《師大學報》與《教育科學研究期刊》60年之內容分析

Research Content Analysis for a Period of 60 Years for the Journal of National Taiwan Normal University and Journal of Research in Education Sciences

10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).01

黃詩媛(Shih-Yuan Huang)；陳學志(Hsueh-Chih Chen)；劉子鍵(Tzu-Chien Liu)；張鑑如(Chien-Ju Chang)；蔡孟寧(Meng-Ning Tsai)

內容分析 ； 師大學報 ； 教育科學研究期刊 ； content analysis ； Journal of National Taiwan Normal University ； Journal of Research in Education Sciences

教育科學研究期刊

63卷1期（2018 / 03 / 01）

1 - 31

繁體中文

本研究採用內容分析法，針對《師大學報》與《教育科學研究期刊》自1956年至2017年間之發展歷史與所收錄論文進行分析，透過研究內容的分類及統計，瞭解學刊在近60年間之領域發展軌跡及未來研究趨勢。本研究共彙整收錄於學刊之1,345篇論文，並依研究目的分類為七個向度進行資料探究，分別為：期刊收錄內容、研究對象、研究主題、研究性質、研究方法、作者貢獻程度、引用文獻分析。研究結果如下：一、學刊自分冊後出版篇數有明顯增加，平均作者量也逐年增長，顯示國內人文教育領域之研究數量增加，且近期作者多採用合作模式共同進行研究。二、研究對象以人類樣本最多，其後依序是語文樣本、數測樣本、其他樣本；而在人類樣本中的研究群體以教師最多，其他年紀樣本的比例也逐年增加，表示學刊收錄論文的研究對象朝多樣性發展。三、研究主題早期以科學教育、歷史與哲學為主，但相關論文逐年遞減，近期隨著期刊分冊後，《師大學報》改以語言與文學為研究主軸，《教育科學研究期刊》則以學習與教學為主，此類研究主題的發表篇數皆逐年攀升，分別顯示兩類學刊各自的研究主題趨勢，如《師大學報》研究重心逐漸轉移至「語文」，而《教育科學研究期刊》的研究主軸為「教」與「學」。四、研究性質以實徵性研究為主軸，其次為論述性研究，而非研究論文之比例最少。五、研究方法是量化研究與質化研究各占半數，量化研究以實驗研究法及調查研究法為主；質化研究則以文獻研究法為多數；混合研究法的使用於近30年開始增加。六、引用文獻分析中，參考文獻以英文文獻為主，引用類型則以書籍與期刊為主。近年來，隨著科技進步，電子資源的引用明顯增加，書籍的引用則是逐年下降。七、針對國內教育類八本學刊在2015年影響係數之比對分析，《教育科學研究期刊》在影響係數中的數據居於首位，且影響係數有逐年增加的趨勢，具有高度影響力，係教育學門專業領域良好且優質的學術期刊。本研究根據系統性資料整理與回顧性探討內容進行討論，提供未來相關領域發展之參考及建議。

The present study examined and analyzed the articles and studies published in the Journal of National Taiwan Normal University and Journal of Research in Education Sciences during the 60-year period from 1956 to 2017. A total of 1,345 published studies were analyzed and classified into seven categories-article contents, participants, research topics, research types, research methods, contributions of authors, and citation analysis. The findings of this study are as follows: (1) The volume, publications, and numbers of authors of the journals have been increased. (2) The highest number of studies were conducted on human samples, followed by language samples, mathematical test samples, and other samples. (3) Early research topics were concentrated on science education, history, and philosophy. However, during the past 60 years, articles on these topics declined year by year. The Journal of National Taiwan Normal University mainly included studies on language and literature and the Journal of Research in Education Sciences mainly included studies on learning and teaching. (4) The highest number of studies employed empirical designs, followed by discourse studies. Non-research articles were the fewest. (5) The majority of studies followed quantitative or qualitative research designs. Quantitative research was mainly based on experimental methods and survey research; qualitative research was mainly based on literature research methods; mixed-methods research has been increased in the past 30 years. (6) Citation references were primarily to English studies with the majority of the citation to books and journals. In recent years, the citation to electronic resources has been increased and the citation to books has declined year by year. (7) A comparative analysis of 2015 impact factors in eight major education journals was conducted. The Journal of Research in Education Sciences was ranked first for its impact factor. In this paper, previous research results and presents suggestions for future research are discussed.

