题名

中華航空公司CI-611澎湖空難罹難者身分辨識之探討

并列篇名

The Study of Victim Identification of China Airlines CI-611 Aircraft Accident in Penghu, Taiwan

DOI

10.6134/tjfm.2009.01.01.12

作者

楊全斌(Chuan-Ping Yang);邱清華(Ching-Hwa Chiu);郭宗禮(Tsung-LI Kuo);鄭景暉(Jiiang-Huei Jeng)

关键词

航機失事 ; 指紋比對 ; DNA比對 ; 齒牙比對 ; Aircraft accident ; Fingerprint identification ; DNA identification ; Odontology identification

期刊名称

台灣法醫學誌

卷期/出版年月

1卷1期(2009 / 06 / 01)

页次

57 - 70

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

2002年5月25日,中華航空公司CI-611班機在澎湖高空發生空難,機體於空中解體,全體乘客及機員共225名均罹難。其遺體大都是完整,無燃燒跡象,死後二、三天尚可目視辨認。至第99日發現的遺體已呈白骨化。 指紋比對:依官方檔案,225名中89名有指紋卡。在發現的175具(77.7%)遺體中,33具經指紋確認。依檔案比例推算,175具之指紋比對應可確認69具,尚差36具,可能因腐敗而無法比對。 DNA比對:7具零星的遺骸中有5具(71.4%)無法檢出DNA型別。檔案中沒有說明,在完整遺骸的404個DNA檢體中有多少個是有檢出或無檢出DNA型別,故無法評估DNA比對的功能。 齒牙比對:檔案中沒有齒牙比對確認身分之詳細數據,故無法顯示牙齒比對之功能。 結論與討論: 1.本案以指紋、DNA比對為主。在齒牙比對方面,卻因並未對罹難者生前及死後的口內影像、X光片與照片等作完整收集與建檔,不無遺憾。 2.遺體腐敗是指紋與DNA比對的最大致命傷,然官方資料宣稱175名尋獲者皆完成DNA比對,令人存疑。DNA比對只使用家屬血液,係用親子鑑定的方法,其實更直接的是使用罹難者生前DNA,其材料可來自病理切片與個人牙刷。DNA比對應提供完整報告,作為未來改善之依據。 3.指紋比對是身分辨識的重要工具,如能建立全國民資料庫,始能發揮最大功能。 4.由於目前尚缺電腦輔助牙齒比對之軟體,有待今後補充。另外,由於齒牙鑑定係倚賴開業牙醫師的義務參與,但牙醫師參與時間畢竟有限,必須有行政助理人員參與支援,負責資料收集與分析整理。 5.政府單位多持資訊不公開態度,故未將資料發表分析,以致對災難遺體辨認作業甚為不利,有待改善。

