閱讀策略教學對高二學生數學學習表現的影響

Effects of Teaching Reading Strategies on Senior High School Student’s Mathematics Performance

10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).02

蘇慧珍(Hui-Chen Su)；楊凱琳(Kai-Lin Yang)；陳佳陽(Chia-Yang Chen)

交互教學法 ； 數學教學 ； 閱讀策略 ； mathematics teaching ； reading strategies ； reciprocal teaching

教育科學研究期刊

62卷1期（2017 / 03 / 01）

33 - 58

英文

本研究參考交互教學法之閱讀策略設計運用閱讀來學習數學的課程，透過實驗研究檢驗此課程是否有助於提升高中二年級學生的數學學習成就、數學閱讀理解以及策略使用的表現。教學實驗共歷時6週，研究採前後測準實驗設計，以臺北市立一所公立高中二年級兩個班級學生為研究對象；其中一班為實驗組，實施閱讀策略教學，另一班對照組則未實施閱讀策略教學，兩班皆由同一位數學教師教學，有效樣本共計74人。研究者共設計四份評量工具檢驗教學實驗的成效，內容包含數學成就測驗、數學閱讀理解測驗以及閱讀策略使用情形自我評估，分別用於實驗前的前測、6週實驗後的第一次後測、經過1週的第二次後測，以及6週實驗後2個月的延後測，再以廣義估計方程式分析測驗資料。研究發現運用閱讀來學習數學課程的成效包含：一、有利於提升學生讀課本時使用各項閱讀策略的頻率；二、有利於提升學生當下的數學成就與數學閱讀理解；三、有利於提升學生使用提問與澄清策略來閱讀未學過的數學文本。但是，隨著教學實驗後所經過的時間愈久，對數學成就與數學閱讀理解的效果會逐漸消失，最後只有利於提升學生使用提問策略來閱讀未學過的數學文本。本研究將針對未如預期的延後測實驗結果提出可能的原因，作為未來進一步改善數學閱讀教學與研究的建議。

The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of teaching reading strategies involving textbooks for senior high school students. Two classes of 11th-grade students participated in this study; one was the experimental class and the other was the control class. The experiment was designed to teach cognitive reading strategies through reciprocal teaching using a mathematics textbook to improve mathematics performance. The quantitative instruments included a mathematics achievement test, reading comprehension test, and self-assessment of reading strategy usage. These instruments were used at four different times: (1) the pretest before the experiment; (2) the first posttest after the experiment; (3) the second posttest 1 week after the experiment; and (4) the delayed measurement 2 months after the experiment. The data obtained were analyzed through the generalized estimating equation method. The results revealed that the teaching experiment effectively promoted students' use of all types of strategies when reading the mathematics textbook. However, the math achievement and reading comprehension tests only demonstrated improvement at the first posttest. After the teaching experiment, these effects gradually disappeared. Regarding the use of reading strategies, the teaching experiment effectively promoted students' use of questioning and clarifying. This effect also gradually disappeared after the teaching experiment. Several explanations of the unexpected results are provided in this paper.

1. 秦麗花、邱上真(2004)。數學文本閱讀理解相關因素探討及其模式建立之研究─以角度單元為例。特殊教育與復健學報，12，99-121。
   連結：
2. 張建妤、柯華葳(2012)。數學成就表現與閱讀理解的關係：以TIMSS 2003 數學試題與PIRLS2006 閱讀成就測驗為工具。教育心理學報，44(1)，95-115。
   連結：
3. Cohen, J.(1992).A power primer.Psychological Bulletin,112(1),155-159.
4. Fuentes, P.(1998).Reading comprehension in mathematics.The Clearing House,72(2),81-88.
5. Huang, C.-T.,Yang, S. C.(2015).Effects of online reciprocal teaching on reading strategies, comprehension, self-efficacy, and motivation.Journal of Educational Computing Research,52(3),381-407.
6. Kamil, M. L.(Ed.),Mosenthal, P. B.(Ed.),Pearson, P. D.(Ed.),Barr, R.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of reading research.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Kane, R. B.(1970).The readability of mathematics textbooks revisited.The Mathematics Teacher,63(7),579-581.
8. McGee, M. G.(1979).Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences.Psychological Bulletin,86(5),889-918.
9. McLaughlin, G. H.(1969).SMOG grading: A new readability formula.Journal of Reading,12(8),639-646.
10. Meyer, K.(2010).'Diving into reading': Revisiting reciprocal teaching in the middle years.Literacy Learning: The Middle Years,18(1),41-52.
11. National Assessment Governing Board(2002).Mathematics framework for the 2003 national assessment of educational progress.Washington, DC:Author.
12. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw Hill.
13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2013).PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy.Paris, France:Author.
14. Ostler, E.(1997).The effect of learning mathematical reading strategies on secondary students' homework grades.The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas,71(1),37-40.
15. Palincsar, A. S.,Brown, A. L.(1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction,1(2),117-175.
16. Pilonieta, P.,Medina, A. L.(2009).Reciprocal teaching for the primary grades: "We can do it, too!".The Reading Teacher,63(2),120-129.
17. Rosenshine, B.,Meister, C.(1994).Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research.Review of Educational Research,64(4),479-530.
18. Schumm, J. S.,Mangrum, C. T.(1991).FLIP: A framework for content area reading.Journal of Reading,35(2),120-124.
19. Smith, F.(1969).The readability of junior high school mathematics textbooks.The Mathematics Teacher,62(4),289-291.
20. Sweller, J.,van Merrienboer, J. J.,Paas, F. G.(1998).Cognitive architecture and instructional design.Educational Psychology Review,10(3),251-296.
21. Thurstone, L. L.(1973).Primary mental abilities.Psychometric Monographs,1,131-136.
22. Voytsekhovska, S.(2008).Kinston, Ontario, Canada,Queen's University.
23. Vygotsky, L. S.,Cole, M.(Eds.)(Trans.),John-Steiner, V.(Eds.)(Trans.),Scribner, S.(Eds.)(Trans.),Souberman, E.(Eds.)(Trans.)(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
24. Wood, D.,Bruner, J. S.,Ross, G.(1976).The role of tutoring in problem solving.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,17(2),89-100.
25. Yang, K.-L.,Li, J.-L.(2016).A framework for assessing reading comprehension of geometric construction texts.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,September,1-16.
26. Yang, K.-L.,Lin, F.-L.(2012).Effects of reading-oriented tasks on students' reading comprehension of geometry proof.Mathematics Education Research Journal,24(2),215-238.
27. Zeger, S. L.,Liang, K.-Y.(1986).Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.Biometrics,42(1),121-130.
28. 陳建豪、楊凱琳(2015)。應用廣義估計方程式於教育研究。臺東大學教育學報，26(1)，41-66。
29. 蘇宜芬(2004)。閱讀理解的影響因素及其在教學上的意義。教師天地，129，21-28。

1. 謝佩蓉(2018)。108課綱第四學習階段國語文閱讀素養線上評量之建構。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，193-228。
2. 張芳全(2021)。高中生數學素養表現因素之分析：以自我教育期望與數學學習動機為中介變項。學校行政，134，23-58。
3. 鄭鈐華,張凌嘉,吳昭容(2021)。從算式或文字閱讀數學科普文章：共變數分析與階層線性模式的比較。教育科學研究期刊，66(1)，107-139。
4. (2022)。高中教師素養導向教學效能量表之發展與驗證。教育與心理研究，45(3)，63-87。