题名

教師協作在校長教學領導對教師自我效能影響的多層次中介效果研究：兼論教育階段的調節效果

并列篇名

Exploring the Multilevel Mediation Effects of Teacher Collaboration on the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-Efficacy: Education Level as a Moderator

DOI

10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0002

作者

張存真(Tsung-Jen Chang)；宋曜廷(Yao-Ting Sung)；邱皓政(Haw-Jeng Chiou)

关键词

分效模式 ； 校長教學領導 ； 教師自我效能 ； 教師協作 ； 教學與學習國際調查 ； unconflated model ； principal instructional leadership ； teacher self-efficacy ； teacher collaboration ； Teaching and Learning International Survey

期刊名称

教育科學研究期刊

卷期/出版年月

67卷4期（2022 / 12 / 01）

页次

35 - 72

内容语文

英文
中文摘要

校長教學領導是發展優質教育和使學校成功的關鍵因素，校長若能營造可使教師成功合作的工作環境並藉以促進教師協作，則此支持性的學校環境可提高教師自我效能並能提升教學成效。本研究旨在探討學校層次之校長教學領導與學校教師協作，以及教師層次之教師協作，對於教師自我效能的影響，除瞭解校長教學領導與教師協作對教師自我效能的直接效果之外，更進一步分析教師協作的跨層次中介效果。由於不同教育階段（國小、國中和高中）的學校文化與學生特性並不相同，因此本研究將檢視教育階段在校長教學領導與教師協作之間的調節效果。本研究使用2018年教學與學習國際調查（TALIS）之臺灣地區553所國小、國中與高中校長及10,129位教師資料進行多層次中介效果模式分析，其中，學校教師協作同時作為學校層次的脈絡變數與教師層次解釋變數，利用分效模式來檢視不同層次變數對教師自我效能的中介影響。研究結果顯示，教師層次的教師協作對教師自我效能具有顯著的正向影響，學校層次的學校教師協作對教師自我效能有顯著的脈絡效果。其次，校長教學領導會透過教師協作的完全中介對教師自我效能產生間接影響。第三，國小和國中教育階段在校長教學領導與學校教師協作之間具有正向調節效果。最後，本研究依據研究結果進行理論與實務的討論，並提出未來研究之建議。
英文摘要

