题名

故事提示策略、工作記憶能力對幼兒故事理解能力的影響

并列篇名

Effects of Story Prompting and Working Memory Ability on Young Children's Story Comprehension

DOI

10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).07

作者

簡馨瑩(Hsin-Ying Chien);連啟舜(Chi-Shun Lien);張紹盈(Shao-Ying Chang)

关键词

工作記憶 ; 序列分析 ; 故事結構 ; 理解 ; comprehension ; sequential analysis ; story grammar ; working memory

期刊名称

教育科學研究期刊

卷期/出版年月

62卷4期(2017 / 12 / 01)

页次

181 - 207

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探討教師提示故事主角的目標與意圖對幼兒在故事理解能力的影響,並進一步分析不同工作記憶能力的幼兒在故事理解能力的表現。另外,應用序列分析法分析幼兒聽完故事後排列故事圖卡的順序情形。研究對象為臺北市公立幼兒園四歲七個月至六歲兩個月幼兒。研究方法採取以2(故事提示有無)×3(高、中、低工作記憶能力)之實驗設計,以多變量共變數分析及序列分析進行資料的分析。實驗組為幼兒接受故事提示的故事朗讀教學,控制組為未接受故事提示的一般朗讀。研究發現:以提示故事主角的目標與意圖方式作為教學策略,有助於幼兒對故事內容的記憶與理解;不同工作記憶能力幼兒在故事理解能力與故事圖卡排序的表現亦有顯著差異。最後,根據研究結果進行討論並對現場教學與未來研究提出建議。

