以計畫行為理論探究高齡者接受圓夢服務之意向

Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explore Behavioral Intention to Accept Dream-Realizing Services of the Elderly

10.53106/207466012022061401006

李尚武(Shang-Wu Li)；楊國柱(Kuo-Chu Yan)；王枝燦(Chih-Tsan Wang)

高齡者 ； 圓夢服務 ； 圓夢需求 ； 行為的意向 ； the elderly ； dream-realizing service ； dream-realizing demand ； behavioral intention

生命教育研究

14卷1期（2022 / 06 / 01）

145 - 181

繁體中文

醫療科技進步、平均壽命延長、生育率降低，進而加速人口結構老化。臺灣已進入「高齡社會」階段，至2021年1月底，65歲以上人口已占全國總人口的16%以上，預計2025年將邁入「超高齡社會」。本研究以計畫行為理論為基礎，納入圓夢需求構面，加以修正理論模型，建立高齡者參與行為的意向模型。以自編「高齡者參與圓夢服務行為的意向問卷」為測量工具，針對高雄地區65歲以上的年長者為研究對象，採立意抽樣問卷調查，共計387份有效樣本。研究發現，影響高齡者參與圓夢服務意願的最大因素是知覺行為控制，其次是態度；此外，主觀規範與圓夢需求皆會顯著影響行為的意向，而且兩者皆會透過態度的中介效果，間接影響高齡行為的意向。最後，依研究發現，對業者及政府研提創業構想及鼓勵投入圓夢服務的措施與建議。

The speeding and aging population structure resulted from progression of healthcare technology, average life expectancy increased, and fertility rates decreased. Taiwan has officially entered the stage of an ＂aged society＂ as Taiwanese people over 65 years old accounted for over 16% of the total population in January, 2021. In addition, Taiwan will become a super-aged society by 2025. Based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB), this study builds up an intention model of the elderly participatory behavior by including the demand facet of dream-realizing services to revise the initial theoretical model. The questionnaire of ＂the scale of behavioral intention of the elderly to participate in the dream-realizing service＂ is used as a tool for testifying the people aged over 65 in Kaohsiung and gains 387 valid samples by purposive sampling method. Research findings show that the most important factor influencing the elderly's willingness to participate in the dream-realizing services is perceived behavioral control. The second factor is attitude. The subjective norms and dream-realizing demand have a remarkable influence on the intention of their behavior and both of the former and later have an indirect influence on the intention of their behavior by the moderated mediation effect of attitude. Finally, according to the study findings, it provides suggestions to industries and the government the ideas to start a business and encourage the investment in dream-realizing services.

