凱利方格法在科學教育研究的應用

Application of Kelly’s Repertory Grid Technique in Research on Science Education

10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).02

林裕仁(Yu-Ren Lin)；林日宗(Jih-Tsung Lin)；洪振方(Jeng-Fung Hung)

科學教育 ； 個人建構理論 ； 凱利方格法 ； science education ； personal construct theory ； repertory grid technique

教育科學研究期刊

61卷1期（2016 / 03 / 01）

43 - 67

繁體中文

本研究以文獻回顧的方法探索凱利方格法的原理與策略，再反思科學教育研究領域中可應用凱利方格法進行研究的契機與限制。凱利方格法的分析與探索主要包含下列階段：元素與構念的萃取、方格的建構與評比，以及方格的分析與解釋。這些資料分析的過程對教育研究而言具備以下優勢。首先，研究者透過凱利方格法的應用，建立有系統的資料蒐集與彙整架構，發現資料中既存的脈絡。再者，凱利方格法除了能針對單一個案所反映的方格評比進行探索與分析外，也容許跨個案的比較。在科學教育相關研究中，這些優勢適合被應用於探索學生科學學習、教師專業發展，以及評鑑科學課程與教科書等。本研究最後也說明在應用凱利方格法分析時須考量的信度與效度，以及相關的研究限制，以更明確地說明使用凱利方格法分析的策略。

This paper discusses the possible application of the repertory grid technique (RGT) in science education through a literature review. We first describe the common strategies for using RGT in psychology and education research. We then explore the reasons for using RGT and the relationship between the aforementioned strategies and the purposes of studies in the literature. Finally, we explain whether and how using RGT can assist researchers in deeply exploring science education. Three basic strategies for using RGT are summarized according to a literature review: eliciting elements and constructs, constructing the grid, and analyzing the grid. RGT enables researchers to construct and reconstruct the qualitative data on the basis of quantitative analysis, which supports exploring subjects’ cognitive systems and comparing subjects. In science education, studies have applied RGT for various purposes, which we categorized into three types: exploring individual cognitive systems, developing principles for teachers’ professional development, and evaluating the quality of textbooks. The limitations and validations of RGT are discussed in the final section of this paper.