英文摘要

China Airlines Flight CI-611 crashed into the sea in Penghu on May 25, 2002. All 225 passengers and crew members were killed. Most bodies were found intact, no signs of burning, and could still be recognized after 2-3 days. The body found on the 99th day was just skeleton. There are three ways to identify the victims, i.e. DNA, fingerprint, and odontology: 1. Fingerprint There were 89 ante-mortem fingerprint records out of 225 victims. Of 175 bodies found, 33 were identified by fingerprint. Base on the ratio of 89/225, there should be 69 bodies identified, the rest 36 could not be identified due to decomposition of bodies. 2. DNA The DNA of 404 samples from complete remains were examined. 5 out of 7 DNA of partial remains were not identified (71.4%). No official data showed how many cases were identified by DNA. 3. Odontology Officials noted ”there were numerous cases identified by 88 dentists working 2-3 days per person”, yet no comprehensive data was released. Conclusion and discussion 1. DNA and fingerprint were emphasized in this investigation. However, there was no complete victims' antemortem and post-mortem dental records for comparison. 2. Fingerprint and DNA identification testing were less effective on decomposed bodies. The officials report that all 175 victims were identified by way of DNA is questionable. The family members' blood was used for DNA testing-paternity test. However, ante-mortem DNA of victims is more direct and effective, such as specimens from pathologic biopsy and personal toothbrush. The result of DNA testing should be disclosed, not kept as confidential, for future improvement. 3. Fingerprint is an important tool for human identification. A national fingerprint data base is imperative for better identification. 4. There was no software for computer assisted dental data matching available. They were urgently needed. Dentists involved in this investigation were private practitioners and their time was limited, so they need administrative assistants to participate in collecting and analyzing dental documentations.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 基礎醫學
社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Lessons learned from 9/11: DNA identification in mass fatality incidents.
  2. 飛航事故調查報告(ASC-AOR-05-02-001)
  3. Mass Fatality Incidents: A guide for human forensic identification June 2005. Retrieved from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/214781.htm
  4. Interpol disaster victim identification guide. Retrieved from http://www.interpol.int/Public/DisasterVictim/default.asp
  5. Aviation Safety Council(June 03, 2003): CI611 Accident Investigation Factual Data Collection Group Report (Injury Documentations Group)..
  6. Hong Chen, Carrie Jackson: Forensic Odontology. Retrieved from http://www.cse.msu.edu/~cse891/Sect601/CaseStudy/ForensicOdontology.pdf
  7. 2004 Thailand Tsunami Relief Information. Retrieved from http://www.inet.co.th/tsunami/
  8. Masatsugu Hashimoto: Interpol Disaster Victim Identification 1st. Pacific Rim Group Summer 2001 ASFO News..
  9. Digital Dental Chart (DDC) Sample. From www.kyorin-u.ac.jp/univ/user/medicine/legal/DDC_Sample.html
  10. 「2005飛航事故處理及生還因素調查研討會」之會議資料.
  11. WinID3 Dental Identification System. Retrieved from http://www.winid.com/
  12. Identifying victims using DNA: A guide for families. April 2005 President's DNA Initiative..
  13. Ammar H. et al.: Automated Dental Identification System (ADIS). From http://www.csee.wvu.edu/adis/
  14. American Board of Forensic Odontology(ABFO), Inc..Diplomates Reference Manual.
  15. Bowers, CM,Bell, Gary L(1997).Manual of Forensic Odontology.ASFO.
  16. Chapenoire, S,Schuliar, Y,Corvisier, JM(1998).Rapid, efficient dental identification of 92% of 13 train passengers carbonized during a collision with a petrol tanker.The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology,19(4),352-355.
  17. Chomdej, T,Pankaow, W,Choychumron, S.(2006).Intelligent dental identification system(IDIS) in forensic medicine.Forensic Science International,158,27-38.
  18. Clement, JG,Winship, V,Ceddia, J,Al-Amad, S,Moralles, A,Hill, AJ(2006).New software for computerassisted dental-data matching in Disaster Victim Identification and long-term missing persons investigation: "DAVID Web".Forensic Science International,159,S24-S29.
  19. Fernando, R.,Vanezis, P.(1998).Medicolegal Aspects of the Thai Airbus Crash Near Kathmandu, Nepal.The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology,19(2)
  20. Haines, DH(1972).Dental identification in the Rijeka air disaster.Journal of Forensic Sciences,1,313-321.
  21. Jensen, Robert A.(1999).Mass Fatality and Casualty Incidents. A Field Guide.CRC Press, LLC.
  22. Kendall, Re(1991).Interpol's co-operation system and activities relating to forensic science.Journal of the Forensic Science Society,31(3),373-382.
  23. Kieser JA,Laing, Wayne,Herbison, Peter(2006).Lessons Learned from Large-scale Comparative Dental Analysis Following the South Asian Tsunami of 2004.Journal of Forensic Sciences,51(1),109-12.
  24. Lee, JC-I(1999).Identification of victims of the 1998 Taoyuan Airbus crash accident using DNA analysis.International Journal of Legal Medicine,113(1),43-46.
  25. Lessig, R,Thiele, K,Edelmann, J.(2006).Tsunami 2004 - experiences, challenges and strategies.International Congress Series,1288,747-749.
  26. Moody, GH,Busuttil, A(1994).Identification in the Lockerbie Air Disaster.The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology,15(1),63-69.
  27. Pan American Health Organization(2006).Management of Dead Bodies After Disasters: A Field Manual for First Responders.
  28. Perrier, M,Bollmann, M,Girod, A,Mangin, P(2006).Swiss DVI at the tsunami disaster: Expect the unexpected.Forensic Science International,159(S),S30-S32.
  29. Petju, M.(2007).Importance of dental records for victim identification following the Indian Ocean tsunami disaster in Thailand.Public Health,121,251-257.
  30. Pretty, A.,Sweet, D.(2001).A look at forensic dentistry - Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity.British Dental Journal,190,359-366.
  31. Prieto, JL.(2007).The 11 March 2004 Madrid terrorist attacks: the importance of the mortuary organization for identification of victims.International Journal of Legal Medicine,121(6),517-522.
  32. Rognum, O.(2004).Handling of medico-legal work in greater accidents and catastrophes.Prehospital and Disaster Medicine,19(S1),S4-S5.
  33. Schuller-Götzburg, P. J.,Suchanek, J.,Gugler, J.(2005).Identifizierung der Tsunamiopfer im Thai Tsunami Victim Identification-Information Management Center (TTVI-IMC) in Phuket, Thailand.J Stomatol,102,109-113.
  34. Schuller-Götzburg, P.,Suchanek, J.(2007).Forensic odontologists successfully identify tsunami victims in Phuket, Thailand.Forensic Science International,171(2-3),204-207.
  35. Sweet, D.(2006).Solving certain dental problems with technology - The Canadian solution in the Thailand tsunami response.Forensic Science International,159(S),S20-S23.
  36. Tang, Nelson(2006).Chayan Dey: Management of Mass Fatalities. Disaster Medicine.Mosby.
  37. 大国勉(1990)。歯や骨からの個人識別。Free Press。
  38. 台灣澎湖地方法院檢察署編(2002)。華航五二五空難事故檢察機關相驗實錄。台灣澎湖地方法院檢察署。
  39. 佐藤喜宣編(2008)。臨床法医学テキスト。中外??社。
  40. 吳木榮(2005)。台灣迪摩團隊―台灣法醫學人身鑑定團隊。重大災難罹難者遺體鑑識國際學術研討會
  41. 勝又義直(2005)。DNA鑑定。名古屋:名古屋大學出版會。
  42. 愛知県歯科医師会(1995)。終焉の着陸復行―中華航空機墜落事故と歯科医の活動記錄
  43. 福島弘文(2005)。DNA鑑定のHANASHI。裳華房。