高中生持續參與遊戲意圖之研究：以3D摩托車數位遊戲為例

High School Students' Continual Participation in Game Intentions: A Case Study of 3D Motorcycle Digital Gaming Learning

10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0002

張聖淵(Sheng-Yuan Chang)；詹勲從(Shiun-Taung Jan)

持續參與遊戲意圖 ； 遊戲焦慮 ； 遊戲認知疲乏 ； 學習價值 ； cognitive failure of gameplay ； continuance intention of gameplaying ； gameplay anxiety ； learning value

教育科學研究期刊

64卷3期（2019 / 09 / 01）

31 - 53

繁體中文

本研究使用平板電腦進行「3D摩托車」數位遊戲，讓未參加過摩托車駕照考試的技術型高中學生模擬騎乘摩托車情境，其中遊戲內容設計了在道路上騎乘摩托車的法規規定、正確騎乘行為，以及其他騎乘行為之干擾，讓使用者學習騎乘技巧與交通法規。進行3D摩托車數位遊戲後，再以問卷調查研究對象在遊戲認知疲乏、遊戲焦慮、學習價值及持續參與遊戲意圖構面之相關性。本研究結果顯示，參與3D摩托車數位遊戲的使用者，其在遊戲認知疲乏與學習價值呈顯著負相關；遊戲焦慮與學習價值呈顯著正相關；學習價值和持續參與遊戲意圖呈顯著正相關。具體而言，本研究結果發現，若3D摩托車數位遊戲能降低使用者遊戲認知疲乏及遊戲焦慮，便能提升使用者之學習價值，進而引發其持續參與遊戲意圖。

The ＂3D Motorcycle＂ digital game is designed to regulate the rules of riding a motorcycle on the road for players to familiar with the rules of transportation by simulating their cognitive and affective perception to explore the effect of this design. After conducting ＂3D Motorcycle＂ game playing, a questionnaires were delivered. The relevance of cognitive failure and anxiety, learning value perception and continuance intention. The findings of this study indicated that cognitive failure was negatively related to learning value perception, but gameplay anxiety was positively related to; the perception of learning value was positively related to continuance intention to play this ＂3D Motorcycle＂ game. The implication of this study suggested that those educational institutes of transportation safety can apply this ＂3D Motorcycle＂ game to enhance the perception of transportation rules to reduce future use real motorcycle accidents.