1. 吳育倫、林靜雯(2013)。兒童地球形狀概念演化樹之跨年級調查驗證。教育科學研究期刊，58(4)，133-163。
   連結：
2. 宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55(4)，97-130。
   連結：
3. 高慧蓮、蘇明洲、許茂聰(2003)。國小六年級學童呼吸作用另有概念之質化研究。師大學報：科學教育類，48(1)，63-92。
   連結：
4. 楊文金(2007)。學生對「類屬－組成」論述的語意理解－以「血液」文本為例。科學教育學刊，15(2)，195-214。
   連結：
5. Bencze, J. L.,Bowen, G. M.,Alsop, S.(2006).Teachers' tendencies to promote student-led science projects: Associations with their views about science.Science Education,90(3),400-419.
6. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O.,Dodick, J.,Tripto, J.(2013).High school students' understanding of the human body system.Research in Science Education,43(1),33-56.
7. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O.,Orion, N.(2010).Systems thinking skills at the elementary school level.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47(5),540-563.
8. Bergman, M. M.(2008).Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
9. Bezzi, A.(1996).Use of repertory grids in facilitating knowledge construction and reconstruction in geology.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33(2),179-204.
10. Bezzi, A.(1999).What is this thing called geoscience? Epistemological dimensions elicited with the repertory grid and their implications for scientific literacy.Science Education,83(6),675-700.
11. Bradshaw, J. M.,Ford, K. M.,Adams-Webber, J. R.,Boose, J. H.(1993).Beyond the repertory grid: New approaches to constructivist knowledge acquisition tool development.International Journal of Intelligent Systems,8(2),287-333.
12. Burnham, S.(2008).Let's talk: Using personal construct psychology to support children & young people.London, UK:Sage.
13. Butt, T.(2004).Understanding, explanation, and personal constructs.Personal Construct Theory & Practice,1,21-27.
14. Canning, C.,Holmes, K.(2006).Community consultation in developing museum projects: A case study using the repertory grid technique.Cultural Trends,15(4),275-297.
15. Caravita, S.,Valente, A.,Luzi, D.,Pace, P.,Khalil, I.,Valanides, N.,Clément, P.(2008).Construction and validation of textbook analysis grids for ecology and environmental education.Science Education International,19(2),97-116.
16. Chitsabesan, P.,Corbett, S.,Walker, L.,Spencer, J.,Barton, J. R.(2006).Describing clinical teachers' characteristics and behaviors using critical incidents and repertory grids: Clinical teaching.Medical Education,40(7),645-653.
17. Cohen, L.,Manion, L.,Morrison, K.(2007).Research methods in education.London, UK:Routledge Falmer.
18. Coo, S.,Germann, C.(2007).Through students' eyes: Using repertory grid technique to understand students' perceptions of online learning.RCA Vestnik (Russian Communication Association),Nov 2007,5-17.
19. Corporaal, A. H.(1991).Repertory grid research into cognitions of prospective primary school teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,7(4),315-329.
20. Creswell, J. W.,Plano Clark, V. L.(2007).Designing and conducting mixed methods research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
21. Fetherstonhaugh, A. R.(1994).Using the repertory grid to probe students' ideas about energy.Research in Science and Technological Education,12(2),117-127.
22. Fisher, B.,Russell, T.,McSweeny, P.(1991).Using personal constructs for course evaluation.Journal of Further and Higher Education,15(1),44-57.
23. Fransella, F.,Bell, R. D.,Bannister, D.(2004).A manual for repertory grid technique.Chichester, UK:John Wiley & Sons.
24. Goldman, D.,Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O.,Shaharabani, D.(2013).Influence of a non-formal environmental education programme on junior high school students' environmental literacy.International Journal of Science Education,35(3),515-545.
25. Guo, Z.,Lu, X.,Li, Y.,Li, Y.(2011).A framework of students' reasons for using CMC media in learning contexts: A structural approach.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(11),2182-2200.
26. Gupta, N.,Fischer, A. R. H.,van der Lans, I. A.,Frewer, L. J.(2012).Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: An expert stakeholder analysis.Journal of Nanoparticle Research,14(5),857.
27. Heine, K.(2009).Using personal and online repertory grid methods for the development of a luxury brand personality.Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,7(1),25-38.
28. Henze, I.,Van Driel, J.,Verloop, N.(2007).The change of science teachers' personal knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of science education reform.International Journal of Science Education,29(15),1819-1846.
29. Hu, R.,Chang, W.-H.,Lin, C.-Y.(2003).Science curriculum components favored by high school students in Taiwan.Journal of Biological Education,37(4),171-175.
30. Jankowicz, D.(2004).The easy guide to repertory grids.Chichester, UK:John Wiley & Sons.
31. Jordan, P. W.,Persson, S.(2007).Exploring users' product constructs: How people think about different types of product.CoDesign,3,97-106.
32. Keeves, J. P.(Ed.)(1997).Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook.Oxford, UK:Elsevier Science.
33. Kelly, G. A.(1955).The psychology of personal constructs.New York, NY:Norton.