Background/Context: Principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration are key characteristics of effective schools (Scheerens, 1990; Teddlie & Reynolds, 2000) and the primary factors that influence teacher self-efficacy. On the basis of the definition provided by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 2018), the present study defined principal instructional leadership as the process of supporting and developing high-quality instructional practices, developing and implementing policies that support student achievements, developing learning communities, providing feedback on instructions, modeling effective instructions, and supporting the use of assessment data. Teacher collaboration refers to the process through which teachers exchange information with their colleagues and learn from each other (Geijsel et al., 2009). The concept of self-efficacy is based on social cognitive theory proposed by Bandura (1977). In the present study, teacher self-efficacy was defined as the competence of teachers to effectively address problems in their classrooms and schools and improve the quality of their teaching, which could eventually improve the learning outcomes of their students (Ainley & Carstens, 2018; Battersby & Cave, 2014; Geijsel et al., 2009; Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001). Purpose: Principal instructional leadership is crucial for high-quality education and schools' success. Principals are responsible for shaping the work environments of teachers; thus, they can strengthen and promote teacher collaboration. A supportive school environment can improve teachers' self-efficacy. The aim of this was to elucidate the direct and indirect - through teacher collaboration - effects of principal instructional leadership on teacher self-efficacy. Because teaching is profoundly influenced by school culture and environmental factors, work pressure at different education levels may create different work environments and exert different effects on principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration. Therefore, we performed additional analyses regarding the contextual moderating effects of education levels (International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED). Design/Methodology/Approach: This study performed a secondary data analysis by using the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (2018) dataset. The sample included principals and teachers from elementary (200 and 3,494, respectively), junior high (202 and 3,835, respectively), and high (151 and 2,800, respectively) schools in Taiwan. Multilevel linear modeling was performed to investigate relationships between principal instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy in these schools. Teacher collaboration at the individual level and principal instructional leadership at the overall level were used as independent variables to evaluate the effects of both levels on teacher self-efficacy. Findings/Results: 1. Teacher Collaboration Exerts a Direct and Contextual Effect on Teacher Self-efficacy. The analysis results revealed a positive relationship between individual- and school-level teacher collaboration and individual-level teacher self-efficacy, indicating that a higher level of teacher collaboration is related to higher perceptions of self-efficacy among teachers; these results supported the study assumption. These two variables were related at both the individual and school levels, which suggests that the use of both individual- and school-level variables is a precise approach for evaluating collaboration. 2. Principal Instructional Leadership Exerts as a Significant Effect (p < .05) on Teacher Collaboration. Principal instructional leadership had a positive and significant direct effect on teacher collaboration. This demonstrates that principal instructional leadership encourages teachers to be productive in their classes, share their ideas with others, and create a cooperative culture. 3. Teacher Collaboration Significantly Mediates the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-efficacy. Principal instructional leadership exerted a significant indirect effect on teacher self-efficacy through teacher collaboration. Thus, principal instructional leadership may play a key role in teacher collaboration and indirectly enhance teachers' self-efficacy through teacher collaboration. 