1. 侯正裕, A. C.-Y.,尚榮安, R.-A.(2018)。專注未必有用－從媒介特性及認知專注探索行動通訊 app 的持續意圖。行銷評論，15(1)，167-191。
   連結：
2. Ackerman, P. L.(Ed.)(2011).Cognitive fatigue: Multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future application.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
3. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M.(1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
4. Bhattacherjee, A.(2001).Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model.MIS Quarterly,25(3),351-370.
5. Byrne, B. M.(2016).Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.London, UK:Routledge.
6. Calvo, P.(Ed.),Gomila, T.(Ed.)(2008).Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach.San Diego, CA:Elsevier.
7. Caplan, S. E.(2010).Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach.Computers in Human Behavior,26(5),1089-1097.
8. Chang, C.-C.(2013).Examining users' intention to continue using social network games: A flow experience perspective.Telematics and Informatics,30(4),311-321.
9. De Dreu, C. K. W.,Beersma, B.,Stroebe, K.,Euwema, M. C.(2006).Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,90(6),927-943.
10. Dillman, D. A.,Smyth, J. D.,Christian, L. M.(2009).Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
11. Durik, A. M.,Shechter, O. G.,Noh, M.,Rozek, C. S.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2015).What if I can't? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance.Motivation and Emotion,39(1),104-118.
12. Eastin, M. S.(2006).Video game violence and the female game player: Self- and opponent gender effects on presence and aggressive thoughts.Human Communication Research,32(3),351-372.
13. Eccles, J. S.,Wigfield, A.(2002).Motivational beliefs, values, and goals.Annual Review of Psychology,53(1),109-132.
14. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
15. Fraser, C.(Ed.),Burchell, B.(Ed.),Hay, D.(Ed.),Duveen, G.(Ed.)(2001).Introducing social psychology.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
16. Gollwitzer, P. M.(1999).Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.American Psychologist,54(7),493-503.
17. Green, S. B.,Salkind, N. J.(2004).Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
18. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.
19. Hamari, J.,Shernoff, D. J.,Rowe, E.,Coller, B.,Asbell-Clarke, J.,Edwards, T.(2016).Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning.Computers in Human Behavior,54,170-179.
20. Hancock, G. R.(Ed.),Mueller, R. O.(Ed.)(2013).Structural equation modeling: A second course.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
21. Hatakka, M.,Keskinen, E.,Gregersen, N. P.,Glad, A.,Hernetkoski, K.(2002).From control of the vehicle to personal self-control: Broadening the perspectives to driver education.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,5(3),201-215.
22. Hong, J.-C.,Hwang, M.-Y.,Liu, Y.-T.,Lin, P.-H.,Chen, Y.-L.(2016).The role of pre-game learning attitude in the prediction to competitive anxiety, perceived utility of pre-game learning of game, and gameplay interest.Interactive Learning Environments,24(1),239-251.
23. Hong, J.-C.,Lin, M.-P.,Hwang, M.-Y.,Tai, K.-H.,Kuo, Y.-C.(2015).Comparing animated and static modes in educational gameplay on user interest, performance and gameplay anxiety.Computers & Education,88,109-118.
24. Hong, J.-C.,Tai, K.-H.,Hwang, M.-Y.,Kuo, Y.-C.(2016).Internet cognitive failure affects learning progress as mediated by cognitive anxiety and flow while playing a Chinese antonym synonym game with interacting verbal-analytical and motor-control.Computers & Education,100,32-44.
25. Hong, J.-C.,Tai, K.-H.,Hwang, M.-Y.,Kuo, Y.-C.,Chen, J.-S.(2017).Internet cognitive failure relevant to users' satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use a government e-learning system.Computers in Human Behavior,66,353-362.
26. Hu, L.-T.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55.
27. Hulleman, C. S.,Kosovich, J. J.,Barron, K. E.,Daniel, D. B.(2017).Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology,109(3),387-404.
28. Hwang, M.-Y.,Hong, J.-C.,Cheng, H.-Y.,Peng, Y.-C.,Wu, N.-C.(2013).Gender differences in cognitive load and competition anxiety affect 6th grade students' attitude toward playing and intention to play at a sequential or synchronous game.Computers & Education,60(1),254-263.
29. Jasperson, J.,Cater, P. E.,Zmud, R. W.(2005).A comprehensive conceptualization of post- adoptive behavior associated with information technology enabled work systems.MIS Quarterly,29(3),525-557.
30. Laffey, J. M.,Espinosa, L.,Moore, J.,Lodree, A.(2003).Supporting learning and behavior of at-risk young children: Computers in urban education.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,35(4),423-440.
31. Laplante, L.,Everett, J.,Thomas, J.(1992).Inhibition through negative priming with stroop stimuli in schizophrenia.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,31(3),307-326.
32. Levy, E. C.,Rafaeli, S.,Ariel, Y.(2016).The effect of online interruptions on the quality of cognitive performance.Telematics and Informatics,33(4),1014-1021.
33. Lowe, D. G.(1985).Further investigations of inhibitory mechanisms in attention.Memory & Cognition,13(1),74-80.
