题名

以素養導向觀點探討中等學校藝術師資培育教材教法課程現況與實踐

并列篇名

Discussion From a Competence-Oriented Perspective on the Status Quo and Practice of the Secondary School Teacher Training "Arts Teaching Material and Methods" Curriculum

DOI

10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0004

作者

陳育祥(Yu-Hsiang Chen)

关键词

十二年國民基本教育 ; 素養導向 ; 師資培育 ; 藝術教材教法 ; 12-year compulsory education ; arts teaching material and methods ; competence-oriented ; teacher education

期刊名称

教育科學研究期刊

卷期/出版年月

63卷4期(2018 / 12 / 01)

页次

89 - 117

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

鑑於十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱核心素養理念,藝術領域課程綱要核心素養與學習重點也依循對應與發展,藝術師資培育階段面對十二年國民基本教育課程政策的典範轉移與實踐轉化,亦需以現存之情境脈絡、處境與課題進行思考。本研究除以文獻梳理探討中等教育階段藝術領域師資培育的學術發展趨勢,並蒐集藝術師資培育單位分科/領域教材教法課程大綱,透過課程大綱文件內容分析與教材教法授課教師個別訪談,將資料概念化與類目化交叉比對,以探討師資培育階段藝術分科/領域教材教法課程與實踐現況。研究結果指出,受到藝術師資生起點行為、課程時數與教師甄選實際考量因素,藝術教材教法課程之現況重視教案設計與教學能力、學習內容多元變異性高、課程綱要之理解與鑑賞教學內容缺乏、合科教學成效不佳等情形,面對未來十二年國民基本教育課程綱要施行,有待思考素養導向之實踐,本研究依據結果提出相關建議。