4. Moderating Effect of Education Level on the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Collaboration. Education level (ISCED) positively moderated the relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration. The relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration was found to be significant in elementary and junior high schools but nonsignificant in high schools. Originality/Significance: Studies have reported principal instructional leadership as an imperative predictor of teacher self-efficacy. However, few studies have focused on the indirect effects of mediating variables, such as teacher collaboration, on the relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy. Accordingly, this study comprehensively analyzed various school and teacher factors by using a single model and evaluated the effects of teacher collaboration on the relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy from a multilevel perspective. Principal instructional leadership was found to be associated with teacher self-efficacy, both directly and indirectly, through teacher collaboration. Suggestions/Implication: 1. Implications for Educational Practice. On the basis of the findings, this study proposes some recommendations for strengthening teacher collaboration, promoting teachers' professional development, and creating a supportive work environment to enhance teacher self-efficacy. Principal instructional leadership is crucial; nevertheless, because principals in Taiwan are administrators and not teachers, they rarely have time to invest in the professional development of teachers. Furthermore, to engage more strongly in instructional and staff development, principals must possess relevant skills. Policymakers should develop training and professional development programs for principals that are centered on the aforementioned topics. 2. Methodological Implications. Preacher et al. (2010) indicated that in a mediation model for 2-1-1 data, when the b effect (the effect of a mediator on a dependent variable) conflates the within and between effects, the indirect effect that necessarily operates between two groups is confounded by the within-group portion of the conflated b effect. This study compared the analysis results of the 2-1-1 unconflated and conflated models to determine the difference between the individual and overall mediating effects of teacher collaboration. The study findings support those of Preacher et al. (2010) in that the between and within effects of a mediator must be separated when a multilevel mediation model is used.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 丁一顧, Y.-K.(2014)。教師專業學習社群之調查研究：「關注學生學習成效」為焦點。課程與教學季刊，17(1)，209-232。
    連結：
  2. 吳清山, C.-S.(2002)。當前教育改革的迷思與省思。學校行政，17，2-9。
    連結：
  3. 梁金都, C.-T.,林明地, M.-D.(2015)。國小校長領導專業學習社群以發展學校集體智慧的策略。教育研究集刊，61(3)，1-46。
    連結：
  4. 陳文彥, W.-Y.,潘慧玲, H.-L.(2019)。校長領導對教師學習領導的影響：檢視信任關係與學業強調的調節作用。教育科學研究期刊，64(1)，119-147。
    連結：
  5. 陳木金, M.-J.,吳堂鐘, T.-J.,吳慧蘭, H.-L.(2016)。學校學習環境指標建構對校長推動教學領導的啟示。學校行政，104，15-38。
    連結：
  6. 陳玉娟, Y.-C.(2021)。學校管理模式與學生偏差行為關係之研究：以教師教學投入與教學支援為中介變項。教育科學研究期刊，66(3)，1-30。
    連結：
  7. 黃易文, I.-W.,湯家偉, C.-W.(2019)。國中社會領域初任教師知覺組織支持、教師同僚共享氛圍和自我效能之關係。教育實踐與研究，32(1)，33-70。
    連結：
  8. 溫福星, F.-H.,邱皓政, H.-J.(2009)。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果；以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報，26(2)，189-211。
    連結：
  9. 魏韶勤, S.-C.,張德銳, D.(2006)。教學觀察與回饋對國小初任教師教學效能影響之研究。課程與教學季刊，9(2)，89-103。
    連結：
  10. 羅寶鳳, P.-F.,陳麒, Q.(2020)。初任教師工作困擾、教學效能與專業表現之研究。教育科學研究期刊，65(2)，37-71。
    連結：
  11. Abu-Tineh, A. M.,Khasawneh, S. A.,Khalaileh, H. A.(2011).Teacher self-efficacy and classroom management styles in Jordanian schools.Management in Education,25(4),175-181.
  12. Ainley, J.,Carstens, R.(2018).,OECD iLibrary.
  13. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Prentice-Hall.
  14. Bandura, A.(2012).On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited.Journal of Management,38(1),9-44.
  15. Bandura, A.(2006).Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents,5(1),307-337.
  16. Bandura, A.(1977).Social learning theory.Prentice-Hall.
  17. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
  18. Battersby, S. L.,Cave, A.(2014).Preservice classroom teachers’ preconceived attitudes, confidence, beliefs, and self-efficacy toward integrating music in the elementary curriculum.Update: Applications of Research in Music Education,32(2),52-59.
  19. Beatty, B. R.(2000).Teachers leading their own professional growth: Self-directed reflection and collaboration and changes in perception of self and work in secondary school teachers.Journal of In-Service Education,26(1),73-97.
  20. Bellibas, M. S.,Liu, Y.(2018).The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate.International Journal of Leadership in Education,21(2),226-244.
  21. Bellibas, M. S.,Liu, Y.(2017).Multilevel analysis of the relationship between principals’ perceived practices of instructional leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions.Journal of Educational Administration,55(1),49-69.
  22. Bridges, E. M.(1967).Instructional leadership: A concept re-examined.Journal of Educational Administration,5(2),136-147.
