科技大學教師對職能融入教學政策之接受態度研究—以「產業職能基準系統」為中介環境

Constructing an Educational Policy Acceptance Model to Explore Attitudes Toward Policy Implementation: Using an Industrial Competency Standards System in Science and Technology Universities

10.6209/JORIES.201806_63(2).0010

洪榮昭(Jon-Chao Hong)；張瑞娥(Jui-O Chang)

科技接受模式 ； 教育政策接受模式 ； 期望價值理論 ； 整合性接受模式 ； 職能基準 ； acceptance model of educational policy ； competency standards ； expectancy-value theory ； technology acceptance model ； unified acceptance model

教育科學研究期刊

63卷2期（2018 / 06 / 01）

251 - 284

繁體中文

基於以往教育政策效益的研究，多聚焦於該領域專家的觀點，而不是從利害關係人的角度進行評估。因此，本研究目的在於建立以科技大學教師觀點之職能基準融入教學政策的接受模式。運用相關接受模式的理論主張為基礎，建構包括教師信念、政策理解性、政策執行性、政策價值性和政策接受態度等五個變項的模式，依序編製問卷、蒐集257份有效樣本，運用結構方程模式進行分析。研究發現：一、所建構模式適配度良好、各變項之信度與效度俱佳，可以解釋科技大學教師對職能政策的接受態度；二、本模式驗證相關接受模式的理論和成分的主張，其中構成期望成分之「政策的理解性」、「政策的執行性」，正向影響價值成分之「政策的價值性」，進而決定科技大學教師對職能政策的接受態度；三、模式中「教師的信念」對於「政策的理解性」和「政策的執行性」，具正相關；「政策的理解性」和「政策的執行性」對於「政策的價值性」，也同具正相關；而「政策的理解性」對「政策的執行性」，並無相關；四、以「教師的信念」為模式的外部變項，可提升模式的解釋力；而「政策的價值性」是模式的重要中介變項。上述的研究發現可供政策決策及執行單位參考；另本模式未來亦可擴大運用至其他對象或政策，具理論和實務的應用性。

Studies related to the effectiveness of policy making have been focused on the concerns of domain experts, not stakeholders. The purpose of this study was to construct an acceptance model of educational policy to explore competency standards integration, and technical-vocational education and teaching. Based on the perspectives of professors from science and technology universities, this study examined the correlations among teaching progressive beliefs, perceived ease of policy understanding and application, perceived value to students, and attitudes toward policy implementation. Quantitative data from 257 participants were collected for confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling. The results revealed that teaching progressive beliefs was positively related to perceived ease of policy understanding and application to teaching settings; perceived ease of policy understanding and application were positively associated with value to students; and value to students was positively correlated with attitude toward policy implementation. In addition, teaching progressive beliefs positively predicted the implementation attitude that was mediated by the perceived value of policies; however, perceived ease of policy understanding and application were essential in explaining the expectancy-value research model. This study suggested that formalization of the policy acceptance model can be applied to explore other policies related to education and policy making for understanding stakeholders' attitudes toward the implementation of new policies.