34. Mayer, R. E.(Ed.)(2014).The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
35. Mayer, R. E.(Ed.)(2014).The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
36. McGill, T. J.,Hobbs, V. J.(2008).How students and instructors using a virtual learning environment perceive the fit between technology and task.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,24(3),191-202.
37. McMorris, T.,Barwood, M.,Hale, B. J.,Dicks, M.,Corbett, J.(2018).Cognitive fatigue effects on physical performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Physiology & Behavior,188(1),103-107.
38. Moreno, R.,Mayer, R.(2007).Interactive multimodal learning environments.Educational Psychology Review,19(3),309-326.
39. Muwonge, C. M.,Ssenyonga, J.,Kwarikunda, D.(2018).Cognitive appraisals, achievement emotions, and motivation towards learning mathematics among lower secondary students.African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,22(2),243-253.
40. Myszewski, J. M.(2010).Mathematical model of the occurrence of human error in manufacturing processses.Quality and Reliability Engineering International,26(8),845-851.
41. Nascimento, B.,Oliveira, T.,Tam, C.(2018).Wearable technology: What explains continuance intention in smartwatches?.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,43,157-169.
42. Nichols, B. S.(2012).The development, validation, and implications of a measure of consumer competitive arousal (CCAR).Journal of Economic Psychology,33(1),192-205.
43. Pekrun, R.(2006).The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice.Educational Psychology Review,18(4),315-341.
44. Pekrun, R.(Ed.),Linnenbrink-Garcia, L.(Ed.)(2014).International handbook of emotions in education.New York, NY:Routledge.
45. Peña, J.,Kim, E.(2014).Increasing exergame physical activity through self and opponent avatar appearance.Computers in Human Behavior,41,262-267.
46. Rozek, C. S.,Hyde, J. S.,Svoboda, R. C.,Hulleman, C. S.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2015).Gender differences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate adolescents in mathematics and science.Journal of Educational Psychology,107(1),195-206.
47. Stewart, S. H.,Taylor, S.,Jang, K. L.,Cox, B. J.,Watt, M. C.,Fedoroff, I. C.,Borger, S. C.(2001).Causal modeling of relations among learning history, anxiety sensitivity, and panic attacks.Behaviour Research and Therapy,39(4),443-456.
48. Tan, W.-K.,Lee, P.-W.,Hsu, C.-W.(2015).Investigation of temporal dissociation and focused immersion as moderators of satisfaction-continuance intention relationship: Smartphone as an example.Telematics and Informatics,32(4),745-754.
49. Tozman, T.,Magdas, E. S.,MacDougall, H. G.,Vollmeyer, R.(2015).Understanding the psychophysiology of flow: A driving simulator experiment to investigate the relationship between flow and heart rate variability.Computers in Human behavior,52,408-418.
50. Watt, M. C.,Stewart, S. H.(2000).Anxiety sensitivity mediates the relationships between childhood learning experiences and elevated hypochondriacal concerns in young adulthood.Journal of Psychosomatic Research,49(2),107-118.
51. Webster, J.,Trevino, L. K.,Ryan, L.(1993).The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions.Computers in Human Behavior,9(4),411-426.
52. Woratanarat, P.,Ingsathit, A.,Chatchaipan, P.,Suriyawongpaisal, P.(2013).Safety riding program and motorcycle-related injuries in Thailand.Accident Analysis & Prevention,58,115-121.
53. Wylie, G. R.,Genova, H. M.,Deluca, J.,Dobryakova, E.(2017).The relationship between outcome prediction and cognitive fatigue: A convergence of paradigms.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,17(4),838-849.
54. Yoshida, N.,Koyanagi, T.(2018).Empirical analysis of hazard perception and driving behaviors among high school and college students on motorcycles in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences (IATSS) Research,42(4),171-179.
55. 內政部警政署 ( 2018 ) 。 警政統計年報 。 取自 https://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/statistics/Y106/mobile/index.html (National Police Agency, Ministry of the Interior. (2018). The e-book of yearly statistics of police administration on 2017. Retrieved from https://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGIP/wSite/statistics/Y106/mobile/index.html ] )
56. 江淑娥, S.-O(1996)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國防醫學院=National Defense Medical Center。
57. 余惠蓮, H.-L.(2003)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
58. 林欣怡, S.-I.(2015)。彰化縣=Changhua, Taiwan，明道大學=Mingdao University。
59. 許家榮, C.-J.(2018)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，中華科技大學=China University of Science and Technology。
60. 葉孋嬋, L.-C.(2016)。以探究式學習激發好奇心。科學發展，522，76-77。

1. 林意珊,宋修德(2021)。發明的自我效能與認知好奇心對持續參與IEYI臺灣選拔賽意圖之研究。教育科學研究期刊，66(1)，83-105。
2. 譚華德,葉貞妮,葉建宏,黃明月,郝永崴,洪榮昭(2021)。數位遊戲式之泰語學習：語言焦慮、自我效能對於情意表現因素及學習價值之相關分析。數位學習科技期刊，13(2)，87-117。
3. 譚華德,葉貞妮,葉建宏,吳宇豐,王志美(2021)。Kahoot APP應用於泰國語言與文化課程：認知疲乏、遊戲興趣、焦慮、價值與持續使用意願之關係。中科大學報，8(2)，1-30。
4. 葉貞妮,王志美(2020)。動手做自我效能、競賽投入與學習價值之相關分析：以PowerTech青少年科技創作競賽為例。中等教育，71(1)，52-73。
5. (2024)。青銀世代之數位遊戲認知與趨避衝突：語意聯想測驗之內容分析。教育科學研究期刊，69(1)，131-164。