  23. Brieve, F. J.(1972).Secondary principals as instructional leaders.NASSP Bulletin,56(368),11-15.
  24. Bruce, C. D.,Esmonde, I.,Ross, J.,Dookie, L.,Beatty, R.(2010).The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(8),1598-1608.
  25. Bryk, A. S.,Sebring, P. B.,Allensworth, E.,Luppescu, S.,Easton, J. Q.(2010).Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago.The University of Chicago Press.
  26. Burgess, R.(Ed.)(1993).Educational research and evaluation: For policy and practice?.Falmer Press.
  27. Burić, I.,Kim, L. E.(2020).Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling.Learning and Instruction,66,101302.
  28. Çalık, T.,Sezgin, F.,Kavgacı, H.,Kilınç, A. Ç.(2012).Examination of relationships between instructional leadership of school principals and self-efficacy of teachers and collective teacher efficacy.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice,12(4),2498-2504.
  29. Cawelti, G.(1999).Improving achievement.American School Board Journal,186(7),34-37.
  30. Chang, I.-H.(2011).A study of the relationships between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools.School Leadership & Management,31(5),491-515.
  31. Chapman, C.,Muijs, D.(2013).Collaborative school turnaround: A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes.Leadership and Policy in Schools,12(3),200-226.
  32. Chen, W.-L.,Elchert, D.,Asikin-Garmager, A.(2018).Comparing the effects of teacher collaboration on student performance in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore.A Journal of Comparative and International Education,50(4),515-532.
  33. Chesnut, S. R.,Burley, H.(2015).Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis.Educational Research Review,15,1-16.
  34. Choi, J.,Lee, J.-H.,Kim, B.(2019).How does learner-centered education affect teacher self-efficacy? The case of project-based learning in Korea.Teaching and Teacher Education,85,45-57.
  35. Chong, W. H.,Kong, C. A.(2012).Teacher collaborative learning and teacher self-efficacy: The case of lesson study.The Journal of Experimental Education,80(3),263-283.
  36. Çoban, Ö.,Özdemir, N.,Bellibaş, M. Ş.(2020).Trust in principals, leaders’ focus on instruction, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy: Testing a multilevel mediation model.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,51(1),95-115.
  37. Cogaltay, N.,Yalcin, M.,Karadag, E.(2016).Educational leadership and job satisfaction of teachers: A meta-analysis study on the studies published between 2000 and 2016 in Turkey.Eurasian Journal of Educational Research,16(62),255-282.
  38. Dalin, P.(1996).Towards schooling for 21st century.A&C Black.
  39. Darling-Hammond, L.(2017).Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice?.European Journal of Teacher Education,40(3),291-309.
  40. Darling-Hammond, L.,McLaughlin, M. W.(2011).Policies that support professional development in an era of reform.Phi Delta Kappan,92(6),81-92.
  41. Day, C.,Gu, Q.,Sammons, P.(2016).The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference.Educational Administration Quarterly,52(2),221-258.
  42. De Jong, L.,Meirink, J.,Admiraal, W.(2019).School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts.Teaching and Teacher Education,86,102925.
  43. Dembo, M. H.,Gibson, S.(1985).Teachers’ sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement.The Elementary School Journal,86(2),173-184.
  44. Devos, G.,Tuytens, M.,Hulpia, H.(2014).Teachers’ organizational commitment: Examining the mediating effects of distributed leadership.American Journal of Education,120(2),205-231.
  45. DuFour, R.,DuFour, R.,Eaker, R.(2016).Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work.Solution Tree.
  46. Durksen, T. L.,Klassen, R. M.,Daniels, L. M.(2017).Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning.Teaching and Teacher Education,67,53-66.
  47. Duyar, I.,Gumus, S.,Bellibas, M. S.(2013).Multilevel analysis of teacher work attitudes: The influence of principal leadership and teacher collaboration.International Journal of Educational Management,27(7),700-719.
  48. Fackler, S.,Malmberg, L. E.(2016).Teachers’ self-efficacy in 14 OECD countries: Teacher, student group, school and leadership effects.Teaching and Teacher Education,56,185-195.
  49. Fancera, S. F.,Bliss, J. R.(2011).Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve school achievement.Leadership and Policy in Schools,10(3),349-370.
  50. Ford, T. G.,Youngs, P. A.(2018).Creating organizational structures to facilitate collegial interaction among teachers: Evidence from a high-performing urban Midwestern US district.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,46(3),424-440.
