大專階段智能障礙學生之學習及就業轉銜概況之研究

Academic and Workplace Transition for College Students With Intellectual Disabilities: An Exploratory Study

10.6209/JORIES.202303_68(1).0002

胡心慈(Shin-Tzu Hu)；林奕廷(Yi-Ting Lin)

中學後教育 ； 高等教育 ； 智能障礙 ； 轉銜 ； post-secondary education ； higher education ； intellectual disability ； transition

教育科學研究期刊

68卷1期（2023 / 03 / 01）

35 - 71

繁體中文;英文

本研究從支持的角度關心智能障礙學生在大專校院學習及就業轉銜狀況，採用質量混合之序列研究方式進行，分別於2018年與2019年對有智能障礙畢業生之48所大專校院資源教室輔導員進行調查，再對輔導過智能障礙生之輔導員、教授、職業重建人員及學生本人共26人進行訪談，瞭解其所提供之支持及學生在課業學習及就業轉銜上的狀況。研究資料在量的部分以描述統計之總和及百分比處理，質的部分以恆常比較法歸納訪談資料以形成主題。研究結果分別從學校之支持、智能障礙生之學習及就業轉銜狀況談起，發現大部分學校並未特別做準備即招收智能障礙生，但仍會透過各種會議宣導、加強相關單位間之聯繫以提供教師與學生支持；資源教室提供學生課業學習及轉銜輔導上各種支持服務，但學生使用率並不高；任課教授願意利用個人時間個別輔導學生並使用多種教學調整策略，但學生理解力不足，輔導成效有限；有些校外之職業重建人員在學生尚未畢業即已開始入校輔導。學生雖覺得課業學習很辛苦，但仍肯定大學生活能擴展視野，有47%的就業率。研究者最後擴充支持系統從生態系統理論之微系統、中介系統、外部系統及大系統分別進行討論並提出建議。

Purpose. This study aimed to understand the challenges that students with intellectual disabilities encounter in the academic learning and adoption processes, and to explore the crucial support systems provided for students with intellectual disabilities by universities. Literature Review. In Taiwan, most students with intellectual disabilities attend vocational high school and seek to work after graduating. However, the majority of students with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities attend university due to parental expectations and the greater number of opportunities offered by a higher education degree. Beginning in 1999, educational institutions began to establish resource rooms to support students with disabilities in Taiwan. However, research has indicated that students with intellectual disabilities require a high level of support in many aspects of life, particularly with regard to academic learning and adjustment, and few studies have explored how to best support these individuals. In the United States, postsecondary education programs designed to meet the needs of students with intellectual disabilities have one of three modes: (1) isolation mode, (2) hybrid mode, and (3) integrated individual support mode. Method. This mixed methods study was conducted between 2018 and 2019. In the first stage, researchers designed questionnaires to investigate the support systems for and transition process of students at higher education institutions or in job hunting activities. The surveys were sent to 161 student disability service counselors in university resource rooms, with 48 questionnaires completed and returned. In the second stage, researchers individually interviewed student disability service counselors, professors, and rehabilitation case managers who had worked with students with intellectual disabilities. This study sought to assess how the abovementioned professionals supported students and how transition services were used in both academic and employment activities. In the third stage, interviewing student disability service counselors by conducting focus group. Results. According to the findings, although most universities lacked specific preparation for students with intellectual disabilities, they strove to enhance the quality and frequency of communication between departments and the administration in an effort to provide support at the time of enrollment. However, the student utilization rate of disability services remained less than 20%, which included support services for academic learning, career counseling, and transition activities. Although students with intellectual disabilities highlighted the challenges of academic study, most still believed that the university experience would be beneficial. The majority of students with intellectual disabilities graduated from university on time with a 47% employment rate. Discussion. This study expanded the current perspective on support systems by constructing a framework that encompasses the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem. The key actors in the microsystem were the parents, classmates, and professors of the students with intellectual disabilities. They were key in the students' adjustment to university life. In the mesosystem, student disability service counselors coordinated department offices and administration to construct a support system in universities. The resource room functioned as a safe space for students with intellectual disabilities. In the exosystem, some student disability service counselors connected students with job hunting resources before graduation; rehabilitation case managers and employers played large roles in the lives of graduates with intellectual disabilities. Many participants in the exosystem believed that obtaining a diploma was the paramount objective for students with intellectual disabilities who attend university; they hoped that a diploma would equip students with the self-determination to choose a career and expand their options. Conclusion. 1. Students with intellectual disabilities confronted considerable challenges in academic learning, adjustment, and transition in university. 2. Students with intellectual disabilities did not receive adequate preparation before entering university. 3. Although student disability service counselors, professors, and rehabilitation case managers provided some support, few services were adopted. 4. Most students with intellectual disabilities graduated from university on time with a 47% employment rate. Suggestions. This study adopted ecosystem theory to describe the support systems available to students with intellectual disabilities. 1. Providing curricular adjustments in higher education. This entails redesigning the course map, adjusting teaching strategies, and empowering professors to teach students with intellectual disabilities. In addition, administrators should provide transition services in a timely manner. 2. Developing a wider variety of postsecondary programs to expand options for students with intellectual disabilities. Students with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan must choose between joining the workforce or enrolling in higher education. Many US studies have noted that students with intellectual disabilities who participate in postsecondary programs exhibit improved academic performance, enhanced social and job-related skills, and a higher employment rate, self-determination, and quality of life. Students with intellectual disabilities will benefit considerably from the development of a wider variety of postsecondary programs providing extensive options based on student needs and career plans. 3. Doing away with the fixation on paper qualifications. Existing social norms place much value on a college degree, and parents and students chase after a degree just for the prestige. Changing mindsets and norms will be an uphill task. 4. For future studies: So far, domestic literature on the issue of students with intellectual disabilities attending university is still insufficient, and most of them are case studies. It's hard to see the whole picture. Future studies should focus on investigating the quality of life of students with intellectual disabilities after graduating from university.