英文摘要

This study explored the effects of a teacher's prompt and children's working memory capacity on story comprehension. A sequential analysis technique was used to explore how accurately children remembered the sequence of events after listening to a story. Participants aged from 4 years and 7 months to 6 years and 2 months were recruited from municipal preschools. A 2 by 3 factorial design with prompt (with/without) and working memory capacity (high/medium/low) as two independent variables was used. A multivariate analysis of covariance and sequential analysis were conducted for data analysis. The experimental group received storytelling with prompts regarding a protagonist's goal, and the control group received storytelling without any prompt. The results revealed that children who received prompts about the protagonist's goals and intention from the teacher exhibited improved story comprehension and improved accuracy in story picture sorting. In addition, a significant difference was observed among the working memory groups. The findings were discussed for educational implications, and future research goals were identified.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 簡馨瑩、連啟舜(2014)。教師手勢對幼兒故事詞彙理解影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊,59(2),61-88。
    連結:
  2. 簡馨瑩、楊瑋婷、簡淑真、王繼伶(2011)。故事結構教學對幼兒故事理解能力及故事結構順序之效果研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,25(2),1-24。
    連結:
  3. 簡馨瑩、趙子揚、王繼伶(2014)。「幼兒工作記憶測驗」之編製。測驗學刊,61(2),159-181。
    連結:
  4. Erkens, G. (2002). MEPA. Multiple episode protocol analysis (Version 4.8) [computer software]. Utrecht, The Netherland: Utrecht University..
  5. Applebee, A. N.(1978).The child's concept of story: Ages two to seventeen.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
  6. Ausubel, D. P.(1960).The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material.Journal of Educational Psychology,51(5),267-272.
  7. Babyak, A. E.,Koorland, M.,Matges, P. G.(2000).The effects of story mapping instruction on the reading comprehension of students with behavioral disorders.Behavioral Disorders,25(3),239-258.
  8. Baddeley, A. D.(2000).The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4(11),417-423.
  9. Baddeley, A. D.(2003).Working memory: Looking back and looking forward.Nature Reviews Neuroscience,4(10),829-839.
  10. Bakeman, R.,Gottman, J. M.(1997).Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  11. Bond, T. G.,Fox, C. M.(2001).Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  12. Brown, G. H.(1977).Development of story in children's reading and writing.Theory into Practice,16(5),357-362.
  13. Cain, K.,Hogan, T.,Pentimonti, J.,The Language and Reading Research Consortium(2013).Reading and listening comprehension from 6 to 9 years: Are attention and memory equally important for both?.20th annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading,Hong Kong, China:
  14. Cain, K.,Oakhill, J. V.,Bryant, P. E.(2004).Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills.Journal of Educational Psychology,96(1),31-42.
  15. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  16. Cole, K. N.(Ed.),Dale, P. S.(Ed.),Thal, D. J.(Ed.)(1996).Communication and language intervention series, vol. 6: Assessment of communication and language.Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes.
  17. Currie, N. K.,Cain, K.(2015).Children's inference generation: The role of vocabulary and working memory.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,137,57-75.
  18. Daneman, M.,Blennerhassett, A.(1984).How to assess the listening comprehension skills of prereaders.Journal of Educational Psychology,76(6),1372-1381.
  19. Dymock, S.(2005).Teaching expository text structure awareness.The Reading Teacher,59(2),177-181.
  20. Engle, R. W.,Carullo, J. J.,Collins, K. W.(1991).Individual differences in working memory for comprehension and following directions.The Journal of Educational Research,84(5),253-262.
  21. Florit, E.,Roch, M.,Altoè, G.,Levorato, C. M.(2009).Listening comprehension in preschoolers: The role of memory.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,27(4),935-951.
  22. Freedle, R. O.(Ed.)(1979).New directions in discourse processing.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
  23. Gardill, M. C.,Jitendra, A. K.(1999).Advanced story map instruction: Effects on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities.Journal of Special Education,33(1),2-17.
  24. Hayward, D.(2003).Edmonton, Canada,University of Alberta.
  25. Idol, L.(1987).Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers.Journal of Learning Disabilities,20(4),196-205.
  26. Kenny, R. F.(1995).The generative effects of instructional organizers with computer-baded interactive video.Journal of Educational Computing Research,12(3),275-296.
  27. Kintsch, W.(1998).Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  28. Mandler, J. M.,Johnson, N. S.(1977).Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall.Cognitive Psychology,9(1),111-151.
  29. Mayer, R. E.(2003).Learning and instruction.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education.
  30. McNamara, D. S.(Ed.)(2007).Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  31. Meringoff, L. K.(1980).Influence of the medium on children's story apprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,72(2),240-249.
  32. Morrow, L. M.(1984).Reading stories to young children: Effects of story structure and traditional questioning strategies on comprehension.Journal of Literacy Research,16(4),273-288.
  33. Morrow, L. M.(2015).Literacy development in the early years: Helping children read and write.Boston, MA:Pearson.
  34. Morrow, L. M.(1986).Effects of structural guidance in story retelling on children's dictation of original stories.Journal of Reading Behavior,18(2),135-152.
  35. Neuman, S. B.,Burden, D.,Holden, E.(1990).Enhancing children's comprehension of a televised story through previewing.The Journal of Educational Research,83(5),258-265.
  36. Poulsen, D.,Kintsch, E.,Kintsch, W.(1979).Children's comprehension and memory for stories.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,28(3),379-403.
  37. Royer, J. M.,Cunningham, D. J.(1981).On the theory and measurement of reading comprehension.Contemporary Educational Psychology,6(3),187-216.
  38. Rumelhart, D. E.(1975).Notes on a schema for stories.Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science,New York, NY:
  39. Stein, N. L.,Trabasso, T.(1992).The organization of emotional experience: Creating links among emotion, thinking, language and intentional action.Cognition and Emotion (Special Issue on Basic Emotions),6(3/4),225-244.
  40. Stevens, R. J.,van Meter, P.,Warcholak, N. D.(2010).The effects of explicitly teaching story structure to primary grade children.Journal of Literacy Research,42(2),159-198.
  41. Stone, C. L.(1983).A meta-analysis of advance organizer studies.The Journal of Experimental Education,51(4),194-199.
  42. Swanson, H. L.,Berninger, V.(1995).The role of working memory in skilled and less skilled readers' comprehension.Intelligence,21(1),83-108.
  43. Trabasso, T.,Stein, N. L.,Johnson, L. R.(1981).Children's knowledge of events: A causal analysis of story structure.Psychology of Learning and Motivation,15,237-282.
  44. van den Broek, P. W.(Ed.),Bauer, P. J.(Ed.),Bourg, T.(Ed.)(1997).Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  45. van den Broek, P.,Lynch, J. S.,Naslund, J.,Ievers-Landis, C. E.,Verduin, K.(2003).The development of comprehension of main ideas in narratives: Evidence from the selection of titles.Journal of Educational Psychology,95(4),707-718.
  46. Williams, J. P.,Hall, K. M.,Lauer, K. D.,Stafford, K. B.,DeSisto, L. A.,deCani, J. S.(2005).Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology,97(4),538-550.
  47. Williams, J. P.,Kao, J. C.,Pao, L. S.,Ordynans, J. G.,Atkins, J. G.,Cheng, R.,DeBonis, D.(2016).Close Analysis of Texts with Structure (CATS): An intervention to teach reading comprehension to at-risk second graders.Journal of Educational Psychology,108(8),1061-1077.
  48. Williams, J. P.,Pollini, S.,Nubla-Kung, A. M.,Snyder, A. E.,Garcia, A.,Ordynans, J. G.,Atkins, J. G.(2014).An intervention to improve comprehension of cause/effect through expository text structure instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology,106(1),1-17.
  49. Williams, J. P.,Stafford, K. B.,Lauer, K. D.,Hall, K. M.,Pollini, S.(2009).Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology,101(1),1-20.
  50. Zwaan, R.,Radvansky, G. A.(1998).Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123(2),162-185.
  51. 小坂圭子(1999)。リスニング能力を指標とした就学前児の文章理解:作動記憶容量と既有知識の影響。発達心理学研究,10(2),77-87。
  52. 內田伸子(1982)。幼児はいかに物語を創るか?。教育心理学研究,30(3),47-58。
  53. 由井久枝(2002)。幼児の物語理解に影響する要因─作動記憶容量と意図情報の役割に注目して。教育心理学研究,50(4),421-426。
  54. 吉野さやか、内田伸子(2013)。幼児の記憶に及ぼす有意味化の効果。認知心理学研究,10(2),121-132。
  55. 林寶貴、錡寶香(2000)。兒童口語理解測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊,19,105-125。
  56. 陳淑如(1997)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan,國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
  57. 陳淑琦(1984)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan,文化大學=Cultural University。
  58. 陸莉修訂、劉鴻香修訂(1994)。修訂畢保德圖畫詞彙測驗(指導手冊)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。
  59. 蘇育瑠(1990)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan,國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
被引用次数
  1. 簡馨瑩(2020)。「記憶-抑制控制」活動融入語文教學對幼兒在執行功能與口語理解表現的效果研究。教育科學研究期刊,65(4),275-304。
  2. 吳美瑤(2018)。文本訊息呈現策略對幼兒口語理解影響之探討。幼兒教育年刊,29,19-38。
  3. 謝承佑,鄭澈,劉佩艷,楊同榮,黃思婧,彭昭英,陳奕凱,江宇珊,丁麒文,Li-Ting Chen(2020)。效果量在臺灣心理與教育期刊的應用:回顧與再思。中華心理學刊,62(4),553-592。