cuthill, M.(2010).Engaged outreach: Using community engagement to facilitate access to higher education for people from low socio-economic backgrounds.Higher Education Research & Development,29(1),59-74.
32. Smith, J.,Pender, M.,Howell, J.(2013).The full extent of student-college academic undermatch.Economics of Education Review,32,247-261.
33. Smith, L.(2011).Experiential 'hot' knowledge and its influence on low-SES students' capacities to aspire to higher education.Critical Studies in Education,52(2),165-177.
34. Tranter, D.(2011).Unequal schooling: How the school curriculum keeps students from low socio-economic backgrounds out of university.International Journal of Inclusive Education,16(9),901-916.
35. University of Cambridge(2013).Raising aspirations: Our commitment to outreach.Cambridge, UK:Author.
36. University of Edinburgh(2014).Strategic plan 2012-2016.Edinburgh, South Bridge:Author.
37. White House(2014).,未出版
38. Wilks, J.,Wilson, K.(2012).Going on to uni? Access and participation in university for students from backgrounds of disadvantage.Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,34(1),79-90.
39. 張鈿富、葉連祺、張奕華(2005)。大學多元入學方案對入學機會之影響。教育政策論壇，8(2)，1-24。

1. 許添明(Tian-Ming Sheu);董馨梅(Hsin-Mei Tung);商雅雯(Ya-Wen Shang)(2022)。我國大學校院經濟弱勢學生協助就學措施之研究。教育科學研究期刊。67(1)。123-158。