  51. Forte, A. M.,Flores, M. A.(2014).Teacher collaboration and professional development in the workplace: A study of Portuguese teachers.European Journal of Teacher Education,37(1),91-105.
  52. Gagné, M.,Deci, E. L.(2005).Self-determination theory and work motivation.Journal of Organizational Behavior,26(4),331-362.
  53. Geijsel, F. P.,Sleegers, P. J. C.,Stoel, R. D.,Krüger, M. L.(2009).The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools.The Elementary School Journal,109(4),406-427.
  54. Glanz, J.(Ed.),Zepeda, S. J.(Ed.)(2016).Supervision: New perspectives for theory and practice.Rowman & Littlefield.
  55. Goddard, R.,Goddard, Y.,Kim, E. S.,Miller, R.(2015).A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning.American Journal of Education,121(4),501-530.
  56. Goddard, Y. L.,Goddard, R. D.,Bailes, L. P.,Nichols, R.(2019).From school leadership to differentiated instruction: A pathway to student learning in schools.The Elementary School Journal,120(2),197-219.
  57. Goddard, Y. L.,Goddard, R.,Tschannen-Moran, M.(2007).A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools.Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education,109(4),877-896.
  58. Goddard, Y. L.,Kim, M.(2018).Examining connections between teacher perceptions of collaboration, differentiated instruction, and teacher efficacy.Teachers College Record,120(1),1-24.
  59. Goddard, Y. L.,Neumerski, C. M.,Goddard, R. D.,Salloum, S. J.,Berebitsky, D.(2010).A multilevel exploratory study of the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of principals’ instructional support and group norms for instruction in elementary schools.The Elementary School Journal,111(2),336-357.
  60. Graham, P.(2007).Improving teacher effectiveness through structured collaboration: A case study of a professional learning community.RMLE Online,31(1),1-17.
  61. Griffin, P.,Murray, L.,Care, E.,Thomas, A.,Perri, P.(2010).Developmental assessment: Lifting literacy through professional learning teams.Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice,17(4),383-397.
  62. Gumus, S.,Bulut, O.,Bellibas, M. S.(2013).The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration in Turkish primary schools: A multilevel analysis.Education Research and Perspectives,40,1-29.
  63. Hallinger, P.(2018).Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,46(1),5-24.
  64. Hallinger, P.(2011).A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly,47(2),271-306.
  65. Hallinger, P.(2005).Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away.Leadership and Policy in Schools,4(3),221-239.
  66. Hallinger, P.,Heck, R. H.(1998).Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,9(2),157-191.
  67. Hallinger, P.,Hosseingholizadeh, R.,Hashemi, N.,Kouhsari, M.(2018).Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,46(5),800-819.
  68. Hansen, B.,Lárusdóttir, S. H.(2015).Instructional leadership in compulsory schools in Iceland and the role of school principals.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,59(5),583-603.
  69. Harris, A.(2004).Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading?.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,32(1),11-24.
  70. Hausman, C. S.,Goldring, E. B.(2001).Sustaining teacher commitment: The role of professional communities.Peabody Journal of Education,76(2),30-51.
  71. Heck, R. H.(2009).Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: Investigating a multilevel cross-classified model.Journal of Educational Administration,47(2),227-249.
  72. Hendriks, M. A.,Scheerens, J.(2013).School leadership effects revisited: A review of empirical studies guided by indirect-effect models.School Leadership and Management,33(4),373-394.
  73. Holzberger, D.,Philipp, A.,Kunter, M.(2013).How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,105(3),774-786.
  74. Honingh, M.,Hooge, E.(2014).The effect of school-leader support and participation in decision making on teacher collaboration in Dutch primary and secondary schools.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,42(1),75-98.
  75. Hughes, J. N.,Grossman, P.,Barker, D.(1990).Teachers’ expectancies, participation in consultation, and perceptions of consultant helpfulness.School Psychology Quarterly,5(3),167-179.
  76. Isa, N. I.,Mansor, A. N.,Wahab, J. L.,Alias, B. S.(2018).Principals’ instructional leadership towards teachers’ self-efficacy.International Journal of Engineering & Technology,7(3.3),449-452.
  77. Jackson, C. K.,Bruegmann, E.(2009).Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers.American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,1(4),85-108.
  78. Jamentz, K.(2002).Isolation is the enemy of improvement: Instructional leadership to support standards-based practice.WestEd.
  79. Johnson, B.(2003).Teacher collaboration: Good for some, not so good for others.Educational Studies,29(4),337-350.