1. 吳芝儀(2012)。大專青年就業力、就業職能與職場職能之內涵探究。當代教育研究季刊，20(2)，1-45。
   連結：
2. 吳采蓉、楊淑晴(2009)。影響國小教師資訊融入教學創新行為結構模式之建構暨結構模式性別恆等性之檢定。教育心理學報，40(3)，385-418。
   連結：
3. 吳為聖、張惠博、郭重吉(2007)。影響國中自然科教師接受資訊科技融入教學之個人因素研究。科學教育學刊，15(5)，543-563。
   連結：
4. 林勇吉、秦爾聰、段曉林(2010)。以敘說探究探討一位國中教師發展數學教學之信念與實務。教育科學研究期刊，55(3)，1-32。
   連結：
5. 林偉文、劉家瑜(2016)。培育科學教學創造力：科學教學創新要素之探究。教育心理學報，48(1)，1-14。
   連結：
6. 邱淑惠、莊孟珊(2004)。臺中地區幼教人員電腦整合教學信念與應用現況之調查研究。師大學報：科學教育類，49(2)，35-60。
   連結：
7. 洪新原、梁定澎、張嘉銘(2005)。科技接受模式之彙總研究。資訊管理學報，12(4)，211-234。
   連結：
8. 張明文、張忠興、游玉英、高曼婷、戴建耘(2016)。高職電機電子群教師教學信念、教師專業發展與教學效能關係之研究。技術及職業教育學報，6(3)，45-65。
   連結：
9. 張源泉(2011)。德國大學理念與教學範式之轉變。當代教育研究季刊，19(2)，1-40。
   連結：
10. 許文楷、黃秀慧、陳榮方(2006)。企業員工對新導入資訊科技之學習態度研究─以ERP 系統之使用者為例。教育心理學報，38(1)，19-36。
    連結：
11. 許孟琪、蔡明昌(2009)。國小教師教育信念及其生命態度關係之探討。教育心理學報，41(1)，91-109。
    連結：
12. 陳儒晰(2013)。幼教人員對資訊科技接受態度之調查研究。教育心理學報，44(3)，669-689。
    連結：
13. 蔡偉澎、江美姿、洪維佳、蔣仲霖(2013)。大學教師信念與教學策略之研究以臺灣某一私立大學為例。高教評鑑與發展，7(2)，63-85。
    連結：
14. 鄭芬蘭、江淑卿、張景媛、陳鳳如(2009)。探究大學教學優良教師的有效能教學活動。教育心理學報，40(4)，663-682。
    連結：
15. 賴崇閔、黃秀美、廖述盛、黃雯雯(2009)。3D虛擬實境應用於醫學教育接受度之研究。教育心理學報，40(3)，341-361。
    連結：
16. 戴建耘、陳宛非、韓長澤、賴慕回、高曼婷(2013)。臺北市中小學校長科技領導之創新關切與科技接受度研究。科學教育學刊，21(1)，97-133。
    連結：
17. Ajzen, I.(1991).The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(2),179-211.
18. Ajzen, I.,Joyce N.,Sheikh S.,Cote, N. G.(2011).Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,33(2),101-117.
19. Allais, S. M.(2011).The impact and implementation of national qualifications frameworks: A comparison of 16 countries.Journal of Education and Work,24(3-4),233-258.
20. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation(2009).Mapping qualifications frameworks across APEC economies.Singapore:APEC Human Resources Development Working Group.
21. Byrne, B. M.(2001).Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Cardoso, S.,Tavares, O.,Sin, C.(2015).The quality of teaching staff: Higher education institutions' compliance with the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance: The case of Portugal.Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability,27(3),205-222.
23. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indices for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9(2),233-255.
24. Chow, A.,Eccles, J. S.,Salmela-Aro, K.(2012).Task value profiles across subjects and aspirations to physical and IT-related sciences in the United States and Finland.Developmental Psychology,48(6),1612-1628.
25. Coburn, C. E.,Hill, H. C.,Spillane, J. P.(2016).Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The common core state standards and implementation.Research Educational Researcher,45(4),243-251.
26. Cohen, D. K.,Hill, H. C.(2000).Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California.Teachers College Record,102(2),294-343.
27. Cohen, D. K.,Spillane, J. P.(1992).Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction.Review of Research in Education,18(1),3-49.
28. Conley, A. M. M.(2012).Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives.Journal of Educational Psychology,104(1),32-47.
29. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science,35(8),982-1003.
30. Doherty, K. M.,Jacobs, S.(2013).,National Council on Teacher Quality.
31. Eccles, J. S.(2009).Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action.Educational Psychologist,44(2),78-89.
32. Eccles, J. S.,Wigfield, A.(1995).In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,21(3),215-225.
33. Eccles, J. S.,Wigfield, A.(2002).Motivational beliefs, values, and goals.Annual Review of Psychology,53,109-132.
34. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
35. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
