羅馬字kap漢字ê學習效率比較：以聽寫kap唸讀為測驗項目

Learning Efficiencies for Roman Scripts and Han Characters: In Terms of Dictation and Oral Reading Tests

10.6621/JTV.2009.0101.03

蒋為文(Wi-Vun Taiffalo Chiung)

羅馬字 ； 漢字 ； 學習效率 ； 聽寫 ； 唸讀 ； Roman scripts ； Han characters ； learning efficiency ； dictation ； oral reading

台語研究

1卷1期（2009 / 09 / 01）

42 - 61

繁體中文

长期以来討論羅馬字hām漢字ê學習效率ê文獻多數停留tī理論ê分析，真罕leh有科學實驗ê數字證據。雖罔蔣爲文(Chiung 2003)bat tī伊ê博士論文lìn根據803人参舆實驗ê結果提出数字證據。可惜参舆tsit-ê實驗ê受测者封象有限。所pái，本研究è目的是tī蒋爲文ê先行研究基礎，加上khah tsē對象参舆測驗，thang進一步了解羅馬字kap漢字tī聽寫kap唸讀tsit 2方面ê學習效率。 Tī蔣爲文(Chiung 2003)tsìn前ê聽寫測驗，kan-tann有國小kap大學生参與受测，本研究新增加前锋國中學生105人kap高中職學生（台南一中、台南女中、亚洲高職）210人。Tī蔣爲文(Chiung 2003)ê唸讀測驗kan-tann有越南學生参舆测試，本研究新增加台灣ê後經國小學生187人kap成大學生30人。本論文ê究方法完全依照蔣爲文(Chiung 2003)ê實驗設計，kan-tann針對受测對象作補充。 研究結果顯示羅馬字比漢字khah優勢ê所在上主要是tī聽寫方面，其次tsiah是唸讀方面。Tī唸讀方面，羅馬字粗ê學生大約到國小五年，漢字粗ài到高中ê階段tsiah有法度tī統計上達到大學生ê唸讀水準。Tī唸讀方面，羅馬字粗ê學生大約到國小二年，漢字粗ài到國小三年è階段tsiah有法度tī統計上達到大學生ê唸讀水準。本研究再度證明tī聽寫kap唸讀方面，羅馬字比漢字khah簡單學。

Many arguments on learning efficiencies for Roman scripts and Han characters were ideologically arose, rather than based on a scientific study. Although Chiung (2003) had done a scientific study in learning efficiencies based on experiments with a total of 803 subjects, the amount was limited. The purpose of this study is to feature out the leaning efficiencies of Han characters based on Chiung's previous study and methodology. A total of 105 junior nigh school students and 210 senior high school students were added in dictation tests. A total of 187 elementary school students and 30 collegians were added in oral reading tests. The results reveal that Roman scripts are superior to Han characters firstly in dictation tests and secondly in oral reading tests. In dictation tests, the subjects in Roman scripts group significantly increased their score each year until the fifth grade, by which time they had the same statistical score as college students. As for subjects in Han characters group, subjects did not statistically reach the same level as college students until they were a round at tenth grade. In oral reading tests, the second grade students in Roman scripts group and third grade students in Han characters significantly reached the statistical score as collegians.

1. Chen, Ping(1999).Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
2. Chen, Ping(1994).Four projected functions of new writing systems for Chinese.Anthropological Linguistics,36(3),366-381.
3. Chiung, Wi-vun T.(2003).University of Texas at Arlington.
4. DeFrancis, John(1996).How efficient is the Chinese writing system?.Visible Language,30(1),6-44.
5. DeFrancis, John(1977).Colonialism and Language Policy in Viet Nam.The Hague:
6. DeFrancis, John(1950).Nationalism and Language Reform in China.Princeton University Press.
7. DeFrancis, John(1990).The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy.Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
8. Gelb, I. J.(1952).A Study of Writing.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9. Hannas, William(1997).Asia's Orthographic Dilemma.Hawaii:University of Hawaii Press.
10. Smalley, William(1963).Orthography Studies.London:United Bible Societies.
11. Tzeng, Ovid(1992).Auto activation of linguistic information in Chinese character recognition.Advances in Psychology,94,119-130.
12. 李孝定(1992)。漢字的起源與演變論叢。台北:聯經。
13. 周有光(1978)。漢字改革概論。澳門:爾雅。
14. 蔣為文(2005)。越南羅馬字和台灣漢字的學習效率及錯誤型態比較。語言、認同與去殖民，台南:
15. 蔣為文(2007)。語言、文學 kap 台灣國家再想像。台南:國立成功大學。