1. 林坤燦、羅清水（2008）。台灣地區身心障礙學生對資源教室實施現況之調查研究。特殊教育學報，27，99-127。https://doi.org/10.6768/JSE.200806.0099【Lin, K.-T., & Lo, C.-S. (2008). The study of the resource room services for college students with special needs in Taiwan. Journal of Special Education, 27, 99-127. https://doi.org/10.6768/JSE.200806.0099】
   連結：
2. 林家琪、林惠芬（2017）。中部地區高職綜合職能科學生之學校適應。特殊教育與輔助科技學報，10，1-26。https://doi.org/10.6684/JRSEAT.201712_(10).0001【Lin, J.-C., & Lin, H.-F. (2017). School adjustment of students in special education classes of vocational high schools in central Taiwan area. Journal of Research in Special Education and Assistive Technology, 10, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.6684/JRSEAT.201712_(10).0001】
   連結：
3. 林素貞、邱愛鈴、莊勝義（2010）。教育人員對我國身心障礙學生就讀大專校院教育議題之調查研究。高雄師大學報，28，61-83。https://doi.org/10.7060/KNUJ-ES.201006.0061【Lin, S.-J., Chiu, A.-L., & Chuang, S.-Y. (2010). An investigation of higher education issues for students with disability in Taiwan. Kaohsiung Normal University Journal, 28, 61-83. https://doi.org/10.7060/KNUJ-ES.201006. 0061】
   連結：
4. 陳怡琇、李菁菁（2012）。新北市高職綜合職能科學生職業自我概念及職業成熟相關之個案研究。育達科大學報，31，137-166。https://doi.org/10.7074/YDAJB.201206.0137【Chen, I.-H., & Li, C.-C. (2012). A study on the relationship between vocational self-concept and vocational maturity of special education students in one vocational high schools in New Taipei City. Yu Da Academic Journal, 31, 137-166. https://doi.org/10.7074/YDAJB.201206.0137】
   連結：
5. 陳幸榆、吳訓生（2015）。大專校院智能障礙學生學校適應研究。障礙者理解半年刊，14（2），67-90。https://doi.org/10.6513/TJUID.2015.14(2).4【Chen, H.-Y., & Wu, H.-S. (2015). The study of the college students with intellectual and developmental disabilities about their school adjustments. Journal of Understanding Individual with Disabilities, 14(2), 67-90. https://doi. org/10.6513/TJUID.2015.14(2).4】
   連結：
6. 陳麗如（2011）。大專校院不同障礙類別與障礙程度身心障礙學生教育需求分析。長庚大專校院人文社會學報，4（2），293-334。https://doi.org/10.7060/10.30114/CGJHSS.201110.0004【Chen, L.-J. (2011). Analyze the special needs for the colleges students with disabilities. Chang Gung Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(2), 293-334. https://doi.org/10.7060/10.30114/CGJHSS.201110.0004】
   連結：
7. 黃彥融（2014）。從教育機會均等觀點探討我國身心障礙學生升大專校院甄試政策。特教論壇，16，46-61。https://doi.org/10.6502/SEF.2014.16.46-61【Huang, Y.-R. (2014). Reviewing university entrance exams policy for senior high school students with disabilities based on the perspectives of equality of educational opportunity. Special Education Forum, 16, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.6502/SEF.2014.16.46-61】
   連結：
8. 張大惠（2011）。從綜合職能科職場實習看產學合作推動技職學生至企業實習。商業職業教育，121，53-56。https://doi.org/10.6380/BEQ.201108.0053【Chang, D.-H. (2011). From the perspective of workplace practice in the comprehensive functional department. Business Education Quarterly, 121, 53-56. https://doi.org/10.6380/BEQ.201108.0053】
   連結：
9. 詹穆彥、張恆豪（2018）。平等參與或特殊待遇？臺灣障礙者大專校院入學制度變遷之社會分析。特殊教育研究學刊，43（3），1-28。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201811_43(3).0001【Chan, M.-Y., & Chang, H.-H. (2018). Equal participation or special treatment?—A sociological analysis of disabled students’ admissions to college in Taiwan. Bulletin of Special Education, 43(3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE.201811_43(3).0001】
   連結：
10. Barbetta, P. M., Bennett, K. D., & Monem, R. (2021). Academic technologies for college students with intellectual disability. Behavior Modification, 45(2), 370-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445520982980
    連結：
11. Becht, K., Blades, C., Agarwal, R., & Burke, S. (2020). Academic access and progress for students with intellectual disability in inclusive postsecondary education: A systematic review of research. Inclusion, 8(2), 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-8.2.90