34. Keynan, A.,Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O.,Goldman, D.(2014).The repertory grid as a tool for evaluating the development of students' ecological system thinking abilities.Studies in Educational Evaluation,41,90-105.
35. Kirkcaldy, B.,Pope, M.,Siefen, G.(1993).Sociogrid analysis of a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology,28(6),296-303.
36. Kreber, C.,Klampfleitner, M.(2012).Construing the meaning of authenticity in university teaching: Comparing explicit to implicit theories.Journal of Constructivist Psychology,25(1),34-69.
37. Kuipers, K.,Grice, J. W.(2009).The structure of novice and expert occupational therapists' clinical reasoning before and after exposure to a domain-specific protocol.Australian Occupational Therapy Journal,56(6),418-427.
38. Kurz, T. L.,Middleton, J. A.(2006).Using a functional approach to change preservice teachers' understanding of mathematics software.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,39(1),45-65.
39. Luk, A. L.,Shek, D.(2006).Perceived personal changes in Chinese ex-mental patients attending a holistic psychiatric rehabilitation program.Social Behavior and Persionality,34(8),939-954.
40. Mayo, A. J.(2004).Repertory grid as a means to compare and contrast developmental theorists.Teaching of Psychology,31(3),178-180.
41. McGregor, I.(2014).Comparing designers' and listeners' experiences.Ai & Society,29(4),473-483.
42. McMillan, W. J.(2007)."Then you get a teacher"-Guidelines for excellence in teaching.Medical Teacher,29(8),209-218.
43. Miles, M. B.,Huberman, A. M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
44. Neimeyer, R. A.,Neimeyer, G. J.(2002).Advances in personal construct psychology.New York, NY:Praeger.
45. Partridge, K.(2012).Exploring pastoral staff's experiences of their own emotional well-being in a secondary school.Educational and Child Psychology,29(4),121-132.
46. Ralley, C.,Allott, R.,Hare, D. J.,Wittkowski, A.(2009).The use of the repertory grid technique to examine staff beliefs about clients with dual diagnosis.Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy,16(2),148-158.
47. Raskin, J. D.,Bridges, S. K.(2002).Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology.New York, NY:Pace University Press.
48. Rayment, T.(2000).Art teachers' views of national curriculum art: A repertory grid analysis.Educational Studies,26(2),165-176.
49. Ribeiro, E.,Feixas, G.,Maia, Â.,Senra, J.,Dada, G.(2012).Changes in the construct systems of first-year university students: Impact on psychological symptoms and problem-solving skills.Journal of Constructivist Psychology,25(2),170-180.
50. Scheer, J. W.,Sewell, K. W(2006).Creative construing: Personal constructions in the arts.Giessen, Germany:Psychosocial-Verlag.
51. Shaw, M. L. G.,Gaines, B. R.(1996).WebGrid: Knowledge elicitation and modeling on the web.Proceedings of WebNet96,Charlottesville, VA:
52. Silvia, C.,Adriana, V.,Daniela, L.,Paul, P.,Nicos, V.,Iman, K.,Pierre, C.(2008).Construction and validation of textbook analysis grids for ecology and environmental education.Science Education International,19(2),97-116.
53. Siraj-Blatchford, J.(1995).Kelly's repertory grid: A technique for developing evaluation in design and technology.Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development conference,Loughborough, UK:
54. Strauss, A.(1987).Qualitative analysis for social scientists.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
55. Suto, W. M. I.,Nádas, R.(2009).Why are some GCSE examination questions harder to mark accurately than others? Using Kelly's repertory grid technique to identify relevant question features.Research Papers in Education,24(3),335-377.
56. Tan, C.-C.,Chen, C.-M.,Lee, H.-M.(2013).Using a paper-based digital pen for supporting English courses in regular classrooms to improve reading fluency.International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing,7(supplement),234-246.
57. Tan, F. B.,Tung, L.-L.,Xu, Y.(2009).A study of web-designers' criteria for effective businessto-consumer (b2c) websites using the repertory grid technique.Journal of Electronic Commerce Research,10(3),155-177.
58. Tobacyk, J. J.(1987).Using personal construct theory in teaching history and systems of psychology.Teaching of Psychology,14(2),111-112.
59. Van Kan, C. A.,Ponte, P.,Verloop, N.(2010).How to conduct research on the inherent moral significance of teaching: A phenomenological elaboration of the standard repertory grid application.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(8),1553-1562.
60. Vanfretti, L.,Farrokhabadi, M.(2013).Evaluating constructive alignment theory implementation in a power systems analysis course through repertory grids.IEEE Transactions on Education,56(4),443-452.
61. Yaxley, B. G.(1991).Developing teachers' theories of teaching: A touchstone approach.London, UK:The Falmer Press.
62. 林陳涌、楊榮祥(1998)。利用凱利方格晤談法探討教師對科學本質的觀點－個案研究。科學教育學刊，6(2)，113-128。
63. 洪振方、周進洋、蔡智文、蔡嘉興(2008)。從「內化與修正」朝向「外推與解釋」的思考機制：以國中一年級學生質量守恆概念發展為例。師大學報：科學教育類，53(2)，59-89。

1. 陳宜棻(Yi-Fen Chen);賴靖憲(Jing-Sian Lai)(2021)。以方法目的鏈探討中高齡者使用LINE之因素。電子商務學報。23(2)。119-152。