Ùi《台灣府城教會報》觀察台語語體ê演變

Using a Historical Corpus of Tâi-oân-hú-siân-kàu-hōe-pò to Study the Evolution of Taiwanese Literary Genres

10.6621/JTV.2013.0501.03

張學謙(Hak-Khiam Tiuⁿ)；楊允言(Ún-Giân Iûⁿ)

多面向方法 ； 語料庫語言學 ； 台語語體 ； 語體變異 ； multi-dimensional approach ； corpus linguistics ； Taiwanese register ； register variation

台語研究

5卷1期（2013 / 03 / 01）

48 - 72

繁體中文

本研究運用《台灣府城教會報》ê書面語料，beh來探討台語語體ê時間演變。Góan分析1885年到1945年chit 60年內底5種台語書面語體（論說文、批、通訊、故事、小傳）ê演變kah後續ê發展。Chit幾年來語料庫語言學ê發展，提供真大量探討語體變化所需要ê研究工具。Goán利用相關ê電腦分析工具，像自動斷詞、語法標記、頻率統計等等來處理語料。本研究採用Biber（1988,1995）ê多面向方法（multi-dimensional model），借語言特徵tī各種語體ê共現分布狀況，探求早期台語書面語體變遷ê情形。本研究ē kah Jang（1998）關係當代台語語體ê分析做比較，來看出台語語體演變ê大概面貌。

Recent development in corpus linguistics has provided powerful research tools necessary for large scale investigations of genres. With the help of computerbased corpus and automated computational tools, the present study aims at a diachronic analysis of Taiwanese genres during 1885-1945 and their subsequent course of development. The evolution of five Taiwanese literary genres (argumentative essays, letters, news report, story and biography) is analyzed in this study. This study adopts Biber's (1988, 1995) multi-dimensional model to specify textual relations among Taiwanese genres. Furthermore, the results of this study will be compared with Jang’s (1998) synchronic study of Taiwanese genres in order to trace the evolution of Taiwanese genres. The purpose of this study is to contribute to the study of genres in sociolinguistics and the development of corpus linguistics.

1. Atkinson, Dwight(1993).University of Southern California.
2. Besnier, Niko(1988).The Linguistic Relationships of Spoken and Written Nukulaelae Registers.Language,64,707-36.
3. Biber, Douglas(1988).Variation across Speech and Writing.Cambridge University Press.
4. Biber, Douglas(1995).Dimensions of Registers Variation: A cross-linguistic comparison.Cambridge University Press.
5. Biber, Douglas,Conard, Susan,Reppen, Randi(1994).Corpus-based approaches to issues in applied linguistics.Applied Linguistics,15,169-189.
6. Biber, Douglas,Finegan, Edward(1994).Multi-dimensional analyses of author's styles: Some case studies from the eighteenth century.Research in Humanities Computing,Oxford:
7. Biber, Douglas,Hared, Mohamed(1994).Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,12,182-216.
8. Biber, Douglas,Hared, Mohamed(1992).Literacy in Somali: Linguistic consequences.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,12,260-282.
9. Chang, Hsun-huei(1996).Linguistic features in written and spoken Mandarin: an interaction between form and function.The Fifth International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics
10. Chang, Hsun-huei(1996).Spoken or Written: A case study of written features in oral texts.The Journal of National Chengchi University,72,459-479.
11. Chen, Chiou-mei,Li, Shiwen(1993).A comparative study of Chinese spoken and written language.Teaching and Research,15(1),105-132.
12. Chen, May Mei-hwa(1990).Taipei,National Taiwan Normal University.
13. Frawley, William(Ed.)(1982).Linguistics and Literacy.New York:Plenum Press.
14. Grabe, William(1984).Written discourse analysis.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,5,101-123.
15. Halliday, M. A. K.(1979).Differences between spoken and written language: Some implications for literacy teaching.Communication Through Reading,Adelaide, SA:
16. Horowitz, R.(ed.),Samuels, S. J.(ed.)(1987).Comprehending Oral and Written Language.New York:Academic.
17. Jang, Shyue-chian(1998).Manoa,University of Hawaii.
18. Kim, Yong-Jin(1990).University of Southern California.
19. Kloss, H.(Ed.),McConnell, G. D.(Ed.)(1978).The Written Languages of the World: A Survey of the Degree and Modes of Use, I: The Americas; Les Langues ecrites du monde: Releve du degre et des modes d'utilisation.Quebec:Les Presses de l'Universite Laval.
20. Lin, I-ling(1992).Taipei,National Taiwan Normal University.
21. Lin, Shu-yu(1993).Taipei,National Taiwan Normal University.
22. Olson, D. R.(ed.),Torrance, N.(ed.),Hildyard, A.(ed.)(1985).Literature, language, and learning: the nature and consequences of reading and writing.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23. Rissanen, M.(ed.),Ihalainen, O.(ed.),Nevalainen, T.(ed.),Taavitsainen, I.(ed.)(1992).History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
24. Stubbs, Michael(1980).Language and Literacy: The Sociolinguistics of Reading and Writing.London:Routedge.
25. Tannen, D.(ed.)(1982).Spoken and written language: exploring orality and literacy.Norwood, N.J.:Ablex.
26. Tannen, D.(ed.)(1982).Spoken and written Language: exploring orality and literacy.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
27. Tannen, Deborah(1985).Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse.Literacy, language, and learning: the nature and consequences of reading and writing,Cambridge:
28. Waugh, Linda R.(ed.),Monville-Burston, Monique(ed.)(1990).On Language.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
29. 張學謙(2004)。白話字kah台語文的現代化。2004台灣羅馬字國際研討會
30. 張學謙(2000)。台語口語及書面語的多面向分析。語言暨語言學，1(1)，89-117。
31. 楊允言編、張學謙編、呂美親編(2008)。台語文運動訪談暨史料彙編。台北:國史館。
32. 蔣為文(2001)。白話字，囝仔人teh用 ê文字。台灣風物，51(4)，15-52。
33. 鄭良偉(2000)。就語言教育的關鍵問題之一：書面語及標音系統之間。第六屆世界台語文化營

1. (2021)。清末臺灣基督長老教會眼中的異教─以《臺灣府城教會報》中的媽祖報導為例。臺灣文獻，72(4)，143-186。