    連結：
12. Bethune-Dix, L., Carter, E. W., Hall, C., McMillan, E., Cayton, J., Day, T., & Bauer, E. (2020). Inclusive higher education for college students with intellectual disability. In G. Crimmins (Ed.), Strategies for supporting inclusion and diversity in the academy (pp. 309-328). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43593-6_16
    連結：
13. Butler, L. N., Sheppard-Jones, K., Whaley, B., Harrison, B., & Michelle, O. (2015). Does participation in higher education make a difference in life outcomes for students with intellectual disability? Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 44(3), 295-298. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-160804
    連結：
14. Gilson, C. B., & Carter, E. W. (2016). Promoting social interactions and job independence for college students with autism or intellectual disability: A pilot study. Journal of Autism Development Disorder, 46(11), 3583-3596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2894-2
    連結：
15. Griffin, M. M., Mello, M. P., Glover, C. A., Carter, E. W., & Hodapp, R. M. (2016). Supporting students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in postsecondary education: The motivations and experiences of peer mentors. Inclusion, 4(2), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-4.2.75
    連結：
16. Hart, D., Grigal, M., & Weir, C. (2010). Expanding the paradigm: Postsecondary education options for individuals with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(3), 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357610373759
    連結：
17. Jones, M. M., Harrison, B., Harp, B., & Sheppard-Jones, K. (2016). Teaching college students with intellectual disability: What faculty members say about the experience. Inclusion, 4(2), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-4.2.89
    連結：
18. May, C. (2012). An investigation of attitude change in inclusive college classes including young adults with an intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12013
    連結：
19. Neubert, D. A., & Moon, M. S. (2006). Postsecondary settings and transition services for students with intellectual disabilities: Models and research. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v39i4.6873
    連結：
20. Phillips, B. A., Fortney, S., & Swafford, I. (2019). College student’s social perceptions toward individuals with intellectual disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207318788891
    連結：
21. Plotner, A. J., & Marshall, K. J. (2015). Postsecondary education programs for students with an intellectual disability: Facilitators and barriers to implementation. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-53.1.58
    連結：
22. Plotner, A. J., Ezell, J. A., VanHorn-Stinnitt, C., & Rose, C. A. (2020). An investigation of coping strategies used by college students with intellectual disability. Inclusion, 8(3), 194-209. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-8.3.194
    連結：
23. Prohn, S. M., Kelley, K. R., & Westling, D. L. (2018). Students with intellectual disability going to college: What are the outcomes? A pilot study. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48(1), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-170920
    連結：
24. Qian, X., Johnson, D. R., Smith, F. A., & Papay, C. K. (2018). Predictors associated with paid employment status of community and technical college students with intellectual disability. American Journal Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123(4), 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-123.4.329
    連結：