  80. Kelchtermans, G.(2006).Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A review.Zeitschrift für Pädagogik,52(2),220-237.
  81. Klassen, R. M.,Tze, V. M. C.(2014).Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis.Educational Research Review,12,59-76.
  82. Kraft, M. A.,Papay, J. P.(2014).Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,36(4),476-500.
  83. Krull, J. L.,MacKinnon, D. P.(2001).Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects.Multivariate Behavioral Research,36(2),249-277.
  84. Krull, J. L.,MacKinnon, D. P.(1999).Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies.Evaluation Review,23(4),418-444.
  85. Lara-Alecio, R.,Tong, F.,Irby, B. J.,Guerrero, C.,Huerta, M.,Fan, Y.(2012).The effect of an instructional intervention on middle school English learners’ science and English reading achievement.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,49(8),987-1011.
  86. Leithwood, K.,Harris, A.,Hopkins, D.(2008).Seven strong claims about successful school leadership.School Leadership and Management,28(1),27-42.
  87. Leithwood, K.,Jantzi, D.(2005).A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005.Leadership and Policy in Schools,4(3),177-199.
  88. Li, L.,Hallinger, P.,Ko, J.(2016).Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong.International Journal of Educational Management,30(1),76-100.
  89. Liu, S.,Hallinger, P.(2018).Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model.Educational Administration Quarterly,54(4),501-528.
  90. Liu, Y.,Bellibaş, M. Ş.,Gümüş, S.(2020).The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,49(3),430-453.
  91. Lockton, M.(2019).Chasing joint work: Administrators’ efforts to structure teacher collaboration.School Leadership & Management,39(5),496-518.
  92. Louis, K. S.,Leithwood, K.,Wahlstrom, K. L.,Anderson, S. E.,Michlin, M.,Mascall, B.(2010).Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learningLearning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning,Wallace Foundation.
  93. Mascall, B.,Leithwood, K.,Strauss, T.,Sacks, R.(2009).The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism.Distributed leadership
  94. McGuigan, L.,Hoy, W. K.(2006).Principal leadership: Creating a culture of academic optimism to improve achievement for all students.Leadership and Policy in Schools,5(3),203-229.
  95. McGuire, B. D.(2011).Exploring the influence of teacher collaboration on teacher self-efficacy: A single case study of a charter high school.Walden University Press.
  96. McHenry, A. N.(2009).University of Southern Mississippi.
  97. McLaughlin, M. W.,Talbert, J. E.(2006).Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement.Teachers College Press.
  98. Mojavezi, A.,Tamiz, M. P.(2012).The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students’ motivation and achievement.Theory & Practice in Language Studies,2(3),483-491.
  99. Moradkhani, S.,Raygan, A.,Moein, M. S.(2017).Iranian EFL teachers’ reflective practices and self-efficacy: Exploring possible relationships.System,65,1-14.
  100. Muijs, D.(2015).Improving schools through collaboration: A mixed methods study of school-to-school partnerships in the primary sector.Oxford Review of Education,41(5),563-586.
  101. Muthén, L. K.,Muthén, B. O.(1998).Mplus user’s guide.Muthén & Muthén.
  102. Ngang, T. K.(2011).The effect of transformational leadership on school culture in male’ primary schools Maldives.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,30,2575-2580.
  103. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). TALIS 2018 technical report (Preliminary version). http://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018_Technical_Report.pdf
  104. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2016).School leadership for developing professional learning communities.Teaching in Focus,15
  105. Ozdemir, N.(2019).A bibliometric analysis of research on principal leadership and student achievement.New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences,6(7),55-61.
  106. Poulos, J.,Culberston, N.,Piazza, P.,D’Entremont, C.(2014).Making space: The value of teacher collaboration.The Education Digest,80(2),28-31.
  107. Preacher, K. J.,Zyphur, M. J.,Zhang, Z.(2010).A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.Psychological Methods,15(3),209-233.
  108. Robinson, V. M.,Lloyd, C. A.,Rowe, K. J.(2008).The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types.Educational Administration Quarterly,44(5),635-674.
  109. Ronfeldt, M.,Farmer, S. O.,McQueen, K.,Grissom, J. A.(2015).Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement.American Educational Research Journal,52(3),475-514.
