题名

中小學教師換證制度之研究：體系內涵、遭遇阻力與配套措施

并列篇名

License Renewal System for Elementary and Secondary School Teachers: Contents, Resistance, and Supporting Measures

DOI

10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0005

作者

吳清山(Ching-Shan Wu)；王令宜(Ling-Yi Wang)；林雍智(Yung-Chih Lin)

关键词

教師證照 ； 教師換證體系 ； 教師專業發展 ； teacher's license ； teacher license renewal (TLR) ； teacher professional development

期刊名称

教育科學研究期刊

卷期/出版年月

66卷3期（2021 / 09 / 01）

页次

161 - 190

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

教師專業能力的提升與教育品質的保障息息相關，因此也成為國際重視的重要議題，透過實施教師換證制度，定期更新教師所需之專業知識，不但有助於教師提升專業能力，也能獲得社會各界信任。本研究旨在探討中小學教師換證制度之內涵、可能遭遇阻力及配套措施，研究方法採用問卷調查方法，以學者專家、教育行政人員及學校教育人員為對象進行研究。本研究結論包含：一、換證能夠有效增進教師專業知能、維持專業水準和確保教學品質；二、換證週期以10年為最合適；三、換證採計條件以研習進修時數占多數；四、免除換證條件以獲得政府或民間團體舉辦之全國性特殊優良教師獎占多數；五、延緩證照更新條件，贊成換證期間內因生產、育嬰、侍親等事由辦理留職停薪者占多數；六、主政核發單位，贊成教育部者占多數；七、換證辦理單位贊成地方政府研習機構者占多數；八、推動換證遭遇之阻力，最主要為缺乏法源依據；九、推動換證之配套措施，主要為將換證明定於《教師法》內，取得法源依據。根據上述結論，本研究再提出若干建議，供規劃及推動中小學教師換證體系之參考。
英文摘要