25. 王天苗（1992）。智能不足兒童輔導手冊。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。【Wang, T.-M. (1992). Handbook for child with intellectual disability. Department of Special Education, National Taiwan Normal University.】
26. 朱姿穎（2015）。高中職就讀普通班身心障礙學生就業轉銜服務之個案分享。臺灣教育評論月刊，5（11），122-126。【Chu, T.-Y. (2015). Case sharing of employment transition service for students with physical disabilities in vocational schools. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 5(11), 122-126.】
27. 何玉琳、蔡桂芳（2015）。大專院校身心障礙畢業生就業狀況、工作滿意度與就業困難之研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報，17，85-104。【He, Y.-L., & Tsai, K.-F. (2015). The study of disable college students in employment status, job satisfaction, and employment difficulty. Bulletin of Eastern-Taiwan Special Education, 17, 85-104.】
28. 何華國（2009）。啟智教育研究（第二版）。五南。【He, H.-K. (2009). Research of intellectual disability education (2nd ed.). Wu-Nan.】
29. 邱滿艷、黃河（2018）。臺南市智能障礙者生活狀況及福利需求調查期末報告。臺南市政府。【Chiu, M.-Y., & Huang, H. (2018). Report of people with intellectual disabilities’s living condition and DEMAND survey in Tainan City. Tainan City Government.】
30. 邱滿艷、黃河、陳雅婷、張惠雯（2020）。宜蘭縣身心障礙者生活狀況及福利需求調查期末報告。宜蘭縣政府。【Chiu, M.-Y., Huang, H., Chen, Y.-T., & Chang, H.-W. (2020). Report of disabled people’s living condition and demand survey in Yi Lan County. Yi Lan County Government.】
31. 宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2011）。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），97-　130。【Sung, Y.-T., & Pan, P.-Y. (2011). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journals of Research in Education Science, 55(4), 97-130.】
32. 身心障礙者權利公約（2014年12月3日）。【The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (December 3, 2014).】
33. 林幸台（2016）。從生涯發展觀點談智能障礙學生的大專校院生涯規劃。推波引水：中華民國智障者家長總會會訊，75，1-3。【Lin, H.-T. (2016). The career planning of students with intellectual disabilities in colleges and universities—From the perspective of career development. Parents’ Association for Persons with Intellectual Disability, Taiwan Newsletter, 75, 1-3.】
34. 林侑靜（2016）。高職綜合職能科智能障礙畢業生就讀大專院校學校適應之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。【Lin, Y.-C. (2016). The study of college adjustment by graduates with IDD from section of special education in vocational high school [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
35. 林惠芳、黃宜苑（2018）。提升大專校院校院身心障礙學生就業知能—以醒吾大專校院為例。就業安全半年刊，17（1），26-40。【Lin, H.-F., & Huang, Y.-Y. (2018). Improving the employability of students with disabilities in colleges and universities—Taking Hsing Wu University as an example. Employment Security, 17(1), 26-40.】
36. 林寶貴（1997）。大專院校資源教室輔導手冊—邁向公元2001年。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。【Lin, B.-K. (1997). Manual of student disability services in college and universities—Towards 2001. Special Education Center, National Taiwan Normal University.】
37. 宣崇慧（2001）。資源教室方案理念在大專校院之實踐。特殊教育季刊，78，20-25。【Hsuan, C.-H. (2011). The practice of resource room program in college (university). Special Education Quarterly, 78, 20-25.】
38. 陳秀芬、林奕廷（2014）。讀大專校院是唯一的選擇嗎？身心障礙學生接受大專校院的另一種可能性。學務通訊，902，4。【Chen, S.-F., & Lin, Y.-T. (2014). Are colleges and universities the only option? Another possibility for students with disabilities to participate in post-secondary programs. Student Affairs Newsletter, 902, 4.】
39. 陳音音（2016）。探討智能障礙大專校院生就業準備之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。【Chen, Y.-Y. (2016). The study of career preparation of college students with intellectual disabilities [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
40. 郭惠慈、黃國倫（2014）。探究智能障礙大學生人際互動經驗─以表達性藝術治療介入與從重要他人的觀點訪談。家庭教育雙月刊，49，17-28。【Kuo, H.-T., & Huang, K.-L. (2014). Exploring the interpersonal experience of college students with intellectual disabilities—Intervention with expressive arts therapy and interviews from the point of view of important others. Journal of Family Education Bimonthly, 49, 17-28.】