  110. Ross, J. A.,Gray, P.(2006).School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs.Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de L’éducation,29(3),798-822.
  111. Scheerens, J.(2000).Improving school effectiveness.Unesco International Institute for Educational Planning.
  112. Scheerens, J.(1990).School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,1(1),61-80.
  113. Schwartz, G.(2017).Carson-Newman University.
  114. Schwarzer, R.,Hallum, S.(2008).Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: Mediation analyses.Applied Psychology,57,152-171.
  115. Sebastian, J.,Huang, H.,Allensworth, E.(2017).Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: Connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,28(3),463-488.
  116. Sehgal, P.,Nambudiri, R.,Mishra, S. K.(2017).Teacher effectiveness through self-efficacy, collaboration and principal leadership.International Journal of Educational Management,34(4),505-517.
  117. Shachar, H.,Shmuelevitz, H.(1997).Implementing cooperative learning, teacher collaboration and teachers’ sense of efficacy in heterogeneous junior high schools.Contemporary Educational Psychology,22(1),53-72.
  118. Shahzad, K.,Naureen, S.(2017).Impact of teacher self-efficacy on secondary school students’ academic achievement.Journal of Education and Educational Development,4(1),48-72.
  119. Sheng, Y. P.,Pearson, M.,Crosby, L.(2003).Organizational culture and employees’ computer self-efficacy: An empirical study.Information Resources Management Journal,16(3),42-58.
  120. Shengnan, L.,Hallinger, P.(2021).Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,49(2),214-233.
  121. Skaalvik, E. M.,Skaalvik, S.(2014).Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion.Psychological Reports,114(1),68-77.
  122. Skaalvik, E. M.,Skaalvik, S.(2009).Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction.Teaching and Teacher Education,25(3),518-524.
  123. Stoll, L.,Kools, M.(2017).The school as a learning organisation: A review revisiting and extending a timely concept.Journal of Professional Capital and Community,2(1),2-17.
  124. Teddlie, C.,Reynolds, D.(2000).The international handbook of school effectiveness research.Psychology Press.
  125. Tschannen-Moran, M.,Gareis, C. R.(2015).Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools.Journal of Educational Administration,53(1),66-92.
  126. Tschannen-Moran, M.,Hoy, A. W.(2001).Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct.Teaching and Teacher Education,17(7),783-805.
  127. Tschannen-Moran, M.,Hoy, A. W.(2007).The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,23(6),944-956.
  128. Vangrieken, K.,Dochy, F.,Raes, E.,Kyndt, E.(2015).Teacher collaboration: A systematic review.Educational Research Review,15,17-40.
  129. Voelkel, R. H., Jr.(2019).Causal relationship among transformational leadership, professional learning communities, and teacher collective efficacy.International Journal of Leadership in Education Theory and Practice
  130. Wahlstrom, K. L.,Louis, K. S.(2008).How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility.Educational Administration Quarterly,44(4),458-495.
  131. Wang, H.,Hall, N. C.,Rahimi, S.(2015).Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions.Teaching and Teacher Education,47,120-130.
  132. Woods, A. M.,Weasmer, J.(2004).Maintaining job satisfaction: Engaging professionals as active participants.The Clearing House,77(3),118-121.
  133. Wu, H.,Gao, X.,Shen, J.(2020).Principal leadership effects on student achievement: A multilevel analysis using Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 data.Educational Studies,46(3),316-336.
  134. Zee, M.,Koomen, H. M.(2016).Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research.Review of Educational research,86(4),981-1015.
  135. Zhang, Z.,Zyphur, M. J.,Preacher, K. J.(2009).Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions.Organizational Research Methods,12(4),695-719.
  136. 李安明, A.-M.(2012)。校長教學領導之改善、學生學習成就及學生學習測驗成績之研究。教育行政研究，2(1)，21-67。
  137. 李安明, A.-M.(2016)。國民小學校長教學領導運作之責任探究：以新竹縣市3所國小為例。教育行政論壇，8(1)，1-33。
  138. 李安明, A.-M.,謝傳崇, C.-C.(2011)。書評－《校長教學領導：理論與實踐》。當代教育研究，19(3)，161-175。
  139. 李懿芳, Y.-F.,江芳盛, F.-S.,喬麗文, L.-W.(2010)。國小校長領導行為、學校氣氛與學習成就之關聯性研究。教育研究月刊，191，39-54。
  140. 邱皓政, H-J.(2017).多層次模式與縱貫資料分析.五南=Wu-Nan.
  141. 柯華葳, H.-W.,陳明蕾, M.-L.,李俊仁, J.-R.,陳冠銘, K.-M.(2019)。,國家教育研究院=National Academy for Educational Research。
  142. 秦夢群, J. M.-C.(2010).教育領導理論與應用.五南=Wu-Nan.
  143. 秦夢群, J. M.-C.,吳勁甫, J.-F.(2011)。國中校長教學領導、學校知識管理與教師教學效能之多層次分析。教育心理與研究，34(2)，1-31。
  144. 鄭淑惠, S.-H.(2017)。校長學習領導與學校願景落實。教育研究月刊，274(1)，69-84。
  145. 鄭進丁, J.-D.(1986).國民小學校長角色之分析.復文=Fu Wen.
被引用次数
  1. 張存真,胡翠君(2023)。學校環境、教師背景與學生表現對偏鄉教師自我效能的影響。教育科學研究期刊，68(3)，179-208。
  2. (2024)。COVID-19線上教學教師情緒勞務對自我效能感影響之研究—以教學正念為調節變項。教育科學研究期刊，69(2)，43-67。
print cancel