1. 侯靖男, J.-N.,江志正, C.-C.(2010)。國小家長參與子女教育行為意向模式之研究。中正教育研究，9(1)，119-159。
   連結：
2. 張嘉麟, C.-L.,李勝雄, S.-S.(2013)。消費者參與健康休閒俱樂部行為意向之研究。運動休閒管理學報，10(1)，19-43。
   連結：
3. Ajzen, I.(1991).The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,50,179-211.
4. Ajzen, I.(2020).The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions.Journal of WILEY,2,314-324.
5. Ajzen, I.,Driver, B. L.(1992).Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice.Journal of Leisure Research,24(3),207-240.
6. Bagozzi, R.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
7. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
8. Butler, R. N.(1963).The life review: An interpretation of reminiscence in the aged.Psychiatry,26,65-76.
9. Chang, M. K.(1998).Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior.Journal of Business Ethics,17(16),1825-1834.
10. Cohen、 G. D.,李淑君（譯）, S.-J.(Trans.)(2009).熟年大腦的無限潛能.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:張老師文化=Living Psychology Publishers.
11. Erikson, E. H.(1963).Childhood and society.New York, NY:Norton.
12. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
13. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall International.
14. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2006).Multivariate data analysis.Hoboken, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
15. Hair, N.,Clark, M.(2007).The ethical dilemmas and challenges of ethnographic research in electronic communities.International Journal of Market Research,49(6),781-800.
16. Hsu, M.-H.,Chiu, C.-M.(2004).Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance.Decision Support Systems,38(3),369-381.
17. Huang, E.,Chuang, M.-H.(2007).Extending the theory of planned behavior as a model to explain post-merger employee behavior of IS use.Computers in Human Behavior,23(1),240-257.
18. Kuhl, J.(Ed.),Beckmann, J.(Ed.)(1985).Action control: From cognition to behavior.Heidelberg, Germany:Springer.
19. Maslow, A. H.(1970).Motivation and personality.New York, NY:Harper & Row.
20. Maslow, A. H.(1969).Theory Z.Journal of Transpersonal Psychology,1(2),31-47.
21. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Nicolaides, P.(1989).Liberalizing trade in services: Strategies for success.London:Routledge.
23. Regan, W. J.(1963).The service revolution.Journal of Marketing,27(3),32-36.
24. Riddle, D.(1986).Service-led growth: The role of the service sector in the world development.New York, NY:Praeger Publishers.
25. Wang, K. H.-C.,Lin, J.-H.,Chen, H.-G.(2019).Explore the needs of the elderly with social awareness.Educational Gerontology,45(5),310-323.
26. 朱瑞玲, R.-L.,楊國樞, K.-S.(1988)。臺灣民眾的心理需求及其相關因素。變遷中的台灣社會：第一次社會變遷基本調查資料的分析
27. 吳明隆, M.-L.(2011).論 SPSS 統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計.新北市=New Taipei City, Taiwan:易習=YiShi Publisher.
28. 李能慧, N.-H.(2008)。雲林縣=Yunlin County, Taiwan，國立雲林科技大學=National Yunlin University of Science & Technology。
29. 李雅慧, Y.-H.,盧婧宜, C.-Y.(2014)。以學習觀點探究中高齡者之未來準備。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，2(1)，17-26。
30. 周玉慧, Y.-H.,朱瑞玲, R.-L.(2008)。變遷中的臺灣民眾心理需求、疏離感與身心困擾。臺灣社會學刊，41，59-95。
31. 林東正, T.-C.,徐筱雯, H.-W.,祝國忠, K.-C.(2010)。社交需求、網站版面設計對交友網站參與意圖之影響。資訊管理展望，12(1)，43-64。
32. 邱天助, T.-C.(1993).教育老人學.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychology.
33. 洪君慧, C.-H.(2013)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，國立中正大學=National Chung Cheng University。
34. 紐文英, W.-Y.(2016).質性研究方法與論文寫作.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:雙葉書廊=Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.
35. 高雄市政府民政局（2014）。103 年 7 月高雄市各區現住人口數按性別及年齡分。高雄市戶籍人口統計月報表。取自 https://cabu.kcg.gov.tw/Web/StatRptsFileList.aspx?appname=StatRptsFileList&yq=103&mq=7&catId=16504724-317b-4d57-8396-bd0af78b5ed4【Kaohsiung City Government Civil Affairs Bureau. (2014). The current population of Kaohsiung City by sex and age in July 2013. Kaohsiung city population monthly report. Retrieved from https://cabu.kcg.gov.tw/Web/StatRptsFileList.aspx?appname=StatRptsFileList&yq=103&mq=7&catId=16504724-317b-4d57-8396-bd0af78b5ed4】
36. 張春興, C.-H.(2005).現代心理學.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:東華=Tung Hua Book.
37. 畢恆達, H.-D.,余漢儀, H.-Y.,嚴祥鸞, X.-L.,周雅容, Y.-R.,胡幼慧, Y.-H.(2006).危險與秘密—研究倫理.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:三民=San Min Book.
38. 郭靜晃, J.-H.(2010).人類行為與社會環境.臺北縣=Taipei County, Taiwan:揚智文化=Yang Chih Book.
39. 陳佑淵, Y.-Y.(2007)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，國立中正大學=National Chung Cheng University。
40. 陳亮佑, L.-Y.,林宜親, Y.-C.(2013)。潛在遊客參與美食節慶活動行為意圖之研究。觀光旅遊研究學刊，8(2)，59-73。
41. 馮燕, Y.(2015)。我國企業社會責任之實踐～《高齡社會白皮書》提供的機會。社區發展季刊，152，8-18。
42. 黃仁華, J.-H.(2013)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，南華大學=Nanhua University。
43. 黃建怡, J.-Y.(2011)。花蓮縣=Hualien County, Taiwan，國立東華大學=National Dong Hwa University。
44. 黃珮婷, P.-T.,李幸娟, S.-J.(2018)。服務連線動起來，互助盡孝有人幫：推動社會經濟照顧模式的一條路。國土及公共治理季刊，6(1)，54-61。
45. 黃富順, F.-S.,林麗惠, L.-H.,梁芷萱, Z.-X.,林曉齡, X.-L.(2008)。教育部委託之專題成果報告教育部委託之專題成果報告,新竹市=Hsinchu City, Taiwan:玄奘大學教育人力資源與發展學系=Department of Educational Human Resources and Development, Xuanzang University。
46. 黃義俊 Huang、 Y.-C.,楊敏里, M.-L.,劉德芳, D.-F.(2010)。以計畫性行為理論實證研究女性創業意向。創業管理研究，5(1)，33-68。
47. 詹涵雯, H.-W.(2008)。桃園市=Taoyuan, Taiwan，國立中央大學=National Central University。
48. 劉慧俐, H.-L.(2007)。人口老化的趨勢與對策。高醫醫訊月刊，26(1)，5。
49. 鄧詩展, S.-Z.(2007)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
50. 簡榮基, J.-C.(2014)。南投縣=Nantou County, Taiwan，南開科技大學=Nan Kai University of Technology。
51. 羅瑞玉, R.-Y.(2009)。老人靈性需求初探—以屏東地區為例。2009 年南臺灣社會發展學術研討會論文集，屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan:
52. 蘇雅萍, Y.-P.(2015)。從圓夢計畫談團隊反移情。臨床心理學刊，9(2)，57-58。
53. 蘇榮彬, J.-P.(2012)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，高苑科技大學=Kao Yuan University。