36. Garcia, L. M.,Roblin, N. P.(2008).Innovation, research and professional development in higher education: Learning from our own experience.Teaching and Teacher Education,24(1),104-116.
37. Gonczi, A.(2013).Competency-based approaches: Linking theory and practice in professional education with particular reference to health education.Educational Philosophy and Theory,45(12),1290-1306.
38. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2009).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
39. Hermans, L.,Cunningham, S.,Slinger, J.(2014).The usefulness of game theory as a method for policy evaluation.Evaluation,20(1),10-25.
40. Hopkins, M.,Spillane, J. P.(2015).Conceptualizing relations between instructional guidance infrastructure (IGI) and teachers' beliefs about mathematics instruction: Regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive considerations.Journal of Educational Change,16(4),421-450.
41. Jones, V.(2009).The green collar economy: How one solution can fix our two biggest problems (EBook).New York, NY:Harper Collins.
42. Kenny, D. A.,Kaniskan, B.,McCoach, D. B.(2014).The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom.Sociological Methods & Research,44(3),486-507.
43. Krajcik, J.,McNeill, K. L.,Reiser, B. J.(2008).Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy.Science Education,92(1),1-32.
44. Kuhl, J.(Ed.),Beckman, J.(Ed.)(1985).Action-control: From cognition to behavior.Heidelberg, Germany:Springer.
45. Legris, P.,Ingham, J.,Collerette, C.(2003).Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model.Information & Management,40(3),191-204.
46. McDonnell, L. M.,Weatherford, M. S.(2016).Recognizing the political in implementation research.Educational Researcher,45(4),233-242.
47. Mitchell, D. E.,Crowson, R. L.,Shipps, D.(2011).Shaping education policy: Power and process.New York, NY:Routledge.
48. Moessinger, P.(2000).The paradox of social order: Linking psychology and sociology.New York, NY:Aldine de Gruyter.
49. Northcote, M.(2009).Educational beliefs of higher education teachers and students: Implications for teacher education.Australian Journal of Teacher Education,34(3),68-81.
50. Norton, L.,Richardson, J. T. E.,Hartley, J.,Newstead, S.,Mayes, J.(2005).Teachers' beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education.Higher Education,50(4),537-571.
51. Norum, K.,Grabinger, R. S.,Duffield, J.(1999).Healing the universe is an inside job: Teachers' views on integrating technology.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,7(3),187-203.
52. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
53. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2007).Qualifications systems: Bridges to lifelong learning.Paris, France:Author.
54. Pierson, M. E.(2001).Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise.Journal of Research on Computing in Education,33(4),413-430.
55. Pynoo, B.,Tondeur, J.,van Braak, J.,Duyck, W.,Sijnave, B.,Duyck, P.(2012).Teachers' acceptance and use of an educational portal.Computers & Education,58(4),1308-1317.
56. Ritter, R. M.(2002).The Oxford style manual.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
57. Schoonenboom, J.(2012).The use of technology as one of the possible means of performing instructor tasks: Putting technology acceptance in context.Computers & Education,59(4),1309-1316.
58. Simpkins, S. D.,Fredricks, J. A.,Eccles, J. S.(2012).Charting the Eccles' expectancy-value model from mothers' beliefs in childhood to youths' activities in adolescence.Developmental Psychology,48(4),1019-1032.
59. Sin, C.(2014).The policy object: A different perspective on policy enactment in higher education.Higher Education,68(3),435-448.