41. 鈕文英（2012）。啟智教育課程與教學設計。心理。【Niu, W.-Y. (2012). Curriculum and instructional design for special eduation. Psychological.】
42. 黃宜苑（2016）。全國大專校院智能障礙學生校園適應情形之調查研究。推波引水：中華民國智障者家長總會會訊，75，7-12。【Huang, Y.-Y. (2016). Investigation and research on campus adaptation of students with intellectual disabilities in colleges and universities in Taiwan. Parents’ Association for Persons with Intellectual Disability, Taiwan Newsletter, 75, 7-12.】
43. 張恆豪、邱春瑜（2017）。教育權。載於孫迺翊、廖福特（主編），身心障礙者權利公約（頁395-422）。財團法人臺灣新世紀文教基金會。【Chan, H.-H., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2017). Education right. In N.-I. Sun & F.-T. Liao (Eds.), Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (pp. 395-422). Taiwan New Center Foundation.】
44. 教育部特殊教育通報網（2022）。https://www.set.edu.tw【Special Education Transmit Net. (2022). https://www.set.edu.tw】
45. 衛生福利部（2017）。105年身心障礙者生活狀況及福利需求調查期末報告。作者。【Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2017). Report of disabled people’s living condition and demand survey 2016. Author.】
46. 劉仲成（2014）。大專校院校院特殊教育資源手冊。教育部。【Liu, C.-C. (2014). Special education in college and university resource handbook. Ministry of Education.】
47. 蔡幸媚、邱滿艷（2018）。身心障礙者權益保障法對庇護工場衝擊之研究—從「離開庇護工場學員」的主要照顧者觀點探討。特教園丁，33（3），7-18。【Tsai, H.-M., & Chiu, M.-Y. (2018). The impact of people with disabilities rights protection act on shelter workshops—The perspectives of laid-off disabled employees. Special Educators Quarterly, 33(3), 7-18.】
48. 謝佳男（2017）。機會之旅—智能障礙學生的大專校院經驗（未出版博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。【Hsieh, C.-N. (2017). A journey of opportunity — Students with intellectual disability going to college [Unpublished doctoral disseration]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
49. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.（2010）。智能障礙定義、分類和支持系統（鄭雅莉，譯）。財團法人心路社會福利基金會。（原著出版於2010年）【American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2010). Mental retardation workbook: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (Y.-L. Cheng, Trans.). Syinlu Social Welfare Foundation. (Original work published 2010)】
50. Eisenman, L. T., Tanverdi, A., Perrington, C., & Geiman, A. (2009). Secondary andpostsecondary community activities of youth with significant disability. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 121-126.
51. Griffin, M. M., Wendel, K. F., Day, T. L., & McMillan, E. D. (2016). Developing peer supports for college students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(3), 263-269.
52. Grigal, M., & Hart, D. (2010). Think college. Paul H. Brooks.
53. Grigal, M., Hart, D., & Weir, C. (2012). Think college standards quality indicators, and benchmarks for inclusive higher education. Institute for Community Inclusion, University of Massachusetts Boston.
54. Hall, M., Kleinert, H. L., & Kearns, F. J. (2000). Going to college! Postsecondary programs for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(3), 58-65.
55. Hamill, L. B. (2003). Going to college: The experiences of a young woman with down syndrome. Mental Retardation, 41(5), 340-353. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2003)41<340:GTCTEO> 2.0.CO;2
56. Lee, S. S. (2009). Overview of the federal higher education opportunity act reauthorization. Insight, 1, 1-2.
57. Migliore, A., Butterworth, J., & Hart, D. (2009). Postsecondary education and employment outcomes for youth with intellectual disabilities. Think College Fast Facts, 1(1), 1.
58. Shaw, S. F., Madaus, J. W., & Dukes, L. L. (2010). Preparing students with disabilities for college success. Paul H. Brooks.
59. Urie Bronfenbrenner. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

1. (2023)。智障者有上大學的權利嗎？。社區發展季刊，184，225-235。