1. 葉寶玲、陳秉華、陳盈君、蔡毅樺(2010)。《教育心理學報》四十年（1967-2007）之內容分析。教育心理學報，41(3)，685-702。
   連結：
2. Alias, N.,Sabdan, M. S.,Aziz, K. A.,Mohammed, M.,Hamidon, I. S.,Jomhari, N.(2013).Research trends and issues in the studies of Twitter: A content analysis of publications in selected journals (2007-2012).Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,103,773-780.
3. Alias, N.,Siraj, S.,Rahman, M. N. A.,Ujang, A.,Gelamdin, R. B.,Said, A. M.(2013).Research and trends in the studies of Webquest from 2005 to 2012: A content analysis of publications in selected journals.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,103,763-772.
4. Berelson, B.(1952).Content analysis in communication research.New York, NY:The Free Press.
5. Bozkurt, A.,Akgun-Ozbek, E.,Yilmazel, S.,Erdogdu, E.,Ucar, H.,Guler, E.,Aydin, C. H.(2015).Trends in distance education research: A content analysis of journals 2009-2013.The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,16(1),330-363.
6. Buboltz, W. C.,Miller, M.,Williams, D. J.(1999).Content analysis of research in the Journal of Counseling Psychology (1973-1998).Journal of Counseling Psychology,46(4),496-503.
7. Cavas, B.(2015).Research trends in Science Education International: A content analysis for the last five years (2011-2015).Science Education International,25(4),573-588.
8. Chang, Y.-H.,Chang, C.-Y.,Tseng, Y.-H.(2010).Trends of science education research: An automatic content analysis.Journal of Science Education and Technology,19(4),315-331.
9. Chu, H.(2015).Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis.Library & Information Science Research,37(1),36-41.
10. Dinkel, A.,Berth, H.,Borkenhagen, A.,Brähler, E.(2004).On raising the international dissemination of German research: Does changing publication language to English attract foreign authors to publish in a German basic psychology research journal?.Experimental Psychology,51(4),319-328.
11. Erdogan, T.(2015).Research trends in dissertations on PBL: A content analysis study.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,197,308-315.
12. Flores, L. Y.,Berkel, L. A.,Nilsson, J. E.,Ojeda, L.,Jordan, S. E.,Lynn, G. L.,Leal, V. M.(2006).Racial/ethnic minority vocational research: A content and trend analysis across 36 years.The Career Development Quarterly,55(1),2-21.
13. Fraenkel, J. R.,Wallen, N. E.,Hyun, H. H.(2014).How to design and evaluate research in education.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
14. Gül, S.,Sözbilir, M.(2016).International trends in biology education research from 1997 to 2014: A content analysis of papers in selected journals.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,12(6),1631-1651.
15. Howard, G. S.,Cole, D. A.,Maxwell, S. E.(1987).Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American psychological association.American Psychologist,42(11),975-986.
16. Jenkins, R. A.(1998).Thirty-two years of history: Analysis of five school psychology journals from 1964 to 1995 for content trends and author gender, affiliation, and frequency of publications.Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences,58(7-A),2531.
17. Kiliç-Çakmak, E.,Çebi, A.,Mihçi, P.,Günbatar, M. S.,Akçayir, M.(2013).A content analysis of educational technology research in 2011.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,106,74-83.
18. Luo, L.,McKinney, M.(2015).JAL in the past decade: A comprehensive analysis of academic library research.The Journal of Academic Librarianship,41(2),123-129.
19. Nolen, A. L.(2009).The content of educational psychology: An analysis of top ranked journals from 2003 through 2007.Educational Psychology Review,21(3),279-289.
20. 王佳琪、何曉琪、陳利銘、鄭英耀(2015)。教育心理學研究與發展趨勢。教育研究月刊，252，80-96。
21. 林燕青、林靜雯(2010)。2004-2008年科學教育研究與發展季刊內容分析。科學教育研究與發展季刊，56，1-28。
22. 陳慧蓉、林宜如、邱美虹(2005)。2000-2004 年SSCI 中科學教育期刊內容分析。教育資料與研究雙月刊，64，119-138。

1. 曾聖雯、侯純純(2018)。《商業設計學報》1997-2017年研究趨向之內容分析。商業設計學報，22，59-75。
2. 陳瓊雅,陳國彥(2021)。「性研究」精選期刊之內容分析：以1990～2019年The Journal of Sex Rescarch為例。性學研究，11(2)，29-49。
3. 陳信助,張文權,林明地(2023)。「教師兼任行政工作倦怠」相關議題研究之回顧分析：以《學校行政》期刊論文為範疇。學校行政，146，60-87。
4. 黃昱凱,康維真,岳修平,王淑美(2020)。科系認同對管理學院大學生創業意圖的調節作用。教育科學研究期刊，65(4)，1-29。
5. (2019)。臺灣學校績效責任議題研究之回顧分析：以1984~2018年期刊論文為範疇。教育研究月刊，302，133-155。