國中7-9年級團體智力測驗信度及效度研究

The Development of a Group Intelligence Test for Children in Grades 7-9

蔡明富(Ming-Fu Tsai)；吳裕益(Yuh-Yih Wu)

團體智力測驗 ； 資優學生 ； group intelligence test ； gifted students

特殊教育與輔助科技學報

9期（2016 / 12 / 01）

69 - 103

繁體中文

本測驗基於流體-晶體智力理論、評量內容兼具語文與非語文、節省施測時間及多套複本測驗等四大特色，主要目的在編製三式適用於評量國中7-9年級學生之團體智力測驗，以供國中資優學生鑑定的初步篩選工具。本測驗包含語文反義、數字系列與圖形類比三個分測驗，全測驗共有59題，作答採五選一方式，施測時間約45分鐘（含作答說明）。研究結果顯示：1.信度方面，分測驗內部一致性係數介於.75~.82之間，全測驗為.84；分測驗間隔四週重測信度係數介於.70~.81之間，全測驗為.87；三式測驗複本信度係數介於.70~.79之間。2.效度方面，除具內容效度外，本測驗分別與「學業成績」、「國民中學語文智力測驗」及「托尼非語文智力測驗」有不錯的效標關聯效度，本測驗亦能區別資優生與普通生之差異；驗證性因素分析結果顯示包括晶體智力與流體智力的雙因素理論模式之適合度甚佳，顯示本測驗因素結構與原先測驗編製的內容架構相符。最後以台灣地區國中7-9年級共3320名學生為樣本，建立「甲式測驗」的全國常模。研究結果顯示本測驗具有不錯的信度與效度，可作為篩選國中資優學生的良好工具。

The purpose of this study was to develop a group intelligence test for children in grades 7-9, which could be used as an identification instrument for gifted students The four major characteristics of the test were a theoretical basis on crystallized and fluid intelligence, a combination of verbal and nonverbal contents, parsimonious test time and multiple test forms. It consisted of three subtests: Verbal Reasoning, Arithematic Reasoning, and Figural Reasoning. It was a group test with 45 minutes limit time for each version. Results revealed that the Cronbach α coefficient of subscales were .744~ .816, while for the overall test it was .838. The test-retest reliability coefficients over a period of four weeks were .702~ .813, while for the overall test it was .869. The different version of the test correlation were .700~ .785. It was found that the total scores of the test were significantly related to the student’s academic performance, the scores of the Verbal Intelligence test and the Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded two factors (crystallized and fluid intelligence) for this test. The results showed the group intelligence test for children (grades 7-9) had acceptable reliability and validity. To this end, the normalized T score norms and percentile ranks for 3320 subjects in the test (Form A) were also developed. The group intelligence test for children (grades 7-9) seems to be a useful and valid tool applied to gifted students.

