學生擬題教學對情意學習成效及學業成就影響之後設分析

Effects of the Problem Posing Strategies of Students on Affective Learning Outcomes and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis

10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(3).01

廖遠光(Yuen-Kuang Liao)；張澄清(Cheng-Ching Chang)

出題 ； 後設分析 ； 情意學習成效 ； 學業成就 ； 擬題 ； academic achievement ； affective learning outcome ； meta-analysis ； problem posing ； question posing

教育科學研究期刊

61卷3期（2016 / 09 / 01）

1 - 42

繁體中文

本研究應用後設分析法探討學生擬題教學對於提升情意及學業成就之效果，並試圖探討可能影響教學成效的變數。以擬題、出題、problem posing、problem generation、problem writing、problem formulation 為關鍵詞，至「臺灣博碩士論文」、「CETD 中文碩博士論文」、「臺灣期刊論文索引」及「CEPS 中文電子期刊」等資料庫檢索相關文獻，共蒐集擬題教學成效之實驗研究31 篇，可提供情意學習17 筆及學業成就34 筆之效果量，計有2,421 個樣本納入分析。研究結果顯示，學生擬題教學對於情意及學業成就具有正向效應，整體效果量分別為0.34 及0.57。意即對於情意及學業成就的提升，皆優於傳統講述式教學法，且對於學業成就的提升效果更佳。情意學習會受到「學科領域」、「教學者偏誤」、「擬題次數」及「網路擬題」等變數之調節作用而呈現差異；學業成就的調節變數則有「學習階段」、「學科領域」、「教學者偏誤」、「課程時數」及「分組學習」等。

A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize existing research that investigated the effects of problem-posing strategies on the affective learning outcomes and academic achievement of students in Taiwan. We adopted problem posing, problem generation, problem writing, and problem formulation as keywords and gathered 31 studies (comprising 17 comparisons for the affective domain and 34 comparisons for academic achievement), converting their quantitative data to effect size (ES). The results demonstrated that problem posing strategies provided considerable benefits than traditional instruction did on students' affective learning outcomes (ES = 0.34) and academic achievement (ES = 0.57), and the larger positive effect sizes showed the benefit is greater on academic achievement. In addition, four moderator variables were selected for investigating affective learning outcomes and five moderator variables were selected for investigating academic achievement (including subject area, instructor bias, total number of courses, and cooperative learning), all of which had statistically significant impacts on the mean ES. Finally, the noteworthy suggestions and limitations of this study were discussed.