英文摘要

Because the curriculum guidelines of 12-year compulsory education consider competency to be its core philosophy, the guidelines drafted for the arts curriculum thus include key learning points and the development of core competencies. However, in addition to these guidelines, changes to the practice and requirements of arts teacher training programs in accordance with this shift in policy require investigation. Through a literature review, this study offers a discussion of the trend of academic development in secondary school teacher training programs. In addition to collecting syllabi for "fine arts/visual arts teaching materials and methods" from teacher training institutes, the researcher conducted individual interviews with instructors of these courses. Through interviews and an analysis of document contents, the data were conceptualized and categorized to cross-verify and investigate the status quo and practice of the "teaching materials and methods" curriculum in teacher training programs. The research results indicated discrepancies in preservice teacher entry behavior, number of teaching hours, and anxiety related to participating in screening tests, and that these factors had the most significant effect on teaching competence and lesson plan design. Significant variance was observed among teacher responses to learning contents, including inadequate understanding of curriculum guidelines, insufficient appreciation for teaching arts, and ineffective interdisciplinary teaching. Therefore, how arts teaching materials and methods are practiced during the implementation of 12-year compulsory education curriculum guidelines requires further investigation. Suggestions are also provided in this study based on the research results.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 吳清山(2017)。素養導向教師教育:理念、挑戰與實踐。學校行政,112,14-27。
    連結:
  2. 吳清山、王令宜(2017)。教師專業標準的理論與應用。學校行政,108,98-118。
    連結:
  3. 李翠玲、黃澤洋(2016)。應用案例教學法增進師資生特殊教育知能之研究。教育理論與實踐學刊,33,1-31。
    連結:
  4. 洪如玉、陳惠青(2016)。解構哲學之探討及其對審美教育學之啟示。教育科學研究期刊,61(1),115-137。
    連結:
  5. 張民杰、吳佩真(2007)。課程大綱應具備的內容與大學生運用情形初探。教育科學期刊,7(1),58-83。
    連結:
  6. 張民杰、濮世緯(2012)。微型教學在師資培育課程「教學原理」之應用。教育理論與實踐學刊,25,57-82。
    連結:
  7. 陳昭儀(2009)。臺灣之大學創造力課程大綱內容分析之探究。課程與教學季刊,12(2),1-17。
    連結:
  8. 黃嘉莉、葉怡芬、許瑛玿、曾元顯(2017)。取得中學教職的關鍵因素:運用決策樹探勘師資培育歷程。教育科學研究期刊,62(2),89-123。
    連結:
  9. 趙惠玲(2003)。典範與妥協:我國中學階段視覺藝術師資之培育。藝術教育研究,5,49-81。
    連結:
  10. 趙惠玲、高震峰(2017)。視覺藝術教育領域之熱門及前瞻研究議題分析:2006至2016。藝術教育研究,33,1-31。
    連結:
  11. 蔡清田(2011)。課程改革中的核心素養之功能。教育科學期刊,10(1),203-217。
    連結:
  12. 鄭明憲、李其昌、陳曉嫻(2017)。中等教育階段藝術領域教師職前專門課程基準方向的建構。藝術教育研究,34,1-32。
    連結:
  13. Broudy, H. S.(1972).Enlightened cherishing: An essay on aesthetic education.Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press.
  14. Cavin, R. M.(2007).Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teachers through microteaching lesson study.Tallahassee, FL:The Florida State University.
  15. Clark, G. A.,Day, M. D.,Greer, W. D.(1987).Discipline-base art education: Becoming student of art.The Journal of Aesthetic Education,21(2),129-193.
  16. Comeaux, E.,Brown, A.,Sieben, N. P.(2015).Issues in athletic administration: A content analysis of syllabi from intercollegiate athletics graduate courses.Innovative Higher Education,40(4),359-372.
  17. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2016). CAEP accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://caepnet.org/standards/introduction
  18. Darling-Hammond, L.(2000).Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence.Educational Policy Analysis Archives,8(1),1-44.
  19. Duncum, P.(2002).Clarifying visual culture art education.Art Education,55(3),6-11.
  20. Efland, A. D.(1995).The spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education.Studies in Art Education,36(3),134-153.
  21. Efland, A. D.(2002).Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
  22. Eisner, E. W.(1989).Educating artistic vision.Reston, VA:The National Art Education Association.
  23. Eisner, E. W.(Ed.),Day, M. D.(Ed.)(2004).Handbook of research and policy in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
  24. Feldman, E. B.(1970).Becoming human through art: Aesthetic experience in the school.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  25. Gordon, J.,Halász, G.,Krawczyk, M.,Leney, T.,Michel, A.,Pepper, D.,Wiśniewski, J.(2009).Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education.
  26. Greer, W. D.(1984).Discipline-based art education: Approaching art as a subject of study.Studies in Art Education,25(4),212-218.
  27. Hamblen, K. A.(1997).Second generation DBAE.Visual Arts Research,23(2),98-106.
  28. Holsti, O. R.(1969).Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
  29. Jonassen, D. H.,Hernandez-Serrano, J.(2002).Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving.Educational Technology Research and Development,50(2),65-77.
  30. Krug, D. H.,Cohen-Evron, N.(2000).Curriculum integration positions and practices in art education.Studies in Art Education,41(3),258-275.
  31. Lowenfeld, V.,Brittain, W. L.(1987).Creative and mental growth.New York, NY:Macmillian.
  32. Music Educators National Conference、陳瓊花譯(1998)。美國藝術教育國家標準。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Ministry of Education。
  33. Neuman, W. L.(2013).Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  34. Newble, D.,Cannon, R.(2000).A handbook for teachers in universities & colleges: A guide to improving teaching methods.London, UK:Kogan Page.
  35. Niemi, H.,Nevgi, A.,Aksit, F.(2016).Active learning promoting student teachers' professional competences in Finland and Turkey.European Journal of Teacher Education,39(4),471-490.
  36. Orchard, J.,Winch, C.(2015).What training do teachers need?: Why theory is necessary to good teaching.Impact,22,1-43.