Enhancing teachers' professional abilities is closely related to ensuring high education quality and has become a key educational issue globally. Teacher license renewal (TLR) systems not only benefit teachers' professional learning but enable them to gain social trust. This study explored the contents of and resistance to implementing TLR; the study also evaluated the system for supporting TLR for elementary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan. This study was conducted using questionnaires administered to scholars, educational administrators, and school educators. Nine conclusions were drawn: (1) TLR can effectively function to enhance the professional knowledge, maintain the professional standards, and ensure the quality of teachers. (2) The TLR cycle period should be 10 years. (3) Training hours are the main consideration of TLR. (4) Most participants agreed that the Nationwide Special Excellent Teacher Awards should be accepted as an exemption to license renewal. (5) TLR should be postponable for childbirth, childcare, or paternity. (6) The Ministry of Education should be the license-issuing authority. (7) The TLR training hours should mainly include those at local government training institutes. (8) The main difficulty of promoting TLR is the lack of a legal basis. Finally, (9) the main measure proposed for supporting TLR is to amend the ＂Teacher Law＂ to obtain the legal basis. A discussion of the implications these concrete suggestions for promoting TLR is presented.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 林雍智, Y.-C.,吳清山, C.-S.(2012)。日本中小學教師換證制度實施之評析與啟示。當代教育研究季刊，20(1)，1-39。
    連結：
  2. Department for Education, DEF (U.K.)(2016).Educational excellence everywhere.
  3. Indiana Department of Education. (2016). FAQ: Licensing verification and information system (LVIS). https://www.doe.in.gov/sites/default/files/licensing/lvis-faq-v15.pdf
  4. JACET教育問題研究会(2008)。2007年度科学研究費補助金基盤研究（B）研究成果報告書2007年度科学研究費補助金基盤研究（B）研究成果報告書,文部科学省=Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan。
  5. Loughran, J. J.(2002).Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching.Journal of Teacher Education,53(1),33-43.
  6. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2019). Renewal of a professional level license. https://www.doe.mass.edu/licensure/academic-prek12/renewal-prolevel-license.pptx
  7. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education(2015).Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2015). Professional license renewal: 2015 addendum to the guidelines for Massachusetts educators. Author..
  8. Minei, M.(2007).On the renewal system of the teacher’s license.Bulletin of Institute of Educational Research,16,33-40.
  9. Moulthrop, D.,Calegari, N. C.,Eggers, D.(2006).Teachers have it easy: The big sacrifices and small salaries of America’s teachers.The New Press.
  10. Osterman, K. F.,Kottkamp, R. B.(1993).Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling hrough professional development.Corwin.
  11. Portland Public Schools(2015).Portland public schools staffing management tool (SMT) user guide.Author.
  12. Schön, D. A.(1984).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.Basic Books.
  13. The Vermont Standards Board for Professional Educators(2019).The Vermont Standards Board for Professional Educators. (2019). Rules governing the licensing of educators and the preparation of educational professionals. Author..
  14. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1966). Recommendation concerning the status of teachers. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13084&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
  15. Virginia Department of Education(2016).Virginia licensure renewal manual.Author.
  16. Virginia Department of Education, Division of Teacher Education and Licensure(2019).Virginia licensure renewal manual.Author.
  17. Wilson, S.(2009).Teacher quality: Education policy white paper.National Academy of Education.
  18. 入澤裕樹(2011)。体育系大学の教員免許更新制講習への取組みに関する調査報告。仙台大学紀要，42(2)，89-94。
  19. 三宅浩子(2007)。教員免許更新制度の政策過程に関する予備的考察：2004年中央教育審議会諮問に至る経緯。教育行財政論叢，10，27-44。
  20. 文部科学省（2010）。教員の資質向上方策の見直し及び教員免許更新制の効果検証に係る調査集計結果。http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/sankou/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/02/24 /1302602_01_1.pdf 【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. (2010). Review of strategies to improve the quality of teachers and survey results of inspecting the effects of teacher certification renewal system. http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/sankou/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/02/24/1302602_01_1.pdf】
  21. 文部科学省（2016）。選択必修領域の導入について。https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/koushin/004/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2016/12/26/1364813_5.pdf 【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. (2016). About the introduction of required areas. https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/koushin/004/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2016/12/26/1364813_5.pdf】
  22. 文部科学省（2009）。教員免許更新制等の今後の在り方について。http://www.mext.go.jp/a_ menu/shotou/koushin/012/1294443.htm 【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. (2009). The states of teacher license renewal system in the future. http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/koushin/012/1294443.htm】
  23. 日向信和(2012)。教員免許制度改革の方向性－中央教育審議会における審議を中心として。季刊教育法，172，12-19。
  24. 江川玟成編、高橋勝編、葉養正明編、望月重信編(2009)。最新教育キーワード。時事通信社=Jiji Press。
  25. 吳清山（2016，11月25日）。吳清山：教師證書宜研議定期更新。中時新聞網。https://campus. chinatimes.com/20161125002477-262301 【Wu, C.-S. (2016, November 25). Teacher certificate should be discussed to renew regularly. China Times. https://campus.chinatimes.com/20161125002477-262301】
  26. 吳清山, C.-S.(2010).師資培育研究.高等教育=Higher Education.
  27. 吳清山, C.-S.(2005)。循序漸進推動：教師換證、評鑑及進階制度。師友月刊，461，7-11。
  28. 林彥佑（2006，4月19日）。談教師換證制度。https://s8912002.pixnet.net/blog/post/159280517 【Lin, Y.-Y. (2006, April 19). Discussing the teacher license renewal system. https://s8912002.pixnet.net/blog/post/159280517】
  29. 林雍智, Y.-C.(2013)。促進教師專業發展：日本教師換證制度之檢討與改革方向。教育研究月刊，231，109-124。
  30. 林雍智, Y.-C.,吳清山, C.-S.(2012)。以定期換證制度促進教師專業發展：美日兩國教師換證制度評析與啟示。教育與心理研究，35(4)，1-27。
  31. 長澤直臣(2014)。東京都の現職教員研修制度の体系化と免許更新制に関する一考察：学び続ける教員としての自立性の確保を目指して。桜美林論考：心理‧教育学研究，5，39-62。
  32. 張德銳（2016，4月10日）。教學分軌與教師生涯進階－教師專業發展的激勵機制。教專Easy Go！。http://blog.udn.com/twblog010/53022057 【Chang, D.-R. (2016, April 10). Instructional divergence and advancement of teacher career: Exciting mechanism of teacher professional development. Teacher Professional Development Easy Go!. http://blog.udn.com/twblog 010/53022057】
  33. 黃嘉莉, J.-L.(2016)。中小學教師證照制度的社會學分析：社會藩籬論觀點。臺灣教育社會學研究，16(2)，65-103。
  34. 楊思偉、高新建、陳木金、魯先華、何金針、張淑姬（2007）。建構臺灣教師在職進修體系之研究。http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/38136/1/4-27.pdf 【Yang, S.-W., Gau, S.-J., Chen, M.-J., Lu, S.-H., Ho, C.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2007). A study of constructing teacher in-service system in Taiwan. http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/38136/1/4-27.pdf】
  35. 蔡清華, C.-H.(2006)。教育部中等教育司委託研究教育部中等教育司委託研究,教育部中等教育司=Ministry of Education。
  36. 篠原清昭(2017)。教員免許状更新講習事業の方法と課題：岐阜県の事例。日本教育情報学会年会論文集
被引用次数
  1. 戰寶華(2023)。支持服務輔導機制促動偏鄉教育變革之歷程探討：以高雄國民教育幼兒班為例。教育科學研究期刊，68(3)，95-139。
  2. (2023)。書評：十二年國民基本教育。教育行政與評鑑學刊，34，121-134。
print cancel