60. Spence, J. T.(Ed.)(1983).Achievement and achievement motives.San Francisco, CA:Freeman.
61. Spillane, J. P.(2000).Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education.Cognition and Instruction,18(2),141-179.
62. Spillane, J. P.,Callahan, K. A.(2000).Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(5),401-425.
63. Spillane, J. P.,Parise, L. M.,Sherer, J. Z.(2011).Organizational routines as coupling mechanisms: Policy, school administration, and the technical core.American Educational Research Journal,48(3),586-619.
64. Spillane, J. P.,Reiser, B. J.,Reimer, T.(2002).Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research.Review of Educational Research,72(3),387-431.
65. Teo, T.,Milutinovic, V.(2015).Modelling the intention to use technology for teaching mathematics among pre-service teachers in Serbia.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,31(4),363-380.
66. Van Driel, J. H.,Bulte, A. M.,Verloop, N.(2007).The relationship between teachers general beliefs about teaching and learning and their domain specific curricular beliefs.Learning and Instruction,17(2),156-171.
67. Venkatesh, V.,Bala, H.(2008).Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions.Decision Sciences,39(2),273-315.
68. Venkatesh, V.,Davis, F. D.(2000).A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies.Management Science,46(2),186-204.
69. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(2000).Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25(1),68-81.
70. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(1992).The development of achievement task value: A theoretical analysis.Developmental Review,12(3),265-310.
71. Young, M.(2011).The educational implications of introducing a NQF for developing countries.Journal of Education and Work,24(3/4),223-232.
72. Young, M. F. D.、丘愛鈴譯、林佩璇譯、周淑卿譯、張鍠焜譯(2004)。未來的課程─從「新教育社會學」到學習的批判理論。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:學富=PRO-ED。
73. 于承平、胡茹萍(2017)。臺灣高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標之研究。教育政策論譠，20(1)，71-105。
74. 于承平、高安邦、林俞均(2010)。英國、澳洲及歐盟資歷架構發展經驗對我國之啟示。教育資料集刊，47，213-244。
75. 任維廉、呂堂榮、劉柏廷(2009)。科技接受行為模式之整合分析：三個主要模式之比較。資管評論，15(1)，101-138。
76. 江文鉅、張美瑤(2012)。德國高等技職教育新貌。教育資料集刊，55，129-146。
77. 江愛華(2007)。澳洲高等教育品質保證制度：背景、政策與架構。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
78. 李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用Graphics & Basic。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychology。
79. 李隆盛(2012)。加強供需校準縮短學用落差。台灣經濟論衡，10(2)，41-45。
80. 胡茹萍(2010)。美國《2006 年柏金斯生涯及技術教育促進法》之探討。教育資料集刊，47，165-182。
81. 高強華(1992)。教師信念研究及其在學校教育革新上的意義。教育研究集刊，34，85-114。
82. 張瑞娥(2011)。建立我國職能標準架構之研究。台灣經濟論衡，9(8)，38-65。
83. 教育部(2014)。第二期技職教育再造計畫。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:作者=Author。
84. 許全守(2007)。建立國家專業技能標準之探討。「建立國家專業技能標準制度研討會」實錄，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
85. 陳均伊、張惠博(2008)。一位化學老師實施探究教學的歷程與省思之個案研究─以「火山爆發」教學活動為例。教育科學研究期刊，53(2)，91-123。
86. 曾素秋(2008)。九年一貫課程設計理念與國中教師教育信念研究─以中彰投四縣市國中教師為例。朝陽人文社會學刊，6(2)，197-253。
87. 游明鑫(2012)。推動我國職能標準制度，促進人力資本投資效能。就業安全，11(1)，37-42。
88. 黃芳銘(2006)。社會科學統計方法學結構方程模式。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan。
89. 黃儒傑(2002)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立高雄師範大學=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
90. 蔡志敏(2014)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
91. 蕭錫錡(2007)。落實國家專業技能標準之探討。「建立國家專業技能標準制度研討會」實錄，臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
92. 羅志成(2013)。英國技職教育改革成效之評估2011 年《渥夫報告》分析。教育資料集刊，59，85-103。

1. 簡傑,黃玉君,洪榮昭(2020)。創業課程接受模式：整合性探討課程易理解性、認知有用性和課程參與態度對創業意圖的影響。課程與教學，23(2)，77-104。
2. 葉建宏,范靜媛,洪榮昭(2019)。技術及職業教育政策之接受度：實踐研究新視角。教育科學研究期刊，64(1)，181-211。
3. 葉貞妮,葉建宏,何雅娟,王志美(2020)。人格特質、過度自信預測學術拖延行為、尋求指導頻率與修業學期數之研究。教育科學研究期刊，65(4)，139-170。