1. 于富雲、吳純萍(2012)。學生出題的學習歷程及其與工作價值感之相關。教育科學研究期刊，57(4)，135-162。
   連結：
2. 林宜篇、于富雲(2012)。學生網路出題教學策略對國小學生生命教育學習成效之影響。新竹教育大學教育學報，28(2)，29-56。
   連結：
3. 邱廷榮、于富雲(2011)。網路學生出題策略應用於國小古典詩課程其成效之研究。教育科學研究期刊，56(4)，99-128。
   連結：
4. 洪琮琪、于富雲、程炳林(2005)。網路出題與合作學習策略運用對學力提昇與學習焦慮之影響。新竹師院學報，20，219-244。
   連結：
5. Nakano, A., Hirashima, T., & Takeuchi, A. (2004). A support environment for learning by describing problem map in arithmetical word problems. Retrieved from http://citexeerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.104.9790&rep=1&type=pdf
6. Miller, M. (2005). Learning and teaching in the affective domain. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching and technology. Retrieved from http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/index.php?title=Teaching_and_Learning_in_Affective_Dom
7. Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Evidence-based education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/methods/whatworks/eb/edlite-index.html
8. Akay, H.,Boz, N.(2010).The effect of problem posing oriented Analyses-II course on the attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics self-efficacy of elementary prospective mathematics teachers.Australian Journal of Teacher Education,35(1),1-75.
9. Barak, M.,Rafaeli, S.(2004).On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,61(1),84-103.
10. Bar-Haim, Y.,Lamy, D.,Pergamin, L.,Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J.,van IJzendoorn, M. J.(2007).Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study.Psychological Bulletin,133(1),1-24.
11. Beal, C. R.,Cohen, P. R.(2012).Teach ourselves: Technology to support problem posing in the STEM classroom.Creative Education,3(4),513-519.
12. Bloom, B.,Englehart, M.,Furst, E.,Hill, W.,Krathwohl, D.(1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain.New York, NY:Longmans, Green.
13. Bonotto, C.(2013).Artifacts as sources for problem-posing activities.Educational Studies in Mathematics,83(1),37-55.
14. Brousseau, G.(1997).Theory of didactical situations in mathematics.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic.
15. Brown, S. I.(Ed.),Walter, M. I.(Ed.)(1993).Problem posing: Reflections and applications.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Brown, S. I.,Walter, M. I.(2005).The art of problem posing.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Cai, J.,Hwang, S.(2002).Generalized and generative thinking in U.S. and Chinese students' mathematical problem solving and problem posing.Journal of Mathematical Behavior,21(4),401-421.
18. Cai, J.,Moyer, J. C.,Wang, N.,Hwang, S.,Nie, B.,Garber, T.(2013).Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students' learning.Educational Studies in Mathematics,83(1),57-69.
19. Chang, K.-E.,Wu, L.-J.,Weng, S.-E.,Sung, Y.-T.(2012).Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning.Computers & Education,58(2),775-786.
20. Christou, C.,Mousoulides, N.,Pittalis, M.,Pitta-Pantazi, D.,Sriraman, B.(2005).An empirical taxonomy of problem posing processes.The International Journal on Mathematics Education,37(3),149-158.
21. Cohen, B. P.,Arechevala-Vargas.(1987).,Stanford, CA:Center for Sociological Research.
22. Cohen, E. G.(1994).Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups.Review of Educational Research,64(1),1-35.
23. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
24. Cooper, H.(Ed.),Hedges, L. V.(Ed.)(1994).The handbook of research synthesis.New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
25. Corwin, R. B.(Ed.)(1996).Talking mathematics: Supporting children's voices.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
26. Crawley, S. L.,Curry, W. H.,Dumois-Sands, J.,Tanner, C.,Wyker, C.(2008).Full-contact pedagogy: Lecturing with questions and student-centered assignments as methods for inciting self-reflexivity for faculty and students.Feminist Teacher,19(1),13-30.
27. Crespo, S.,Sinclair, N.(2008).What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,11(5),395-415.
28. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1977).Beyond boredom and anxiety.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
29. Cunningham, R. F.(2004).Problem posing: An opportunity for increasing student responsibility.Mathematics and Computer Education,38(1),83-89.
30. de Jesus, H.,Almeida, P.,Teixeira-Dias, J.,Watts, M.(2006).Students' questions: Building a bridge between Kolb's learning styles and approaches to learning.Education+Training,48(2/3),97-111.
31. Denny, P.,Hamer, J.,Luxton-Reilly, A.,Purchase, H.(2008).PeerWise: Students sharing their multiple choice questions.Proceeding of the Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research
32. Ellerton, N.(1986).Children's made-up mathematics problem-A new perspective on talented mathematicians.Educational Studies in Mathematics,17(3),261-271.
33. English, L. D.(1997).Development of seventh-grade students' problem posing.Proceedings of the 21st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education,Lahti, Finland:
34. English, L. D.(1997).The development of fifth-grade children's problem-posing abilities.Educational Studies in Mathematics,34(3),183-217.
35. English, L. D.(1998).Children's problem posing within formal and informal contexts.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,29(1),83-106.
36. Fellenz, M. R.(2004).Using assessment to support higher level learning: The multiple choice item development assignment.Assessment & Education in Higher Education,29(6),703-719.
37. Freire, P.(1970).Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York, NY:The Seabury Press.
38. Gall, M. D.,Borg, W. R.,Gall, J. P.(1996).Educational research: An introduction.White Plains, NY:Longman.
39. Goldin, G.(1998).Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,17(2),137-165.
40. Greene, L.(2005).Carnegie chronicle: Questioning questions.The National Teaching and Learning Forum,14(2),1-6.
41. Gunn, V.(2007).Approaches to small group learning and teaching.
42. Harel, G.,Koichu, B.,Manaster, A.(2006).Algebra teachers' ways of thinking characterizing the mental act of problem posing.Proceedings of PME 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education,Prague, Czech Republic:
43. Harel, G.,Tall, D. O.(1991).The general, the abstract, and the generic in advanced mathematics.For the Learning of Mathematics,11(1),38-42.
44. Hattie, J.,Marsh, H. W.,Neill, J. T.,Richards, G. E.(1997).Adventure education and outward bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference.Review of Educational Research,67(1),43-87.
45. Hazeyama, A.,Hirai, Y.(2007).Concerto II: A learning community support system based on question-posing.Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies,Niigata, Japan:
46. Hedges, L. V.,Olkin, I.(1985).Statistical methods for meta-analysis.Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
47. Jungck, J. R.(1985).A problem posing approach to biology education.The American Biology Teacher,47(5),264-266.
48. Kar, T.,Özdemir, E.,Ipek, A. S.,Albayrak, M.(2010).The relation between the problem posing and problem solving skills of prospective elementary mathematics teachers.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2(2),1577-1583.
49. Koichu, B.(2008).Theoretical framework for characterizing responses to multiple problem posing tasks.Proceedings of the international workshop on multiple solution connecting tasks,Haifa, Israel:
50. Kontorovich, I.,Koichu, B.,Leikin, R.,Berman, A.(2012).An exploratory framework for handling the complexity of mathematical problem posing in small groups.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,31(1),149-161.
51. Lavy, I.,Bershadsky, I.(2003).Problem posing via "what if not?" strategy in solid geometry-A case study.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,22(4),369-387.
52. Leikin, R.(2005).Qualities of professional dialogue: Connecting graduate research on teaching and the undergraduate teachers' program.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,36(2-3),235-254.
53. Lester, F.(Ed.),Charles, R.(Ed.)(2003).Teaching mathematics through problem solving.Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
54. Lowrie, T.(2002).Young children posing problems: The influence of teacher intervention on the type of problems children pose.Mathematics Education Research Journal,14(2),87-98.
55. Mamona-Downs, J.,Downs, M.(2005).The identity of problem solving.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,24(3-4),385-401.
56. McIntosh, A.(Ed.),Ellerton, N.(Ed.)(1998).Research in mathematics education: A contemporary perspective.Perth, Australia:MASTEC, Edith Cowan University.
57. Mestre, J. P.(2002).Probing adults' conceptual understanding and transfer of learning via problem posing.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,23(1),9-50.
58. Nardone, C. F.,Lee, R. G.(2011).Critical inquiry across the disciplines: Strategies for student-generated problem posing.College Teaching,59(1),13-22.
59. Pelczer, I.,Rodriguez, F. G.(2008).Problem posing strategies of mathematically gifted students.Proceedings of the 5th international conference on creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students,Haifa, Israel:
60. Perrin, J. R.(2007).Problem posing at all levels in the calculus classroom.School Science & Mathematics,107(5),182-192.
61. Qin, Z.,Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(1995).Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving.Review of Educational Research,65(2),129-143.
62. Rosenshine, B.,Meister, C.,Chapman, S.(1996).Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies.Review of Educational Research,66(2),181-221.
63. Rosenthal, R.(1991).Meta-analytic procedures for social research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
64. Rosli, R.,Capraro, M. M.,Capraro, R. M.(2014).The effects of problem posing on student mathematical learning: A meta-analysis.International Education Studies,7(13),227-241.
65. Schoenfeld, A.(1985).Mathematical problem solving.New York, NY:Academic Press.