1. 鄒小蘭、王琡棻(2014)。國小一般智能資賦優異學生鑑定資料分析與探究。特教育學報，39，81-110。
   連結：
2. 蔡明富(2014)。國小2～3年級團體智力測驗之發展及其信效度研究。特殊教育與復健學報，30，23-50。
   連結：
3. 蔡明富(2014)。國小4～6年級團體智力測驗的編製。高雄師大學報教育與社會科學類，36，47-76。
   連結：
4. 教育部（2007）。國民教育階段資優學生鑑定安置流程。取自http://trcgt.ck.tp.edu.tw/resource_law.aspx
5. 林幸台（2002）。國民中學團體語文智力測驗指導手冊。臺北：教育部特殊教育工作小組。
6. Brown, L.,Sherbenou, R.,Johnson, S.(1997).Test of nonverbal Intelligence.Austin, TX:PRO-ED.
7. Canivez, G. L.(2014).Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: Direct versus indirect hierarchical structures.School Psychology Quarterly,29(1),38-51.
8. Carroll, J. B.(1993).Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
9. Clark, B.(2012).Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at school and home.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
10. Davis, G. A.,Rimm, S. B.,Siegel, S.(2010).Education of the gifted and talented.Needham Heights:Allyn and Bacon.
11. de Ayala, R. J.(2009).The theory and practice of item response theory.New York:Guildford.
12. DeMars, C.(2010).Item response theory.New York:Oxford University Press.
13. Demetriou, A.(Ed.),Efklides, A.(Ed.)(1994).Intelligence, mind, and reasoning: Structure and development.Amsterdam:North-Holland.
14. Devena, S. E.,Gay, C. E.,Watkins, M. W.(2013).Confirmatory factor analysis of the WISC-IV in a hospital referral sample.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,31(6),591-599.
15. Ebel, R. L.,Frisbie, D. A.(1991).Essentials of educational measurement.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
16. Embretson, S. E.,Reise, S. P.(2000).Item response theory for psychologists.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Flanagan, D. P.(Ed.),Genshaft, J. L.(Ed.),Harrison, P. L.(Ed.)(1997).Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
18. Flanagan, D. P.(Ed.),Genshaft, J. L.(Ed.),Harrison, P. L.(Ed.)(1997).Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
19. Flanagan, D. P.(Ed.),Harrison, P. L.(Ed.)(2005).Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
20. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2006).Multivariate data analysis.NJ:Pearson.
21. Hambleton, R. K.,Swaminathan, H.(1985).Item response theory: Principles and applications.Boston, MA:Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
22. Hammill, D. D.,Pearson, N. A.,Wiederholt, J. E.(1997).Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence.Austin, TX:Pro-Ed.
23. Hau, K.,Marsh, H. W.(2004).The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes.British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology,57,327-351.
24. Hussain, L.,Jamil, A.,Siraji, M. J.,Maroof, K.(2012).Development and standardization of intelligence test for children.International Journal of Learning & Development,2(5),190-202.
25. Kamphaus, R. W.(1993).Clinical assessment of children's intelligence.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
26. Kaplan, R.M.,Saccuzzo, D. P.(2013).Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues.Belmont, CA:Cengage Learning.
27. Kolen, M. J.,Brennan, R. L.(2004).Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices.New York:Springer-Verlag.
28. Lohman, D. F.,Hagen, E.(2001).Cognitive Abilities Test.Itasca, IL:Riverside.
29. McCallum, R. S.(Ed.)(2003).Handbook of nonverbal assessment.New York, NY:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
30. McCallum, R. S.,Bracken, B. A.(1998).The Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test.Itasca, IL:Riverside.
31. McDonald, R. P.,Ho, M. H. R.(2002).Principles and Practice in Reporting Statistical Equation Analyses.Psychological Methods,7(1),64-82.
32. Murphy, K. R.,Davidshofer, C. O.(2004).Psychological testing: Principles and applications.Upper Saddler River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
33. Naglieri, J. A.(2003).Naglieri nonverbal ability test.San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation.
34. Nakano, S.,Watkins, M. W.(2013).Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fourth edition among referred native American students.Psychology in the Schools,50(10),957-968.
35. Otis, A.,Lennon, R.(1996).Otis-Lennon school ability test.San Antonio, TX:Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement.
36. Reynolds, C. R.(Ed.),Kamphaus, R. W.(Ed.)(2003).Handbook of psychological & educational assessment of children: Intelligence, aptitude, and achievement.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
37. Rizza, M. G.,McIntosh, D. E.,McCunn, A.(2001).Profile analysis of the Woodcock-Johnson Ⅲ tests of cognitive abilities with gifted students.Psychology in the Schools,38(5),447-455.
38. Rowe, A. H.(Ed.)(1991).Intelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Sternberg, R. J.(1985).Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence.NY:Cambridge University Press.
40. Sternberg, R. J.(1992).Ability tests, measurements, and markets.Journal of Educational Psychology,84,134-140.
41. Swaminathan, H.,Gifford, J. A.(1983).Estimation of parameters in the three-parameter latent trait model.New horizons in testing,New York:
42. Volker, M. A.,Lopata, C.,Cook-Cottone, C.(2006).Assessment of children with intellectual giftedness and reading disabilities.Psychology in the Schools,43(8),855-869.
43. 王寶墉(1993)。現代測驗理論。臺北:心理。
44. 余民寧(2009)。試題反應理論及其應用。臺北:心理。
45. 吳武典、金瑜、張靖卿(2011)。多向度團體智力測驗。臺北:心理。
46. 吳武典、胡心慈、蔡崇建、王振德、林幸台、郭靜姿(2006)。托尼非語文智力測驗指導手冊。臺北:心理。
47. 吳訓生(2007)。國民小學學業性向測驗指導手冊。臺北:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
48. 周文欽、歐滄和、許擇基、盧欽銘、金樹人、范德鑫(1995)。心理與教育測驗。臺北:心理。
49. 徐正穩、路君約(1995)。圖形式智力測驗指導手冊。臺北:中國行為科學社。
50. 許天威、蕭金土(1999)。綜合性非語文智力測驗。臺北:心理。
51. 陳榮華(2004)。國民中學智力測驗更新版。臺北:中國行為科學社。
52. 陳榮華(1998)。陳氏非語文能力測驗。臺北:中國行為科學社。
53. 黃國彥、鍾思嘉、林珊如、李良哲(1983)。羅桑二氏語文智力測驗指導手冊。臺北:正昇教育科學社。
54. 路君約、盧欽銘(1991)。國民中學智力測驗（第三種）。臺北:中國行為科學社。