  37. Pintrich, P. R.(2004).A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students.Educational Psychology Review,16(4),385-407.
  38. Shulman, J. H.,Colbert, J. A.(1989).Cases as catalysts for cases: Inducing reflection in teacher education.Action in Teacher Education,11(1),44-52.
  39. Shulman, L. S.(1986).Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher,15(2),4-14.
  40. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1998).Basics of qualitative research techniques.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  41. Walker, J. A.,Chaplin, S.(1997).Visual culture: An introduction.Manchester, UK:Manchester University Press.
  42. Walker, S. R.(2001).Teaching meaning in artmaking.Worcester, MA:Davis.
  43. Wiggins, G. P.,McTighe, J.(2011).The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  44. Zimmerman, E.(1994).Current research and practice about pre-service visual art specialist teacher education.Studies in Art Education,35(2),79-89.
  45. 王秀雄(1990)。美術與教育。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:臺北市立美術館=Taipei Fine Arts Museum。
  46. 王采薇、羅美蘭(2010)。藝術師資培育生的全球化與全球在地觀點的視覺文化影像研究。國際藝術教育學刊,8(2),125-148。
  47. 王麗雁、鄭明憲(2011)。蛻變中的成長:臺灣視覺教育百年。美育,180,6-15。
  48. 吳政達、蔡瑜庭(2017)。從能力本位到標準本位的師資培育。教育研究月刊,273,48-66。
  49. 吳清山(2006)。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊,2(1),1-31。
  50. 呂燕卿(1999)。藝術與人文學習領域綱要與統整性互融式課程設計之觀念。美育,106,29-38。
  51. 林曼麗(2000)。臺灣視覺藝術教育研究。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:雄獅=Lion。
  52. 林曼麗(2003)。藝術教育於二十一世紀教育中應有的角色。國家政策季刊,2(3),91-102。
  53. 袁汝儀(1994)。由戰後臺灣的五種視覺藝術教育趨勢─探討視覺藝術教師自主性之重要性與培養。美育,54,39-52。
  54. 國家教育研究院(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自http://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw【National Academy for Educational Research. (2014). The general guide of twelve-year basic education curriculum.Retrieved from http://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-7944,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw】
  55. 國家教育研究院(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:國民中小學暨普通高級中等學校藝術領域。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/22/pta_17992_2831983_65865.pdf【National Academy for Educational Research. (2018). The guide of twelve-year basic education curriculum: Arts area of elementary, junior and ordinary senior high schools. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/22/pta_17992_2831983_65865.pdf】
  56. 張民杰(2008)。以案例教學法增進實習教師班級經營知能之研究。國民教育研究學報,20,147-176。
  57. 張栢烟、許雯婷(2004)。視覺文化藝術教育內涵分析。臺東大學教育學報,15(1),245-263。
  58. 教育部(1995)。高級中學美術課程標準。臺北市:作者。【Ministry of Education. (1995). National standards for high school arts education. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
  59. 教育部(2006)。普通高級中學課程暫行綱要。臺北市:作者。【Ministry of Education. (2006). High school temporary curriculum guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
  60. 教育部(1971)。高級中學美術課程標準。臺北市:作者。【Ministry of Education. (1971). National standards for high school arts education. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
  61. 教育部(2016)。中華民國教師專業標準指引。取自http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZmR0LmhjLmVkdS50d3x0ZXBkLWZkdC1oYy1lZHUtdHd8Z3g6MjFhZDk4Y2E5NTY5YWY5ZQ【Ministry of Education. (2016). Guidelines for teacher professional standards, R.O.C.. Retrieved from http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZmR0LmhjLmVkdS50d3x0ZXBkLWZkdC1oYy1lZHUtdHd8Z3g6MjFhZDk4Y2E5NTY5YWY5ZQ】
  62. 莫大元(1956)。怎樣教美術。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:正中書局=Cheng Chung Bookstore。
  63. 莫大元(1968)。美術科教材教法。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國民中學教師職前訓練班=Pre-service Education Class for Junior High School Levels。
  64. 郭禎祥、楊須美(1988)。以艾斯納(E.W. Eisner)「學術本位的美術教育」(DBAE)為理論基礎探討現今我國國民美術教育。師大學報:教育類,33,575-593。
  65. 陳育祥(2016)。心智圖像策略運用於師資生視覺藝術課程設計之實踐探究。國際藝術教育學刊,14(2),142-160。
  66. 陳朝平(2000)。臺灣美術教育思想的演變與跨世紀的思維。2000 年臺灣美術教育發展國際學術研討會論文集,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:
  67. 陳瓊花(2005)。當前視覺藝術教育研究的趨勢。藝術教育研究的回顧與展望研討會論文集,屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan:
  68. 陳瓊花(2001)。從美術教育的觀點探討課程統整設計之模式與案例。視覺藝術,4,97-126。
  69. 陳瓊花(2017)。美感素養導向教學之理論與實踐。教育研究月刊,275,18-33。
  70. 陳瓊花、康台生、姚世澤、趙惠玲、吳舜文、蘇郁惠、林佳儀(2003)。國立臺灣藝術教育館委託報告國立臺灣藝術教育館委託報告,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
  71. 曾鈺羢(2017)。師培重大變革─課程將全面鬆綁由大學自主。國立教育廣播電臺。取自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%B8%AB%E5%9F%B9%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%A7%E8%AE%8A%E9%9D%A9-%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E5%B0%87%E5%85%A8%E9%9D%A2%E9%AC%86%E7%B6%81%E7%94%B1%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%BB-041100146.html【Tseng, Y.-J. (2017). The revolutionary change in teacher training: Policy relaxation and returning university autonomy. National Education Radio. Retrieved from https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%B8%AB%E5%9F%B9%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%A7%E8%AE%8A%E9%9D%A9-%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E5%B0%87%E5%85%A8%E9%9D%A2%E9%AC%86%E7%B6%81%E7%94%B1%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%BB-041100146.html】
  72. 黃壬來(2006)。國際視覺藝術教育趨勢。2006 全國藝術教育專題研討會論文集,花蓮縣=Hualien, Taiwan:
  73. 黃冬富(2008)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫結案報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫結案報告,屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan:國立屏東教育大學=National Pingtung University of Education。
  74. 黃嘉雄(2011)。九年一貫課程該實施學習領域之合科教學或分科教學。教育資料與研究雙月刊,98,27-54。
  75. 趙惠玲(2004)。後現代藝術教育思潮:視覺文化藝術教育。臺灣教育,628,14-22。
  76. 趙惠玲(1996)。從我國國中美術教育現況談師資培育的一些課題。師大學報,41,573-606。
  77. 蕭炳欽(2003)。提昇藝術教育師資水準之行政策略。美育,132,70-73。
被引用次数
  1. 簡瑋成(2022)。國中小校長學習領導、教師學習領導及學生核心素養關係之研究:素養導向教育觀點。教育科學研究期刊,67(3),37-75。
  2. (2024)。從經驗教師解讀課綱之課程意識再思藝術素養導向課程統整。藝術教育研究,47,87-118。