66. Schoenfeld, A. H.(Ed.)(1987).Cognitive science and mathematics education.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67. Silver, E. A.(1994).On mathematical problem posing.For the Learning of Mathematics,14(1),19-28.
68. Silver, E. A.,Mamona, J.(1989).Problem posing by middle school teachers.Proceedings of the eleventh annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education,New Brunswick, NJ:
69. Silver, E. A.,Mamona-Downs, J.,Leung, S. S.,Kenney, P. A.(1996).Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,27(3),293-309.
70. Singer, M.,Ellerton, N.,Cai, J.(2013).Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions.Educational Studies in Mathematics,83(1),1-7.
71. Springer, L.,Stanne, M. E.,Donovan, S. S.(1999).Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis.Review of Educational Research,69(1),21-51.
72. Sternberg, R.(1998).Abilities are forms of developing expertise.Educational Researcher,27(3),11-20.
73. Van Harpen, X. Y.,Presmeg, N. C.(2013).An investigation of relationships between students' mathematical problem-posing abilities and their mathematical content knowledge.Educational Studies in Mathematics,83(1),117-132.
74. von Glasersfeld, E.(1995).Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning.London, UK:The Falmer Press.
75. What Works ClearinghouseTM(2014).Procedures and standards handbook (version 3.0).
76. Wilson, E. V.(2004).ExamNet asynchronous learning network: Augmenting face-to-face courses with student-developed exam questions.Computers & Education,42(1),87-107.
77. Wirkala, C.,Kuhn, D.(2011).Problem-based learning in K-12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects?.American Educational Research Journal,48(5),1157-1186.
78. Yu, F.-Y.(2011).Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes.Computers & Education,56(6),484-494.
79. Yu, F.-Y.,Liu, Y.-H.,Chan, T.-W.(2005).A web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment.Innovations in Education and Teaching International,42(4),337-348.
80. 于富雲、劉祐興(2008)。學生出題與傳統練習策略對大學生學習成就、認知與後設認知策略使用之影響。教育與心理研究，31(3)，25-52。
81. 方文鋒(2009)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南大學=National University of Tainan。
82. 王俐文(2008)。彰化市=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
83. 王靜雯(2007)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，國立中正大學=National Chung Cheng University。
84. 安蓮心(2011)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學=National Cheng Kung University。
85. 吳聰敏(2010)。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan，亞洲大學=Asia University。
86. 李承華(2002)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北師範學院=National Taipei Teachers College。
87. 林慶宗(2005)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，國立嘉義大學=National Chiayi University。
88. 俞怡中(2009)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南大學=National University of Tainan。
89. 姜堡混(2011)。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan，亞洲大學=Asia University。
90. 洪琮琪(2002)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學=National Cheng Kung University。
91. 徐文鈺(1996)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
92. 徐桂琴(2010)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南大學=National University of Tainan。
93. 秦嘉智(2012)。桃園縣=Taoyuan County, Taiwan，中原大學=Chung Yuan Christian University。
94. 翁聖恩(2008)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
95. 康滋容(2005)。屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan，國立屏東師範學院=National Pingtung Teachers College。
96. 張育綾(2008)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學=National Cheng Kung University。
97. 張雅綺(2013)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣科技大學=National Taiwan University of Science and Technology。
98. 郭重吉(1995)。建構主義與數理科的學習輔導。學生輔導，38，32-39。
99. 陳佩琦(2003)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立中山大學=National Sun Yat-sen University。
100. 陳金章(2007)。屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan，國立屏東教育大學=National Pingtung University of Education。
101. 陳國蕙、洪志成(2007)。「案例教學策略」對商職民商法課程學習成效之影響。國民教育研究學報，19，109-140。
102. 陳逸亮(2014)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南大學=National University of Tainan。
103. 陳錦芬、曾泓璋(2006)。小組電腦擬題活動對英語字彙學習成就與學習情意之影響。國立臺北教育大學學報－教育類，19(1)，89-118。
104. 黃信維(2014)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南大學=National University of Tainan。
105. 黃俊惟(2003)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，國立嘉義大學=National Chiayi University。
106. 楊晏婷(2011)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學=National Cheng Kung University。
107. 鄭雅惠(2008)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，國立中正大學=National Chung Cheng University。
108. 蕭景文(2005)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，國立嘉義大學=National Chiayi University。
109. 賴奕嬛(2011)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學=National Cheng Kung University。
110. 鍾雅琴(2002)。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan，國立臺中師範學院=National Taichung Teachers College。

1. 黃佩岑、陳斐卿(2017)。擁有感的變化―以建立班級數學題庫之過程為例。清華教育學報，34(2)，131-172。
2. 廖遠光,陳勇欣(2021)。我國近30年科技融入數學教學對中小學生學習成效影響之後設分析。教育心理學報，52(4)，781-805。
3. (2017)。質性研究綜合在教學研究上的運用。教育研究月刊，278，60-78。